Placental gene-expression profiles of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy reveal involvement of multiple molecular pathways in blood vessel formation and inflammation

QiaoLing Du, YouDong Pan, YouHua Zhang, HaiLong Zhang, YaJuan Zheng, Ling Lu, JunLei Wang, Tao Duan, JianFeng Chen, QiaoLing Du, YouDong Pan, YouHua Zhang, HaiLong Zhang, YaJuan Zheng, Ling Lu, JunLei Wang, Tao Duan, JianFeng Chen

Abstract

Background: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy-associated liver disease with potentially deleterious consequences for the fetus, particularly when maternal serum bile-acid concentration >40 μM. However, the etiology and pathogenesis of ICP remain elusive. To reveal the underlying molecular mechanisms for the association of maternal serum bile-acid level and fetal outcome in ICP patients, DNA microarray was applied to characterize the whole-genome expression profiles of placentas from healthy women and women diagnosed with ICP.

Methods: Thirty pregnant women recruited in this study were categorized evenly into three groups: healthy group; mild ICP, with serum bile-acid concentration ranging from 10-40 μM; and severe ICP, with bile-acid concentration >40 μM. Gene Ontology analysis in combination with construction of gene-interaction and gene co-expression networks were applied to identify the core regulatory genes associated with ICP pathogenesis, which were further validated by quantitative real-time PCR and histological staining.

Results: The core regulatory genes were mainly involved in immune response, VEGF signaling pathway and G-protein-coupled receptor signaling, implying essential roles of immune response, vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in ICP pathogenesis. This implication was supported by the observed aggregated immune-cell infiltration and deficient blood vessel formation in ICP placentas.

Conclusions: Our study provides a system-level insight into the placental gene-expression profiles of women with mild or severe ICP, and reveals multiple molecular pathways in immune response and blood vessel formation that might contribute to ICP pathogenesis.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes in placentas from healthy pregnancies and women with ICP. (A) Clinical features of healthy women and women with mild or severe ICP. 10 pregnant women were recruited for each group, and data are shown as mean ± s.d. (n = 10). (B) Hierarchical clustering of genes whose expression was altered by more than 1.5-fold in ICP placentas comparing to those in healthy placentas. Red and green represent individual genes that were differentially up-regulated or down-regulated, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Significantly enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms associated with ICP pathogenesis. The primary functions of the sorted differentially expressed genes in ICP placentas were assessed by GO analysis. Ten significantly enriched GO terms in both mild ICP and severe ICP (Intersection, A) and five significantly enriched GO terms in mild ICP only (B) and severe ICP only (C) are shown respectively. The vertical axis is the GO category and the horizontal axis is the enrichment value of GO.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Gene-interaction network. Genes associated with the significantly enriched GO terms were analyzed by gene-interaction network, which was built according to the relationships among genes, proteins, and compounds in the KEGG database. Circles, squares, and triangles represent, respectively, genes differentially regulated in both mild ICP and severe ICP (Intersection), mild ICP only, and severe ICP only. Red and green represent genes that were differentially up-regulated or down-regulated, respectively. Detailed gene-gene relationships with the degree of each gene are shown in Additional file 3: Spreadsheet S1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Validation of the identified core regulatory genes associated with ICP pathogenesis by qPCR. Genes with expression patterns in placental tissues from healthy group, mild ICP, and severe ICP (10 pregnancies per group) consistent with those in the microarray data are shown: Genes involved in (A) immune response, (B) VEGF signaling and (C) G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. Relative expression of each target gene was normalized to GAPDH, and expression levels in the healthy group were defined as 1. All reactions were performed in triplicate, and data are presented as mean ± s.d. (n = 10). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; NS, not significant. Primer pairs used were listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Immune cell infiltration in placental tissues from healthy group, mild ICP, and severe ICP. (A) Representative images of immunohistochemistry staining for the leukocyte marker CD45 in placental tissues from healthy group, mild ICP, and severe ICP (10 pregnancies per group). Brown staining (arrows) indicates reactivity. Scale bars represent 100 μm. (B) Quantification of leukocytes (CD45 positive), T cell (CD3 positive) and B cell (CD19 positive) in placental tissues from healthy group, mild ICP, and severe ICP (10 pregnancies per group). Data are presented as mean ± s.d. (n = 10). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Histological staining of placental tissues from healthy group, mild ICP, and severe ICP. (A) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of placental tissues from three groups of pregnancies (10 pregnancies per group). Scale bar represents 200 μm. (B) Quantification of capillaries per villus of placental tissues from three groups of pregnancies (10 pregnancies per group). Data are presented as mean ± s.d. (n = 10). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

References

    1. Arrese M, Reyes H. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a past and present riddle. Ann Hepatol. 2006;7(3):202–205.
    1. Arrese M, Macias RI, Briz O, Perez MJ, Marin JJ. Molecular pathogenesis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2008;7:e9.
    1. Lausman AY, Al-Yaseen E, Sam D, Nitsch R, Barrett JF, Chan WS. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in women with a multiple pregnancy: an analysis of risks and pregnancy outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;7(11):1008–1013.
    1. Beuers U, Pusl T. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy–a heterogeneous group of pregnancy-related disorders? Hepatology. 2006;7(4):647–649.
    1. Laatikainen T, Tulenheimo A. Maternal serum bile acid levels and fetal distress in cholestasis of pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1984;7(2):91–94.
    1. Glantz A, Marschall HU, Mattsson LA. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates. Hepatology. 2004;7(2):467–474.
    1. Williamson C, Miragoli M, Sheikh Abdul Kadir S, Abu-Hayyeh S, Papacleovoulou G, Geenes V, Gorelik J. Bile acid signaling in fetal tissues: implications for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Dig Dis. 2011;7(1):58–61.
    1. Colombo C, Zuliani G, Ronchi M, Breidenstein J, Setchell KD. Biliary bile acid composition of the human fetus in early gestation. Pediatr Res. 1987;7(2):197–200.
    1. Geenes VL, Lim YH, Bowman N, Tailor H, Dixon PH, Chambers J, Brown L, Wyatt-Ashmead J, Bhakoo K, Williamson C. A placental phenotype for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Placenta. 2011;7(12):1026–1032.
    1. Colombo C, Roda A, Roda E, Buscaglia M, Dell’Agnola CA, Filippetti P, Ronchi M, Sereni F. Correlation between fetal and maternal serum bile acid concentrations. Pediatr Res. 1985;7(2):227–231.
    1. Laatikainen TJ. Fetal bile acid levels in pregnancies complicated by maternal intrahepatic cholestasis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;7(7):852–856.
    1. Perez MJ, Macias RI, Marin JJ. Maternal cholestasis induces placental oxidative stress and apoptosis. Protective effect of ursodeoxycholic acid. Placenta. 2006;7(1):34–41.
    1. Wikstrom Shemer E, Thorsell M, Ostlund E, Blomgren B, Marschall HU. Stereological assessment of placental morphology in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Placenta. 2012;7(11):914–918.
    1. Wei J, Wang H, Yang X, Dong M, Wang Z. Altered gene profile of placenta from women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;7(5):801–810.
    1. Cristofalo VJ. A DNA chip off the aging block. Nat Med. 2000;7(5):507.
    1. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;7:3.
    1. Saeys Y, Inza I, Larranaga P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2007;7(19):2507–2517.
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B Methodological. 1995;7(1):289–300.
    1. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;7(1):25–29.
    1. Dupuy D, Bertin N, Hidalgo CA, Venkatesan K, Tu D, Lee D, Rosenberg J, Svrzikapa N, Blanc A, Carnec A, Carvunis AR, Pulak R, Shingles J, Reece-Hoyes J, Hunt-Newbury R, Viveiros R, Mohler WA, Tasan M, Roth FP, Le Peuch C, Hope IA, Johnsen R, Moerman DG, Barabasi AL, Baillie D, Vidal M. Genome-scale analysis of in vivo spatiotemporal promoter activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;7(6):663–668.
    1. Pujana MA, Han JD, Starita LM, Stevens KN, Tewari M, Ahn JS, Rennert G, Moreno V, Kirchhoff T, Gold B, Assmann V, Elshamy WM, Rual JF, Levine D, Rozek LS, Gelman RS, Gunsalus KC, Greenberg RA, Sobhian B, Bertin N, Venkatesan K, Ayivi-Guedehoussou N, Sole X, Hernandez P, Lazaro C, Nathanson KL, Weber BL, Cusick ME, Hill DE, Offit K. et al.Network modeling links breast cancer susceptibility and centrosome dysfunction. Nat Genet. 2007;7(11):1338–1349.
    1. Prieto C, Risueno A, Fontanillo C, de las Rivas J. Human gene coexpression landscape: confident network derived from tissue transcriptomic profiles. PLoS One. 2008;7(12):e3911.
    1. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;7(2):101–113.
    1. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science. 2002;7(5586):1551–1555.
    1. Carlson MR, Zhang B, Fang Z, Mischel PS, Horvath S, Nelson SF. Gene connectivity, function, and sequence conservation: predictions from modular yeast co-expression networks. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:40.
    1. Spirin V, Mirny LA. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;7(21):12123–12128.
    1. Floreani A, Caroli D, Lazzari R, Memmo A, Vidali E, Colavito D, D’Arrigo A, Leon A, Romero R, Gervasi M. Intrahepatic Cholestasis Of Pregnancy: New Insights Into Its Pathogenesis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;7:1410–1415.
    1. Gleicher N, Elkayam U. Peripartum cardiomyopathy, an autoimmune manifestation of allograft rejection? Autoimmun Rev. 2009;7(5):384–387.
    1. Gleicher N. Why much of the pathophysiology of preeclampsia-eclampsia must be of an autoimmune nature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;7(1) 5 e1-7.
    1. Gleicher N, Barad DH. Gestational dermatosis shortly after implantation associated with parental class II HLA compatibility and maternal immune activation: preliminary report of a prospective case series. Dermatology. 2011;7(3):206–211.
    1. Geva E, Ginzinger DG, Zaloudek CJ, Moore DH, Byrne A, Jaffe RB. Human placental vascular development: vasculogenic and angiogenic (branching and nonbranching) transformation is regulated by vascular endothelial growth factor-A, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoietin-2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;7(9):4213–4224.
    1. Noonan DM, De Lerma BA, Vannini N, Mortara L, Albini A. Inflammation, inflammatory cells and angiogenesis: decisions and indecisions. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008;7(1):31–40.
    1. White AC, Lavine KJ, Ornitz DM. FGF9 and SHH regulate mesenchymal Vegfa expression and development of the pulmonary capillary network. Development. 2007;7(20):3743–3752.
    1. Hayashi H, Sano H, Seo S, Kume T. The Foxc2 transcription factor regulates angiogenesis via induction of integrin beta3 expression. J Biol Chem. 2008;7(35):23791–23800.
    1. Luhmann UF, Neidhardt J, Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Schafer NF, Glaus E, Feil S, Berger W. Vascular changes in the cerebellum of Norrin/Ndph knockout mice correlate with high expression of Norrin and Frizzled-4. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;7(10):2619–2628.
    1. Cao Y, Linden P, Farnebo J, Cao R, Eriksson A, Kumar V, Qi JH, Claesson-Welsh L, Alitalo K. Vascular endothelial growth factor C induces angiogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;7(24):14389–14394.
    1. Karkkainen MJ, Petrova TV. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in the regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Oncogene. 2000;7(49):5598–5605.
    1. Sepúlveda WH GC, Cruz MA, Rudolph MI. Vasoconstrictive effect of bile acids on isolated human placental chorionic veins. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991;7(3):5.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa