Association of N-Terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Kelly M Chin, Lewis J Rubin, Richard Channick, Lilla Di Scala, Sean Gaine, Nazzareno Galiè, Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani, Marius M Hoeper, Irene M Lang, Vallerie V McLaughlin, Ralph Preiss, Gérald Simonneau, Olivier Sitbon, Victor F Tapson, Kelly M Chin, Lewis J Rubin, Richard Channick, Lilla Di Scala, Sean Gaine, Nazzareno Galiè, Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani, Marius M Hoeper, Irene M Lang, Vallerie V McLaughlin, Ralph Preiss, Gérald Simonneau, Olivier Sitbon, Victor F Tapson

Abstract

Background: NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) levels are included in the multiparametric risk assessment approach for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) outlined in PAH guidelines. However, data supporting the use of NT-proBNP risk thresholds in assessing prognosis in PAH are limited. The GRIPHON trial (Prostacyclin [PGI2] Receptor Agonist In Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension) provides an opportunity to assess the prognostic value of NT-proBNP thresholds in a controlled clinical trial and to evaluate the response to selexipag according to these thresholds.

Methods: The event-driven GRIPHON trial randomly assigned patients to selexipag or placebo. NT-proBNP was measured at regular intervals in GRIPHON. Here, patients were categorized post hoc into low, medium, and high NT-proBNP subgroups according to 2 independent sets of thresholds: (1) baseline tertiles: <271 ng/L; 271 to 1165 ng/L; >1165 ng/L; and (2) 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines cutoffs: <300 ng/L; 300 to 1400 ng/L; >1400 ng/L. Hazard ratios (selexipag versus placebo) with 95% CIs were calculated for the primary end point (composite morbidity/mortality events) by NT-proBNP category at baseline using Cox proportional-hazards models, and at any time during the exposure period using a time-dependent Cox model.

Results: With both thresholds, baseline and follow-up NT-proBNP categories were highly prognostic for future morbidity/mortality events during the study ( P<0.0001). In the time-dependent analysis, the risk of experiencing a morbidity/mortality event was 92% and 83% lower in selexipag-treated patients with a low and medium NT-proBNP level, and 90% and 56% lower in placebo-treated patients with a low and medium NT-proBNP level, in comparison with patients with a high NT-proBNP level. Selexipag reduced the risk of morbidity/mortality events across all 3 NT-proBNP categories in both the baseline and time-dependent analyses, with a more pronounced treatment benefit of selexipag seen in the medium and low NT-proBNP subgroups (interaction P values 0.20 and 0.007 in the baseline and time-dependent analyses).

Conclusions: These analyses further establish the prognostic relevance of NT-proBNP levels in PAH and provide first evidence for the association of NT-proBNP level and treatment response. Using 2 similar sets of thresholds, these analyses support the relevance of the low, medium, and high NT-proBNP categories as part of the multiparametric risk assessment approach outlined in the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of PAH patients.

Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01106014.

Keywords: brain natriuretic peptide; hypertension, pulmonary; prostacyclin receptor; risk assessment.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Shift table for change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) category from baseline to week 26. Values are shown as n (%). Low, medium, and high NT-proBNP cutoffs were determined according to baseline NT-proBNP tertiles (low: <271 ng/L; medium: 271–1165 ng/L; high: >1165 ng/L). Analyses were performed only in patients who were still in the double-blind treatment at week 26 and who had an NT-proBNP value at baseline and week 26; 289 patients randomly assigned at baseline were excluded from these analyses for the following reasons (categories are not mutually exclusive): primary end point event before week 26 (n=147), premature discontinuation of double-blind treatment before week 26 (n=121), missing NT-proBNP value at baseline (n=14) or at week 26 (n=239). BL indicates baseline.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time from randomization to first morbidity or mortality event in subgroups defined by NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) level at baseline. Low, medium, and high NT-proBNP cutoffs were determined according to baseline NT-proBNP tertiles (low: <271 ng/L; medium: 271–1165 ng/L; high: >1165 ng/L).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Time from week 26 to first morbidity or mortality event based on change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) category from baseline to week 26 for placebo and selexipag patients. Data shown for (A) patients receiving placebo and (B) patients receiving selexipag. Low, medium, and high NT-proBNP cutoffs determined according to baseline NT-proBNP tertiles (low: <271 ng/L; medium: 271–1165 ng/L; high: >1165 ng/L). Subgroups are defined as: stable low (low NT-proBNP at baseline and at week 26), stable medium (medium NT-proBNP at baseline and at week 26), stable high (high NT-proBNP at baseline and at week 26), improved (high at baseline and medium or low at week 26, or medium at baseline and low at week 26), and deteriorated (low at baseline and medium or high at week 26, or medium at baseline and high at week 26).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Treatment effect of selexipag on time from randomization to first morbidity or mortality event.A, Treatment effect in subgroups defined by NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) level at baseline. B, Treatment effect by time-dependent NT-proBNP category. Low, medium, and high NT-proBNP cutoffs were determined according to baseline NT-proBNP tertiles (low: <271 ng/L; medium: 271–1165 ng/L; high: >1165 ng/L). HR indicates hazard ratio; and N/A, not available.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot showing the treatment effect of selexipag vs placebo on morbidity/mortality (hazard ratio plus 95% CIs and 95% confidence bands) by NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) level at baseline. The black line indicates the hazard ratio of each subpopulation, the dark blue dashed line indicates the 95% CI for each individual subpopulation. The light blue dashed line shows the 95% confidence bands, which define the confidence interval of the best-fit line and indicate with 95% certainty the bounds within which the true curve will fall. Vertical lines indicate the 300 ng/L and 1400 ng/L NT-proBNP thresholds. HR indicates hazard ratio.

References

    1. Benza RL, Miller DP, Gomberg-Maitland M, Frantz RP, Foreman AJ, Coffey CS, Frost A, Barst RJ, Badesch DB, Elliott CG, Liou TG, McGoon MD. Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL). Circulation. 2010;122:164–172. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.898122.
    1. Benza RL, Gomberg-Maitland M, Miller DP, Frost A, Frantz RP, Foreman AJ, Badesch DB, McGoon MD. The REVEAL Registry risk score calculator in patients newly diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2012;141:354–362. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0676.
    1. Galiè N, Channick RN, Frantz RP, Grünig E, Jing ZC, Moiseeva O, Preston IR, Pulido T, Safdar Z, Tamura Y, McLaughlin VV. Risk stratification and medical therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2018;53:1801889. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01889-2018.
    1. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, Simonneau G, Peacock A, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Beghetti M, Ghofrani A, Gomez Sanchez MA, Hansmann G, Klepetko W, Lancellotti P, Matucci M, McDonagh T, Pierard LA, Trindade PT, Zompatori M, Hoeper M ESC Scientific Document Group. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:67–119. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317.
    1. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, Simonneau G, Peacock A, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Beghetti M, Ghofrani A, Gomez Sanchez MA, Hansmann G, Klepetko W, Lancellotti P, Matucci M, McDonagh T, Pierard LA, Trindade PT, Zompatori M, Hoeper M. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J. 2015;46:903–975. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01032-2015.
    1. Lador F, Soccal PM, Sitbon O. Biomarkers for the prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension: Holy Grail or flying circus? J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33:341–343. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.12.012.
    1. Souza R, Bogossian HB, Humbert M, Jardim C, Rabelo R, Amato MB, Carvalho CR. N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide as a haemodynamic marker in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2005;25:509–513. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00100504.
    1. Souza R, Jardim C, Julio Cesar Fernandes C, Silveira Lapa M, Rabelo R, Humbert M. NT-proBNP as a tool to stratify disease severity in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Respir Med. 2007;101:69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.04.014.
    1. Fijalkowska A, Kurzyna M, Torbicki A, Szewczyk G, Florczyk M, Pruszczyk P, Szturmowicz M. Serum N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic parameter in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2006;129:1313–1321. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.5.1313.
    1. Nickel N, Golpon H, Greer M, Knudsen L, Olsson K, Westerkamp V, Welte T, Hoeper MM. The prognostic impact of follow-up assessments in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2012;39:589–596. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00092311.
    1. Nagaya N, Nishikimi T, Uematsu M, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Kakishita M, Fukushima K, Okano Y, Nakanishi N, Miyatake K, Kangawa K. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic indicator in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2000;102:865–870. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.8.865.
    1. Leuchte HH, El Nounou M, Tuerpe JC, Hartmann B, Baumgartner RA, Vogeser M, Muehling O, Behr J. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and renal insufficiency as predictors of mortality in pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2007;131:402–409. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1758.
    1. Mauritz GJ, Rizopoulos D, Groepenhoff H, Tiede H, Felix J, Eilers P, Bosboom J, Postmus PE, Westerhof N, Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Usefulness of serial N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide measurements for determining prognosis in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1645–1650. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.025.
    1. Zelniker T, Uhlmann L, Spaich S, Friedrich J, Preusch MR, Meyer FJ, Katus HA, Giannitsis E. Novel biomarkers for risk stratification in pulmonary arterial hypertension. ERJ Open Res. 2015;1:000082015. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00008-2015.
    1. Ghofrani HA, Grimminger F, Grünig E, Huang Y, Jansa P, Jing ZC, Kilpatrick D, Langleben D, Rosenkranz S, Menezes F, Fritsch A, Nikkho S, Humbert M. Predictors of long-term outcomes in patients treated with riociguat for pulmonary arterial hypertension: data from the PATENT-2 open-label, randomised, long-term extension trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:361–371. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30019-4.
    1. Frantz RP, Farber HW, Badesch DB, Elliott CG, Frost AE, McGoon MD, Zhao C, Mink DR, Selej M, Benza RL. Baseline and serial brain natriuretic peptide level predicts 5-year overall survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: data from the REVEAL Registry. Chest. 2018;154:126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.009.
    1. Sitbon O, Channick R, Chin KM, Frey A, Gaine S, Galiè N, Ghofrani HA, Hoeper MM, Lang IM, Preiss R, Rubin LJ, Di Scala L, Tapson V, Adzerikho I, Liu J, Moiseeva O, Zeng X, Simonneau G, McLaughlin VV GRIPHON Investigators. Selexipag for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2522–2533. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503184.
    1. Yale University. The Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) Project. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE). 2018. . Accessed March 19, 2019.
    1. Dafni U. Landmark analysis at the 25-year landmark point. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:363–371. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957951.
    1. Bonetti M, Gelber RD. A graphical method to assess treatment-covariate interactions using the Cox model on subsets of the data. Stat Med. 2000;19:2595–2609.
    1. Boucly A, Weatherald J, Savale L, Jais X, Cottin V, Prevot G, Picard F, de Groote P, Jevnikar M, Bergot E, Chaouat A, Chabanne C, Bourdin A, Parent F, Montani D, Simonneau G, Humbert M, Sitbon O. Risk assessment, prognosis and guideline implementation in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1700889. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00889-2017.
    1. Hoeper MM, Kramer T, Pan Z, Eichstaedt CA, Spiesshoefer J, Benjamin N, Olsson KM, Meyer K, Vizza CD, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Distler O, Opitz C, Gibbs JSR, Delcroix M, Ghofrani HA, Huscher D, Pittrow D, Rosenkranz S, Grunig E. Mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prediction by the 2015 European pulmonary hypertension guidelines risk stratification model. Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1700740. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00740-2017.
    1. NICE. Acute heart failure: diagnosis and management. 2014. . Accessed March 20, 2019.
    1. Kylhammar D, Kjellström B, Hjalmarsson C, Jansson K, Nisell M, Söderberg S, Wikström G, Rådegran G. A comprehensive risk stratification at early follow-up determines prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:4175–4181. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx257.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa