Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Development of an AI-Assisted Diagnostic Tool for Mycosis Fungoides and Other Cutaneous Lymphoproliferative Diseases Using Microscopic Image Analysis: A Training and Validation Study

14 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Kariman Mostafa Sayed Mansour, Cairo University

Cutaneous lymphoproliferative diseases (CLPDs) are a group of skin disorders that range from benign conditions, such as pseudolymphomas, to malignant forms like cutaneous T-cell and B-cell lymphomas. Mycosis fungoides is the most common malignant type, but diagnosis is often difficult because many benign skin conditions can mimic lymphoma. Current diagnostic methods rely on microscopic examination of biopsies, which can be subjective and vary between pathologists.

This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning model that uses digitized biopsy images and clinical data to distinguish malignant CLPDs from benign ones. By applying artificial intelligence to dermatopathology, the project seeks to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce variability, and support clinicians in making timely treatment decisions. The novelty of this work lies in applying advanced AI methods to a rare and challenging group of skin diseases, with the potential to enhance patient care in both specialized centers and resource-limited settings.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Cutaneous lymphoproliferative diseases (CLPDs) encompass both benign and malignant disorders, ranging from pseudolymphomas to cutaneous T-cell and B-cell lymphomas. Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common malignant subtype, but diagnosis is often challenging because benign inflammatory conditions can closely mimic lymphoma. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard, yet interpretation is subjective and prone to inter-observer variability. This highlights the need for standardized diagnostic tools, including artificial intelligence (AI) solutions.

This study is a retrospective diagnostic accuracy investigation using routinely collected data. Archived hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides of patients with MF and other CLPDs will be retrieved from the Dermatopathology Unit at Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals, Cairo University. Slides of benign mimickers such as pseudolymphoma and pityriasis lichenoides will also be included. Cases with poor slide quality or insufficient data will be excluded.

Digitized images will be captured using both high-resolution microscope cameras and standardized smartphone devices to evaluate feasibility. Experienced dermatopathologists will annotate regions of interest, and relevant clinical data will be extracted to build a structured database. Deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), will be trained and validated on these datasets. Preprocessing techniques such as color normalization, stain separation, and data augmentation will be applied to enhance robustness.

The primary outcomes are diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the AI models in differentiating malignant from benign CLPDs, and in staging MF. Secondary outcomes include comparison with expert dermatopathologists, assessment of smartphone-based imaging, and evaluation across magnification levels. More than 500 slides collected over the past five years will be used, divided into training, validation, and testing sets.

By integrating AI into dermatopathology, this study aims to reduce diagnostic variability, improve accuracy, and explore novel imaging approaches. The work represents one of the first applications of deep learning to CLPDs, with potential to enhance patient care in both specialized centers and resource-limited healthcare settings.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

463

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Cairo, Egipto
        • Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals, Cairo University

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

N/A

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Archived slides of patients diagnosed with malignant CLPDs (e.g., mycosis fungoides, cutaneous B-cell lymphoma) and benign mimickers (e.g., pseudolymphoma, pityriasis lichenoides chronica, PLEVA) were identified from the pathology database of Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals, Cairo University.

Cases were selected based on WHO-EORTC diagnostic criteria and availability of adequate quality H&E slides plus relevant clinical data.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Archived slides of patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of malignant CLPDs (e.g., mycosis fungoides at all stages, cutaneous B-cell lymphoma, primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, lymphomatoid papulosis), based on WHO-EORTC criteria.
  • Archived slides of patients with benign CLPDs that mimic MF clinically and histologically (e.g., pseudolymphoma, pityriasis lichenoides chronica, pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta [PLEVA]).
  • Availability of adequate quality hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides.
  • Availability of relevant clinical data (age, sex, disease duration, distribution of lesions, drug history).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Slides with significant artifacts (folding, tearing, poor staining) that prevent adequate image analysis.
  • Cases with insufficient clinical or pathological data for definitive diagnosis.
  • Cases with secondary cutaneous CLPDs

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
MF
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as mycosis fungoides

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

PLC/PLEVA
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as PLC or PLEVA

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

TCD
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as T cell dyscrasia

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

BCL
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as B cell lymphoma

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

Pseudolymphoma
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as pseudo lymphoma

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Diagnostic accuracy of AI model
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the trained AI models in differentiating benign CLPDs from malignant types.
Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Comparison with dermatopathologists
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Compare AI model diagnostic accuracy with that of experienced dermatopathologists
Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Smartphone imaging feasibility
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Assess feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of AI models using smartphone-captured histopathology images.
Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de enero de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de noviembre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de diciembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

30 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

15 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

15 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • MD-152-2025

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre AI-assisted histopathology image analysis

Suscribir