A phase I/II trial of intraoperative breast radiotherapy in an Asian population: 10-year results with critical evaluation

Mariko Kawamura, Yoshiyuki Itoh, Takeshi Kamomae, Masataka Sawaki, Toyone Kikumori, Nobuyuki Tsunoda, Junji Ito, Yoshie Shimoyama, Hiroko Satake, Shinji Naganawa, Mariko Kawamura, Yoshiyuki Itoh, Takeshi Kamomae, Masataka Sawaki, Toyone Kikumori, Nobuyuki Tsunoda, Junji Ito, Yoshie Shimoyama, Hiroko Satake, Shinji Naganawa

Abstract

Although phase III trials have been published comparing whole breast irradiation (WBI) with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), long-term follow-up results are lacking. We report the 10-year follow-up results of a prospective phase I/II clinical trial of IORT. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) tumor size <2.5 cm, (ii) desire for breast-conserving surgery, (iii) age >50 years, (iv) negative margins after resection and (v) sentinel lymph node-negative disease. A single dose of IORT (19-21 Gy) was delivered to the tumor bed in the operation room just after wide local excision of the primary breast cancer using a 6-12 MeV electron beam. Local recurrence was defined as recurrence or new disease within the treated breast and was evaluated annually using mammography and ultrasonography. A total of 32 patients were eligible for evaluation. The median patient age was 65 years and the median follow-up time was 10 years. Two patients experienced local recurrence just under the nipple, out of the irradiated field, after 8 years of follow-up. Three patients had contralateral breast cancer and one patient experienced bone metastasis after 10 years of follow-up. No patient experienced in-field recurrence nor breast cancer death. Eight patients had hypertrophic scarring at the last follow-up. There were no lung or heart adverse effects. This is the first report of 10-year follow-up results of IORT as APBI. The findings suggest that breast cancer with extended intraductal components should be treated with great caution.

Keywords: APBI; IORT; breast cancer; local control; long follow-up.

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Local control rate.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and pathological images of the primary tumor of patient #2 in Table 2 who had recurrence after 8 years follow-up. Axial view of delayed-phase (~5 min after gadolinium injection) T1-weighted image (left) shows linear enhancement toward nipple. She was diagnosed to have invasive cT1c tumor with extensive intraductal components. However, the resected specimen had intraductal components only (right).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI images of patients #1 and #2 (Table 2) at first presentation and MRI or CT image at recurrence. (A) Sagittal view of delayed-phase (~5 min after gadolinium injection) T1-weighted image (T1WI) of primary tumor at first presentation. Patient #1: a small enhanced nodule (↑) is captured in the nipple direction which indicates the EIC of the primary tumor (*). Patient #2: a 1.2 cm enhanced tumor is captured. In this view, the EIC is not completely clear, but as shown in Fig. 2, the axial view is suspected of having EIC. (B) Delayed-phase T1WI (achieved in the prone position) of patient #1 at recurrence and contrast enhanced CT image (achieved in the supine position) of patient #2 at recurrence. Enhanced tumor just under the nipple is captured in both patients.

References

    1. Strnad V, Ott OJ, Hildebrandt G et al. . 5-year results of accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation with boost after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: A randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2016;387:229–38.
    1. Livi L, Meattini I, Marrazzo L et al. . Accelerated partial breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus whole breast irradiation: 5-year survival analysis of a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Cancer 2015;51:451–63.
    1. Njeh CF, Saunders MW, Langton CM. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): A review of available techniques. Radiation Oncology 2010;5.
    1. Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Maisonneuve P et al. . Intraoperative radiotherapy versus external radiotherapy for early breast cancer (ELIOT): A randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet Oncology 2013;14:1269–77.
    1. Vaidya JS, Wenz F, Bulsara M et al. . Risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast radiotherapy for breast cancer: 5-year results for local control and overall survival from the TARGIT-A randomised trial. Lancet 2014;383:603–13.
    1. Smith BD, Arthur DW, Buchholz TA et al. . Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the AMERICAN SOCIETY for radiation ONCOLOGY (ASTRO). International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 2009;74:987–1001.
    1. Correa C, Harris EE, Leonardi MC et al. . Accelerated partial breast irradiation: Executive summary for the update of an ASTRO evidence-based consensus statement. Practical Radiation Oncology 2017;7:73–9.
    1. Kawamura M, Itoh Y, Sawaki M et al. . A phase I/II trial of intraoperative breast radiotherapy in an Asian population: 5-year results of local control and cosmetic outcome. Radiation Oncology 2015;10.
    1. Sawaki M, Sato S, Noda S et al. . Phase I/II study of intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer 2012;19:353–9.
    1. Oshima T, Aoyama Y, Shimozato T et al. . An experimental attenuation plate to improve the dose distribution in intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy for breast cancer. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2009;54:3491–500.
    1. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplantation 2013;48:452–8.
    1. Sawaki M, Miyamoto T, Fujisawa T et al. . Multicenter phase II study of intraoperative radiotherapy of early breast cancer: Ipsilateral tumor recurrence. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2019;26:2428–34.
    1. Salvadori B, Marubini E, Miceli R et al. . Reoperation for locally recurrent breast cancer in patients previously treated with conservative surgery. British Journal of Surgery 1999;86:84–7.
    1. Holliday EB, Kirsner SM, Thames HD et al. . Lower mean heart dose with deep inspiration breath hold-whole breast irradiation compared with brachytherapy-based accelerated partial breast irradiation for women with left-sided tumors. Practical Radiation Oncology 2017;7:80–5.
    1. Whelan TJ, Pignol JP, Levine MN et al. . Long-term results of Hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;362:513–20.
    1. Smith BD, Bellon JR, Blitzblau R et al. . Radiation therapy for the whole breast: Executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline. Practical Radiation Oncology 2018;8:145–52.
    1. Nozaki M, Kagami Y, Shibata T et al. . A primary analysis of a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, confirmatory trial of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery in Japan: JCOG0906. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2019;49:57–62.
    1. Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P et al. . Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2013;368:987–98.
    1. Jacobse JN, Duane FK, Boekel NB et al. . Radiation dose-response for risk of myocardial infarction in breast cancer survivors. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 2019;103:595–604.
    1. Kunkler IH, Williams LJ, Jack WJL et al. . Breast-conserving surgery with or without irradiation in women aged 65 years or older with early breast cancer (PRIME II): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncology 2015;16:266–73.
    1. Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Bellon JR et al. . Lumpectomy plus Tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: Long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2013;31:2382–7.
    1. Niessen FB, Spauwen PHM, Schalkwijk J et al. . On the nature of hypertrophic scars and keloids: A review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1999;104:1435–58.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa