Amifampridine safety and efficacy in spinal muscular atrophy ambulatory patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover phase 2 trial

Silvia Bonanno, Riccardo Giossi, Riccardo Zanin, Valentina Porcelli, Claudio Iannacone, Giovanni Baranello, Gary Ingenito, Stanley Iyadurai, Zorica Stevic, Stojan Peric, Lorenzo Maggi, Silvia Bonanno, Riccardo Giossi, Riccardo Zanin, Valentina Porcelli, Claudio Iannacone, Giovanni Baranello, Gary Ingenito, Stanley Iyadurai, Zorica Stevic, Stojan Peric, Lorenzo Maggi

Abstract

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disease where a deficient amount of SMN protein leads to progressive lower motor neuron degeneration. SMN-enhancing therapies are now available. Yet, fatigue and signs of impaired neuromuscular junction (NMJ) transmission could contribute to SMA phenotype. Amifampridine prolongs presynaptic NMJ terminal depolarization, enhancing neuromuscular transmission.

Methods: SMA-001 was a phase 2, 1:1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Ambulatory (walking unaided at least 30 m) SMA Type 3 patients, untreated with SMN-enhancing medications, entered a run-in phase where amifampridine was titrated up to an optimized stable dose. Patients achieving at least three points improvement in Hammersmith Functional Motor Score Expanded (HFMSE) were randomized to amifampridine or placebo, alternatively, in the 28-day double-blind crossover phase. Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AE) collection. Primary efficacy measure was the HFMSE change from randomization. Secondary outcomes included timed tests and quality of life assessment. Descriptive analyses and a mixed effects linear model were used for statistics.

Results: From 14 January 2019, 13 patients, mean age 34.5 years (range 18-53), with 5/13 (38.5%) females, were included. No serious AE were reported. Transient paresthesia (33.3%) was the only amifampridine-related AE. Six patients for each treatment sequence were randomized. Amifampridine treatment led to a statistically significant improvement in HFMSE (mean difference 0.792; 95% CI from 0.22 to 1.37; p = 0.0083), compared to placebo, but not in secondary outcomes.

Discussion: SMA-001 study provided Class II evidence that amifampridine was safe and effective in treating ambulatory SMA type 3 patients.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03781479; EUDRACT 2017-004,600-22.

Keywords: 3,4-diaminopyridine; Amifampridine; Fatigue; Hammersmith functional motor score expanded; Randomized controlled trial; Spinal muscular atrophy.

Conflict of interest statement

S. Bonanno received honoraria for advisory board activities and compensation for travel and congress participation from Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen and Roche; R. Giossi received support for congress participation from Mylan; R. Zanin received funds for travel and congress participation from Biogen; V. Porcelli has nothing to disclose; C. Iannacone has received honoraria for statistical consultancy from Roche, Bayer-Schering, ReiThera, Abiogen, and MolMed; G. Baranello received speaker and consulting fees from Biogen, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. (AveXis), and Roche and has worked as principal investigator of SMA studies sponsored by Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., and Roche; G. Ingenito has corporate appointment with Catalyst Pharmaceuticals; S. Iyadurai has corporate appointment with Catalyst Pharmaceuticals; Z. Stevic reports following conflicts of interest, all outside this work: receiving lecture honoraria from Pfizer and Roche; S. Peric reports following conflicts of interest, all outside this work: receiving lecture honoraria from Pfizer, Teva Actavis, Berlin Chemie Menarini, Mylan, Worwag, Adoc, and Salveo, research grants from Kedrion and Octapharma, consultant fees from argenx and Mylan, and travel grants from Octapharma, Kedrion, Teva Actavis, Sanofi Genzyme, Pfizer, Roche, Adoc, and Berlin Chemie Menarini, and reports no other conflicts of interest outside or related to this work; L. Maggi has received honoraria for speaking, advisory boards and compensation for congress participations from Sanofi Genzyme, Roche and Biogen, outside the submitted work.

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

References

    1. Hamilton G, Gillingwater TH. Spinal muscular atrophy: going beyond the motor neuron. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.11.002.
    1. Ogino S, Leonard DGB, Rennert H, et al. Genetic risk assessment in carrier testing for spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Med Genet. 2002;110:301–307. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10425.
    1. Lunn MR, Wang CH. Spinal muscular atrophy. Lancet (Lond, Engl) 2008;371:2120–2133. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60921-6.
    1. Munsat TL, Davies KE. International SMA consortium meeting (26–28 June 1992, Bonn, Germany) Neuromuscul Disord. 1992;2:423–428. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8966(06)80015-5.
    1. Goulet BB, Kothary R, Parks RJ. At the “junction” of spinal muscular atrophy pathogenesis: the role of neuromuscular junction dysfunction in SMA disease progression. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13:1160–1174. doi: 10.2174/15665240113139990044.
    1. Kolb SJ, Kissel JT. Spinal muscular atrophy. Neurol Clin. 2015;33:831–846. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2015.07.004.
    1. Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1723–1732. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702752.
    1. Darras BT, Masson R, Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska M, et al. Risdiplam-treated infants with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy versus historical controls. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:427–435. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102047.
    1. Mendell JR, Al-Zaidy S, Shell R, et al. Single-dose gene-replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1713–1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706198.
    1. Arnold WD, Severyn S, Zhao S, et al. Persistent neuromuscular junction transmission defects in adults with spinal muscular atrophy treated with nusinersen. BMJ Neurol Open. 2021;3:e000164. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2021-000164.
    1. Chaytow H, Faller KME, Huang Y-T, Gillingwater TH. Spinal muscular atrophy: from approved therapies to future therapeutic targets for personalized medicine. Cell Rep Med. 2021;2:100346. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100346.
    1. Wadman RI, Vrancken AFJE, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. Dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction in spinal muscular atrophy types 2 and 3. Neurology. 2012;79:2050–2055. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182749eca.
    1. Pera MC, Luigetti M, Pane M, et al. 6MWT can identify type 3 SMA patients with neuromuscular junction dysfunction. Neuromuscul Disord. 2017;27:879–882. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.07.007.
    1. Montes J, McDermott MP, Martens WB, et al. Six-minute walk test demonstrates motor fatigue in spinal muscular atrophy. Neurology. 2010;74:833–838. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d3e308.
    1. Montes J, Dunaway S, Garber CE, et al. Leg muscle function and fatigue during walking in spinal muscular atrophy type 3. Muscle Nerve. 2014;50:34–39. doi: 10.1002/mus.24081.
    1. de Groot IJM, de Witte LP. Physical complaints in ageing persons with spinal muscular atrophy. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:258–262. doi: 10.1080/16501970510030156.
    1. Piepers S, van den Berg LH, Brugman F, et al. A natural history study of late onset spinal muscular atrophy types 3b and 4. J Neurol. 2008;255:1400–1404. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0929-0.
    1. Maddison P, Newsom-Davis J, Mills KR. Effect of 3,4-diaminopyridine on the time course of decay of compound muscle action potential augmentation in the Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:1196–1198. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199809)21:9<1196::aid-mus11>;2-q.
    1. Maddison P, Newsom-Davis J, Mills KR. Distribution of electrophysiological abnormality in Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;65:213–217. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.2.213.
    1. Skeie GO, Apostolski S, Evoli A, et al. Guidelines for treatment of autoimmune neuromuscular transmission disorders. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:893–902. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03019.x.
    1. Lindquist S, Stangel M. Update on treatment options for Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome: focus on use of amifampridine. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:341–349. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S10464.
    1. Bonanno S, Pasanisi MB, Frangiamore R, et al. Amifampridine phosphate in the treatment of muscle-specific kinase myasthenia gravis: a phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, double crossover study. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118819013. doi: 10.1177/2050312118819013.
    1. Verma S, Mazell SN, Shah DA. Amifampridine phosphate in congenital myasthenic syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54:809–810. doi: 10.1002/mus.25230.
    1. Bever CTJ, Leslie J, Camenga DL, et al. Preliminary trial of 3,4-diaminopyridine in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1990;27:421–427. doi: 10.1002/ana.410270411.
    1. CHMP Zenas, INN-amifampridine. . Accessed 1 Nov 2021
    1. Oh SJ, Shcherbakova N, Kostera-Pruszczyk A, et al. Amifampridine phosphate (Firdapse(®)) is effective and safe in a phase 3 clinical trial in LEMS. Muscle Nerve. 2016;53:717–725. doi: 10.1002/mus.25070.
    1. O’Hagen JM, Glanzman AM, McDermott MP, et al. An expanded version of the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale for SMA II and III patients. Neuromuscul Disord. 2007;17:693–697. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2007.05.009.
    1. Pera MC, Coratti G, Forcina N, et al. Content validity and clinical meaningfulness of the HFMSE in spinal muscular atrophy. BMC Neurol. 2017;17:39. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0790-9.
    1. Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4378. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4378.
    1. Sansone VA, Panzeri M, Montanari M, et al. Italian validation of INQoL, a quality of life questionnaire for adults with muscle diseases. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:1178–1187. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02992.x.
    1. Orcesi S, Ariaudo G, Mercuri E, et al. A new self-report quality of life questionnaire for children with neuromuscular disorders: presentation of the instrument, rationale for its development, and some preliminary results. J Child Neurol. 2014;29:167–181. doi: 10.1177/0883073813511859.
    1. Sanders DB, Howard JFJ, Massey JM. 3,4-Diaminopyridine in Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome and myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;681:588–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb22949.x.
    1. Sanders DB, Massey JM, Sanders LL, Edwards LJ. A randomized trial of 3,4-diaminopyridine in Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Neurology. 2000;54:603–607. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.3.603.
    1. McEvoy KM, Windebank AJ, Daube JR, Low PA. 3,4-diaminopyridine in the treatment of Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1567–1571. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198912073212303.
    1. Oh SJ, Claussen GG, Hatanaka Y, Morgan MB. 3,4-Diaminopyridine is more effective than placebo in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over drug study in LEMS. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40:795–800. doi: 10.1002/mus.21422.
    1. Wirtz PW, Verschuuren JJ, van Dijk JG, et al. Efficacy of 3,4-diaminopyridine and pyridostigmine in the treatment of Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86:44–48. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.35.
    1. Stolte B, Bois J-M, Bolz S, et al. Minimal clinically important differences in functional motor scores in adults with spinal muscular atrophy. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27:2586–2594. doi: 10.1111/ene.14472.
    1. Goodman AD, Brown TR, Cohen JA, et al. Dose comparison trial of sustained-release fampridine in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2008;71:1134–1141. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000326213.89576.0e.
    1. Chiriboga CA, Marra J, LaMarca NM, et al. Lack of effect on ambulation of dalfampridine-ER (4-AP) treatment in adult SMA patients. Neuromuscul Disord. 2020;30:693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2020.07.007.
    1. Maggi L, Bello L, Bonanno S, et al. Nusinersen safety and effects on motor function in adult spinal muscular atrophy type 2 and 3. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91:1166–1174. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323822.
    1. Hagenacker T, Wurster CD, Günther R, et al. Nusinersen in adults with 5q spinal muscular atrophy: a non-interventional, multicentre, observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:317–325. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30037-5.
    1. Bonanno S, Zanin R, Bello L, et al. Quality of life assessment in adult spinal muscular atrophy patients treated with nusinersen. J Neurol. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10954-3.
    1. Dunaway Young S, Montes J, Kramer SS, et al. Perceived fatigue in spinal muscular atrophy: a pilot study. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2019;6:109–117. doi: 10.3233/JND-180342.
    1. Stam M, Wadman RI, Wijngaarde CA, et al. Protocol for a phase II, monocentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial to assess efficacy of pyridostigmine in patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 2–4 (SPACE trial) BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019932.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa