- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07561827
The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) on Pediatric Pain Management Following Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) Surgery (ESPB)
This study is being done to better understand the efficacy of an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in pain management for children with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis or Neuromuscular Scoliosis undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion surgery. The study team is trying to find out if receiving the ESPB leads to less pain and less need for pain medication after surgery.
The ESPB involves an injection of a local anesthetic, ropivacaine, into your child's back muscles to help block pain signals.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- Fase 3
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Tripta Rughwani
- Número de teléfono: 415-353-4701
- Correo electrónico: tripta.rughwani@ucsf.edu
Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio
- Nombre: Stephanie Chu
- Número de teléfono: 415-353-1454
- Correo electrónico: stephanie.chu4@ucsf.edu
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, Estados Unidos, 94158
- Reclutamiento
- University of California San Francisco
-
Contacto:
- Tripta Rughwani
- Número de teléfono: 415-353-4701
- Correo electrónico: tripta.rughwani@ucsf.edu
-
Contacto:
- Stephanie Chu
- Número de teléfono: 415-353-1454
- Correo electrónico: stephanie.chu4@ucsf.edu
-
Investigador principal:
- Ishaan Swarup, MD
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Niño
- Adulto
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) or neuromuscular scoliosis
- Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) Surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with forms of scoliosis other than AIS or NM Scoliosis.
- Patients undergoing a spinal deformity correction surgery other than Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery
- Allergy or other contraindication to erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with Ropivacaine patients who are taking pre-operative opioids
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Único
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ESPB with Ropivacaine + standard postoperative pain protocol
Erector spinae plan block (ESPB) with Ropivacaine and standard postoperative pain protocol
|
This drug is approved as a local anesthetic.
|
|
Sin intervención: No ESPB + standard postoperative pain protocol
No erector spinae plane block (ESPB) or type of injection and standard posteropative pain protocol
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Compare Oral Morphine Equivalents and Benzodiazepine Doses used in the first 72 hours after surgery among patients who have a ESPB with standard postoperative pain protocols versus those with standard protocols alone.
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline to 72 hours after surgery.
|
Institutional pain management protocol: patients have a hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia pump until post-operative day 1 and as needed (PO) methadone two times a day, as well as PO oxycodone every 4 hours as needed for moderate pain and IV hydromorphone every 2 hours as needed for severe pain.
PO diazepam is available every 6 hours for muscle spasms.
The oral morphine equivalents and benzodiazepine doses used in the first 72 hours after surgery will be the primary method of assessing postoperative pain and muscle spasms respectively.
|
Change from Baseline to 72 hours after surgery.
|
|
Evaluate if combining ESPBs with standard postoperative pain protocols reduce postoperative pain scores in the first 24 hours postoperatively as compared to standard protocols alone.
Periodo de tiempo: From Baseline to 24 hours after surgery.
|
Pain will be measured on a numerical scale from zero to ten, with zero being no pain at all and ten being the worst pain you have ever felt.
Scores will be gathered at multiple time points the day of surgery, and post-op day 1, 2 and 3. We will take the average pain score.
These numerical pain scores will be the secondary method of assessing postoperative pain.
|
From Baseline to 24 hours after surgery.
|
|
Assess time to clearance from physical therapy among patients who have a ESPB with standard postoperative pain protocols versus those with standard protocols alone.
Periodo de tiempo: From postoperative day 1 to physical therapy clearance.
|
Time to clearance from physical therapy (PT) is a measure that demonstrates the amount of time required to obtain a functional level of mobilization after surgery.
This mobilization is often pain limited.
For neuromuscular patients with mobility limitations, aim 3 will be measured based on when patients are cleared by PT for safe discharge home.
We will measure time to clearance in both groups.
|
From postoperative day 1 to physical therapy clearance.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Ishaan Swarup, MD, University of California, San Francisco
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
- Chin KJ, Lewis S. Opioid-free Analgesia for Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Blocks in a Multimodal Anesthetic Regimen. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):E379-E383. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002855.
- Melvin JP, Schrot RJ, Chu GM, Chin KJ. Low thoracic erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgery: a case series. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Sep;65(9):1057-1065. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1145-8. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
- Kendall MC, Alves L, Traill LL, De Oliveira GS. The effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postsurgical pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 1;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01016-8.
- Changoor S, Giakas A, Sacks K, Asma A, Lang RS, Yorgova P, Rogers K, Gabos PG, Shah SA. The Role of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Multimodal Pain Management Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Faster and Farther With Less Opioids. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Jan 15;49(2):E11-E16. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004702. Epub 2023 May 1.
- Akesen S, Guler SB, Akesen B. Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2022 Sep;56(5):327-332. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2022.22019.
- Tsui BCH, Esfahanian M, Lin C, Policy J, Vorhies J. Moving toward patients being pain- and spasm-free after pediatric scoliosis surgery by using bilateral surgically-placed erector spinae plane catheters. Can J Anaesth. 2020 May;67(5):621-622. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01543-0. Epub 2019 Nov 27. No abstract available.
- Diwan SM, Yamak Altinpulluk E, Khurjekar K, Nair A, Dongre H, Turan A. Bilateral erector spinae plane block for scoliosis surgery: Case series. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2020 Mar;67(3):153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2019.11.012. Epub 2020 Feb 11. English, Spanish.
- Vergari A, Frassanito L, DI Muro M, Nestorini R, Chierichini A, Rossi M, DI Stasio E. Bilateral lumbar ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus local anesthetic infiltration for perioperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022 Jun;88(6):465-471. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.15950-X. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 24-42517
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .