Sun and ski holidays improve vitamin D status, but are associated with high levels of DNA damage

Bibi Petersen, Hans C Wulf, Margarita Triguero-Mas, Peter A Philipsen, Elisabeth Thieden, Peter Olsen, Jakob Heydenreich, Payam Dadvand, Xavier Basagaña, Tove S Liljendahl, Graham I Harrison, Dan Segerbäck, Alois W Schmalwieser, Antony R Young, Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen, Bibi Petersen, Hans C Wulf, Margarita Triguero-Mas, Peter A Philipsen, Elisabeth Thieden, Peter Olsen, Jakob Heydenreich, Payam Dadvand, Xavier Basagaña, Tove S Liljendahl, Graham I Harrison, Dan Segerbäck, Alois W Schmalwieser, Antony R Young, Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen

Abstract

Skin cancer is caused by solar UVR, which is also essential for vitamin D production. DNA damage (thymine dimers: T-T dimers) and vitamin D (25(OH)D) synthesis are both initiated by solar UVB. We aimed to investigate the simultaneous adverse and beneficial effects of solar UVB exposure in holidaymakers. Sun-seekers and skiers (n=71) were observed over 6 days through on-site monitoring, personal diary entries, and recording of personal UVB exposure doses with electronic dosimeters. Urine and blood samples were analyzed for T-T dimers and 25(OH)D, respectively. The volunteers had a statistically significant increase in vitamin D. There were strong associations between UVB exposure and post-holiday levels of T-T dimers and vitamin D, as well as between post-holiday T-T dimers and vitamin D. We conclude that UVB-induced vitamin D synthesis is associated with considerable DNA damage in the skin. These data, on two major health predictors, provide a basis for further field studies that may result in better understanding of the risks and benefits of "real life" solar exposure. However, vitamin D status can be improved more safely through the use of vitamin D dietary supplements.

References

    1. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2000 Apr;16(2):57-61
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 1998 Dec;111(6):982-8
    1. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Oct;97(1-2):13-9
    1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Feb;54(2):301-17
    1. Arch Dermatol. 1988 Jun;124(6):869-71
    1. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Nov;167(5):1124-30
    1. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 1996 Apr;1(2):143-6
    1. Photochem Photobiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;87(6):1464-7
    1. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2011 Jul;20(4):345-53
    1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Dec;14(12):2868-72
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 2010 Feb;130(2):546-53
    1. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010 Jan;9(1):11-7
    1. Med Lab Sci. 1984 Oct;41(4):327-36
    1. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2012 Dec;11(12):1808-16
    1. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Feb;166(2):430-3
    1. Mutagenesis. 2013 May;28(3):249-56
    1. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2011 Jul;10(7):1161-8
    1. Br J Dermatol. 2007 Apr;156(4):716-9
    1. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2013 Jan;12(1):190-6
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Dec;80(6 Suppl):1678S-88S
    1. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Jan;164(1):163-9
    1. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2012 Jan;11(1):90-7
    1. Acta Derm Venereol. 2001 May;81(2):81-6
    1. Acta Med Scand. 1974 Dec;196(6):517-20
    1. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2006 Jun;22(3):141-7
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13765-70
    1. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jun;9(6):599-612
    1. Photochem Photobiol. 2005 Sep-Oct;81(5):1138-44
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989 May;68(5):882-7
    1. Biomarkers. 2012 Nov;17(7):634-41
    1. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:39-85
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 2001 Aug;117(2):263-8
    1. Exp Dermatol. 2008 Dec;17(12):1037-44

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa