Single unit hyperactivity and bursting in the auditory thalamus of awake rats directly correlates with behavioural evidence of tinnitus

Bopanna I Kalappa, Thomas J Brozoski, Jeremy G Turner, Donald M Caspary, Bopanna I Kalappa, Thomas J Brozoski, Jeremy G Turner, Donald M Caspary

Abstract

Tinnitus is an auditory percept without an environmental acoustic correlate. Contemporary tinnitus models hypothesize tinnitus to be a consequence of maladaptive plasticity-induced disturbance of excitation-inhibition homeostasis, possibly convergent on medial geniculate body (MGB, auditory thalamus) and related neuronal networks. The MGB is an obligate acoustic relay in a unique position to gate auditory signals to higher-order auditory and limbic centres. Tinnitus-related maladaptive plastic changes of MGB-related neuronal networks may affect the gating function of MGB and enhance gain in central auditory and non-auditory neuronal networks, resulting in tinnitus. The present study examined the discharge properties of MGB neurons in the sound-exposure gap inhibition animal model of tinnitus. MGB single unit responses were obtained from awake unexposed controls and sound-exposed adult rats with behavioural evidence of tinnitus. MGB units in animals with tinnitus exhibited enhanced spontaneous firing, altered burst properties and increased rate-level function slope when driven by broadband noise and tones at the unit's characteristic frequency. Elevated patterns of neuronal activity and altered bursting showed a significant positive correlation with animals' tinnitus scores. Altered activity of MGB neurons revealed additional features of auditory system plasticity associated with tinnitus, which may provide a testable assay for future therapeutic and diagnostic development.

© 2014 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2014 The Physiological Society.

Figures

Figure 1. Example of thionin-stained coronal section…
Figure 1. Example of thionin-stained coronal section containing medial geniculate body (MGB)
White dashed line represents the electrode track passing through dorsal (dMGB) and ventral MGB (vMGB) demarcated by dashed red lines. Scale bar = 500 μm. CA = Cornu Ammonis.
Figure 2. Characteristic frequencies (CFs) and thresholds…
Figure 2. Characteristic frequencies (CFs) and thresholds of MGB units recorded from unexposed control animals and sound-exposed animals with behavioural evidence of tinnitus (tinnitus animals)
A, scatter plot of individual MGB unit thresholds at their CF from control (blue) and tinnitus (red) rats. B, average threshold at CF of MGB units recorded from control (blue) and tinnitus (red) rats did not exhibit any significant difference (P = 0.234; unpaired t test, two-tailed). +, Mean firing threshold. Error bars represent SEM.
Figure 3. Spontaneous firing rates (SFRs) of…
Figure 3. Spontaneous firing rates (SFRs) of MGB units recorded from unexposed control (control animals) and sound-exposed animals with behavioural evidence of tinnitus (tinnitus animals)
A, average SFRs of MGB units recorded from tinnitus animals (9.09 ± 0.9423; red, six animals) were significantly elevated (P = 0.0005; unpaired t test, two-tailed) in comparison to controls (4.68 ± 0.48; blue, nine animals). +, Mean SFR. B, scatter plot of average SFR of MGB units recorded from individual animals (y-axis) Showing a significant correlation (y = 1.830x + 4.812, P = 0.004; Pearson correlation coefficient) with the animals’ tinnitus z-scores (x-axis). Blue and red squares represent control and sound-exposed animals, respectively. Error bars represent SEM.
Figure 4. Spontaneous bursting activity of MGB…
Figure 4. Spontaneous bursting activity of MGB units recorded from unexposed control (control animals) and sound-exposed animals with behavioural evidence of tinnitus (tinnitus animals)
A, C and E, MGB units recorded from tinnitus animals (red; six animals) exhibited significantly elevated, average bursts per minute (P = 0.0001) (A), average spikes in a burst (P = 0.009) (C) and average burst duration (P = 0.043) (E) compared to control rats (blue; nine animals). Unpaired t test was used to determine the statistical significance between the two groups. +, Mean of the test variable. B, D and F, scatter plots of average burst variables (y-axis) of MGB units from individual animals against that an animal's tinnitus z-score (x-axis). A significant correlation (y = 11.98x + 9.619, P = 0.001) was observed between average bursts per minute and animals’ tinnitus scores (B). However, average spikes in burst (P = 0.082) (D) and average burst duration (P = 0.237) (F) did not exhibit significant correlation with the animals’ tinnitus z-scores. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine statistical significance of the correlations. Blue and red squares represent control and sound-exposed animals, respectively. Error bars represent SEM.
Figure 5. Rate-level functions comparing average responses…
Figure 5. Rate-level functions comparing average responses of MGB units to broadband noise (BBN) from unexposed control animals (blue; eight animals) with sound-exposed animals with behavioural evidence of tinnitus (red; six animals)
AE, rate-level function of MGB units in response to BBN stimuli. A, significant (unpaired t test) increase in average firing rates of MGB units was observed in tinnitus rats (red) at intensities of 0 dB (P = 0.001), 20 dB (P = 0.006), 50 dB (P = 0.025), 60 dB (P = 0.002), 70 dB (P = 0.024) and 80 dB (P = 0.049) compared to control rats (blue). Average firing rates were not significantly different at other intensities. BE, scatter plots of average firing rates of MGB units (y-axis) from individual animals in response to BBN stimuli at different intensities against that animal's tinnitus z-score. A significant correlation was observed between average firing rates and animals’ tinnitus scores at 60 dB (C) (y = 10.21x + 20.53, P = 0.002), 70 dB (D) (y = 9.707x + 29.13, P = 0.014) and 80 dB (E) (y = 10.39x + 38.92, P = 0.017) but not at 30 dB (B). In all the plots, blue and red squares represent control and sound-exposed animals, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine statistical significance of the correlations. Error bars represent SEM.
Figure 6. Rate-level functions comparing average responses…
Figure 6. Rate-level functions comparing average responses of MGB units to individual unit's CF from unexposed control animals (blue; nine animals) with sound-exposed animals with behavioural evidence of tinnitus (red; six animals)
A–E, rate-level function of MGB units in response to unit's CF. A, significant increase (unpaired t test) in average firing rates of MGB units was observed at 10 dB (P = 0.027), 40 dB (P = 0.048), 50 dB (P = 0.025), 60 dB (P = 0.035), 70 dB (P = 0.036) and 80 dB (P = 0.012) in tinnitus rats (red) compared to control rats (blue). Average firing rates were not significantly different at intensities of 30 dB and below. BE, scatter plots of average firing rate of MGB units recorded from individual animals in response to CF stimuli (y-axis) at different intensities against that animal's tinnitus z-score. Significant correlations were observed at 60 dB (C) (y = 10.47x + 20.71, P = 0.011), 70 dB (D) (y = 10.23x + 31.18, P = 0.015) and 80 dB (E) (y = 11.64x + 39.75, P = 0.012) but not at 30 dB (B). In all the plots, blue and red squares represent control and sound-exposed animals, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine statistical significance of the correlations. Error bars represent SEM.

References

    1. Axelsson A. Ringdahl A. Tinnitus–a study of its prevalence and characteristics. Br J Audiol. 1989;23:53–62.
    1. Bajo VM, Rouiller EM, Welker E, Clarke S, Villa AE, de Ribaupierre Y. de Ribaupierre F. Morphology and spatial distribution of corticothalamic terminals originating from the cat auditory cortex. Hear Res. 1995;83:161–174.
    1. Bartlett EL. The organization and physiology of the auditory thalamus and its role in processing acoustic features important for speech perception. Brain Lang. 2013;126:29–48.
    1. Bartlett EL. Smith PH. Anatomic, intrinsic, and synaptic properties of dorsal and ventral division neurons in rat medial geniculate body. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81:1999–2016.
    1. Bartlett EL. Wang X. Neural representations of temporally modulated signals in the auditory thalamus of awake primates. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:1005–1017.
    1. Bartlett EL. Wang X. Correlation of neural response properties with auditory thalamus subdivisions in the awake marmoset. J Neurophysiol. 2011;105:2647–2667.
    1. Bauer CA, Brozoski TJ, Rojas R, Boley J. Wyder M. Behavioural model of chronic tinnitus in rats. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;121:457–462.
    1. Bauer CA, Turner JG, Caspary DM, Myers KS. Brozoski TJ. Tinnitus and inferior colliculus activity in chinchillas related to three distinct patterns of cochlear trauma. J Neurosci Res. 2008;86:2564–2578.
    1. Brickley SG. Mody I. Extrasynaptic GABAA receptors: their function in the CNS and implications for disease. Neuron. 2012;73:23–34.
    1. Bright DP, Aller MI. Brickley SG. Synaptic release generates a tonic GABAA receptor-mediated conductance that modulates burst precision in thalamic relay neurons. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2560–2569.
    1. Brozoski TJ, Bauer CA. Caspary DM. Elevated fusiform cell activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of chinchillas with psychophysical evidence of tinnitus. J Neurosci. 2002;22:2383–2390.
    1. Caspary DM, Schatteman TA. Hughes LF. Age-related changes in the inhibitory response properties of dorsal cochlear nucleus output neurons: role of inhibitory inputs. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10952–10959.
    1. Cooper Jr JC. Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 1971–75: Part II. Tinnitus, subjective hearing loss, and well-being. J Am Acad Audiol. 1994;5:37–43.
    1. Cope DW, Hughes SW. Crunelli V. GABAA receptor-mediated tonic inhibition in thalamic neurons. J Neurosci. 2005;25:11553–11563.
    1. Dong S, Rodger J, Mulders WH. Robertson D. Tonotopic changes in GABA receptor expression in guinea pig inferior colliculus after partial unilateral hearing loss. Brain Res. 2010;1342:24–32.
    1. Eggermont JJ. Hearing loss, hyperacusis, or tinnitus: what is modelled in animal research? Hear Res. 2013;295:140–149.
    1. Engineer ND, Moller AR. Kilgard MP. Directing neural plasticity to understand and treat tinnitus. Hear Res. 2013;295:58–66.
    1. Engineer ND, Riley JR, Seale JD, Vrana WA, Shetake JA, Sudanagunta SP, Borland MS. Kilgard MP. Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature. 2011;470:101–104.
    1. Finlayson PG. Kaltenbach JA. Alterations in the spontaneous discharge patterns of single units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus following intense sound exposure. Hear Res. 2009;256:104–117.
    1. Grace AA. Bunney BS. The control of firing pattern in nigral dopamine neurons: burst firing. J Neurosci. 1984;4:2877–2890.
    1. Henry JA, Roberts LE, Caspary DM, Theodoroff SM. Salvi RJ. Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25:5–22.
    1. Ison JR, Bowen GP, Pak J. Gutierrez E. Changes in the strength of prepulse inhibition with variation in the startle baseline associated with individual differences and with old age in rats and mice. Psychobiology. 1997;25:266–274.
    1. Jeanmonod D, Magnin M. Morel A. Low-threshold calcium spike bursts in the human thalamus. Common physiopathology for sensory, motor and limbic positive symptoms. Brain. 1996;119:363–375.
    1. Kaltenbach JA. Tinnitus: models and mechanisms. Hear Res. 2011;276:52–60.
    1. Kaltenbach JA, Zacharek MA, Zhang J. Frederick S. Activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of hamsters previously tested for tinnitus following intense tone exposure. Neurosci Lett. 2004;355:121–125.
    1. Kaltenbach JA. Zhang J. Intense sound-induced plasticity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of rats: evidence for cholinergic receptor upregulation. Hear Res. 2007;226:232–243.
    1. Kamke MR, Brown M. Irvine DR. Plasticity in the tonotopic organization of the medial geniculate body in adult cats following restricted unilateral cochlear lesions. J Comp Neurol. 2003;459:355–367.
    1. Krahe TE. Guido W. Homeostatic plasticity in the visual thalamus by monocular deprivation. J Neurosci. 2011;31:6842–6849.
    1. Leaver AM, Renier L, Chevillet MA, Morgan S, Kim HJ. Rauschecker JP. Dysregulation of limbic and auditory networks in tinnitus. Neuron. 2011;69:33–43.
    1. LeDoux JE, Farb CR. Romanski LM. Overlapping projections to the amygdala and striatum from auditory processing areas of the thalamus and cortex. Neurosci Lett. 1991;134:139–144.
    1. Lee CC. Winer JA. Connections of cat auditory cortex: I. Thalamocortical system. J Comp Neurol. 2008;507:1879–1900.
    1. Li S, Choi V. Tzounopoulos T. Pathogenic plasticity of Kv7.2/3 channel activity is essential for the induction of tinnitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:9980–9985.
    1. Llano DA, Turner J. Caspary DM. Diminished cortical inhibition in an aging mouse model of chronic tinnitus. J Neurosci. 2012;32:16141–16148.
    1. Llinas R, Urbano FJ, Leznik E, Ramirez RR. van Marle HJ. Rhythmic and dysrhythmic thalamocortical dynamics: GABA systems and the edge effect. Trends Neurosci. 2005;28:325–333.
    1. Llinas RR, Ribary U, Jeanmonod D, Kronberg E. Mitra PP. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia: a neurological and neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:15222–15227.
    1. Llinas RR. Steriade M. Bursting of thalamic neurons and states of vigilance. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:3297–3308.
    1. Lockwood AH, Salvi RJ. Burkard RF. Tinnitus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:904–910.
    1. Longenecker RJ. Galazyuk AV. Development of tinnitus in CBA/CaJ mice following sound exposure. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011;12:647–658.
    1. Ma WL, Hidaka H. May BJ. Spontaneous activity in the inferior colliculus of CBA/J mice after manipulations that induce tinnitus. Hear Res. 2006;212:9–21.
    1. Manzoor NF, Chen G. Kaltenbach JA. Suppression of noise-induced hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus following application of the cholinergic agonist, carbachol. Brain Res. 2013a;1523:28–36.
    1. Manzoor NF, Gao Y, Licari F. Kaltenbach JA. Comparison and contrast of noise-induced hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus. Hear Res. 2013b;295:114–123.
    1. Manzoor NF, Licari FG, Klapchar M, Elkin RL, Gao Y, Chen G. Kaltenbach JA. Noise-induced hyperactivity in the inferior colliculus: its relationship with hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108:976–988.
    1. Motts SD. Schofield BR. Cholinergic cells in the tegmentum send branching projections to the inferior colliculus and the medial geniculate body. Neuroscience. 2011;179:120–130.
    1. Muhlau M, Rauschecker JP, Oestreicher E, Gaser C, Rottinger M, Wohlschlager AM, Simon F, Etgen T, Conrad B. Sander D. Structural brain changes in tinnitus. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:1283–1288.
    1. Mulders WH. Robertson D. Hyperactivity in the auditory midbrain after acoustic trauma: dependence on cochlear activity. Neuroscience. 2009;164:733–746.
    1. Mulders WH, Seluakumaran K. Robertson D. Efferent pathways modulate hyperactivity in inferior colliculus. J Neurosci. 2010;30:9578–9587.
    1. Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Klein R, Klein BE. Tweed TS. Prevalence and 5-year incidence of tinnitus among older adults: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;13:323–331.
    1. Norena AJ. Eggermont JJ. Changes in spontaneous neural activity immediately after an acoustic trauma: implications for neural correlates of tinnitus. Hear Res. 2003;183:137–153.
    1. Overton PG. Clark D. Burst firing in midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997;25:312–334.
    1. Pilati N, Large C, Forsythe ID. Hamann M. Acoustic over-exposure triggers burst firing in dorsal cochlear nucleus fusiform cells. Hear Res. 2012;283:98–106.
    1. Rauschecker JP, Leaver AM. Muhlau M. Tuning out the noise: limbic–auditory interactions in tinnitus. Neuron. 2010;66:819–826.
    1. Richardson BD, Brozoski TJ, Ling LL. Caspary DM. Targeting inhibitory neurotransmission in tinnitus. Brain Res. 2012;1485:77–87.
    1. Richardson BD, Hancock KE. Caspary DM. Stimulus-specific adaptation in auditory thalamus of young and aged awake rats. J Neurophysiol. 2013;110:1892–1902.
    1. Roberts LE, Eggermont JJ, Caspary DM, Shore SE, Melcher JR. Kaltenbach JA. Ringing ears: the neuroscience of tinnitus. J Neurosci. 2010;30:14972–14979.
    1. Sametsky ES, Turner JG, Larson D, Ling L. Caspary DM. 2014. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of Association for Research in Otolaryngology & Tinnitus-related changes in GABAA receptor inhibition in rat auditory thalamus.
    1. Shargorodsky J, Curhan GC. Farwell WR. Prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus among US adults. Am J Med. 2010;123:711–718.
    1. Sherman SM. Tonic and burst firing: dual modes of thalamocortical relay. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:122–126.
    1. Su YY, Luo B, Jin Y, Wu SH, Lobarinas E, Salvi RJ. Chen L. Altered neuronal intrinsic properties and reduced synaptic transmission of the rat's medial geniculate body in salicylate-induced tinnitus. PloS ONE. 2012;7:e46 969.
    1. Turner J, Parrish J, Hughes L, Wang H-N, Brozoski T, Bauer C. Caspary D. 2005. Behavioural gap detection deficits in the Fischer Brown Norway (FBN) rat model of presbycusis. Presented at the midwinter meeting of the Association of Research in Otolaryngology in New Orleans, LA.
    1. Turner JG, Brozoski TJ, Bauer CA, Parrish JL, Myers K, Hughes LF. Caspary DM. Gap detection deficits in rats with tinnitus: a potential novel screening tool. Behav Neurosci. 2006;120:188–195.
    1. van Gendt MJ, Boyen K, de Kleine E, Langers DR. van Dijk P. The relation between perception and brain activity in gaze-evoked tinnitus. J Neurosci. 2012;32:17528–17539.
    1. Varela C. Sherman SM. Differences in response to muscarinic activation between first and higher order thalamic relays. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:3538–3547.
    1. Varela C. Sherman SM. Differences in response to serotonergic activation between first and higher order thalamic nuclei. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:1776–1786.
    1. Vogler DP, Robertson D. Mulders WH. Hyperactivity in the ventral cochlear nucleus after cochlear trauma. J Neurosci. 2011;31:6639–6645.
    1. Wang H, Brozoski TJ, Turner JG, Ling L, Parrish JL, Hughes LF. Caspary DM. Plasticity at glycinergic synapses in dorsal cochlear nucleus of rats with behavioural evidence of tinnitus. Neuroscience. 2009;164:747–759.
    1. Winer JA, Kelly JB. Larue DT. Neural architecture of the rat medial geniculate body. Hear Res. 1999;130:19–41.
    1. Winer JA. Larue DT. Patterns of reciprocity in auditory thalamocortical and corticothalamic connections: study with horseradish peroxidase and autoradiographic methods in the rat medial geniculate body. J Comp Neurol. 1987;257:282–315.
    1. Winer JA. Lee CC. The distributed auditory cortex. Hear Res. 2007;229:3–13.
    1. Winer JA, Miller LM, Lee CC. Schreiner CE. Auditory thalamocortical transformation: structure and function. Trends Neurosci. 2005;28:255–263.
    1. Winer JA, Schreiner CE. Edeline J-M. The Auditory Cortex. New York: Springer; 2011. Physiological properties of neurons in the medial geniculate Body; pp. 251–274. Winer JA & Schreiner CE.
    1. Yang G, Lobarinas E, Zhang L, Turner J, Stolzberg D, Salvi R. Sun W. Salicylate induced tinnitus: behavioural measures and neural activity in auditory cortex of awake rats. Hear Res. 2007;226:244–253.
    1. Yang S, Weiner BD, Zhang LS, Cho SJ. Bao S. Homeostatic plasticity drives tinnitus perception in an animal model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:14974–14979.
    1. Yu XJ, Xu XX, He S. He J. Change detection by thalamic reticular neurons. Nature Neurosci. 2009;12:1165–1170.
    1. Zhang J. Auditory cortex stimulation to suppress tinnitus: mechanisms and strategies. Hear Res. 2013;295:38–57.
    1. Zhang JS, Kaltenbach JA, Godfrey DA. Wang J. Origin of hyperactivity in the hamster dorsal cochlear nucleus following intense sound exposure. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:819–831.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa