Patients at the Highest Risk for Reherniation Following Lumbar Discectomy in a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Frederic Martens, Peter Vajkoczy, Senol Jadik, Aldemar Hegewald, Jonathan Stieber, Robert Hes, Frederic Martens, Peter Vajkoczy, Senol Jadik, Aldemar Hegewald, Jonathan Stieber, Robert Hes

Abstract

Background: The purposes of the present study were to (1) confirm the risk of recurrent lumbar disc herniation in patients with a large anular defect who had undergone limited discectomy and (2) assess potential risk factors within this population.

Methods: The patient population was extracted from the control cohort of a prospective, randomized, multicenter controlled trial investigating the efficacy of an anular closure device following standard limited discectomy. All control patients underwent limited discectomy for the treatment of a single-level symptomatic posterior or posterolateral lumbar disc herniation. Only patients presenting with a large anular defect (6 to 10 mm wide by 4 to 6 mm long) were included in the study (n = 278). Baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics were recorded. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 6 weeks and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Imaging modalities included magnetic resonance imaging, low-dose computed tomography, and radiographs. Symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc herniation was defined as any symptomatic postoperative herniation on either side of the index level. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of demographic and surgical variables associated with the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniation was performed.

Results: The mean anular defect area (and standard deviation) was 39.3 ± 9.1 mm2, and the mean excised nuclear tissue volume was 1.3 ± 0.8 mL. At 2 years, the incidence of symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc herniation was 25.3% (64 of 253), with the herniation occurring at a mean of 264 days after the index procedure. Of the 64 patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation, 36 underwent a subsequent surgical procedure. Logistic regression analysis identified an increased risk for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in females (odds ratio, 2.2) and in patients with greater anular defect widths (odds ratio, 1.3). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between age and sex (p = 0.005).

Conclusions: The outcomes of the present study provide the most substantial evidence to date in confirming previous reports of a high risk of reherniation among patients with large anular defects. Among those with large anular defects (width, ≥6 mm), females ≤50 years of age had the highest risk (up to ∼10 times higher) of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. It is recommended that an anular repair or closure should be performed after limited discectomies in patients with large anular defects.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Algorithm for determination of symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc herniation on the basis of reoperation or clinical presentation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart diagram summarizing patient allocation and follow-up retention.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flowchart summarizing progression of subsequent surgical interventions following symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Line graph showing the probabilities (and 95% CIs) of symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc herniation based on age and sex.

References

    1. Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934;211(5):210-5.
    1. O’Connell JE. Protrusions of the lumbar intervertebral discs, a clinical review based on five hundred cases treated by excision of the protrusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951. February;33-B(1):8-30.
    1. Spengler DM. Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982. Nov-Dec;7(6):604-7.
    1. Arts MP, Brand R, Koes BW, Peul WC. Effect modifiers of outcome of surgery in patients with herniated disc related sciatica? A subgroup analysis of a randomised clinical trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010. November;81(11):1265-74. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
    1. Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D. Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. January;85(1):102-8.
    1. Carragee EJ, Spinnickie AO, Alamin TF, Paragioudakis S. A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006. March 15;31(6):653-7.
    1. Daneyemez M, Sali A, Kahraman S, Beduk A, Seber N. Outcome analyses in 1072 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1999. June;42(2):63-8.
    1. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Feltes CH, Smisson HF, 3rd, Johnston KW, Vogel RL, Robinson JS., Jr Correlation of the amount of disc removed in a lumbar microdiscectomy with long-term outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. November 15;29(22):2521-4; discussion 2525–6.
    1. Henriksen L, Schmidt K, Eskesen V, Jantzen E. A controlled study of microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy. Br J Neurosurg. 1996. June;10(3):289-93.
    1. Kim CH, Chung CK, Park CS, Choi B, Kim MJ, Park BJ. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. April 01;38(7):581-90.
    1. Leven D, Passias PG, Errico TJ, Lafage V, Bianco K, Lee A, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Spratt KF, Morgan TS, Gerling MC. Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for intervertebral disc herniation: a subanalysis of eight-year SPORT data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015. August 19;97(16):1316-25.
    1. Malter AD, McNeney B, Loeser JD, Deyo RA. 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998. April 01;23(7):814-20.
    1. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Flum DR, Wickizer TM, Heagerty PJ, Lenkoski AF, Deyo RA. Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation. Spine J. 2012. February;12(2):89-97. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
    1. McGirt MJ, Eustacchio S, Varga P, Vilendecic M, Trummer M, Gorensek M, Ledic D, Carragee EJ. A prospective cohort study of close interval computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging after primary lumbar discectomy: factors associated with recurrent disc herniation and disc height loss. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. September 01;34(19):2044-51.
    1. Osterman H, Sund R, Seitsalo S, Keskimäki I. Risk of multiple reoperations after lumbar discectomy: a population-based study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. March 15;28(6):621-7.
    1. Thomé C, Barth M, Scharf J, Schmiedek P. Outcome after lumbar sequestrectomy compared with microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005. March;2(3):271-8.
    1. Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983. March;8(2):131-40.
    1. Kim KT, Lee DH, Cho DC, Sung JK, Kim YB. Preoperative risk factors for recurrent lumbar disk herniation in L5-S1. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015. December;28(10):E571-7.
    1. Parker SL, Grahovac G, Vukas D, Ledic D, Vilendecic M, McGirt MJ. Cost savings associated with prevention of recurrent lumbar disc herniation with a novel annular closure device: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2013. September;74(5):285-9. Epub 2013 May 13.
    1. Klassen PD, Hes R, Bouma GJ, Eustacchio S, Barth M, Kursumovic A, Jadik S, Heidecke V, Bostelmann R, Thome C, Vajkoczy P, Kohler HP, Fandino J, Assaker R, Van de Kelft E, Frohlich S, van den Brink W, Perrin J, Wolfs J, Arts M, Martens F. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study protocol to demonstrate the superiority of a bone-anchored prosthesis for anular closure used in conjunction with limited discectomy to limited discectomy alone for primary lumbar disc herniation. International Journal of Clinical Trials. 2016. August;3(3):120-31.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010. June 01;152(11):726-32. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
    1. Leblanc DR, Schneider M, Angele P, Vollmer G, Docheva D. The effect of estrogen on tendon and ligament metabolism and function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017. September;172:106-16. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
    1. Belykh E, Krutko AV, Baykov ES, Giers MB, Preul MC, Byvaltsev VA. Preoperative estimation of disc herniation recurrence after microdiscectomy: predictive value of a multivariate model based on radiographic parameters. Spine J. 2017. March;17(3):390-400. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
    1. Heindel P, Tuchman A, Hsieh PC, Pham MH, D’Oro A, Patel NN, Jakoi AM, Hah R, Liu JC, Buser Z, Wang JC. Reoperation rates after single-level lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. April 15;42(8):E496-501.
    1. McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery. 2009. February;64(2):338-44; discussion 344–5.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa