A randomized controlled trial comparing mupirocin and polysporin triple ointments in peritoneal dialysis patients: the MP3 Study

Rory F McQuillan, Ernest Chiu, Sharon Nessim, Charmaine E Lok, Janet M Roscoe, Paul Tam, Sarbjit Vanita Jassal, Rory F McQuillan, Ernest Chiu, Sharon Nessim, Charmaine E Lok, Janet M Roscoe, Paul Tam, Sarbjit Vanita Jassal

Abstract

Background and objectives: Infectious complications remain a significant cause of peritoneal dialysis (PD) technique failure. Topical ointments seem to reduce peritonitis; however, concerns over resistance have led to a quest for alternative agents. This study examined the effectiveness of applying topical Polysporin Triple ointment (P(3)) against mupirocin in a multi-centered, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: PD patients routinely applied either P(3) or mupirocin ointment to their exit site. Patients were followed for 18 months or until death or catheter removal. The primary study outcome was a composite endpoint of exit-site infection (ESI), tunnel infection, or peritonitis.

Results: Seventy-five of 201 randomized patients experienced a primary outcome event (51 peritonitis episodes, 24 ESIs). No difference was seen in the time to first event for P(3) (13.2 months; 95% confidence interval, 11.9-14.5) and mupirocin (14.0 months; 95% confidence interval, 12.7-15.4) (P=0.41). Twice as many patients reported redness at the exit site in the P(3) group (14 versus 6, P=0.10). Over the complete study period, a higher rate per year of fungal ESIs was seen in patients using P(3) (0.07 versus 0.01; P=0.02) with a corresponding increase in fungal peritonitis (0.04 versus 0.00, respectively; P<0.05).

Conclusions: This study shows that P(3) is not superior to mupirocin in the prophylaxis of PD-related infections. Colonization of the exit site with fungal organisms is of concern and warrants further study. As such, the use of P(3) over mupirocin is not advocated in the prophylaxis of PD-related infections.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram showing patient recruitment and follow-up. HD, hemodialysis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier graph showing time to primary end point (catheter-related infection). Solid line indicates mupirocin; dashed line, P3 ointment. PD, peritoneal dialysis; Mup, mupirocin; P3, Polysporin Triple.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa