- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT05385445
Electronic Medical Records to Increase Adherence to the Choosing Wisely Recommendations
The Use of Electronic Medical Records to Change Clinician Behaviour and Increase Adherence to the Choosing Wisely Recommendations
Audit and Feedback (A&F), a strategy aimed at promoting modified practice through performance feedback, is a method to change provider behaviour and reduce unnecessary medical services. This study aims to assess the use of A&F to change:
- antibiotic prescribing for viral infections
- antipsychotic prescribing to patients with dementia
- routine measure of vitamin D in low risk adults
- annual screening blood tests (without direct indication by the risk profile of the patient)
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
The investigators conducted a clustered randomized trial of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) to assess the impact of A&F interventions to change prescribing and screening rates.
In January 2016, MaPCReN included 239 providers in 46 practices across Manitoba, representing ~20% of Manitoba primary care providers. MaPCReN recruits consenting primary care providers (family physicians, nurse practitioners and community pediatricians) that receive semi-annual feedback reports for practice reflection and quality improvement. Feedback reports provide practice-level details including disease prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients, reported in comparison to other providers at the same practice, health region and provincially
Investigators implemented an A&F cycle reporting on practice behaviours related to four Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) recommendations.
A) "Don't use antibiotics for upper respiratory infections that are likely viral in origin, such as influenza-like illness, or self-limiting, such as sinus infections of less than seven days of duration." • Bacterial infections of the respiratory tract are rare and usually only secondary complications from initial viral infections. Antibiotics are rarely indicated for upper respiratory illness and patients may suffer adverse effects from antibiotics.
B) Don't routinely measure Vitamin D in low risk adults.
• Routine supplementation of vitamin D is recommended for people living in Northern climates regardless of measured laboratory levels. There is no indication for ordering vitamin D unless a patient is suffering severe renal or metabolic disease.
C) Don't do annual screening blood tests unless directly indicated by the risk profile of the patient.
• There is minimal value in ordering routine blood tests in asymptomatic patients and in fact some "routine" screening tests such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is in fact recommended against due to the likelihood of producing false positive results. This may lead to additional and unnecessary testing.
D) Don't prescribe antipsychotics to treat behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.
• There are some instances where patients with behavioural symptoms of dementia require antipsychotic medicines although these instances are rare. These medicines should be used judiciously given for this indication because they provide limited benefit and may cause serious side effects including premature death
MaPCReN personnel randomly assigned numbers to clinics for randomization. Number of physicians practicing at each clinic was controlled during randomization.
The intervention "Group 1" received the standard feedback report with a one-page summary of the CWC recommendations of interest. Group 1 did not receive any data specific to their prescribing. Intervention "Group 2" received the standard feedback report, CWC recommendation summary and practice-specific data related to their prescribing rates for the CWC recommendations of interest, compared to rates for other providers at their clinic, in their health region and in the province. The control group received the standard feedback report with no information related to CWC.
The A&F intervention took place between January 2016 and January 2017. Retrospective Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the MaPCReN repository was assessed between January 2014-December 2019 to assess changes in prescribing rates during and immediately following the A&F intervention (2016/17), as well as assess continued change in practice after the A&F (2018/19) compared to prescribing rates prior to the A&F (2014/15). There were seven clinics not included in the 2018/19 analysis due to a change in EMR vendor that may have compromised data quality.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Manitoba
-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canadá, R3W0A8
- University of Manitoba, Department of Family Medicine
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Filho
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- All primary care providers participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN), the Manitoba practice-based network of the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Primary care providers not participating in MaPCReN
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Pesquisa de serviços de saúde
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Dobro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Audit and Feedback Group 1
The intervention "Group 1" received the standard feedback report with a one-page summary of the CWC recommendations of interest.
Group 1 did not receive any data specific to their prescribing.
|
The investigators conducted a clustered randomized trial of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) to assess the impact of Audit & Feedback interventions to change prescribing and laboratory ordering.
|
|
Experimental: Audit and Feedback Group 2
Intervention "Group 2" received the standard feedback report, CWC recommendation summary and practice-specific data related to their prescribing rates for the CWC recommendations of interest, compared to rates for other providers at their clinic, in their health region and in the province.
|
The investigators conducted a clustered randomized trial of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) to assess the impact of Audit & Feedback interventions to change prescribing and laboratory ordering.
|
|
Sem intervenção: Control
The control group received the standard feedback report with no information related to CWC.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory infections that are likely viral in origins
Prazo: 12 months
|
Investigators assessed baseline prescribing (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
|
12 months
|
|
Change in prescribing of antipsychotics to treat behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Prazo: 12 months
|
Investigators assessed baseline prescribing (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
|
12 months
|
|
Change in Vitamin D laboratory testing
Prazo: 12 months
|
Investigators assessed baseline ordering (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
|
12 months
|
|
Change in PSA ordering (annual screening)
Prazo: 12 months
|
Investigators assessed baseline ordering (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
|
12 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Publicações e links úteis
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- HS19281(H2016:022)
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .