Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Development of an AI-Assisted Diagnostic Tool for Mycosis Fungoides and Other Cutaneous Lymphoproliferative Diseases Using Microscopic Image Analysis: A Training and Validation Study

14 de julho de 2026 atualizado por: Kariman Mostafa Sayed Mansour, Cairo University

Cutaneous lymphoproliferative diseases (CLPDs) are a group of skin disorders that range from benign conditions, such as pseudolymphomas, to malignant forms like cutaneous T-cell and B-cell lymphomas. Mycosis fungoides is the most common malignant type, but diagnosis is often difficult because many benign skin conditions can mimic lymphoma. Current diagnostic methods rely on microscopic examination of biopsies, which can be subjective and vary between pathologists.

This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning model that uses digitized biopsy images and clinical data to distinguish malignant CLPDs from benign ones. By applying artificial intelligence to dermatopathology, the project seeks to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce variability, and support clinicians in making timely treatment decisions. The novelty of this work lies in applying advanced AI methods to a rare and challenging group of skin diseases, with the potential to enhance patient care in both specialized centers and resource-limited settings.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Cutaneous lymphoproliferative diseases (CLPDs) encompass both benign and malignant disorders, ranging from pseudolymphomas to cutaneous T-cell and B-cell lymphomas. Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common malignant subtype, but diagnosis is often challenging because benign inflammatory conditions can closely mimic lymphoma. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard, yet interpretation is subjective and prone to inter-observer variability. This highlights the need for standardized diagnostic tools, including artificial intelligence (AI) solutions.

This study is a retrospective diagnostic accuracy investigation using routinely collected data. Archived hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides of patients with MF and other CLPDs will be retrieved from the Dermatopathology Unit at Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals, Cairo University. Slides of benign mimickers such as pseudolymphoma and pityriasis lichenoides will also be included. Cases with poor slide quality or insufficient data will be excluded.

Digitized images will be captured using both high-resolution microscope cameras and standardized smartphone devices to evaluate feasibility. Experienced dermatopathologists will annotate regions of interest, and relevant clinical data will be extracted to build a structured database. Deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), will be trained and validated on these datasets. Preprocessing techniques such as color normalization, stain separation, and data augmentation will be applied to enhance robustness.

The primary outcomes are diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the AI models in differentiating malignant from benign CLPDs, and in staging MF. Secondary outcomes include comparison with expert dermatopathologists, assessment of smartphone-based imaging, and evaluation across magnification levels. More than 500 slides collected over the past five years will be used, divided into training, validation, and testing sets.

By integrating AI into dermatopathology, this study aims to reduce diagnostic variability, improve accuracy, and explore novel imaging approaches. The work represents one of the first applications of deep learning to CLPDs, with potential to enhance patient care in both specialized centers and resource-limited healthcare settings.

Tipo de estudo

Observacional

Inscrição (Estimado)

463

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Cairo, Egito
        • Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals, Cairo University

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho
  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

N/D

Método de amostragem

Amostra Não Probabilística

População do estudo

Archived slides of patients diagnosed with malignant CLPDs (e.g., mycosis fungoides, cutaneous B-cell lymphoma) and benign mimickers (e.g., pseudolymphoma, pityriasis lichenoides chronica, PLEVA) were identified from the pathology database of Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals, Cairo University.

Cases were selected based on WHO-EORTC diagnostic criteria and availability of adequate quality H&E slides plus relevant clinical data.

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Archived slides of patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of malignant CLPDs (e.g., mycosis fungoides at all stages, cutaneous B-cell lymphoma, primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, lymphomatoid papulosis), based on WHO-EORTC criteria.
  • Archived slides of patients with benign CLPDs that mimic MF clinically and histologically (e.g., pseudolymphoma, pityriasis lichenoides chronica, pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta [PLEVA]).
  • Availability of adequate quality hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides.
  • Availability of relevant clinical data (age, sex, disease duration, distribution of lesions, drug history).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Slides with significant artifacts (folding, tearing, poor staining) that prevent adequate image analysis.
  • Cases with insufficient clinical or pathological data for definitive diagnosis.
  • Cases with secondary cutaneous CLPDs

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

Coortes e Intervenções

Grupo / Coorte
Intervenção / Tratamento
MF
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as mycosis fungoides

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

PLC/PLEVA
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as PLC or PLEVA

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

TCD
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as T cell dyscrasia

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

BCL
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as B cell lymphoma

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

Pseudolymphoma
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as pseudo lymphoma

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Diagnostic accuracy of AI model
Prazo: Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the trained AI models in differentiating benign CLPDs from malignant types.
Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Comparison with dermatopathologists
Prazo: Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Compare AI model diagnostic accuracy with that of experienced dermatopathologists
Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Smartphone imaging feasibility
Prazo: Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Assess feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of AI models using smartphone-captured histopathology images.
Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de janeiro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

30 de novembro de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

30 de dezembro de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

30 de junho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

14 de julho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

15 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

15 de julho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

14 de julho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de janeiro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • MD-152-2025

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever