Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?

Blair Henry, Adic Perez, Sandy Trpcic, Sandro Rizoli, Barto Nascimento, Blair Henry, Adic Perez, Sandy Trpcic, Sandro Rizoli, Barto Nascimento

Abstract

Background: This article presents the results of a community consultation (CC) process completed in Toronto, Ontario, using a random digit dialling technique, on the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of exception from informed consent when conducting emergency research involving the use of massive blood transfusions.

Methods: In 2012, our hospital conducted a CC, using a random digit dialling technique, to elicit the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of an exemption from informed consent for an upcoming clinical trial. A total of 500 participants from high violent crime areas were interviewed as part of this consultation.

Results: The response rate for the telephone survey was 54%. Participants indicated a personal acceptance rate of 76%, acceptance of the justification for the exception to consent at 81%, thatthe study would meet the best interest of patients and the community at 81% and that youth (between 15 and 18 years) could be enrolled at 71%. When offered, no participant requested an opt-out wrist band to avoid being enrolled in this study.

Discussion: The use of violent crime neighborhoods to locate at risk communities was not effective in identifying the appropriate community of interest for this study. Though only representing a small subpopulation from a large Canadian city, the attitudes noted here is suggestive that Canadians may have a similar level of acceptance as the US based on published studies. However, given the resources needed to undertake this process and that in the end it did not elicit any useful feedback or recommendations for enhancing the safety of participants, the future use of phone surveys as a means of engaging communities should be reconsidered.

Level of evidence level v: This is a retrospective subanalysis of a CC using a randomized phone dialling technique from a site prior to the start of the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios Trial. The CC was not designed specifically for research purposes and as such reflect only a case study from a single center.

Trial registration number: Pre-result, NCT01545232.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Blackford MG, Falletta L, Andrews DA, Reed MD. A burn center paradigm to fulfill deferred consent public disclosure and community consultation requirements for emergency care research. Burns 2012;38:807–12.
    1. McClure KB, DeIorio NM, Gunnels MD, Ochsner MJ, Biros MH, Schmidt TA. Attitudes of emergency department patients and visitors regarding emergency exception from informed consent in resuscitation research, community consultation, and public notification. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:352–9.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for, institutional review boards, clinical investigators and sponsors: exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research. Rockville, MD: US Food and Drug Administration, 2013.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Title 21 (Code of Federal Regulations), Part 50.24 protection of human subjects. 1996;2004.
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement. Ethical Conduct for Research Involving humans, (TCPS2) December 2010.
    1. Halperin H, Paradis N, Mosesso V, Nichol G, Sayre M, Ornato JP, Gerardi M, Nadkarni VM, Berg R, Becker L, et al. . Recommendations for implementation of community consultation and public disclosure under the Food and Drug Administration's “Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research”: a special report from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative and Critical Care: endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 2007;116:1855–63.
    1. Dickert NW, Kass NE. Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: a study of survivors of sudden cardiac death. Soc Sci Med 2009;68:183–91.
    1. Baraniuk S, Tilley BC, del Junco DJ, Fox EE, van Belle G, Wade CE, Podbielski JM, Beeler AM, Hess JR, Bulger EM, et al. . Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial: design, rationale and implementation. Injury 2014;45:1287–95.
    1. Statistics Canada. 2006 Community Profiles. Toronto Ontario: (accessed Feb 2012).
    1. Biros MH. The people speak: community consultation in emergency research. Ann Emerg Med 2011;57:355–6.
    1. Fehr AE, Pentz RD, Dickert NW. Learning from experience: a systematic review of community consultation acceptance data. Ann Emerg Med 2015;65:162–71.
    1. Dickert NW, Govindarajan P, Harney D, Silbergleit R, Sugarman J, Weinfurt KP, Pentz RD. Community consultation for prehospital research: experiences of study coordinators and principal investigators. Prehosp Emerg Care 2014;18:274–81.
    1. Blixen CE, Agich GJ. Stroke patients' preferences and values about emergency research. J Med Ethics 2005;31:608–11.
    1. Abboud PA, Heard K, Al-Marshad AA, Lowenstein SR. What determines whether patients are willing to participate in resuscitation studies requiring exception from informed consent? J Med Ethics 2006;32:468–72.
    1. Chin TL, Moore EE, Coors ME, Chandler JG, Ghasabyan A, Harr JN, Stringham JR, Ramos CR, Ammons S, Banerjee A, et al. . Exploring ethical conflicts in emergency trauma research: the COMBAT (Control of Major Bleeding after Trauma) study experience. Surgery 2015;157:10–19.
    1. Biros MH, Sargent C, Miller K. Community attitudes towards emergency research and exception from informed consent. Resuscitation 2009;80:1382–7.
    1. Silbergleit R, Biros MH, Harney D, Dickert N, Baren J. Implementation of the exception from informed consent regulations in a large multicenter emergency clinical trials network: the RAMPART experience. Acad Emerg Med 2012;19:448–54.
    1. Sims CA, Isserman JA, Holena D, Sundaram LM, Tolstoy N, Greer S, Sonnad S, Pascual J, Reilly P. Exception from informed consent for emergency research: consulting the trauma community. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:157–65.
    1. Bulger EM, Schmidt TA, Cook AJ, Brasel KJ, Griffiths DE, Kudenchuk PJ, Davis D, Bardarson B, Idris AH, Aufderheide TP. The random dialing survey as a tool for community consultation for research involving the emergency medicine exception from informed consent. Ann Emerg Med 2009;53:341–50.
    1. Shah AN, Sugarman J. Protecting research subjects under the waiver of informed consent for emergency research: experiences with efforts to inform the community. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41:72–8.
    1. Mosesso VN, Brown LH, Greene HL, Schmidt TA, Aufderheide TP, Sayre MR, Stephens SW, Travers A, Craven RA, et al. . Conducting research using the emergency exception from informed consent: the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial experience. Resuscitation 2004;61:29–36.
    1. Govindarajan P, Dickert NW, Meeker M, De Souza N, Harney D, Hemphill CJ, Pentz R. Emergency research: using exception from informed consent, evaluation of community consultations. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20:98–103.
    1. Nelson MJ, Deiorio NM, Schmidt TA, Zive DM, Griffiths D, Newgard CD. Why persons choose to opt out of an exception from informed consent cardiac arrest trial. Resuscitation 2013;84:825–30.
    1. Nelson M, Schmidt TA, DeIorio NM, McConnell KJ, Griffiths DE, McClure KB. Community consultation methods in a study using exception to informed consent. Prehosp Emerg Care 2008;12:417–25.
    1. Kleindorfer D, Lindsell CJ, Alwell K, Woo D, Flaherty ML, Eilerman J, Khatri P, Adeoye O, Ferioli S, Kissela BM. Ischemic stroke survivors' opinion regarding research utilizing exception from informed consent. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;32:321–6.
    1. Sims CA, Isserman JA, Holena D, Sundaram LM, Tolstoy N, Greer S, Sonnad S, Pascual J, Reilly P. Exception from informed consent for emergency research: consulting the trauma community. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:157–65.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa