Reducing the nicotine content to make cigarettes less addictive

Neal L Benowitz, Jack E Henningfield, Neal L Benowitz, Jack E Henningfield

Abstract

Nicotine is highly addictive and is primarily responsible for the maintenance of cigarette smoking. In 1994, Benowitz and Henningfield proposed the idea of federal regulation of the nicotine content of cigarettes such that the nicotine content of cigarettes would be reduced over time, resulting in lower intake of nicotine and a lower level of nicotine dependence. When nicotine levels get very low, cigarettes would be much less addictive. As a result, fewer young people who experiment with cigarettes would become addicted adult smokers and previously addicted smokers would find it easier to quit smoking when they attempt to do so. The regulatory authority to promulgate such a public health strategy was provided by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Although it precludes 'reducing nicotine to zero', the act does not prohibit the Food and Drug Administration from setting standards for cigarette nicotine content that would prevent them from being capable of causing addiction. This paper reviews the assumptions implicit in a nicotine reduction strategy, examines the available data on the feasibility and safety of nicotine reduction, and discusses the public education, surveillance and support services that would be needed for the implementation of such a policy.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plasma cotinine concentration over the weeks of the study during progressive reduction of the nicotine content of cigarettes (weeks 1–6) and after returning to usual cigarettes or quitting (weeks 7–10). The bars represent the SEM. Data points represent mean values for 20 subjects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cigarette consumption over the weeks of the study during a progressive reduction of nicotine content of cigarettes (weeks 1–6) and after returning to usual cigarettes or quitting (weeks 7–10).

References

    1. Department of Health and Human Services PHS Preventing tobacco use among young people. A report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1994.
    1. Department of Health and Human Services PHS How tobacco causes disease: the biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease. A report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2010
    1. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products opened for signature.. (accessed 2 Jan 2013)
    1. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation Report on the Scientific Basis of Tobacco Product Regulation: fourth report of a WHO study group. WHO Technical Report Series; No. 967. (accessed 2 Jan 2013)
    1. British American Tobacco Company. RDW. Complexity of the PA 5A machine and variables pool. Minnesota Trial Exhibit 10,392. State of Minnesota et al v. Phlip Morris, Incl, et al. (1959)
    1. Henningfield JE, Benowitz NL, Connolly GN, et al. Reducing tobacco addiction through tobacco product regulation. Tob Control 2004;13:132–5
    1. National Cancer Institute Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. NIH Publication No. 02–5074.. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 2001
    1. Hatsukami DK, Perkins KA, Lesage MG, et al. Nicotine reduction revisited: science and future directions. Tob Control 2010;19:e1–10
    1. Hatsukami DK, Benowitz NL, Donny E, et al. Nicotine reduction: strategic research plan. Nicotine Tob Res Published Online First 15 Nov 2012. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts214
    1. Benowitz NL, Henningfield JE. Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation. N Engl J Med 1994;331:123–5
    1. Hatsukami DK, Kotlyar M, Hertsgaard LA, et al. Reduced nicotine content cigarettes: effects on toxicant exposure, dependence and cessation. Addiction 2010;105:343–55
    1. US Government. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Public Law # 111–31 2009. (accessed 27 Sep 2012)
    1. Benowitz NL. Biomarkers of cigarette smoking. In: Shopland DR, Wilkenfeld J, Henningfield J, Eriksen MP, Modell SD, eds. The FTC cigarette test method for determining tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields for US cigarettes NCI smoking and tobacco control Monograph No 7. NIH Publication No. 96-4028. Bethesda, MD: US National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 1996:93–111
    1. Henningfield JE, Benowitz NL, Slade J, et al. Reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Tob Control 1998;7:281–93
    1. Sofuoglu M, Lesage MG. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The reinforcement threshold for nicotine as a target for tobacco control. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012;125:1–7
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Draft guidance for industry: assessment of abuse potential of drugs. 2010. (accessed 27 Sep 2012)
    1. Carter LP, Griffiths RR. Principles of laboratory assessment of drug abuse liability and implications for clinical development. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009;105(Suppl 1):S14–25
    1. Carter LP, Stitzer ML, Henningfield JE, et al. Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:3241–62
    1. Benowitz NL, Hall SM, Stewart S, et al. Nicotine and carcinogen exposure with smoking of progressively reduced nicotine content cigarette. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:2479–85
    1. Benowitz NL, Dains KM, Hall SM, et al. Smoking behavior and exposure to tobacco toxicants during 6 months of smoking progressively reduced nicotine content cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21:761–9
    1. Rose J, Behm F. Effects of low nicotine content cigarettes on smoke intake. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6:309–19
    1. Donny EC, Houtsmuller E, Stitzer ML. Smoking in the absence of nicotine: behavioral, subjective and physiological effects over 11 days. Addiction 2007;102:324–34
    1. Institute of Medicine Ending the tobacco problem: a blueprint for the nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2007
    1. Benowitz NL, ed. Nicotine safety and toxicity. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998
    1. Warner KE, Slade J, Sweanor DT. The emerging market for long-term nicotine maintenance. JAMA 1997;278:1087–92
    1. Warner KE, Peck CC, Woosley RL, et al. Treatment of tobacco dependence: innovative regulatory approaches to reduce death and disease: preface. Food Drug Law J 1998;53(Suppl):1–8
    1. Slade J, Henningfield JE. Tobacco product regulation: context and issues. Food Drug Law J 1998;53(Suppl):43–74
    1. Henningfield JE, Slade J. Tobacco-dependence medications: public health and regulatory issues. Food Drug Law J 1998;53(Suppl):75–114
    1. Koop CE. Preface. In: Boyle P, Gray N, Henningfield J, Seffrin J, Zatonski W, eds. Tobacco and public health: science and policy. 2nd edn Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010:v-xvii.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa