Guidelines for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA)

Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Victor Chong, Anat Loewenstein, Michael Larsen, Eric Souied, Reinier Schlingemann, Bora Eldem, Jordi Monés, Gisbert Richard, Francesco Bandello, European Society of Retina Specialists, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Victor Chong, Anat Loewenstein, Michael Larsen, Eric Souied, Reinier Schlingemann, Bora Eldem, Jordi Monés, Gisbert Richard, Francesco Bandello, European Society of Retina Specialists

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is still referred to as the leading cause of severe and irreversible visual loss world-wide. The disease has a profound effect on quality of life of affected individuals and represents a major socioeconomic challenge for societies due to the exponential increase in life expectancy and environmental risks. Advances in medical research have identified vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as an important pathophysiological player in neovascular AMD and intraocular inhibition of VEGF as one of the most efficient therapies in medicine. The wide introduction of anti-VEGF therapy has led to an overwhelming improvement in the prognosis of patients affected by neovascular AMD, allowing recovery and maintenance of visual function in the vast majority of patients. However, the therapeutic benefit is accompanied by significant economic investments, unresolved medicolegal debates about the use of off-label substances and overwhelming problems in large population management. The burden of disease has turned into a burden of care with a dissociation of scientific advances and real-world clinical performance. Simultaneously, ground-breaking innovations in diagnostic technologies, such as optical coherence tomography, allows unprecedented high-resolution visualisation of disease morphology and provides a promising horizon for early disease detection and efficient therapeutic follow-up. However, definite conclusions from morphologic parameters are still lacking, and valid biomarkers have yet to be identified to provide a practical base for disease management. The European Society of Retina Specialists offers expert guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic management of neovascular AMD supporting healthcare givers and doctors in providing the best state-of-the-art care to their patients.

Trial registration number: NCT01318941.

Keywords: Retina.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classic choroidal neovascularisation is located above, the retinal pigment epithelium layer and is associated with intraretinal cystoid spaces and/or subretinal fluid. Due to its subretinal location, the neovascular net is delineated with distinct margins. Leakage in late-phase angiography confirms the biologic activity of the lesion (ophthalmoscopy, spectral domain-optical coherence tomography, early fluorescein angiography (FA), late FA).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Occult choroidal neovascularisation is located underneath the retinal pigment epithelium layer. By fluorescein angiography (FA), an area of stippled, or pinpoint hyperfluorescence with leakage in late phases, are seen. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) (right lower image) may visualise the neovascular pattern of the occult lesion (ophthalmoscopy, early FA, late FA, ICGA).
Figure 3
Figure 3
A retinal angiomatous proliferation is characterised by an early hyperfluorescent spot at the level of the retinal vasculature, mostly at the site of a focal haemorrhage and progressive intraretinal leakage. The concomitant optical coherence tomography scan reveals a pigment epithelium detachment and intraretinal cystoid expansions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Marked intraretinal exudates and/or haemorrhage seen clinically are associated with multiple hyperfluorescent polyps angiographically in polypoidal chorioidopathy. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) is often helpful in delineating the polypoidal components despite haemorrhage (ophthalmoscopy, early fluorescein angiography (FA), ICGA, late FA).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) reveals a fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment and a serous retinal detachment in a patient with age-related macular degeneration affected by a type 1 choroidal neovascularisation (scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, SD-OCT).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Fluorescein angiography (FA) and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) identify a minimally classic choroidal neovascularisation with the classic component in the nasal portion of the macular area and the occult component in the temporal area (FA, SD-OCT).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features of type 2 (classic) choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) associated with exudative age-related macular degeneration are shown: fluorescein angiography (FA) visualises a small type 2 neovascular membrane. On SD-OCT, CNV appears between the retina and the retinal pigment epithelium, associated with some exudative cystoid spaces and increased central retinal thickness. (FA, SD-OCT).
Figure 8
Figure 8
In retinal angiomatous proliferation, fluorescein angiography (FA) shows a hot-spot in the macular area. On spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a focal pigment epithelial detachment and intraretinal cystoid spaces are the pathognomonic features. (FA, SD-OCT).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features of polypoidal choroidopathy are shown: Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) identifies a hyperfluorescent polypoidal lesion. A punctuate haemorrhage associated with the hot-spot on angiography suggests a retinal angiomatous proliferation. SD-OCT shows a dome-shaped elevation, the sign of a polypoidal lesion. (ICGA, scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, SD-OCT).
Figure 10
Figure 10
MARINA study. (A) Rate of loss or gain of visual acuity at 12 and 24 months associated with ranibizumab, as compared with sham injection. At 12 months, mean increases in visual acuity were +6.5 letters in the 0.3 mg group and +7.2 letters in the 0.5 mg group, as compared with a decrease of –10.4 letters in the sham-injection group (p

Figure 11

ANCHOR study. Mean (±SE) changes…

Figure 11

ANCHOR study. Mean (±SE) changes in the number of letters read as a…

Figure 11
ANCHOR study. Mean (±SE) changes in the number of letters read as a measure of visual acuity from baseline through 12 months. The tracking of mean changes in visual acuity scores over time showed that the values in each of the ranibizumab groups were significantly superior to those in the verteporfin group at each month during the first year (p

Figure 12

EXCITE study. (A, B) Proportion…

Figure 12

EXCITE study. (A, B) Proportion of patients with (A) visual acuity loss (…

Figure 12
EXCITE study. (A, B) Proportion of patients with (A) visual acuity loss (

Figure 13

HARBOR study. (A) Mean change…

Figure 13

HARBOR study. (A) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in best-corrected visual…

Figure 13
HARBOR study. (A) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). *Vertical bars are ±1 SE of the unadjusted mean. Mean number of injections was analysed for patients who received at least 1 ranibizumab injection in the study eye. At month 12, the mean change from baseline in BCVA for the four groups was +10.1 letters (0.5 mg monthly), +8.2 letters (0.5 mg pro-re-nata (PRN)), +9.2 letters (2.0 mg monthly), and +8.6 letters (2.0 mg PRN). The proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline at month 12 in the 4 groups was 34.5%, 30.2%, 36.1% and 33.0%, respectively. The mean number of injections was 7.7 and 6.9 for the 0.5 mg PRN and 2.0 mg PRN groups, respectively. (B) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in central foveal thickness (CFT) by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Vertical bars are ±1 SE of the unadjusted mean. The mean change from baseline in CFT at month 12 in the 4 groups was −172, −161.2, −163.3, and −172.4 μm, respectively. Printed with permission from ref 55.

Figure 14

CATT study. (A) The mean…

Figure 14

CATT study. (A) The mean change in visual acuity from enrolment over time…

Figure 14
CATT study. (A) The mean change in visual acuity from enrolment over time in patients treated with the same dosing regimen for 2 years. While ranibizumab monthly, becacizumab monthly and ranibizumab as needed meet the non-inferiority level, treatment with bevacizumab as needed led to inconclusive results and non-inferiority was not proven. At 2 years, the mean increase in letters in visual acuity from baseline was +8.8 in the ranibizumab monthly group, +7.8 in the bevacizumab monthly group, +6.7 in the ranibizumab as-needed group and +5.0 in the bevacizumab as-needed group. Main gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment. Switching from monthly to as-needed treatment resulted in greater mean decrease in vision during year 2 with −2.2 letters. (B) Differences in mean change in visual acuity at 2 years and 95% CIs in patients treated with the same dosing regimen for 2 years. The difference in mean improvements for patients treated with bevacizumab relative to those treated with ranibizumab was −1.4 letters. The difference in mean improvements for patients treated by an as-needed regimen relative to those treated monthly was −2.4 letters. (C) The mean change in total foveal thickness from enrolment over time by dosing regimen within drug group: (A) ranibizumab and (B) bevacizumab. Mean gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment. The proportion without fluid ranged from 13.9% in the bevacizumab as-needed group to 45.5% in the ranibizumab monthly group. Printed with permission from ref 54.

Figure 15

IVAN study. Mean differences in…

Figure 15

IVAN study. Mean differences in best corrected distance visual acuity at 2 years…

Figure 15
IVAN study. Mean differences in best corrected distance visual acuity at 2 years by drug (top) and by regimen (bottom). Black dashed line shows non-inferiority limit of −3.5 letters. Mean differences estimated with data from visits 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24, adjusted for centre size. For best-corrected visual acuity, bevacizumab was neither non-inferior nor inferior to ranibizumab (mean difference −1.37 letters, 95% CI −3.75 to 1.01; p=0.26). Discontinuous treatment was neither non-inferior nor inferior to continuous treatment (−1.63 letters, −4.01 to 0.75; p=0.18). Printed with permission from ref 93.

Figure 16

VIEW studies. (A) Mean change…

Figure 16

VIEW studies. (A) Mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The…

Figure 16
VIEW studies. (A) Mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The inset shows the difference in least square mean (with 95% CI) between intravitreal aflibercept arms and ranibizumab (aflibercept minus ranibizumab) for BCVA change from baseline to week 96, full analysis set. Outcomes for the aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were similar at weeks 52 and 96. Mean BCVA gains were 8.3–9.3 letters at week 52 and 6.6–7.9 letters at week 96. Patients received, on average, 16.5, 16.0, 16.2 and 11.2 injections over 96 weeks and 4.7, 4.1, 4.6 and 4.2 injections during weeks 52 through 96 in the Rq4, 2q4, 0.5q4, and 2q8 groups, respectively. All aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were equally effective in improving BCVA and preventing BCVA loss at 96 weeks. (B) Mean change from baseline central retinal thickness, full analysis set. Bimonthly fluctuations in central retinal thickness (CRT) are seen during the fixed regimen in year 1 in the 2q8 arm. During the second year with a capped pro-re-nata regimen, variations in CRT become larger with a quarterly fluctuation pattern. Printed with permission from ref 111.
All figures (16)
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Smith W, Assink J, Klein R, et al. Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: pooled findings from three continents. Ophthalmology 2001;108:697–704 - PubMed
    1. Kawasaki R, Yasuda M, Song SJ, et al. The prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2010;117:921–7 - PubMed
    1. Friedman DS, O'Colmain BJ, Munoz B, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:564–72 - PubMed
    1. Seddon JM, Willett WC, Speizer FE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and age-related macular degeneration in women. JAMA 1996;276: 1141–6 - PubMed
    1. Seddon JM, Cote J, Davis N, et al. Progression of age-related macular degeneration: association with body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:785–92 - PubMed
Show all 152 references
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure 11
Figure 11
ANCHOR study. Mean (±SE) changes in the number of letters read as a measure of visual acuity from baseline through 12 months. The tracking of mean changes in visual acuity scores over time showed that the values in each of the ranibizumab groups were significantly superior to those in the verteporfin group at each month during the first year (p

Figure 12

EXCITE study. (A, B) Proportion…

Figure 12

EXCITE study. (A, B) Proportion of patients with (A) visual acuity loss (…

Figure 12
EXCITE study. (A, B) Proportion of patients with (A) visual acuity loss (

Figure 13

HARBOR study. (A) Mean change…

Figure 13

HARBOR study. (A) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in best-corrected visual…

Figure 13
HARBOR study. (A) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). *Vertical bars are ±1 SE of the unadjusted mean. Mean number of injections was analysed for patients who received at least 1 ranibizumab injection in the study eye. At month 12, the mean change from baseline in BCVA for the four groups was +10.1 letters (0.5 mg monthly), +8.2 letters (0.5 mg pro-re-nata (PRN)), +9.2 letters (2.0 mg monthly), and +8.6 letters (2.0 mg PRN). The proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline at month 12 in the 4 groups was 34.5%, 30.2%, 36.1% and 33.0%, respectively. The mean number of injections was 7.7 and 6.9 for the 0.5 mg PRN and 2.0 mg PRN groups, respectively. (B) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in central foveal thickness (CFT) by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Vertical bars are ±1 SE of the unadjusted mean. The mean change from baseline in CFT at month 12 in the 4 groups was −172, −161.2, −163.3, and −172.4 μm, respectively. Printed with permission from ref 55.

Figure 14

CATT study. (A) The mean…

Figure 14

CATT study. (A) The mean change in visual acuity from enrolment over time…

Figure 14
CATT study. (A) The mean change in visual acuity from enrolment over time in patients treated with the same dosing regimen for 2 years. While ranibizumab monthly, becacizumab monthly and ranibizumab as needed meet the non-inferiority level, treatment with bevacizumab as needed led to inconclusive results and non-inferiority was not proven. At 2 years, the mean increase in letters in visual acuity from baseline was +8.8 in the ranibizumab monthly group, +7.8 in the bevacizumab monthly group, +6.7 in the ranibizumab as-needed group and +5.0 in the bevacizumab as-needed group. Main gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment. Switching from monthly to as-needed treatment resulted in greater mean decrease in vision during year 2 with −2.2 letters. (B) Differences in mean change in visual acuity at 2 years and 95% CIs in patients treated with the same dosing regimen for 2 years. The difference in mean improvements for patients treated with bevacizumab relative to those treated with ranibizumab was −1.4 letters. The difference in mean improvements for patients treated by an as-needed regimen relative to those treated monthly was −2.4 letters. (C) The mean change in total foveal thickness from enrolment over time by dosing regimen within drug group: (A) ranibizumab and (B) bevacizumab. Mean gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment. The proportion without fluid ranged from 13.9% in the bevacizumab as-needed group to 45.5% in the ranibizumab monthly group. Printed with permission from ref 54.

Figure 15

IVAN study. Mean differences in…

Figure 15

IVAN study. Mean differences in best corrected distance visual acuity at 2 years…

Figure 15
IVAN study. Mean differences in best corrected distance visual acuity at 2 years by drug (top) and by regimen (bottom). Black dashed line shows non-inferiority limit of −3.5 letters. Mean differences estimated with data from visits 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24, adjusted for centre size. For best-corrected visual acuity, bevacizumab was neither non-inferior nor inferior to ranibizumab (mean difference −1.37 letters, 95% CI −3.75 to 1.01; p=0.26). Discontinuous treatment was neither non-inferior nor inferior to continuous treatment (−1.63 letters, −4.01 to 0.75; p=0.18). Printed with permission from ref 93.

Figure 16

VIEW studies. (A) Mean change…

Figure 16

VIEW studies. (A) Mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The…

Figure 16
VIEW studies. (A) Mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The inset shows the difference in least square mean (with 95% CI) between intravitreal aflibercept arms and ranibizumab (aflibercept minus ranibizumab) for BCVA change from baseline to week 96, full analysis set. Outcomes for the aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were similar at weeks 52 and 96. Mean BCVA gains were 8.3–9.3 letters at week 52 and 6.6–7.9 letters at week 96. Patients received, on average, 16.5, 16.0, 16.2 and 11.2 injections over 96 weeks and 4.7, 4.1, 4.6 and 4.2 injections during weeks 52 through 96 in the Rq4, 2q4, 0.5q4, and 2q8 groups, respectively. All aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were equally effective in improving BCVA and preventing BCVA loss at 96 weeks. (B) Mean change from baseline central retinal thickness, full analysis set. Bimonthly fluctuations in central retinal thickness (CRT) are seen during the fixed regimen in year 1 in the 2q8 arm. During the second year with a capped pro-re-nata regimen, variations in CRT become larger with a quarterly fluctuation pattern. Printed with permission from ref 111.
All figures (16)
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Smith W, Assink J, Klein R, et al. Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: pooled findings from three continents. Ophthalmology 2001;108:697–704 - PubMed
    1. Kawasaki R, Yasuda M, Song SJ, et al. The prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2010;117:921–7 - PubMed
    1. Friedman DS, O'Colmain BJ, Munoz B, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:564–72 - PubMed
    1. Seddon JM, Willett WC, Speizer FE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and age-related macular degeneration in women. JAMA 1996;276: 1141–6 - PubMed
    1. Seddon JM, Cote J, Davis N, et al. Progression of age-related macular degeneration: association with body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:785–92 - PubMed
Show all 152 references
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 12
Figure 12
EXCITE study. (A, B) Proportion of patients with (A) visual acuity loss (

Figure 13

HARBOR study. (A) Mean change…

Figure 13

HARBOR study. (A) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in best-corrected visual…

Figure 13
HARBOR study. (A) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). *Vertical bars are ±1 SE of the unadjusted mean. Mean number of injections was analysed for patients who received at least 1 ranibizumab injection in the study eye. At month 12, the mean change from baseline in BCVA for the four groups was +10.1 letters (0.5 mg monthly), +8.2 letters (0.5 mg pro-re-nata (PRN)), +9.2 letters (2.0 mg monthly), and +8.6 letters (2.0 mg PRN). The proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline at month 12 in the 4 groups was 34.5%, 30.2%, 36.1% and 33.0%, respectively. The mean number of injections was 7.7 and 6.9 for the 0.5 mg PRN and 2.0 mg PRN groups, respectively. (B) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in central foveal thickness (CFT) by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Vertical bars are ±1 SE of the unadjusted mean. The mean change from baseline in CFT at month 12 in the 4 groups was −172, −161.2, −163.3, and −172.4 μm, respectively. Printed with permission from ref 55.

Figure 14

CATT study. (A) The mean…

Figure 14

CATT study. (A) The mean change in visual acuity from enrolment over time…

Figure 14
CATT study. (A) The mean change in visual acuity from enrolment over time in patients treated with the same dosing regimen for 2 years. While ranibizumab monthly, becacizumab monthly and ranibizumab as needed meet the non-inferiority level, treatment with bevacizumab as needed led to inconclusive results and non-inferiority was not proven. At 2 years, the mean increase in letters in visual acuity from baseline was +8.8 in the ranibizumab monthly group, +7.8 in the bevacizumab monthly group, +6.7 in the ranibizumab as-needed group and +5.0 in the bevacizumab as-needed group. Main gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment. Switching from monthly to as-needed treatment resulted in greater mean decrease in vision during year 2 with −2.2 letters. (B) Differences in mean change in visual acuity at 2 years and 95% CIs in patients treated with the same dosing regimen for 2 years. The difference in mean improvements for patients treated with bevacizumab relative to those treated with ranibizumab was −1.4 letters. The difference in mean improvements for patients treated by an as-needed regimen relative to those treated monthly was −2.4 letters. (C) The mean change in total foveal thickness from enrolment over time by dosing regimen within drug group: (A) ranibizumab and (B) bevacizumab. Mean gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment. The proportion without fluid ranged from 13.9% in the bevacizumab as-needed group to 45.5% in the ranibizumab monthly group. Printed with permission from ref 54.

Figure 15

IVAN study. Mean differences in…

Figure 15

IVAN study. Mean differences in best corrected distance visual acuity at 2 years…

Figure 15
IVAN study. Mean differences in best corrected distance visual acuity at 2 years by drug (top) and by regimen (bottom). Black dashed line shows non-inferiority limit of −3.5 letters. Mean differences estimated with data from visits 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24, adjusted for centre size. For best-corrected visual acuity, bevacizumab was neither non-inferior nor inferior to ranibizumab (mean difference −1.37 letters, 95% CI −3.75 to 1.01; p=0.26). Discontinuous treatment was neither non-inferior nor inferior to continuous treatment (−1.63 letters, −4.01 to 0.75; p=0.18). Printed with permission from ref 93.

Figure 16

VIEW studies. (A) Mean change…

Figure 16

VIEW studies. (A) Mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The…

Figure 16
VIEW studies. (A) Mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The inset shows the difference in least square mean (with 95% CI) between intravitreal aflibercept arms and ranibizumab (aflibercept minus ranibizumab) for BCVA change from baseline to week 96, full analysis set. Outcomes for the aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were similar at weeks 52 and 96. Mean BCVA gains were 8.3–9.3 letters at week 52 and 6.6–7.9 letters at week 96. Patients received, on average, 16.5, 16.0, 16.2 and 11.2 injections over 96 weeks and 4.7, 4.1, 4.6 and 4.2 injections during weeks 52 through 96 in the Rq4, 2q4, 0.5q4, and 2q8 groups, respectively. All aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were equally effective in improving BCVA and preventing BCVA loss at 96 weeks. (B) Mean change from baseline central retinal thickness, full analysis set. Bimonthly fluctuations in central retinal thickness (CRT) are seen during the fixed regimen in year 1 in the 2q8 arm. During the second year with a capped pro-re-nata regimen, variations in CRT become larger with a quarterly fluctuation pattern. Printed with permission from ref 111.
All figures (16)
Figure 13
Figure 13
HARBOR study. (A) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). *Vertical bars are ±1 SE of the unadjusted mean. Mean number of injections was analysed for patients who received at least 1 ranibizumab injection in the study eye. At month 12, the mean change from baseline in BCVA for the four groups was +10.1 letters (0.5 mg monthly), +8.2 letters (0.5 mg pro-re-nata (PRN)), +9.2 letters (2.0 mg monthly), and +8.6 letters (2.0 mg PRN). The proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline at month 12 in the 4 groups was 34.5%, 30.2%, 36.1% and 33.0%, respectively. The mean number of injections was 7.7 and 6.9 for the 0.5 mg PRN and 2.0 mg PRN groups, respectively. (B) Mean change from baseline to month 12 in central foveal thickness (CFT) by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Vertical bars are ±1 SE of the unadjusted mean. The mean change from baseline in CFT at month 12 in the 4 groups was −172, −161.2, −163.3, and −172.4 μm, respectively. Printed with permission from ref 55.
Figure 14
Figure 14
CATT study. (A) The mean change in visual acuity from enrolment over time in patients treated with the same dosing regimen for 2 years. While ranibizumab monthly, becacizumab monthly and ranibizumab as needed meet the non-inferiority level, treatment with bevacizumab as needed led to inconclusive results and non-inferiority was not proven. At 2 years, the mean increase in letters in visual acuity from baseline was +8.8 in the ranibizumab monthly group, +7.8 in the bevacizumab monthly group, +6.7 in the ranibizumab as-needed group and +5.0 in the bevacizumab as-needed group. Main gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment. Switching from monthly to as-needed treatment resulted in greater mean decrease in vision during year 2 with −2.2 letters. (B) Differences in mean change in visual acuity at 2 years and 95% CIs in patients treated with the same dosing regimen for 2 years. The difference in mean improvements for patients treated with bevacizumab relative to those treated with ranibizumab was −1.4 letters. The difference in mean improvements for patients treated by an as-needed regimen relative to those treated monthly was −2.4 letters. (C) The mean change in total foveal thickness from enrolment over time by dosing regimen within drug group: (A) ranibizumab and (B) bevacizumab. Mean gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment. The proportion without fluid ranged from 13.9% in the bevacizumab as-needed group to 45.5% in the ranibizumab monthly group. Printed with permission from ref 54.
Figure 15
Figure 15
IVAN study. Mean differences in best corrected distance visual acuity at 2 years by drug (top) and by regimen (bottom). Black dashed line shows non-inferiority limit of −3.5 letters. Mean differences estimated with data from visits 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24, adjusted for centre size. For best-corrected visual acuity, bevacizumab was neither non-inferior nor inferior to ranibizumab (mean difference −1.37 letters, 95% CI −3.75 to 1.01; p=0.26). Discontinuous treatment was neither non-inferior nor inferior to continuous treatment (−1.63 letters, −4.01 to 0.75; p=0.18). Printed with permission from ref 93.
Figure 16
Figure 16
VIEW studies. (A) Mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The inset shows the difference in least square mean (with 95% CI) between intravitreal aflibercept arms and ranibizumab (aflibercept minus ranibizumab) for BCVA change from baseline to week 96, full analysis set. Outcomes for the aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were similar at weeks 52 and 96. Mean BCVA gains were 8.3–9.3 letters at week 52 and 6.6–7.9 letters at week 96. Patients received, on average, 16.5, 16.0, 16.2 and 11.2 injections over 96 weeks and 4.7, 4.1, 4.6 and 4.2 injections during weeks 52 through 96 in the Rq4, 2q4, 0.5q4, and 2q8 groups, respectively. All aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were equally effective in improving BCVA and preventing BCVA loss at 96 weeks. (B) Mean change from baseline central retinal thickness, full analysis set. Bimonthly fluctuations in central retinal thickness (CRT) are seen during the fixed regimen in year 1 in the 2q8 arm. During the second year with a capped pro-re-nata regimen, variations in CRT become larger with a quarterly fluctuation pattern. Printed with permission from ref 111.

References

    1. Smith W, Assink J, Klein R, et al. Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: pooled findings from three continents. Ophthalmology 2001;108:697–704
    1. Kawasaki R, Yasuda M, Song SJ, et al. The prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2010;117:921–7
    1. Friedman DS, O'Colmain BJ, Munoz B, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:564–72
    1. Seddon JM, Willett WC, Speizer FE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and age-related macular degeneration in women. JAMA 1996;276: 1141–6
    1. Seddon JM, Cote J, Davis N, et al. Progression of age-related macular degeneration: association with body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:785–92
    1. Klein R, Li X, Kuo JZ, et al. Associations of candidate genes to age-related macular degeneration among racial/ethnic groups in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:1010–20 e1
    1. Gemmy Cheung CM, Li X, Cheng CY, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for age-related macular degeneration in Indians: a comparative study in Singapore and India. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155:764–73, 73 e1–3
    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2163–96
    1. Miskala PH, Bass EB, Bressler NM, et al. Surgery for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: quality-of-life findings: SST report no. 12. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1981–92
    1. Spilsbury K, Garrett KL, Shen WY, et al. Overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the retinal pigment epithelium leads to the development of choroidal neovascularization. Am J Pathol 2000;157:135–44
    1. Krzystolik MG, Afshari MA, Adamis AP, et al. Prevention of experimental choroidal neovascularization with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody fragment. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:338–46
    1. Ferrara N, Mass RD, Campa C, et al. Targeting VEGF-A to treat cancer and age-related macular degeneration. Annu Rev Med 2007;58:491–504
    1. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1419–31
    1. Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006;355: 1432–44
    1. Rein DB, Wittenborn JS, Zhang X, et al. Forecasting age-related macular degeneration through the year 2050: the potential impact of new treatments. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:533–40
    1. Chang TS, Bressler NM, Fine JT, et al. Improved vision-related function after ranibizumab treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1460–9
    1. Campbell JP, Bressler SB, Bressler NM. Impact of availability of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy on visual impairment and blindness due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:794–5
    1. Frennesson C, Nilsson UL, Peebo BB, et al. Significant improvements in near vision, reading speed, central visual field and related quality of life after ranibizumab treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:420–5
    1. Bloch SB, Larsen M, Munch IC. Incidence of legal blindness from age-related macular degeneration in denmark: year 2000 to 2010. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:209–13 e2
    1. van der Reis MI, La Heij EC, De Jong-Hesse Y, et al. A systematic review of the adverse events of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. Retina 2011;31:1449–69
    1. Day S, Acquah K, Lee PP, et al. Medicare costs for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, 1994–2007. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:1014–20
    1. Hawkes N. Avastin is as effective as Lucentis for wet AMD and could save NHS 84 m pound a year, study shows. BMJ 2012;344:e3275.
    1. Holekamp NM, Liu Y, Yeh WS, et al. Clinical utilization of anti-VEGF agents and disease monitoring in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:825–33 e1
    1. Krause L, Yousif T, Pohl K. An epidemiological study of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Germany. Curr Med Res Opin 2013;29:1391–7
    1. Rofagha S, Bhisitkul RB, Boyer DS, et al. Seven-year outcomes in ranibizumab-treated patients in ANCHOR, MARINA, and HORIZON: a multicenter cohort study (SEVEN-UP). Ophthalmology 2013;120:2292–9
    1. Do DV. Detection of new-onset choroidal neovascularization. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013;24:244–7
    1. Chew EY, Clemons TE, Bressler SB, et al. Randomized trial of a home monitoring system for early detection of choroidal neovascularization home monitoring of the Eye (HOME) study. Ophthalmology 2014;121:535–44
    1. Segal O, Ferencz JR, Cohen P, et al. Persistent elevation of intraocular pressure following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Isr Med Assoc J 2013;15:352–5
    1. Bakri SJ, Moshfeghi DM, Francom S, et al. Intraocular pressure in eyes receiving monthly ranibizumab in 2 pivotal age-related macular degeneration clinical trials. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1102–8
    1. Gess AJ, Fung AE, Rodriguez JG. Imaging in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Semin Ophthalmol 2011;26:225–33
    1. Ha SO, Kim DY, Sohn CH, et al. Anaphylaxis caused by intravenous fluorescein: clinical characteristics and review of literature. Intern Emerg Med 2014;9:325–30
    1. Ying GS, Huang J, Maguire MG, et al. Baseline predictors for one-year visual outcomes with ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2013;120:122–9
    1. Tran TH, Querques G, Forzy G, et al. Angiographic regression patterns after intravitreal ranibizumab injections for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011;42:498–508
    1. Rosenfeld PJ, Shapiro H, Tuomi L, et al. Characteristics of patients losing vision after 2 years of monthly dosing in the phase III ranibizumab clinical trials. Ophthalmology 2011;118:523–30
    1. Koh AH, Chen LJ, Chen SJ, et al. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: evidence-based guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Retina 2013;33:686–716
    1. Parravano M, Pilotto E, Musicco I, et al. Reproducibility of fluorescein and indocyanine green angiographic assessment for RAP diagnosis: a multicenter study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2012;22:598–606
    1. Yannuzzi LA, Negrao S, Iida T, et al. Retinal angiomatous proliferation in age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2012;32(Suppl 1):416–34
    1. Khurana RN, Dupas B, Bressler NM. Agreement of time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with fluorescein leakage from choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1376–80
    1. Malamos P, Sacu S, Georgopoulos M, et al. Correlation of high-definition optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography imaging in neovascular macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4926–33
    1. Sadda SR, Liakopoulos S, Keane PA, et al. Relationship between angiographic and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) parameters for quantifying choroidal neovascular lesions. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248:175–84
    1. Mathew R, Pefkianaki M, Kopsachilis N, et al. Correlation of fundus fluorescein angiography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in identification of membrane subtypes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmologica 2014;231:153–9
    1. Sander B. Optical coherence tomography in ophthalmology: an overview. Acta Ophthalmol 2009;87:245–6
    1. Keane PA, Patel PJ, Liakopoulos S, et al. Evaluation of age-related macular degeneration with optical coherence tomography. Surv Ophthalmol 2012;57:389–414
    1. Giani A, Pellegrini M, Invernizzi A, et al. Aligning scan locations from consecutive spectral-domain optical coherence tomography examinations: a comparison among different strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:7637–43
    1. Choma M, Sarunic M, Yang C, et al. Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2003;11: 2183–9
    1. Coscas F, Querques G, Forte R, et al. Combined fluorescein angiography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of classic choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration before and after intravitreal ranibizumab injections. Retina 2012;32:1069–76
    1. Querques G, Atmani K, Berboucha E, et al. Angiographic analysis of retinal-choroidal anastomosis by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy technology and corresponding (eye-tracked) spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina 2010;30:222–34
    1. Fung AE, Lalwani GA, Rosenfeld PJ, et al. An optical coherence tomography-guided, variable dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:566–83
    1. Holz FG, Amoaku W, Donate J, et al. Safety and efficacy of a flexible dosing regimen of ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the SUSTAIN study. Ophthalmology 2011;118:663–71
    1. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Eldem B, Guymer R, et al. Efficacy and safety of monthly versus quarterly ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the EXCITE study. Ophthalmology 2011;118:831–9
    1. Patel PJ, Tufail A. Optimizing individualized therapy with bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2012. Published Online First. doi:
    1. Kiss CG, Geitzenauer W, Simader C, et al. Evaluation of ranibizumab-induced changes in high-resolution optical coherence tomographic retinal morphology and their impact on visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:2376–83
    1. Simader C, Ritter M, Bolz M, et al. Morphologic parameters relevant for visual outcome during anti-angiogenic therapy of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1237–45
    1. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Fine SL, et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1388–98
    1. Busbee BG, Ho AC, Brown DM, et al. Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1046–56
    1. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Waldstein S, Deak GG, et al. A paradigm shift in the management of age-related macular degeneration: The role of biomarkers in antiangiogenic therapy. 2014
    1. Keane PA, Liakopoulos S, Ongchin SC, et al. Quantitative subanalysis of optical coherence tomography after treatment with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3115–20
    1. Kashani AH, Keane PA, Dustin L, et al. Quantitative subanalysis of cystoid spaces and outer nuclear layer using optical coherence tomography in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:3366–73
    1. Golbaz I, Ahlers C, Stock G, et al. Quantification of the therapeutic response of intraretinal, subretinal, and subpigment epithelial compartments in exudative AMD during anti-VEGF therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:1599–605
    1. Querques G, Forte R, Berboucha E, et al. Spectral-domain versus time domain optical coherence tomography before and after ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Res 2011;46:152–9
    1. Amissah-Arthur KN, Panneerselvam S, Narendran N, et al. Optical coherence tomography changes before the development of choroidal neovascularization in second eyes of patients with bilateral wet macular degeneration. Eye (Lond) 2012;26:394–9
    1. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 2003;9:669–76
    1. Moshfeghi AA, Puliafito CA. Pegaptanib sodium for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2005;14:671–82
    1. Gragoudas ES, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET, Jr, et al. Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2805–16
    1. Chakravarthy U, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET, Jr, et al. Year 2 efficacy results of 2 randomized controlled clinical trials of pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1508 e1–25.
    1. Schmidt-Erfurth UM, Richard G, Augustin A, et al. Guidance for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:486–94
    1. Chen Y, Wiesmann C, Fuh G, et al. Selection and analysis of an optimized anti-VEGF antibody: crystal structure of an affinity-matured Fab in complex with antigen. J Mol Biol 1999;293:865–81
    1. Husain D, Kim I, Gauthier D, et al. Safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in combination with verteporfin PDT on experimental choroidal neovascularization in the monkey. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:509–16
    1. Gaudreault J, Fei D, Rusit J, et al. Preclinical pharmacokinetics of Ranibizumab (rhuFabV2) after a single intravitreal administration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:726–33
    1. Zayit-Soudry S, Zemel E, Loewenstein A, et al. Safety evaluation of repeated intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and ranibizumab in rabbit eyes. Retina 2010;30:671–81
    1. Brown DM, Michels M, Kaiser PK, et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results of the ANCHOR study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:57–65 e5
    1. Bressler NM, Chang TS, Suner IJ, et al. Vision-related function after ranibizumab treatment by better- or worse-seeing eye: clinical trial results from MARINA and ANCHOR. Ophthalmology 2010;117:747–56 e4
    1. Regillo CD, Brown DM, Abraham P, et al. Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER Study year 1. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:239–48
    1. Chakravarthy U, Harding SP, Rogers CA, et al. Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: one-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1399–411
    1. Silva R, Axer-Siegel R, Eldem B, et al. The SECURE study: long-term safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2013;120:130–9
    1. Singer MA, Awh CC, Sadda S, et al. HORIZON: an open-label extension trial of ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1175–83
    1. Heier JS, Boyer DS, Ciulla TA, et al. Ranibizumab combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: year 1 results of the FOCUS Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1532–42
    1. Abedi F, Wickremasinghe S, Islam AF, et al. Anti-VEGF treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a Treat-and-Extend Protocol Over 2 Years. Retina 2014;34:1531–8.
    1. Cilley JC, Barfi K, Benson AB, III, et al. Bevacizumab in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2007;7:739–49
    1. Stefanadis C, Synetos A, Tousoulis D, et al. Systemic administration of bevacizumab increases the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with metastatic cancer. Int J Cardiol 2012;154:341–4
    1. Stewart MW, Rosenfeld PJ, Penha FM, et al. Pharmacokinetic rationale for dosing every 2 weeks versus 4 weeks with intravitreal ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept (vascular endothelial growth factor Trap-eye). Retina 2012;32:434–57
    1. Matsuyama K, Ogata N, Matsuoka M, et al. Plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and pigment epithelium-derived factor before and after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:1215–18
    1. Carneiro AM, Costa R, Falcao MS, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor plasma levels before and after treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Acta Ophthalmol 2012;90:e25–30
    1. Zehetner C, Kirchmair R, Huber S, et al. Plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor before and after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, ranibizumab and pegaptanib in patients with age-related macular degeneration, and in patients with diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:454–9
    1. Stein JD, Newman-Casey PA, Mrinalini T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2014;121:936–45
    1. Rosenfeld PJ, Moshfeghi AA, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2005;36:331–5
    1. Avery RL, Pieramici DJ, Rabena MD, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2006;113:363–72 e5
    1. Abraham-Marin ML, Cortes-Luna CF, Alvarez-Rivera G, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:651–5
    1. Gonzalez S, Rosenfeld PJ, Stewart MW, et al. Avastin doesn't blind people, people blind people. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:196–203 e1
    1. Moshfeghi AA, Rosenfeld PJ, Flynn HW, Jr, et al. Endophthalmitis after intravitreal vascular [corrected] endothelial growth factor antagonists: a six-year experience at a university referral center. Retina 2011;31:662–8
    1. Johnson D, Sharma S. Ocular and systemic safety of bevacizumab and ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013;24:205–12
    1. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Ying GS, et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1897–908
    1. Chakravarthy U, Harding SP, Rogers CA, et al. Alternative treatments to inhibit VEGF in age-related choroidal neovascularisation: 2-year findings of the IVAN randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382:1258–67
    1. Kodjikian L, Souied EH, Mimoun G, et al. Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the GEFAL noninferiority randomized trial. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2300–9
    1. Winnik S, Lohmann C, Siciliani G, et al. Systemic VEGF inhibition accelerates experimental atherosclerosis and disrupts endothelial homeostasis—implications for cardiovascular safety. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:2453–61
    1. Avery RL. What is the evidence for systemic effects of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, and should we be concerned? Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98(Suppl 1):i7–10
    1. Schmucker C, Ehlken C, Agostini HT, et al. A safety review and meta-analyses of bevacizumab and ranibizumab: off-label versus goldstandard. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e42701.
    1. Jansen RM. The off-label use of medication: the latest on the Avastin—Lucentis debacle. Med Law 2013;32:65–77
    1. Holash J, Davis S, Papadopoulos N, et al. VEGF-Trap: a VEGF blocker with potent antitumor effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:11393–8
    1. Stewart MW, Rosenfeld PJ. Predicted biological activity of intravitreal VEGF Trap. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:667–8
    1. Stewart MW. What are the half-lives of ranibizumab and aflibercept (VEGF Trp-eye) in human eyes? Calculations with a mathematical model. Eye Rep 2011;1:e5.
    1. Papadopoulos N, Martin J, Ruan Q, et al. Binding and neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and related ligands by VEGF Trap, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Angiogenesis 2012;15:171–85
    1. Yu L, Liang XH, Ferrara N. Comparing protein VEGF inhibitors: in vitro biological studies. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011;408:276–81
    1. Saishin Y, Takahashi K, Lima e Silva R, et al. VEGF-TRAP(R1R2) suppresses choroidal neovascularization and VEGF-induced breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier. J Cell Physiol 2003;195:241–8
    1. Cao J, Zhao L, Li Y, et al. A subretinal matrigel rat choroidal neovascularization (CNV) model and inhibition of CNV and associated inflammation and fibrosis by VEGF trap. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6009–17
    1. Inai T, Mancuso M, Hashizume H, et al. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in cancer causes loss of endothelial fenestrations, regression of tumor vessels, and appearance of basement membrane ghosts. Am J Pathol 2004;165:35–52
    1. Nguyen QD, Shah SM, Hafiz G, et al. A phase I trial of an IV-administered vascular endothelial growth factor trap for treatment in patients with choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1522 e1–22 e14
    1. Nguyen QD, Shah SM, Browning DJ, et al. A phase I study of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor trap-eye in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2141–8 e1
    1. Heier JS, Boyer D, Nguyen QD, et al. The 1-year results of CLEAR-IT 2, a phase 2 study of vascular endothelial growth factor trap-eye dosed as-needed after 12-week fixed dosing. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1098–106
    1. Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2537–48
    1. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Kaiser PK, Korobelnik JF, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: ninety-six-week results of the VIEW studies. Ophthalmology 2014;121:193–201
    1. Kumar N, Marsiglia M, Mrejen S, et al. Visual and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept in eyes with persistent subfoveal fluid despite previous treatments with ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2013;33:1605–12
    1. Cho H, Shah CP, Weber M, et al. Aflibercept for exudative AMD with persistent fluid on ranibizumab and/or bevacizumab. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:1032–5
    1. Yonekawa Y, Andreoli C, Miller JB, et al. Conversion to aflibercept for chronic refractory or recurrent neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:29–35 e2
    1. Argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy. Three-year results from randomized clinical trials. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:694–701
    1. Argon laser photocoagulation for senile macular degeneration. Results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:912–18
    1. Glatt H, Machemer R. Experimental subretinal hemorrhage in rabbits. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;94:762–73
    1. Coscas G, Soubrane G. [Argon laser photocoagulation of subretinal neovascularization in senile macular degeneration. Results of a randomized study of 60 cases]. Bull Mem Soc Fr Ophtalmol 1982;94:149–54
    1. Argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy. Five-year results from randomized clinical trials. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1109–14
    1. Bennett SR, Folk JC, Blodi CF, et al. Factors prognostic of visual outcome in patients with subretinal hemorrhage. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109:33–7
    1. Laser photocoagulation of subfoveal neovascular lesions in age-related macular degeneration. Results of a randomized clinical trial. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1220–31
    1. Bressler NM. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: two-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials-tap report 2. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:198–207
    1. Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy Study Group. Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial including lesions with occult with no classic choroidal neovascularization—verteporfin in photodynamic therapy report 2. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:541–60
    1. Kaiser PK. Verteporfin PDT for subfoveal occult CNV in AMD: two-year results of a randomized trial. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:1853–60
    1. Kaiser PK, Boyer DS, Cruess AF, et al. Verteporfin plus ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: twelve-month results of the DENALI study. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1001–10
    1. Larsen M, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lanzetta P, et al. Verteporfin plus ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: twelve-month MONT BLANC study results. Ophthalmology 2012;119:992–1000
    1. Tozer K, Roller AB, Chong LP, et al. Combination therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2029–34
    1. Dugel PU, Bebchuk JD, Nau J, et al. Epimacular brachytherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized, controlled trial (CABERNET). Ophthalmology 2013;120:317–27
    1. Dugel PU, Petrarca R, Bennett M, et al. Macular epiretinal brachytherapy in treated age-related macular degeneration: MERITAGE study: twelve-month safety and efficacy results. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1425–31
    1. Silva RA, Moshfeghi AA, Kaiser PK, et al. Radiation treatment for age-related macular degeneration. Semin Ophthalmol 2011;26:121–30
    1. Petrarca R, Jackson TL. Radiation therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:57–63
    1. Moshfeghi AA, Morales-Canton V, Quiroz-Mercado H, et al. 16 Gy low-voltage x-ray irradiation followed by as needed ranibizumab therapy for age-related macular degeneration: 12 month outcomes of a ‘radiation-first’ strategy. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:1320–4
    1. Jackson TL.2012. Radiation for CNV: CABERNET/MERITAGE/INTREPID.
    1. Hochman MA, Seery CM, Zarbin MA. Pathophysiology and management of subretinal hemorrhage. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;42:195–213
    1. Stifter E, Michels S, Prager F, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration with large submacular hemorrhage. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:886–92
    1. Avery RL, Fekrat S, Hawkins BS, et al. Natural history of subfoveal subretinal hemorrhage in age-related macular degeneration. Retina 1996;16:183–9
    1. Kuhli-Hattenbach C, Fischer IB, Schalnus R, et al. Subretinal hemorrhages associated with age-related macular degeneration in patients receiving anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:316–21 e1
    1. Shultz RW, Bakri SJ. Treatment for submacular hemorrhage associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Semin Ophthalmol 2011;26:361–71
    1. Ohji M, Saito Y, Hayashi A, et al. Pneumatic displacement of subretinal hemorrhage without tissue plasminogen activator. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1326–32
    1. Gopalakrishan M, Giridhar A, Bhat S, et al. Pneumatic displacement of submacular hemorrhage: safety, efficacy, and patient selection. Retina 2007;27:329–34
    1. Hattenbach LO, Klais C, Koch FH, et al. Intravitreous injection of tissue plasminogen activator and gas in the treatment of submacular hemorrhage under various conditions. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1485–92
    1. Hassan AS, Johnson MW, Schneiderman TE, et al. Management of submacular hemorrhage with intravitreous tissue plasminogen activator injection and pneumatic displacement. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1900–6; discussion 06–7
    1. Chen CY, Hooper C, Chiu D, et al. Management of submacular hemorrhage with intravitreal injection of tissue plasminogen activator and expansile gas. Retina 2007;27:321–8
    1. de Juan E, Jr, Machemer R. Vitreous surgery for hemorrhagic and fibrous complications of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;105:25–9
    1. Peyman GA, Nelson NC, Jr, Alturki W, et al. Tissue plasminogen activating factor assisted removal of subretinal hemorrhage. Ophthalmic Surg 1991;22: 575–82
    1. Ibanez HE, Williams DF, Thomas MA, et al. Surgical management of submacular hemorrhage. A series of 47 consecutive cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:62–9
    1. Haupert CL, McCuen BW, II, Jaffe GJ, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy, subretinal injection of tissue plasminogen activator, and fluid-gas exchange for displacement of thick submacular hemorrhage in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:208–15
    1. Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Childs AL, et al. Surgery for hemorrhagic choroidal neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration: ophthalmic findings: SST report no. 13. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1993–2006
    1. Oshima Y, Ohji M, Tano Y. Pars plana vitrectomy with peripheral retinotomy after injection of preoperative intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator: a modified procedure to drain massive subretinal haemorrhage. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:193–8
    1. Fine HF, Iranmanesh R, Del Priore LV, et al. Surgical outcomes after massive subretinal hemorrhage secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2010;30:1588–94
    1. Treumer F, Klatt C, Roider J, et al. Subretinal coapplication of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration with submacular haemorrhage. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:48–53
    1. Arias L, Mones J. Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy with tissue plasminogen activator, gas and intravitreal bevacizumab in the management of predominantly hemorrhagic age-related macular degeneration. Clin Ophthalmol 2010;4:67–72

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa