Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses

Andrew Evans, Patsy Whelehan, Kim Thomson, Denis McLean, Katrin Brauer, Colin Purdie, Lee Jordan, Lee Baker, Alastair Thompson, Andrew Evans, Patsy Whelehan, Kim Thomson, Denis McLean, Katrin Brauer, Colin Purdie, Lee Jordan, Lee Baker, Alastair Thompson

Abstract

Introduction: Shear wave elastography is a new method of obtaining quantitative tissue elasticity data during breast ultrasound examinations. The aims of this study were (1) to determine the reproducibility of shear wave elastography (2) to correlate the elasticity values of a series of solid breast masses with histological findings and (3) to compare shear wave elastography with greyscale ultrasound for benign/malignant classification.

Methods: Using the Aixplorer® ultrasound system (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix en Provence, France), 53 solid breast lesions were identified in 52 consecutive patients. Two orthogonal elastography images were obtained of each lesion. Observers noted the mean elasticity values in regions of interest (ROI) placed over the stiffest areas on the two elastography images and a mean value was calculated for each lesion. A sub-set of 15 patients had two elastography images obtained by an additional operator. Reproducibility of observations was assessed between (1) two observers analysing the same pair of images and (2) findings from two pairs of images of the same lesion taken by two different operators. All lesions were subjected to percutaneous biopsy. Elastography measurements were correlated with histology results. After preliminary experience with 10 patients a mean elasticity cut off value of 50 kilopascals (kPa) was selected for benign/malignant differentiation. Greyscale images were classified according to the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). BI-RADS categories 1-3 were taken as benign while BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were classified as malignant.

Results: Twenty-three benign lesions and 30 cancers were diagnosed on histology. Measurement of mean elasticity yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 for two observers assessing the same pairs of elastography images. Analysis of images taken by two independent operators gave an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.80. Shear wave elastography versus greyscale BI-RADS performance figures were sensitivity: 97% vs 87%, specificity: 83% vs 78%, positive predictive value (PPV): 88% vs 84%, negative predictive value (NPV): 95% vs 82% and accuracy: 91% vs 83% respectively. These differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Shear wave elastography gives quantitative and reproducible information on solid breast lesions with diagnostic accuracy at least as good as greyscale ultrasound with BI-RADS classification.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation of mean stiffness measurements by two independent observers on each pair of elastography images. r = 0.99.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation of mean stiffness measurements on pairs of elastography images taken by two independent operators. r = 0.80.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ultrasound and elastography images of a fibroadenoma showing low stiffness. Mean 25 kPa.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Ultrasound and elastography images of a benign fibroadenoma. Ultrasound and elastography images showing a benign fibroadenoma with suspicious greyscale ultrasound features but benign elastography features. Mean 32 kPa.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ultrasound and elastography images of an invasive ductal cancer. Ultrasound and elastography images of an invasive ductal cancer showing typical peri-tumoural stiffness (arrow).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Ultrasound and elastography images of an invasive cancer. Ultrasound and elastography images showing an invasive cancer with benign greyscale features but suspicious peri-tumoural stiffness on the elastography image (arrow).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Receiver-operating characteristic curve comparing performance. Receiver-operating characteristic curve to compare the performance of greyscale Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) with shear-wave elastography mean stiffness.

References

    1. Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, Van De Vijver MJ, Van Voorthuisen AE. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology. 1999;213:413–422.
    1. Lister D, Evans AJ, Burrell HC, Blamey RW, Wilson ARM, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Kollias J. The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:490–492. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80167-0.
    1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196:123–134.
    1. Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, Wenkel E, Lux MP, Schrauder M, Koscheck T, Bautz W, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Bani MR. Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60:398–404. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.002.
    1. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, Stavros AT, Johnson KK, Yakes WF, Truell JE, Price JG, Kortz AB, Clark DG. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology. 1993;187:507–511.
    1. Fleury E, Fleury JSV, Piato S, Roveda D Jr. New elastographic classification of breast lesions during and after compression. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2009;15:96–103.
    1. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239:341–350. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2391041676.
    1. Schaefer FKW, Heer I, Schaefer PJ, Mundhenke C, Osterholz S, Order BM, Hofheinz N, Hedderich J, Heller M, Jonat W, Schreer I. Breast ultrasound elastography - results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2009. in press .
    1. Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, Hesley GK, Sisney GA, Svensson WE, Fine JP, Jiang J, Hangiandreou NJ. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology. 2007;245:401–410. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452061805.
    1. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ, Morton MJ, Nordland MR, Meixner DD, Hall TJ, Farrell MA, Mandrekar JN, Harmsen WS, Charboneau JW. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging - clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology. 2006;238:425–437. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2381041336.
    1. Chung SY, Moon WK, Choi JW, Cho N, Jang M, Kim KG. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:9–14. doi: 10.3109/02841850903273966.
    1. Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51:396–409. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2004.1295425.
    1. Fink M, Tanter M. Multiwave imaging and super resolution. Phys Today. 2010;63:28–33. doi: 10.1063/1.3326986.
    1. Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A, Deffieux T, Gennisson J-L, Montaldo G, Muller M, Tardivon A, Fink M. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:1373–1386. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.02.002.
    1. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, Sigal-Zafrani B, Bercoff J, Deffieux T, Gennisson JL, Fink M, Neuenschwander S. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging - preliminary results. Radiology. 2010;256:297–303. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090385.
    1. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4.
    1. National Research Ethics Service. Approval for Medical Devices Research: Guidance for Researchers, Manufacturers, Research Ethics Committees and NHS R&D Offices. Version 2. London: National Patient Safety Agency; 2008.
    1. Medizinische Fakultät - Universität Ulm.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa