V-NOTES Versus Laparoscopy for Sterilization and Sexual Function (VNOTES-LS-FSFI)
5 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Onur Ada, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
Randomised Prospective Comparison of Sexual Function and Postoperative Recovery Following V-NOTES Versus Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation and Salpingectomy
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare two minimally invasive surgical approaches, transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) and conventional laparoscopy, in women undergoing bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for sterilization.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does V-NOTES have a different effect on postoperative sexual function compared with conventional laparoscopy?
- Does V-NOTES improve postoperative recovery, including pain, discharge time, and return to normal activity?
- What surgical or medical problems occur with each surgical approach?
- Researchers will compare V-NOTES with conventional laparoscopy to see whether one approach provides better postoperative sexual function and recovery outcomes after sterilization surgery.
Participants will:
- Undergo bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy using either V-NOTES or conventional laparoscopy.
- Complete sexual function questionnaires before surgery, at 6 weeks after surgery, and at 6 months after surgery.
- Be evaluated for postoperative pain, discharge time, return to normal activity, need for additional pain medication, complications, and perioperative laboratory changes.
- Attend scheduled postoperative follow-up visits at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Activo, no reclutando
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Estimado)
118
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Bornova
-
Izmir, Bornova, Turquía (Türkiye)
- Izmir Tepecik TRH
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Sí
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women aged 30 to 45 years
- Sexually active women
- Women who have completed childbearing and request permanent surgical sterilization
- Scheduled to undergo bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for contraceptive purposes
- Able and willing to attend scheduled postoperative follow-up visits at 6 weeks and 6 months
- Able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Stage 2 or higher pelvic organ prolapse
- Active vaginal infection
- History of rectal surgery
- Suspected rectovaginal endometriosis
- Suspected malignancy
- Pregnancy
- Menopause
- Unable or unwilling to attend scheduled postoperative follow-up visits
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Otro
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: V-NOTES
Participants assigned to this arm will undergo sterilization surgery, either bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy, using the V-NOTES approach.
|
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) will be used to perform bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for sterilization.
In this approach, the peritoneal cavity will be accessed through a posterior vaginal fornix incision.
A single-port transvaginal access platform will be inserted, and the sterilization procedure will be completed under endoscopic visualization.
At the end of the procedure, the posterior vaginal fornix incision will be closed with absorbable suture.
|
|
Comparador activo: Laparoscopy
Participants in this arm will undergo bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for sterilization using conventional laparoscopy.
|
Laparoscopy will be used to perform bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for sterilization.
In this approach, the procedure will be performed through standard abdominal trocar access, including an umbilical trocar for laparoscope insertion and two additional lower abdominal trocars for surgical instruments.
The sterilization procedure will be completed under laparoscopic visualization, and the abdominal skin incisions will be closed at the end of the procedure.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in postoperative sexual function as assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index total score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, postoperative 6th week, and postoperative 6th month
|
The Female Sexual Function Index is a 19-item self-reported questionnaire that evaluates female sexual function across six domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain.
The total score ranges from 2.0 to 36.0, with higher scores indicating better sexual function.
The outcome will be reported as the change in total Female Sexual Function Index score from baseline to 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery.
A positive change indicates improvement in sexual function, whereas a negative change indicates worsening.
|
Baseline, postoperative 6th week, and postoperative 6th month
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Índice de masa corporal (IMC)
Periodo de tiempo: Base
|
Base
|
|
|
History of previous obstetric and non-obstetric surgery
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline/preoperative assessment
|
Previous surgical history will be assessed preoperatively using a structured case report form and review of the participant's medical records.
Obstetric surgery includes previous cesarean section or surgery for pregnancy-related indications.
Non-obstetric surgery includes previous gynecologic, abdominal, pelvic, or other surgical procedures unrelated to pregnancy.
The number and percentage of participants with previous surgery will be compared between the V-NOTES and laparoscopy groups.
|
Baseline/preoperative assessment
|
|
Participants With Pre-existing Comorbidities Assessed by Medical History and Medical Record Review
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
|
Pre-existing comorbidities will be assessed at baseline using participant medical history and medical record review.
Comorbidities will include chronic systemic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, thyroid disease, pulmonary disease, and other relevant chronic conditions.
The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with at least one pre-existing comorbidity in each study group.
|
Baseline
|
|
Duration of the surgical prosedure
Periodo de tiempo: Intraoperative
|
Defined as the time in minutes from the initial incision to completion of skin closure
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Estimated intraoperative blood loss volume measured in milliliters
Periodo de tiempo: Intraoperative
|
Estimated intraoperative blood loss will be assessed during surgery and recorded in milliliters (mL).
Blood loss will be estimated based on the volume of blood collected in the suction canister.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Postoperative inflammatory marker - Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
Periodo de tiempo: Preoperative and postoperative first day
|
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
|
Preoperative and postoperative first day
|
|
Postoperative inflammatory marker
Periodo de tiempo: Preoperative and postoperative first day
|
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio
|
Preoperative and postoperative first day
|
|
Time to return to normal activity (day)
Periodo de tiempo: Postoperative (up to 6 months)
|
Postoperative (up to 6 months)
|
|
|
Length of hospital stay (hour)
Periodo de tiempo: Postoperative (up to 1 week)
|
Postoperative (up to 1 week)
|
|
|
Need for additional analgesic doses
Periodo de tiempo: Postoperative (up to 3 days)
|
Postoperative (up to 3 days)
|
|
|
Complications
Periodo de tiempo: Intraoperative, postoperative (up to 6 months)
|
Intraoperative (bleeding, organ injury) Postoperative (infection, wound dehiscence, rectovaginal fistula, readmission within the first 6 weeks, dyspareunia)
|
Intraoperative, postoperative (up to 6 months)
|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS)
Periodo de tiempo: Postoperative 6th and 24th hour
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, an 11-point pain intensity scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores indicate worse postoperative pain.
The mean Visual Analog Scale score will be compared between the V-NOTES and conventional laparoscopy groups.
|
Postoperative 6th and 24th hour
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Publicaciones Generales
- Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.
- Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Wu PJ, Han CM, Yen CF. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):818-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
- Baekelandt J. Total Vaginal NOTES Hysterectomy: A New Approach to Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1088-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 May 22.
- Coomber RS, Sodergren MH, Clark J, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications in clinical practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar 16;4(3):65-74. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i3.65.
- Ahn KH, Song JY, Kim SH, Lee KW, Kim T. Transvaginal single-port natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for benign uterine adnexal pathologies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
- Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Boyd D, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew466.
- Tanaka M, Sagawa T, Yamazaki R, Myojo S, Dohi S, Inoue M. Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2619-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2749-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
- Li YC, Ku FC, Kuo HH, Tseng HJ, Wang CJ. Transvaginal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic adnexectomy (TVEA vs. CLA): A propensity-matched study and literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;56(3):336-341. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.04.013.
- Linke GR, Luz S, Janczak J, Zerz A, Schmied BM, Siercks I, Warschkow R, Beutner U, Tarantino I. Evaluation of sexual function in sexually active women 1 year after transvaginal NOTES: a prospective cohort study of 106 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Jan;398(1):139-45. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0993-x. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
- Huang YT, Yang LY, Pan YB, Huang HY, Wu KY, Wang CJ, Weng CH. Learning Curve Analysis of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Adnexal Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Feb;27(2):489-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
- Kaya C, Alay I, Cengiz H, Baghaki S, Aslan O, Ekin M, Yasar L. Conventional Laparoscopy or Vaginally Assisted Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Pathologies: A Paired Sample Cross-Sectional Study. J Invest Surg. 2021 Nov;34(11):1185-1190. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1789246. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
- Kaya C, Aktoz F, Gunes AC, Tercan C, Sacinti KG, Yassa M, AlAli H. Evaluating the efficacy and benefits of vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Sep;313:114596. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114596. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
- Zhang Y, Jia Y, Dai X, Wang F, Gong Y. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy for ovarian mature cystic teratoma. A randomized controlled trial. Ginekol Pol. 2024;95(5):343-349. doi: 10.5603/gpl.95422. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
- Yan J, Zhou D, Zhang S, Zhang B, Tuo X, Meng Q, Lv Q. Clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for benign adnexal disease: a prospective trial. BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03226-5.
- Mollahuseyinoglu Kullac F, Ozdemir AZ, Yildiz C. A single center retrospective study of vNOTES hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy operations. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40881. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040881.
- Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jul;60(1):114-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01309-4.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
6 de agosto de 2025
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
1 de diciembre de 2026
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
1 de diciembre de 2026
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
1 de junio de 2026
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
5 de junio de 2026
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
9 de junio de 2026
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
9 de junio de 2026
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
5 de junio de 2026
Última verificación
1 de junio de 2026
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- VNOTES-LAP-STER-FSFI-2025
- 2025/07-17 (Otro identificador: The Ethics Committee of Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital)
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
SÍ
Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
- SAVIA
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .