Performance Evaluation of Dorsal Vein Network of Hand Imaging Using Relative Total Variation-Based Regularization for Smoothing Technique in a Miniaturized Vein Imaging System: A Pilot Study

Kyuseok Kim, Hyun-Woo Jeong, Youngjin Lee, Kyuseok Kim, Hyun-Woo Jeong, Youngjin Lee

Abstract

Vein puncture is commonly used for blood sampling, and accurately locating the blood vessel is an important challenge in the field of diagnostic tests. Imaging systems based on near-infrared (NIR) light are widely used for accurate human vein puncture. In particular, segmentation of a region of interest using the obtained NIR image is an important field, and research for improving the image quality by removing noise and enhancing the image contrast is being widely conducted. In this paper, we propose an effective model in which the relative total variation (RTV) regularization algorithm and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) are combined, whereby some major edge information can be better preserved. In our previous study, we developed a miniaturized NIR imaging system using light with a wavelength of 720-1100 nm. We evaluated the usefulness of the proposed algorithm by applying it to images acquired by the developed NIR imaging system. Compared with the conventional algorithm, when the proposed method was applied to the NIR image, the visual evaluation performance and quantitative evaluation performance were enhanced. In particular, when the proposed algorithm was applied, the coefficient of variation was improved by a factor of 15.77 compared with the basic image. The main advantages of our algorithm are the high noise reduction efficiency, which is beneficial for reducing the amount of undesirable information, and better contrast. In conclusion, the applicability and usefulness of the algorithm combining the RTV approach and CLAHE for NIR images were demonstrated, and the proposed model can achieve a high image quality.

Keywords: adaptive smoothing technique; development of miniaturized vein imaging system; near-infrared image; performance evaluation of image quality; relative total variation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Schematic of the developed vein viewer system configuration; (b) photograph of the system.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart describing the application of the proposed dorsal vein recognition framework to a near infrared (NIR) image.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Vein segmentation images (top) of the left hand for an 850-nm NIR image (none ①), the median filter (②), the Wiener filter (③), and the proposed relative total variation (RTV) regularization-based smoothing algorithm (④), which were acquired using our established miniaturized vein imaging system and the synthesized images of blending them with a light image (bottom).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Experimental results for the coefficient of variation (COV) factors of the segmentation image under four conditions: none (①), the median filter (②), the Wiener filter (③), and the proposed filter (④). The COV was calculated for the specified regions A to D in the yellow-box regions in Figure 3. The regions of interest (ROIs) were set as boxes A to D because these parts quantitatively determined the amount of additional noise relative to the manicured vein. The average COV factors of image-processing methods ①to ④ were 0.86, 0.60, 0.35, and 0.05, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Examples of vein segmentation images (top) of the right hand for a 940-nm NIR image (none (①), the median filter (②), the Wiener filter (③), and the proposed filter (④) and the fusion images with the vein image on the top (bottom). These results exhibited a similar tendency to those for the 850-nm NIR image and the vessel extraction results, indicating that excellent visibility can be obtained using the proposed algorithm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Intensity profiles (for line AB in Figure 5) for different smoothing methods applied to the acquired NIR image.

References

    1. Dan G., Guo Z., Ding H., Zhou Y. Enhancement of Dorsal Hand Vein Image with a Low-Cost Binocular Vein Viewer System. J. Med. Imaging Health Inform. 2015;5:1–7. doi: 10.1166/jmihi.2015.1400.
    1. Sun C.Y., Lee K.C., Lin I.H., Wu C.L., Huang H.P., Lin Y.Y., Hsu Y.F., Yu H.R. Near-infrared light device can improve intravenous cannulation in critically ill children. Pediatrics Neonatol. 2013;54:194–197. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.12.012.
    1. Kim M.J., Park J.M., Rhee N., Je S.M., Hong S.H., Lee Y.M., Chung S.P., Kim S.H. Efficacy of vein viewer in pediatric peripheral intravenous access: A randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Pediatrics. 2012;171:1121–1125. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1713-9.
    1. Szmuk P., Steiner J., Pop R.B., Farrow-Gillespie A., Mascha E.J., Sessler D.I. The viewer vascular imaging system worsens first-attempt cannulation rate for experienced nurses in infants and children with anticipated difficult intravenous access. Anesth. Analg. 2013;116:1087–1092. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828a739e.
    1. Gaikwad V., Pardeshi S. Vein detection using infrared imaging system. Int. J. Electr. Electron. Comput. Syst. 2014;2:2347–2820.
    1. Karaaltin M.V. Utilizing the vein viewer technology to map out a venous flap preoperatively. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2013;29:423–424. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343951.
    1. Yusoff S., Ramli A.R., Hasjim S.J., Rokhani F.Z. Review on Vein Enhancement Methods for Biometric System. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 2015;4:833–841.
    1. Murata M., Kuroda R., Fujihara Y., Otsuka Y., Shibata H., Shibaguchi T., Kamata Y., Miura N., Kuriyama N., Sugawa S. A High Near-Infrared Sensitivity Over 70-dB SNR CMOS Image Sensor with Lateral Overflow Integration Trench Capacitor. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 2020;67:1653–1659. doi: 10.1109/TED.2020.2975602.
    1. Yu Z., Cai Y., Mo D. Comparative Study on Noise Reduction Effect of Fiber Optic Hydrophone Based on LMS and NLMS Algorithm. Sensors. 2020;20:301. doi: 10.3390/s20010301.
    1. Kauba C., Reissing J., Uhl A. Pre-processing cascades and fusion in finger vein recognition; Proceedings of the International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG); Darmstadt, Germany. 10–12 September 2014.
    1. Fernandez R., Armada M. Multisensory system for the detection and localization of peripheral subcutaneous vein. Sensors. 2017;17:897. doi: 10.3390/s17040897.
    1. Miura N., Nagasaka A., Miyatake T. Feature extraction of finger-vein patterns based on repeated line tracking and its application to personal identification. Mach. Vis. Appl. 2004;15:194–203. doi: 10.1007/s00138-004-0149-2.
    1. Miura N., Nagasaka A., Miyatake T. Extraction of finger-vein patterns using maximum curvature points in image profiles. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 2017;90:1185–1194. doi: 10.1093/ietisy/e90-d.8.1185.
    1. Huang B., Dai Y., Li R., Tang D., Li W. Finger-vein authentication based on wide line detector and pattern normalization; Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition; Istanbul, Turkey. 23–26 August 2010.
    1. Kumar A., Zhou Y. Human identification using finger images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012;21:2228–2244. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2011.2171697.
    1. Ton B., Veldhuis R. A high quality finger vascular pattern dataset collected using a custom designed capturing device; Proceedings of the International Conference on Biometrics (ICB); Madrid, Spain. 4–7 June 2013.
    1. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. ManCybern. 1979;9:62–66. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076.
    1. Lee E.C., Lee H.C., Park K.R. Finger vein recognition using minutia-based alignment and local binary pattern-based feature extraction. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2009;19:179–186. doi: 10.1002/ima.20193.
    1. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2004;60:91–110. doi: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94.
    1. Bay H., Ess A., Tuytelaars T., Gool L.V. Sppeded-up robust features (SURF) Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 2008;110:346–359. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014.
    1. Luo Z., Liu Z., Li J. Micro-blood vessel detection using k-means clustering and morphological thinning. Adv. Neural Netw.-ISNN 2011. 2011;6677:348–354. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21111-9_39.
    1. Li X., Huang D., Wang Y. Comparative study of deep learning methods on dorsal hand vein recognition. Chin. Conf. Biom. Recognit. CCBR 2016. 2016;9967:296–306. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46654-5_33.
    1. Zuiderveld K. Graphic Gems IV. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 1994. Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization; pp. 474–485.
    1. Zhao J., Tian H., Xu W., Li X. A new approach to hand vein image enhancement; Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation; Changsha, Hunan, China. 10–11 October 2009.
    1. Zhang J., Yang J. Finger-vein image enhancement based on combination of gray-level grouping and circular gabor filter; Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science; Wuhan, China. 19–20 December 2009.
    1. Shaheed K., Liu H., Yang G., Qureshi I., Gou J., Yin Y. A systematic review of finger vein recognition techniques. Information. 2018;9:213. doi: 10.3390/info9090213.
    1. Moccia S., Momi E.D., Hadji S.E., Mattos L.S. Blood vessel segmentation algorithms-review of methods, datasets and evaluation metrics. Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 2018;158:71–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.02.001.
    1. Uhl A., Busch C., Marcel S., Veldhuis R. Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 1994. Handbook of vascular biometrics; pp. 3–61.
    1. Xu L., Yan Q., Xia Y. Structure extraction from texture via relative total variation. ACM Trans. Graph. 2012;31 doi: 10.1145/2366145.2366158.
    1. Rudin L.I., Osher S., Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys. D. 1992;60:259–268. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F.
    1. Kang S.H., Yoon M.S., Han D.K., Lee Y. Total variation noise reduction algorithm in computed tomograph image with custom-built phantom using 3D-printer. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2020;170:108631. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108631.
    1. Lee S., Lee Y. Performance evaluation of total variation (TV) denoising technique for dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) with photon counting detector (PCD): Monte Carlo simulation study. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2019;156:94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.10.028.
    1. Han Y., Feng X.C., Baciu G., Wang W.W. Nonconvex sparse regularizer based speckle noise removal. Pattern Recognit. 2013;46:989–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.10.010.
    1. Liu Q., Xiong B., Yang D., Zhang M. A generalized relative total variation method for image smoothing. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2016;75:7909–7930. doi: 10.1007/s11042-015-2709-z.
    1. Gong C., Zeng L. Adaptive iterative reconstruction based on relative total variation for low-intensity computed tomography. Signal Process. 2019;165:149–162. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.06.031.
    1. Li M., Zhang W., Xiao M., Xu C. Image decomposition and completion using relative total variation and schatten quasi-norm regularization. Neurocomputing. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.123.
    1. Cadena L., Zotin A., Cadena F., Espinosa N. Proceedings of SPIE 10752, Applications of Digital Image Processing XLI. Volume 10752. SPIE; Bellingham, WA, USA: 2018. Noise removal of the x-ray medical image using fast spatial filters and GPU.
    1. Cannistraci C.V., Abbas A., Gao X. Median modified wiener filter for nonlinear adaptive spatial denoising of protein NMR multidimensional spectra. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:8017. doi: 10.1038/srep08017.
    1. Kanungo T., Mount D.M., Netanyahu N.S., Piatko C.D., Silverman R., Wu A.Y. An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: Analysis and implementation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002;24:881–892. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017616.
    1. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Satistical Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 1977;39:1–38.
    1. Li Y., Zhang J., He R., Tian L., Wei H. Hybrid DE-EM Algorithm for Gaussian Mixture Model-Based Wireless Channel Multipath Clustering. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2019;2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/4639612.
    1. Han D.K., Kim K., Lee Y. Development and Application of a Deep Convolutional Neural Network Noise Reduction Algorithm for Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Magn. 2019;24:223–229. doi: 10.4283/JMAG.2019.24.2.223.
    1. Park C.R., Kang S.H., Lee Y. Optimization of mask size with median modified Wiener filter algorithm for gamma images using pixelated semiconductor detector: Monte Carlo simulation study. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A. 2020;980:164472. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164472.
    1. Cesaro A., Moscarella E., Gragnano F., Perrotta R., Diana V., Pariggiano I., Concilio C., Alfieri A., Cesaro F., Mercone G., et al. Transradial access versus transfemoral access: A comparison of outcomes and efficacy in reducing hemorrhagic events. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2019;17:435–447. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2019.1627873.
    1. Jang Y.S., Kook Y.H., Kim J.L., Jeong H.W. Development of the cost-effective, miniaturized vein imaging system with enhanced noise reduction. J. Adv. Trends Comput. Sci. Eng. 2019;8:3166–3170. doi: 10.30534/ijatcse/2019/80862019.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa