Timing of elective surgery and risk assessment after SARS-CoV-2 infection: an update: A multidisciplinary consensus statement on behalf of the Association of Anaesthetists, Centre for Perioperative Care, Federation of Surgical Specialty Associations, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Royal College of Surgeons of England

K El-Boghdadly, T M Cook, T Goodacre, J Kua, S Denmark, S McNally, N Mercer, S R Moonesinghe, D J Summerton, K El-Boghdadly, T M Cook, T Goodacre, J Kua, S Denmark, S McNally, N Mercer, S R Moonesinghe, D J Summerton

Abstract

The impact of vaccination and new SARS-CoV-2 variants on peri-operative outcomes is unclear. We aimed to update previously published consensus recommendations on timing of elective surgery after SARS-CoV-2 infection to assist policymakers, administrative staff, clinicians and patients. The guidance remains that patients should avoid elective surgery within 7 weeks of infection, unless the benefits of doing so exceed the risk of waiting. We recommend individualised multidisciplinary risk assessment for patients requiring elective surgery within 7 weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This should include baseline mortality risk calculation and assessment of risk modifiers (patient factors; SARS-CoV-2 infection; surgical factors). Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with previous variants increased peri-operative mortality risk three-fold throughout the 6 weeks after infection, and assumptions that asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection does not add risk are currently unfounded. Patients with persistent symptoms and those with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 may require a longer delay than 7 weeks. Elective surgery should not take place within 10 days of diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, predominantly because the patient may be infectious, which is a risk to surgical pathways, staff and other patients. We now emphasise that timing of surgery should include the assessment of baseline and increased risk, optimising vaccination and functional status, and shared decision-making. While these recommendations focus on the omicron variant and current evidence, the principles may also be of relevance to future variants. As further data emerge, these recommendations may be revised.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; complications; surgery; timing.

© 2022 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Communicating risk when considering surgery within 7 weeks of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. This is a tool that may be used for patients who are no longer infectious (≥ 10 days after diagnosis). Clinicians should begin by assessing baseline risk, then consider risk modifiers, followed by determining the risk of deferring surgery for 7 weeks after infection. This communication tool should be used in conjunction with our recommendations to support shared decision‐making.

References

    1. Abbott TEF, Fowler AJ, Dobbs TD, et al. Mortality after surgery with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in England: a population‐wide epidemiological study. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2021; 127: 205–14.
    1. Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Glasbey JC, et al. Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: An international cohort study. Lancet 2020; 396: 27–38.
    1. COVIDSurg Collaborative, GlobalSurg Collaborative . Timing of surgery following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: an international prospective cohort study. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 748–58.
    1. El‐Boghdadly K, Cook TM, Goodacre T, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, COVID‐19 and timing of elective surgery: a multidisciplinary consensus statement on behalf of the Association of Anaesthetists, the Centre for Peri‐operative Care, the Federation of Surgical Specialty Associations, the Royal College. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 940–6.
    1. Rohatgi N, Smilowitz NR, Reejhsinghani R. Perioperative cardiovascular considerations prior to elective noncardiac surgery in patients with a history of COVID‐19. Journal of the American Medical Association Surgery 2022. Epub 12 January. 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6953.
    1. COVIDSurg Collaborative, GlobalSurg Collaborative. SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: Data from an international prospective cohort study. British Journal of Surgery 2021; 108: 1056–63.
    1. UK Health Security Agency . SARS‐CoV‐2 Variants of Concern and Variants under Investigation in England. Technical Briefing 34. 2022. (accessed 08/02/2022).
    1. Abdullah F, Myers J, Basu D, et al. Decreased severity of disease during the first global omicron variant Covid‐19 outbreak in a large hospital in Tshwane, South Africa. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2022; 116: 38–42.
    1. Nepogodiev D, Abbott TE, Ademuyiwa AO, et al. Projecting COVID‐19 disruption to elective surgery. Lancet 2022; 399: 233–4.
    1. Nepogodiev D, Omar OM, Glasbey JC, et al. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans. British Journal of Surgery 2020; 107: 1440–9.
    1. COVIDSurg Collaborative . CovidSurg‐3: outcomes of surgery in COVID‐19 infection. 2021. (accessed 14/01/2022).
    1. Haas EJ, Angulo FJ, McLaughlin JM, et al. Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and COVID‐19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data. Lancet 2021; 397: 1819–29.
    1. National Health Service . Vaccination as a Condition of Deployment (VCOD) for Healthcare Workers—Phase 1: Planning and Preparation. 2021. (accessed 08/02/2022).
    1. Black JRM, Bailey C, Przewrocka J, Dijkstra KK, Swanton C. COVID‐19: the case for health‐care worker screening to prevent hospital transmission. Lancet 2020; 395: 1418–20.
    1. Glasbey JC, Nepogodiev D, Simoes JFF, et al. Elective cancer surgery in COVID‐19‐free surgical pathways during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic: An international, multicenter, comparative cohort study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2021; 39: 66–78.
    1. Wolter N, Jassat W, Walaza S, et al. Early assessment of the clinical severity of the SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant in South Africa: a data linkage study. Lancet 2022; 399: 437–46.
    1. ICNARC . ICNARC Report on COVID‐19 in Critical Care: England, Wales and Northern Ireland 14 January 2022. 2022. (accessed 08/02/2022).
    1. NCEPOD . Surgical outcome risk tool v2 (SORT). 2021. (accessed 18/01/2022).
    1. COVIDSurg Collaborative, GlobalSurg Collaborative . Effects of pre‐operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery: an international prospective cohort study. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 1454–64.
    1. El‐Boghdadly K, Lockwood S, Crawshaw A et al. Preoperative Assessment and Optimisation for Adult Surgery Including Consideration of COVID‐19 and its Implications. 2021. (accessed 08/02/2022).
    1. COVIDSurg Collaborative . Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: an international cohort study. Lancet 2020; 396: 27–38.
    1. COVIDSurg Collaborative, GlobalSurg Collaborative . SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and venous thromboembolism after surgery: an international prospective cohort study. Anaesthesia 2022; 77: 28–39.
    1. Cook TM. Risk to health from COVID‐19 for anaesthetists and intensivists – a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2020; 75: 1494–508.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa