Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Childhood Pharmacoresistant Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Narong Auvichayapat, Katenipa Sinsupan, Orathai Tunkamnerdthai, Paradee Auvichayapat, Narong Auvichayapat, Katenipa Sinsupan, Orathai Tunkamnerdthai, Paradee Auvichayapat

Abstract

Background: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe childhood epileptic syndrome with high pharmacoresistance. The treatment outcomes are still unsatisfied. Our previous study of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in children with focal epilepsy showed significant reduction in epileptiform discharges. We hypothesized that cathodal tDCS when applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) combined with pharmacologic treatment will be more effective for reducing seizure frequency in patients with LGS than pharmacologic treatment alone.

Materials and methods: Study participants were randomized to receive either (1) pharmacologic treatment with five consecutive days of 2 mA cathodal tDCS over M1 for 20 min or (2) pharmacologic treatment plus sham tDCS. Measures of seizure frequency and epileptic discharges were performed before treatment and again immediately post-treatment and 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-week follow-up.

Result: Twenty-two patients with LGS were enrolled. Participants assigned to the active tDCS condition reported significantly more pre- to post-treatment reductions in seizure frequency and epileptic discharges that were sustained for 3 weeks after treatment.

Conclusion: Five consecutive days of cathodal tDCS over M1 combined with pharmacologic treatment appears to reduce seizure frequency and epileptic discharges. Further studies of the potential mechanisms of tDCS in the LGS are warranted.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02731300 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov).

Keywords: Lennox–Gastaut syndrome; cathodal stimulation; childhood pharmacoresistant epilepsy; transcranial direct current stimulation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image of a single adverse event. Three points of superficial skin burn under the reference electrode in active tDCS group, which resolved within 2 days.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of tDCS on seizure frequency. Data are presented as mean ± SD of number seizure frequency/day at baseline, treatment period (day 1–day 5), and various time points after treatment: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. *p = 0.004, **p = 0.002, and ***p < 0.001 as compared to sham tDCS condition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of tDCS on epileptiform discharges. Data are presented as mean ± SD of number epileptiform discharges per 30 min of EEG recording at baseline, and various time points after treatment: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. **p = 0.005 and ***p < 0.001 as compared to sham tDCS condition.

References

    1. Arzimanoglou A, Guerrini R, Aicardi J. Aicardi’s Epilepsy in Children. 3rd ed Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; (2004). p. 38–50.
    1. Alving J. Classification of the epilepsies. An investigation of 402 children. Acta Neurol Scand (1979) 60:157–63.10.1111/j.1600-0404.1979.tb02963.x
    1. Beaumanoir A. The Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a personal study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl (1982) 35:85–99.
    1. Gastaut H, Dravet C, Loubier D, Glove C, Viani F, Gastaut JA, et al. Evolution Clinique et prognostic du syndrome de Lennox-Gastaut. In: Lugaresi E, Pazzaglia P, Tassinari C, editors. Evolution and Prognosis of Epilepsies. Bologna: Aulo Gaggi; (1973). p. 133–54.
    1. Blume WT. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: potential mechanisms of cognitive regression. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev (2004) 10:150–3.10.1002/mrdd.20029
    1. Hwang PALS, Otsubo H, Riviello JJ, Holmes GL. Age-specific seizure disorders. In: Holmes GL, Moshe SL, Jones HR, editors. Clinical Neurophysiology of Infant, Childhood, and Adolescence. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; (2006). p. 219–51.
    1. Anne TB. Identification of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Neurol Clin (2009) 27:1003–13.10.1016/j.ncl.2009.06.001
    1. Genton P, Dravet C. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. 2nd ed In: Engel J, Pedley TA, editors. Epilepsy a Comprehensive Textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; (2008). p. 2417–27.
    1. Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull (2007) 72:208–14.10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004
    1. Purpura DP, McMurtry JG. Intracellular activities and evoked potential changes during polarization of motor cortex. J Neurophysiol (1965) 28:166–85.
    1. Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art. Brain Stimul (2008) 1:206–23.10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004
    1. Kabakov AY, Muller PA, Pascual-Leone A, Jensen FE, Rotenberg A. Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimul ation in isolated rat hippocampus. J Neurophysiol (2012) 107:1881–9.10.1152/jn.00715.2011
    1. Mattai A, Miller R, Weisinger B, Greenstein D, Bakalar J, Tossell J, et al. Tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in childhood-onset schizophrenia. Brain Stimul (2011) 4:275–80.10.1016/j.brs.2011.01.001
    1. Badawy RA, Macdonell RA, Vogrin SJ, Lai A, Cook MJ. Cortical excitability decreases in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia (2012) 53:1546–53.10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03599.x
    1. Liebetanz D, Klinker F, Hering D, Koch R, Nitsche MA, Potschka H, et al. Anticonvulsant effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in the rat cortical ramp model of focal epilepsy. Epilepsia (2006) 47:1216–24.10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00539.x
    1. Kamida T, Kong S, Eshima N, Abe T, Fujiki M, Kobayashi H. Transcranial direct current stimulation decreases convulsions and spatial memory deficits following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in immature rats. Behav Brain Res (2011) 217:99–103.10.1016/j.bbr.2010.08.050
    1. Fregni F, Thome-Souza S, Nitsche MA, Freedman SD, Valente KD, Pascual-Leone A. A controlled clinical trial of cathodal DC polarization in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia (2006) 47:335–42.10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00426.x
    1. Auvichayapat N, Rotenberg A, Gersner R, Ngodklang S, Tiamkao S, Tassaneeyakul W, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of refractory childhood focal epilepsy. Brain Stimul (2013) 6:696–700.10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.009
    1. Stafstrom CE, Rho JM. Neurophysiology of seizures and epilepsy. 5th ed In: Swaiman KF, Ashwal S, Ferriero DM, Schor NF, editors. Swaiman’s Pediatric Neurology: Principles and Practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders; (2012). p. 711–26.
    1. Lowenstein DH. Seizures and epilepsy. 3rd ed In: Hauser SL, Josephson SA, editors. Harrison’s Neurology in Clinical Medicine. China: McGrawHillEducation; (2013). p. 231–55.
    1. Panayiotopoulos CP. The Epilepsies: Seizures, Syndromes and Management. Oxfordshire: Bladon Medical Publishing; (2005). p. 160.
    1. Bancaud J, Henriksen O, Rubio-Donnadieu F, Seino M, Dreifuss FE, Penry JK. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League against Epilepsy. Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia (1981) 22:489–501.10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb06159.x
    1. Bourgeois BF, Douglass LM, Sankar R. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a consensus approach to differential diagnosis. Epilepsia (2014) 55(4):4–9.10.1111/epi.12567
    1. Yook SW, Park SH, Seo JH, Kim SJ, Ko MH. Suppression of seizure by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in an epileptic patient – a case report. Ann Rehabil Med (2011) 35:579–82.10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.579
    1. Varga ET, Terney D, Atkins MD, Nikanorova M, Jeppesen DS, Uldall P, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in refractory continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep: a controlled study. Epilepsy Res (2011) 97:142–5.10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.07.016
    1. Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, et al. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol (2005) 568:291–303.10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429
    1. Liebetanz D, Fregni F, Monte-Silva KK, Oliveira MB, Amâncio-dos-Santos A, Nitsche MA, et al. After-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cortical spreading depression. Neurosci Lett (2006) 1(398):85–90.10.1016/j.neulet.2005.12.058
    1. Sparing R, Buelte D, Meister IG, Paus T, Fink GR. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies. Hum Brain Mapp (2008) 29:82–96.10.1002/hbm.20360
    1. Herwig U, Satrapi P, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C. Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr (2003) 16:95–9.10.1023/B:BRAT.0000006333.93597.9d

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa