Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Electronic Medical Records to Increase Adherence to the Choosing Wisely Recommendations

17 maggio 2022 aggiornato da: University of Manitoba

The Use of Electronic Medical Records to Change Clinician Behaviour and Increase Adherence to the Choosing Wisely Recommendations

Audit and Feedback (A&F), a strategy aimed at promoting modified practice through performance feedback, is a method to change provider behaviour and reduce unnecessary medical services. This study aims to assess the use of A&F to change:

  1. antibiotic prescribing for viral infections
  2. antipsychotic prescribing to patients with dementia
  3. routine measure of vitamin D in low risk adults
  4. annual screening blood tests (without direct indication by the risk profile of the patient)

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

The investigators conducted a clustered randomized trial of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) to assess the impact of A&F interventions to change prescribing and screening rates.

In January 2016, MaPCReN included 239 providers in 46 practices across Manitoba, representing ~20% of Manitoba primary care providers. MaPCReN recruits consenting primary care providers (family physicians, nurse practitioners and community pediatricians) that receive semi-annual feedback reports for practice reflection and quality improvement. Feedback reports provide practice-level details including disease prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients, reported in comparison to other providers at the same practice, health region and provincially

Investigators implemented an A&F cycle reporting on practice behaviours related to four Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) recommendations.

A) "Don't use antibiotics for upper respiratory infections that are likely viral in origin, such as influenza-like illness, or self-limiting, such as sinus infections of less than seven days of duration." • Bacterial infections of the respiratory tract are rare and usually only secondary complications from initial viral infections. Antibiotics are rarely indicated for upper respiratory illness and patients may suffer adverse effects from antibiotics.

B) Don't routinely measure Vitamin D in low risk adults.

• Routine supplementation of vitamin D is recommended for people living in Northern climates regardless of measured laboratory levels. There is no indication for ordering vitamin D unless a patient is suffering severe renal or metabolic disease.

C) Don't do annual screening blood tests unless directly indicated by the risk profile of the patient.

• There is minimal value in ordering routine blood tests in asymptomatic patients and in fact some "routine" screening tests such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is in fact recommended against due to the likelihood of producing false positive results. This may lead to additional and unnecessary testing.

D) Don't prescribe antipsychotics to treat behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.

• There are some instances where patients with behavioural symptoms of dementia require antipsychotic medicines although these instances are rare. These medicines should be used judiciously given for this indication because they provide limited benefit and may cause serious side effects including premature death

MaPCReN personnel randomly assigned numbers to clinics for randomization. Number of physicians practicing at each clinic was controlled during randomization.

The intervention "Group 1" received the standard feedback report with a one-page summary of the CWC recommendations of interest. Group 1 did not receive any data specific to their prescribing. Intervention "Group 2" received the standard feedback report, CWC recommendation summary and practice-specific data related to their prescribing rates for the CWC recommendations of interest, compared to rates for other providers at their clinic, in their health region and in the province. The control group received the standard feedback report with no information related to CWC.

The A&F intervention took place between January 2016 and January 2017. Retrospective Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the MaPCReN repository was assessed between January 2014-December 2019 to assess changes in prescribing rates during and immediately following the A&F intervention (2016/17), as well as assess continued change in practice after the A&F (2018/19) compared to prescribing rates prior to the A&F (2014/15). There were seven clinics not included in the 2018/19 analysis due to a change in EMR vendor that may have compromised data quality.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

239

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3W0A8
        • University of Manitoba, Department of Family Medicine

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino
  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All primary care providers participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN), the Manitoba practice-based network of the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary care providers not participating in MaPCReN

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Audit and Feedback Group 1
The intervention "Group 1" received the standard feedback report with a one-page summary of the CWC recommendations of interest. Group 1 did not receive any data specific to their prescribing.
The investigators conducted a clustered randomized trial of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) to assess the impact of Audit & Feedback interventions to change prescribing and laboratory ordering.
Sperimentale: Audit and Feedback Group 2
Intervention "Group 2" received the standard feedback report, CWC recommendation summary and practice-specific data related to their prescribing rates for the CWC recommendations of interest, compared to rates for other providers at their clinic, in their health region and in the province.
The investigators conducted a clustered randomized trial of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) to assess the impact of Audit & Feedback interventions to change prescribing and laboratory ordering.
Nessun intervento: Control
The control group received the standard feedback report with no information related to CWC.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory infections that are likely viral in origins
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Investigators assessed baseline prescribing (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
12 months
Change in prescribing of antipsychotics to treat behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Investigators assessed baseline prescribing (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
12 months
Change in Vitamin D laboratory testing
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Investigators assessed baseline ordering (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
12 months
Change in PSA ordering (annual screening)
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
Investigators assessed baseline ordering (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
12 months

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 gennaio 2016

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 gennaio 2017

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

31 dicembre 2019

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

29 aprile 2022

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

17 maggio 2022

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

23 maggio 2022

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

23 maggio 2022

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

17 maggio 2022

Ultimo verificato

1 aprile 2022

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • HS19281(H2016:022)

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi