COmparison of Maintenance of Propofol And Sevoflurane Spectral Study (COMPASS)
Comparison of EEG Power Spectrum During Maintenance of Anesthesia With Propofol Versus Sevoflurane
Lower EEG alpha band power is currently extensively studied as a potential biomarker of brain vulnerability. No previous study has evaluated whether there was a difference in EEG power spectrum ranges between propofol and sevoflurane, the two main anesthetic agents for maintenance of general anesthesia, in order to define a cut-off value for the prediction of a higher risk of postoperative delirium.
- Primary objective: comparison of EEG alpha power (dB) during maintenance of anesthesia with propofol and sevoflurane using data available in the NeuroSense® depth-of-anesthesia monitoring
- Secondary objectives: comparison of other EEG frequency bands during maintenance of anesthesia with propofol and sevoflurane using data from the NeuroSense® depth-of-anesthesia monitoring
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Since the development and commercialization of quantitative EEG monitors, which compute an index to assess the depth of sedation, the interest of anesthesiologists for neurophysiology has increased considerably. Indeed, frontal EEG represents an accessible, non-invasive technique to monitor the brain, the target-organ of our hypnotic drugs.
Anesthesia interferes with the physiological oscillations generated by the brain, and these disturbances impact the EEG. For instance, common hypnotic agents used for the maintenance of general anesthesia, intravenous propofol or inhaled sevoflurane, provide a typical pattern on the raw EEG related to their main mechanism of action: predominant simultaneous frontal slow/delta (0.1-4 Hz) and alpha (8-12 Hz) oscillations.
Intraoperative alpha oscillations are currently being extensively studied, as they might be a potential biomarker of brain vulnerability, which could help in predicting postoperative delirium, one of the most prevalent neurological complication after surgery. Recently, in a prospective observational cohort study including 220 patients, we showed that adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia who had lower intraoperative frontal EEG alpha band power were at higher risk of postoperative delirium. Lower intraoperative frontal EEG alpha band power was also correlated with poorer preoperative cognitive scores in our clinical series, which confirms previously published observations.
However, some practical questions still need to be addressed before this electroencephalographical marker can be integrated into a risk-prediction model for postoperative delirium. More specifically, we are not currently able to suggest a "universal" cut-off value for intraoperative frontal alpha-band power under general anesthesia that could be useful for a daily clinical practice. For example, an important issue is that the definition of the cut-off value will highly depend on the choice of anesthetic drugs. Although propofol and volatile anesthetics, such as sevoflurane, share similar neurophysiological characteristics, their respective EEG patterns and spectrograms are not identical (increased power in the thêta-band with volatile anesthetics). Otherwise, both propofol and sevoflurane EEG patters become completely different when they are used in combination with other anesthetic agents, such as benzodiazepines, ketamine or dexmedetomodine. These combinations are frequently used in multimodal anesthesia practice, and can deeply impact EEG frequency band power values. Consequently, at the moment, "low" alpha band power remains rather an observation on our patients' EEG spectrogram throughout surgery than a quantifiable value.
The main objective of this study is a first step towards to definition of a cut-off value for EEG frontal alpha band power to predict postoperative delirium. We aim to determine whether there is a significant difference in EEG power spectrum ranges between propofol and sevoflurane, the two main anesthetic maintenance agents. More precisely, it would require "simple", non-balanced, maintenance of general anesthesia using either propofol or sevoflurane, with the avoidance of any other hypnotic drugs. This type of maintenance is frequently used for minor interventions requiring general anesthesia.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Brussels, Bélgica, 1200
- Reclutamiento
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc
-
Contacto:
- Céline Khalifa, MD PhD
- Número de teléfono: +3227641821
- Correo electrónico: celine.khalifa@saintluc.uclouvain.be
-
Contacto:
- Laetitia Miltoni, MD
- Número de teléfono: +3227641821
-
Sub-Investigador:
- Christine Watremez, MD PhD
-
Sub-Investigador:
- Mona Momeni, MD PhD
-
Sub-Investigador:
- David Kahn, MD
-
Investigador principal:
- Céline Khalifa, MD PhD
-
Sub-Investigador:
- Robert Tircoveanu, MD
-
Sub-Investigador:
- Aurélie Jacobs Sariyar, MD
-
Sub-Investigador:
- Maximilien Cappe, MD
-
Sub-Investigador:
- Lina Puodzukaite, MD
-
Sub-Investigador:
- Guillaume Lemaire, MD
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients undergoing elective electrophysiological interventions, such as atrial fibrillation ablation procedures, under general anesthesia
- Capable to give informed consent
- French-speaking patients
Exclusion Criteria:
- Need for a premedication with benzodiazepine before anesthesia
- Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< 50%) or underlying cardiac pathology requiring a more balanced anesthesia (administration of benzodiazepine and/or ketamine during anesthesia)
- Preoperative MoCA score < 26/30 (for patients > ou = 55 years old)
- Patients treated with anti-epileptic drugs
- Patients treated with benzodiazepines (ex: for anxiolysis or sleep disorders)
- Emergencies
- Morbid obesity (BMI > 40kg/m2)
- Background of severe postoperative nausea/vomit
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Ciencia básica
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador activo: Propofol maintenance
|
Maintenance of general anesthesia for simple electrophysiological procedures
|
|
Experimental: Sevoflurane maintenance
|
Maintenance of general anesthesia for simple electrophysiological procedures
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Alpha-band power
Periodo de tiempo: Intra-operative
|
Power in decibels from the NeuroWave monitor under general anesthesia
|
Intra-operative
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Delta-band power
Periodo de tiempo: Intra-operative
|
Power in decibels from the NeuroWave monitor
|
Intra-operative
|
|
Thêta-band power
Periodo de tiempo: Intra-operative
|
Power in decibel from the NeuroWave monitor
|
Intra-operative
|
|
Bêta-band power
Periodo de tiempo: Intra-operative
|
Power in decibel from the NeuroWave monitor
|
Intra-operative
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 2025/15JUL/299
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .