Determinants of imbalanced sex ratio at birth in Nepal: evidence from secondary analysis of a large hospital-based study and nationally-representative survey data

Elina Pradhan, Erin Pearson, Mahesh Puri, Manju Maharjan, Dev Chandra Maharjan, Iqbal Shah, Elina Pradhan, Erin Pearson, Mahesh Puri, Manju Maharjan, Dev Chandra Maharjan, Iqbal Shah

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify sex ratios at births (SRBs) in hospital deliveries in Nepal, and understand the socio-demographic correlates of skewed SRB. Skewed SRBs in hospitals could be explained by sex selective abortion, and/or by decision to have a son delivered in a hospital-increased in -utero investments for male fetus. We use data on ultrasound use to quantify links between prenatal knowledge of sex, parity and skewed SRBs.

Design: Secondary analysis of: (1) de-identified data from a randomizedrandomised controlled trial, and (2) 2011 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS).

Setting: Nepal.

Participants: (1) 75 428 women who gave birth in study hospitals, (2) NDHS: 12 674 women aged 15-49 years.

Outcome measures: SRB, and conditional SRB of a second child given first born male or female were calculated.

Results: Using data from 75 428 women who gave birth in six tertiary hospitals in Nepal between September 2015 and March 2017, we report skewed SRBs in these hospitals, with some hospitals registering deliveries of 121 male births per 100 female births. We find that a nationally representative survey (2011 NDHS) reveals no difference in the number of hospital delivery of male and female babies. Additionally, we find that: (1) estimated SRB of second-order births conditional on the first being a girl is significantly higher than the biological SRB in our study and (2) multiparous women are more likely to have prenatal knowledge of the sex of their fetus and to have male births than primiparous women with the differences increasing with increasing levels of education.

Conclusions: Our analysis supports sex-selective abortion as the dominant cause of skewed SRBs in study hospitals. Comprehensive national policies that not only plan and enforce regulations against gender-biased abortions and, but also ameliorate the marginalizedmarginalised status of women in Nepal are urgently required to change this alarming manifestation of son preference.

Trial registration number: NCT02718222.

Keywords: health policy; public health; reproductive medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sex ratio at birth at study hospitals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted sex ratio at birth across women’s education and parity.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted knowledge of sex of current child before birth across women’s education and parity.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sex ratio at birth across women’s education, parity and knowledge of sex of child before birth.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sex ratio at birth (SRB) of second birth order across women’s education and living male child.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Conditional SRB of second-order birth with no male sibling, comparison between hospital sample (study) and Nepal DHS across education groups. DHS, Demographic and Health Survey.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Sex ratio at birth (SRB) across sociodemographic characteristics between all births in the last 3 years and second-order births conditional on having an older sister.

References

    1. Guilmoto CZ. The sex ratio transition in Asia. Popul Dev Rev 2009;35:519–49. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00295.x
    1. Bélanger D, Thi Hai Oanh K, Jianye L, et al. . Les rapports de masculinité à la naissance augmentent-ils au Vietnam ? Population 2003;58:255.
    1. Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Levi F, et al. . Trends in male:female ratio among newborn infants in 29 countries from five continents. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1394–6. 10.1093/humrep/13.5.1394
    1. Bank W. World Bank. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C, 2017.
    1. Attane I. Watering the neighbour’s garden: the growing demographic female deficit in Asia. 2007. (Accessed 28 Sep 2016).
    1. Gupta MD, Chung W, Shuzhuo L. Evidence for an incipient decline in numbers of missing girls in China and India. Popul Dev Rev 2009;35:401–16. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00285.x
    1. Bhat PNM, Zavier AJF. Factors Influencing the Use of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques and the Sex Ratio at Birth in India. Econ Polit Wkly 2007;42:2292–303.
    1. Urquia ML, Moineddin R, Jha P, et al. . Sex ratios at birth after induced abortion. CMAJ 2016;188:E181–90. 10.1503/cmaj.151074
    1. Leone T, Matthews Z, Dalla Zuanna G. Impact and determinants of sex preference in Nepal. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2003;29:69–75. 10.2307/3181060
    1. Grech V. Gendercide and femineglect. Early Hum Dev 2015;91:851–4. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.10.014
    1. Frost MD, Puri M, Hinde PR. Falling sex ratios and emerging evidence of sex-selective abortion in Nepal: evidence from nationally representative survey data. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002612 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002612
    1. Puri M, Tamang A. Understanding factors influencing adverse sex ratios at birth and exploring what works to achieve balance: the situation in selected districts of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: CREHPA, 2015.
    1. Government of Nepal. National safe abortion service policy. B.S, 2060.
    1. Lamichhane P, Harken T, Puri M, et al. . Sex-selective abortion in Nepal: a qualitative study of health workers' perspectives. Womens Health Issues 2011;21:S37–S41. 10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.001
    1. Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) [Nepal], New ERA, and Macro International Inc. Nepal demographic and health survey 2011. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Health and Population, New ERA, and Macro International Inc, 2012.
    1. Canning D, Shah IH, Pearson E, et al. . Institutionalizing postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) services in Sri Lanka, Tanzania, and Nepal: study protocol for a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:362 10.1186/s12884-016-1160-0
    1. Jha P, Kumar R, Vasa P, et al. . Low male-to-female sex ratio of children born in India: national survey of 1·1 million households. The Lancet 2006;367:211–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67930-0
    1. Jha P, Kesler MA, Kumar R, et al. . Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011. Lancet 2011;377:1921–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60649-1
    1. Fukuda M, Fukuda K, Mason S, et al. . The sex ratio at birth after recent major earthquakes in Japan. Early Hum Dev 2018;123:30–1. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.06.002
    1. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 2004;119:249–75. 10.1162/003355304772839588
    1. Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev Econ Stat 2008;90:414–27. 10.1162/rest.90.3.414
    1. Webb MD. Reworking wild bootstrap based inference for clustered errors. Queen’s University, Department of economics. 2014. (Accessed 16 Dec 2016).
    1. Roodman D. BOOTTEST: Stata module to provide fast execution of the wild bootstrap with null imposed. Boston College Department of Economics. 2016. (Accessed 16 Dec 2016).
    1. Central Bureau of Statistics. Population monograph of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: National Planning Commission Secretariat, Government of Nepal, 2014.
    1. Ministry of Health, Nepal New ERA, ICF. Nepal demographic and health survey 2016. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Health, Nepal, 2017.
    1. Korea S. Republic of Korea. Korean statistical information service. (Accessed 12 Jan 2018).
    1. Chung W, Gupta MD. The Decline of Son Preference in South Korea: the roles of development and public policy. Popul Dev Rev 2007;33:757–83. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00196.x
    1. Park CB, Cho N-H. Consequences of Son Preference in a Low-Fertility Society: Imbalance of the Sex Ratio at Birth in Korea. Popul Dev Rev 1995;21:59–84. 10.2307/2137413
    1. Hesketh T, Lu L, Xing ZW. The consequences of son preference and sex-selective abortion in China and other Asian countries. CMAJ 2011;183:1374–7. 10.1503/cmaj.101368
    1. Chun H, Das Gupta M. Gender discrimination in sex selective abortions and its transition in South Korea. Womens Stud Int Forum 2009;32:89–97. 10.1016/j.wsif.2009.03.008
    1. Bongaarts J, Guilmoto CZ. How many more missing women? Excess female mortality and prenatal sex selection, 1970-2050. Popul Dev Rev 2015;41:241–69. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00046.x

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa