Methylomic analysis of monozygotic twins discordant for autism spectrum disorder and related behavioural traits

C C Y Wong, E L Meaburn, A Ronald, T S Price, A R Jeffries, L C Schalkwyk, R Plomin, J Mill, C C Y Wong, E L Meaburn, A Ronald, T S Price, A R Jeffries, L C Schalkwyk, R Plomin, J Mill

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) defines a group of common, complex neurodevelopmental disorders. Although the aetiology of ASD has a strong genetic component, there is considerable monozygotic (MZ) twin discordance indicating a role for non-genetic factors. Because MZ twins share an identical DNA sequence, disease-discordant MZ twin pairs provide an ideal model for examining the contribution of environmentally driven epigenetic factors in disease. We performed a genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in a sample of 50 MZ twin pairs (100 individuals) sampled from a representative population cohort that included twins discordant and concordant for ASD, ASD-associated traits and no autistic phenotype. Within-twin and between-group analyses identified numerous differentially methylated regions associated with ASD. In addition, we report significant correlations between DNA methylation and quantitatively measured autistic trait scores across our sample cohort. This study represents the first systematic epigenomic analyses of MZ twins discordant for ASD and implicates a role for altered DNA methylation in autism.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) A significantly (P<2.2E−16) higher number of CpG sites with a large average within-twin β differences was observed in autism spectrum disorder (ASD)-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs compared with unaffected twin pairs (that is, concordant for low Childhood Autism Symptom Test (CAST) score). (b) Absolute mean Δβ of the top 50 differentially methylated CpG sites in ASD-discordant MZ twin pairs and in unaffected MZ twin pairs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
DNA methylation differences (Δβ; autism spectrum disorder (ASD) twin minus well twin) for the top 10 ASD-associated differentially methylated CpG sites in six ASD-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) The top 10 CpG sites showing the most significant correlation with total Childhood Autism Symptom Test (CAST) score. Each circle represents a sample. For some loci, the high correlations are influenced by extreme DNA methylation and CAST scores from a single pair of autism spectrum disorder (ASD)-concordant twins (denoted as blue triangles). (b) Significant correlation between P2RY11 and NRXN1 DNA methylation and quantitative autistic trait scores remains when the extreme twin pair was excluded. Solid and dashed lines represent results from correlation analysis including and excluding the extreme twin pair, respectively.

References

    1. Baird G, Simonoff E, Pickles A, Chandler S, Loucas T, Meldrum D, et al. Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP) Lancet. 2006;368:210–215.
    1. Ronald A, Hoekstra RA. Autism spectrum disorders and autistic traits: a decade of new twin studies. Am J Med Genet B. 2011;156B:255–274.
    1. Berg JM, Geschwind DH. Autism genetics: searching for specificity and convergence. Genome Biol. 2012;13:247.
    1. Happe F, Ronald A. The fractionable autism triad: a review of evidence from behavioural, genetic, cognitive and neural research. Neuropsychol Rev. 2008;18:287–304.
    1. Happe F, Ronald A, Plomin R. Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1218–1220.
    1. Ronald A, Happe F, Bolton P, Butcher LM, Price TS, Wheelwright S, et al. Genetic heterogeneity between the three components of the autism spectrum: a twin study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45:691–699.
    1. Henikoff S, Matzke MA. Exploring and explaining epigenetic effects. Trends Genet. 1997;13:293–295.
    1. Ma DKK, Marchetto MC, Guo JJU, Ming GL, Gage FH, Song HJ. Epigenetic choreographers of neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:1338–1344.
    1. Keverne EB, Curley JP. Epigenetics, brain evolution and behaviour. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008;29:398–412.
    1. Wong CCY, Mill J, Fernandes C. Drugs and addiction: an introduction to epigenetics. Addiction. 2011;106:480–489.
    1. Schanen NC. Epigenetics of autism spectrum disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:R138–R150.
    1. Grafodatskaya D, Chung B, Szatmari P, Weksberg R. Autism spectrum disorders and epigenetics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49:794–809.
    1. Gregory S, Connelly J, Towers A, Johnson J, Biscocho D, Markunas C, et al. Genomic and epigenetic evidence for oxytocin receptor deficiency in autism. BMC Med. 2009;7:62.
    1. Nagarajan RP, Hogart AR, Gwye Y, Martin MR, LaSalle JM. Reduced MeCP2 expression is frequent in autism frontal cortex and correlates with aberrant MECP2 promoter methylation. Epigenetics. 2006;1:e1–11.
    1. Shulha HP, Cheung I, Whittle C, Wang J, Virgil D, Lin CL, et al. Epigenetic signatures of autism: trimethylated H3K4 landscapes in prefrontal neurons. Arch Gen psychiatry. 2012;69:314–324.
    1. Heijmans BT, Mill J. Commentary: the seven plagues of epigenetic epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:74–78.
    1. Bell JT, Spector TD. A twin approach to unraveling epigenetics. Trends Genet. 2011;27:116–125.
    1. Gordon L, Joo JE, Powel JE, Ollikainen M, Novakovic B, Li X, et al. Neonatal DNA methylation profile in human twins is specified by a complex interplay between intrauterine environmental and genetic factors, subject to tissue-specific influence. Genome Res. 2012;22:1395–1406.
    1. Kaminsky ZA, Tang T, Wang SC, Ptak C, Oh GH, Wong AH, et al. DNA methylation profiles in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Nat Genet. 2009;41:240–245.
    1. Wong CC, Caspi A, Williams B, Craig IW, Houts R, Ambler A, et al. A longitudinal study of epigenetic variation in twins. Epigenetics. 2010;5:516–526.
    1. Dempster E, Pidsley R, Schalkwyk L, Owens S, Georgiades A, Kane F, et al. Disease-associated epigenetic changes in monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:4786–4796.
    1. Rakyan VK, Beyan H, Down TA, Hawa MI, Maslau S, Aden D, et al. Identification of type 1 diabetes-associated DNA methylation variable positions that precede disease diagnosis. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002300.
    1. Nguyen AT, Rauch TA, Pfeifer GP, Hu VW. Global methylation profiling of lymphoblastoid cell lines reveals epigenetic contributions to autism spectrum disorders and a novel autism candidate gene, RORA, whose protein product is reduced in autistic brain. FASEB J. 2010;24:3036–3051.
    1. Haworth CMA, Davis OSP, Plomin R. Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): a genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioural development from childhood to young adulthood. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013;16:117–125.
    1. Williams J, Scott F, Stott C, Allison C, Bolton P, Baron-Cohen S, et al. The CAST (Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test) Autism. 2005;9:45–68.
    1. Ronald A, HappÈ F, Plomin R. A twin study investigating the genetic and environmental aetiologies of parent, teacher and child ratings of autistic-like traits and their overlap. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;17:473–483.
    1. Ronald A, Happe F, Price TS, Baron-Cohen S, Plomin R. Phenotypic and genetic overlap between autistic traits at the extremes of the general population. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45:1206–1214.
    1. Bibikova M, Le J, Barnes B, Saedinia-Melnyk S, Zhou L, Shen R, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling using Infinium assay. Epigenomics. 2009;1:177–200.
    1. Chen PY, Feng S, Joo JWJ, Jacobsen SE, Pellegrini M. A comparative analysis of DNA methylation across human embryonic stem cell lines. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R62.
    1. Kadota K, Nakai Y, Shimizu K. Ranking differentially expressed genes from Affymetrix gene expression data: methods with reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity. Algorithms Mol Biol. 2009;4:7.
    1. Karimi M, Johansson S, Stach D, Corcoran M, GrandÈr D, Schalling M, et al. LUMA (LUminometric Methylation Assay)—a high throughput method to the analysis of genomic DNA methylation. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312:1989–1995.
    1. Wang K, Li MY, Hadley D, Liu R, Glessner J, Grant SFA, et al. PennCNV: an integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data. Genome Res. 2007;17:1665–1674.
    1. Colella S, Yau C, Taylor JM, Mirza G, Butler H, Clouston P, et al. QuantiSNP: an Objective Bayes Hidden-Markov Model to detect and accurately map copy number variation using SNP genotyping data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:2013–2025.
    1. Schalkwyk LC, Meaburn EL, Smith R, Dempster EL, Jeffries AR, Davies MN, et al. Allelic skewing of DNA methylation is widespread across the genome. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:196–212.
    1. Marshall CR, Noor A, Vincent JB, Lionel AC, Feuk L, Skaug J, et al. Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am J Med Genet. 2008;82:477–488.
    1. Faulk C, Dolinoy DC. Timing is everything: the when and how of environmentally induced changes in the epigenome of animals. Epigenetics. 2011;6:791–797.
    1. Rakyan VK, Down TA, Balding DJ, Beck S. Epigenome-wide association studies for common human diseases. Nat Rev. 2011;12:529–541.
    1. Kaminsky Z, Tochigi M, Jia P, Pal M, Mill J, Kwan A, et al. A multi-tissue analysis identifies HLA complex group 9 gene methylation differences in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;17:728–740.
    1. Davies MN, Volta M, Pidsley R, Lunnon K, Dixit A, Lovestone S, et al. Functional annotation of the human brain methylome identifies tissue-specific epigenetic variation across brain and blood. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R43.
    1. Boks MP, de Jong NM, Kas MJ, Vinkers CH, Fernandes C, Kahn RS, et al. Current status and future prospects for epigenetic psychopharmacology. Epigenetics. 2012;7:20–28.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa