A Factorial Experiment to Optimize Remotely Delivered Behavioral Treatment for Obesity: Results of the Opt-IN Study

Bonnie Spring, Angela F Pfammatter, Sara H Marchese, Tammy Stump, Christine Pellegrini, H Gene McFadden, Donald Hedeker, Juned Siddique, Neil Jordan, Linda M Collins, Bonnie Spring, Angela F Pfammatter, Sara H Marchese, Tammy Stump, Christine Pellegrini, H Gene McFadden, Donald Hedeker, Juned Siddique, Neil Jordan, Linda M Collins

Abstract

Objective: Intensive behavioral obesity treatments face scalability challenges, but evidence is lacking about which treatment components could be cut back without reducing weight loss. The Optimization of Remotely Delivered Intensive Lifestyle Treatment for Obesity (Opt-IN) study applied the Multiphase Optimization Strategy to develop an entirely remotely delivered, technology-supported weight-loss package to maximize the amount of weight loss attainable for ≤$500.

Methods: Six-month weight loss was examined among adults (N = 562) with BMI ≥ 25 who were randomly assigned to conditions in a factorial experiment crossing five dichotomous treatment components set to either low/high (12 vs. 24 coaching calls) or off/on (primary care provider reports, text messaging, meal replacements, and buddy training).

Results: About 84.3% of participants completed the final assessment. The treatment package yielding maximum weight loss for ≤$500 included 12 coaching calls, buddy training, and primary care provider progress reports; produced average weight loss of 6.1 kg, with 57.1% losing ≥5% and 51.8% losing ≥7%; and cost $427 per person. The most expensive candidate-treatment component (24 vs. 12 coaching calls) was screened out of the optimized treatment package because it did not increase weight loss.

Conclusions: Systematically testing each treatment component's effect on weight loss made it possible to eliminate more expensive but less impactful components, yielding an optimized, resource-efficient obesity treatment for evaluation in a randomized controlled trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01814072.

© 2020 The Obesity Society.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
CONSORT diagram depicting participant flow through the six month study.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Effect of Buddy×PCP×Text interaction on weight change (kg) at six months. Plots on the left (A) show weight gain or loss among those who received buddy training, with text messaging and PCP report turned on or off. Plots on the right (B) show weight change among those who received no buddy training with text messaging and PCP report either on or off. Error bars depict the 95% confidence interval of each estimated mean. Abbreviations: BUDDY=buddy training; PCP=progress report sent to primary care provider; TEXT=text messaging.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa