Evaluating the Efficacy of Crisaborole Using the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index and Percentage of Affected Body Surface Area

Jonathan I Silverberg, Anna M Tallman, William C Ports, Robert A Gerber, Huaming Tan, Michael A Zielinski, Jonathan I Silverberg, Anna M Tallman, William C Ports, Robert A Gerber, Huaming Tan, Michael A Zielinski

Abstract

Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. This post hoc analysis pools results from 2 phase 3 studies (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02118766 [AD-301]; NCT02118792 [AD-302]) to evaluate crisaborole efficacy in patients ≥ 2 years with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (per Investigator's Static Global Assessment) using the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) and percentage of treatable body surface area (%BSA). Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive crisaborole (n = 1,016) or vehicle (n = 506) twice daily for 28 days. ADSI scores were the sum of pruritus, erythema, exudation, excoriation, and lichenification severity scores, each graded on a 4-point scale from none (0) to severe (3). Respective mean changes in ADSI score and %BSA at day 29 were (crisaborole vs. vehicle) -3.52 versus -2.42 (p < 0.0001) and -7.43 versus -4.44 (p < 0.0001). Crisaborole was effective in treating mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis based on ADSI and %BSA.

Keywords: Investigator’s Static Global Assessment; atopic dermatitis; atopic dermatitis severity index; crisaborole.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: JIS served as a consultant and/or advisory board member for and received honoraria from AbbVie, AnaptysBio, Asana, Arena, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, Kiniksa, LEO, Menlo, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron-Sanofi, and Realm; served as a speaker for Regeneron-Sanofi; and received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline. WCP, HT, RAG, and MAZ are employees and stockholders of Pfizer Inc. AMT is a former employee and stockholder of Pfizer Inc.

Data sharing statement: Upon request, and subject to certain criteria, conditions and exceptions (see https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical-trials/trial-data-and-results for more information), Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data from Pfizer-sponsored global interventional clinical studies conducted for medicines, vaccines and medical devices (1) for indications that have been approved in the US and/or EU or (2) in programs that have been terminated (i.e., development for all indications has been discontinued). Pfizer will also consider requests for the protocol, data dictionary, and statistical analysis plan. Data may be requested from Pfizer trials 24 months after study completion. The de-identified participant data will be made available to researchers whose proposals meet the research criteria and other conditions, and for which an exception does not apply, via a secure portal. To gain access, data requestors must enter into a data access agreement with Pfizer.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) score calculation and severity bands.aAdditional detail regarding grading of signs/symptoms can be found in Paller AS, et al (6).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Baseline atopic dermatitis (AD) severity by outcomes measure (pooled AD-301 and AD-302).aSeverity bands for Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI): clear/ almost clear (0–< 2), mild (2–< 6), moderate (6–< 9), severe (9–15) (18), bSeverity bands for percentage of treatable body surface area (%BSA): clear (0), mild (> 0–< 16), moderate (16–< 40), severe (40–100) (18). ISGA: Investigator’s Static Global Assessment; SD: standard deviation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean change in Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) score from baseline over time (pooled AD-301 and AD-302).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proportion of patients with Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) score of clear/almost clear at day 29 by baseline ADSIa(A) and baseline percentage of treatable body surface area (%BSA)b(B) (pooled AD-301 and AD-302).aADSI scores were stratified according to following severity bands: clear/almost clear (0–< 2), mild (2–< 6), moderate (6–< 9), and severe (9–15) (18). Analysis was conducted among patients with baseline ADSI > 1. b%BSA was stratified according to the following severity bands: clear (0), mild (> 0–< 16), moderate (16–< 40), and severe (40–100) (18).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Change from baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) score at day 29 by baseline lichenification (pooled AD-301 and AD-302).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Proportion of patients with (A) success in Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA)aand (B) ISGA clear or almost clear at day 29 by baseline Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) severityb(pooled AD-301 and AD-302).aISGA success was defined as achieving score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with a 2-grade or more improvement from baseline. bADSI scores were stratified according to following severity bands: clear/almost clear (0–< 2), mild (2–< 6), moderate (6–< 9), and severe (9–15) (18).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Proportion of patients with (A) success in Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA)aand (B) ISGA clear or almost clear at day 29 by baseline percentage of treatable body surface area (%BSA) severityb. aISGA success was defined as achieving score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with a 2-grade or more improvement from baseline, b%BSA was stratified according to the following severity bands: clear (0), mild (> 0–< 16), moderate (16–< 40), and severe (40–100) (18).

References

    1. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1483–1494.
    1. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Ann Dermatol 2010; 22: 125–137.
    1. Charman C, Williams H. Outcome measures of disease severity in atopic eczema. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 763–769.
    1. Gerbens LA, Chalmers JR, Rogers NK, Nankervis H, Spuls PI. Reporting of symptoms in randomized controlled trials of atopic eczema treatments: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2016; 175: 678–686.
    1. Rehal B, Armstrong AW. Health outcome measures in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review of trends in disease severity and quality-of-life instruments 1985–2010. PLoS One 2011; 6: e17520.
    1. Paller AS, Tom WL, Lebwohl MG, Blumenthal RL, Boguniewicz M, Call RS, et al. . Efficacy and safety of crisaborole ointment, a novel, nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in children and adults. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 75: 494–503.e496.
    1. von Kobyletzki LB, Thomas KS, Schmitt J, Chalmers JR, Deckert S, Aoki V, et al. . What factors are important to patients when assessing treatment response: an international cross-sectional survey. Acta Derm Venereol 2017; 97: 86–90.
    1. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, Krol A, Paller AS, Schwarzenberger K, et al. . Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 71: 116–132.
    1. Schneider L, Tilles S, Lio P, Boguniewicz M, Beck L, LeBovidge J, et al. . Atopic dermatitis: a practice parameter update 2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 131: 295–299.e 291–227.
    1. Wollenberg A, Oranje A, Deleuran M, Simon D, Szalai Z, Kunz B, et al. . ETFAD/EADV Eczema task force 2015 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult and paediatric patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 30: 729–747.
    1. Boguniewicz M, Fonacier L, Guttman-Yassky E, Ong PY, Silverberg J, Farrar JR. Atopic dermatitis yardstick: practical recommendations for an evolving therapeutic landscape. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018; 120: 10–22.e12.
    1. Eucrisa [prescribing information] . New York, NY: Pfizer Labs; December 2018.
    1. Stein Gold LF, Spelman L, Spellman MC, Hughes MH, Zane LT. A phase 2, randomized, controlled, dose-ranging study evaluating crisaborole topical ointment, 0.5% and 2% in adolescents with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol 2015; 14: 1394–1399.
    1. Murrell DF, Gebauer K, Spelman L, Zane LT. Crisaborole topical ointment, 2% in adults with atopic dermatitis: a phase 2a, vehicle-controlled, proof-of-concept study. J Drugs Dermatol 2015; 14: 1108–1112.
    1. Yosipovitch G, Simpson EL, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Luger T, Ständer S, et al. . Assessment of pruritus in atopic dermatitis: validation of the Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS). Itch 2018; 3: e13.
    1. Lewis-Jones MS, Finlay AY. The Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): initial validation and practical use. Br J Dermatol 1995; 132: 942–949.
    1. Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) – a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19: 210–216.
    1. Chopra R, Vakharia PP, Sacotte R, Patel N, Immaneni S, White T, et al. . Severity strata for Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), modified EASI, Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), objective SCORAD, Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index and body surface area in adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177: 1316–1321.
    1. Glazenburg EJ, Mulder PG, Oranje AP. A statistical model to predict the reduction of lichenification in atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 2015; 95: 294–297.
    1. Schmitt J, Spuls PI, Thomas KS, Simpson E, Furue M, Deckert S, et al. . The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) statement to assess clinical signs of atopic eczema in trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 134: 800–807.
    1. Siegfried EC, Jaworski JC, Eichenfield LF, Paller A, Hebert AA, Simpson EL, et al. . Developing drugs for treatment of atopic dermatitis in children (≥3 months to <18 years of age): draft guidance for industry. Pediatr Dermatol 2018; 35: 303–322.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa