Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer

V Abkevich, K M Timms, B T Hennessy, J Potter, M S Carey, L A Meyer, K Smith-McCune, R Broaddus, K H Lu, J Chen, T V Tran, D Williams, D Iliev, S Jammulapati, L M FitzGerald, T Krivak, J A DeLoia, A Gutin, G B Mills, J S Lanchbury, V Abkevich, K M Timms, B T Hennessy, J Potter, M S Carey, L A Meyer, K Smith-McCune, R Broaddus, K H Lu, J Chen, T V Tran, D Williams, D Iliev, S Jammulapati, L M FitzGerald, T Krivak, J A DeLoia, A Gutin, G B Mills, J S Lanchbury

Abstract

Background: Defects in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other members of the homologous recombination pathway have potential therapeutic relevance when used to support agents that introduce or exploit double-stranded DNA breaks. This study examines the association between homologous recombination defects and genomic patterns of loss of heterozygosity (LOH).

Methods: Ovarian tumours from two independent data sets were characterised for defects in BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51C, and LOH profiles were generated. Publically available data were downloaded for a third independent data set. The same analyses were performed on 57 cancer cell lines.

Results: Loss of heterozygosity regions of intermediate size were observed more frequently in tumours with defective BRCA1 or BRCA2 (P=10(-11)). The homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score was defined as the number of these regions observed in a tumour sample. The association between HRD score and BRCA deficiency was validated in two independent ovarian cancer data sets (P=10(-5) and 10(-29)), and identified breast and pancreatic cell lines with BRCA defects.

Conclusion: The HRD score appears capable of detecting homologous recombination defects regardless of aetiology or mechanism. This score could facilitate the use of PARP inhibitors and platinum in breast, ovarian, and other cancers.

Conflict of interest statement

VA, KMT, JP, JC, TVT, DW, DI, SJ, LF, AG, and JSL are employees of Myriad Genetics, Inc. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fraction of lengths of LOH regions vs length of these regions adjusted to the length of chromosome arm. Chromosomes 13, 14, 15, and 22 were excluded because SNPs are not available for the p arms of these chromosomes. The largest adjusted value of 2 corresponds to LOH over the entire chromosome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Homologous recombination deficiency score in tumour samples. The number of long LOH regions is shown on the x axis. Blue circles: BRCA1- or BRCA2-deficient samples. Red circles: BRCA1- and BRCA2-intact samples. The combined area under the blue and red circles is the same. This normalisation is used only to facilitate visualisation of the circles. The size of each individual circle is proportional to the number of samples with the corresponding number of LOH regions. (A) Homologous recombination deficiency score for the first cohort (44 of 132 samples were BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficient). (B) Homologous recombination deficiency score for the second cohort (18 of 43 samples were BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficient). (C) Homologous recombination deficiency score for the third cohort (146 of 434 samples were BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficient). (D) Homologous recombination deficiency score for the combined data from all three cohorts. Row A: 221 samples with either BRCA1, or BRCA2, or RAD51C deficient genes; B: 80 BRCA1 mutants (a BRCA1 mutant with a BRCA2 mutation, a BRCA1 mutant with a methylated BRCA1 promoter, and a BRCA1 mutant with a methylated RAD51C promoter were excluded from this plot); C: 43 BRCA2 mutants (a BRCA2 mutant with a BRCA1 mutation was excluded from this plot); D: 82 samples with low expression or methylation of BRCA1 (a sample with a methylated BRCA1 promoter and a BRCA1 mutation was excluded from this plot); E: 13 samples with methylation of RAD51C (a sample with a methylated RAD51C promoter and a BRCA1 mutation was excluded from this plot). Red circles: 388 samples with BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51C intact genes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of HRD scores in cancer cell lines. Red circles: cell lines with intact BRCA1 or BRCA2. (A) 28 non-ovarian cell lines; (B) 16 ovarian cell lines. Green circles: six carriers of heterozygous mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2. Violet circles: one carrier of a homozygous mutation with reversion in BRCA1. Blue circles: six carriers of homozygous mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 or with methylated BRCA1. The combined area under the green, red, blue and violet circles is the same. The size of each individual circle is proportional to the number of samples with the corresponding number of LOH regions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier plot of OS post surgery for HRD score split at it’s median. These data were generated using 507 samples from the TCGA data set for which copy number data and survival information were available. Median OS for samples with high and low HRD score were 1499 (95% CI=(1355–1769)) and 1163 (95% CI=(1081–1354)) days, respectively. The P-value was calculated using Cox model.

References

    1. Beaudet AL, Tsui LCA (1993) A suggested nomenclature for designating mutations. Hum Mutat 2: 245–248
    1. Birkbak NJ, Wang ZC, Kim JY, Eklund AC, Li Q, Tian R, Bowman-Colin C, Li Y, Greene-Colozzi A, Iglehart JD, Tung N, Ryan PD, Garber JE, Silver DP, Szallasi Z, Richardson AL (2012) Telomeric allele imbalance indicated defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Cancer Discov 2: 366–375
    1. Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, Parker KM, Flower D, Lopez E, Kyle S, Meuth M, Curtin NJ, Helleday T (2005) Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 434: 913–917
    1. Byler Dann R, DeLoia JA, Timms KM, Zorn KK, Potter J, Flake DD, Lanchbury JS, Krivak TC (2012) BRCA1/2 mutations and expression: response to platinum chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125: 677–682
    1. Cerbinskaite A, Mukhopadhyay A, Plummer ER, Curtin NJ, Edmondson RJ (2011) Defective homologous recombination in human cancers. Cancer Treat Rev 38: 89–100
    1. Durkin AS, Reid YA (1998) Short tandem repeat loci utilized in human cell line identification. ATCC Connection 18: (Numbers 2 & 3)
    1. Edwards SL, Brough R, Lord CJ, Natrajan R, Vatcheva R, Levine DA, Boyd J, Reis-Filho JS, Ashworth A (2008) Resistance to therapy caused by intragenic deletion in BRCA2. Nature 451: 1111–1115
    1. Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt AN, Johnson DA, Richardson TB, Santarosa M, Dillon KJ, Hickson I, Knights C, Martin NM, Jackson SP, Smith GC, Ashworth A (2005) Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 434: 917–921
    1. Friedenson B (2005) BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathways and the risk of cancers other than breast or ovarian. MolGenMed 7: 60
    1. Gelmon KA, Thischkowitz M, Mackay H, Swenerton K, Robidoux A, Tonkin K, Hirte H, Huntsman D, Clemons M, Gilks B, Yerushalmi R, Macpherson E, Carmichael J, Oza A (2011) Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-randomized study. Lancet Oncol 12: 852–861
    1. Hennessy BT, Timms KM, Carey MS, Gutin A, Meyer LA, Flake DD, Abkevich V, Potter J, Pruss D, Glenn P, Li Y, Li J, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Smith McCune K, Markman M, Broaddus RR, Lanchbury JS, Lu KH, Mills GB (2010) Somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could expand the number of patients benefiting from poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 28: 3570–3576
    1. Holstege H, Horlings HM, Velds A, Langerød A, Børresen-Dale AL, van de Vijver MJ, Nederlof PM, Jonkers J (2010) BRCA1-mutated and basal-like breast cancers have similar aCGH profiles and a high incidence of protein truncating TP53 mutations. BMC Cancer 10: 654.
    1. Loveday C, Turnbull C, Ramsay E, Hughes D, Ruark E, Frankum JR, Bowden G, Kalmyrzaev B, Warren-Perry M, Snape K, Adlard JW, Barwell J, Berg J, Brady AF, Brewer C, Brice G, Chapman C, Cook J, Davidson R, Donaldson A, Douglas F, Greenhalgh L, Henderson A, Louise I, Kumar A (2011) Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Nat Genet 43: 879–882
    1. Marsit CJ, Liu M, Nelson HH, Posner M, Suzuki M, Kelsey KT (2004) Inactivation of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway in lung and oral cancers: implications for treatment and survival. Oncogene 23: 1000–1004
    1. Meindl A, Hellebrand H, Wiek C, Erven V, Wappenschmidt B, Niederacher D, Freund M, Lichtner P, Hartmann L, Schaal H, Ramser J, Honisch E, Kubisch C, Wichmann HE, Kast K, Deißler H, Engel C, Müller-Myhsok B, Neveling K, Kiechle M, Mathew CG, Schindler D, Schmutzler RK, Hanenberg H (2010) Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet 42: 410–414
    1. Mendes-Pereira AM, Martin SA, Brough R, McCarthy A, Taylor JR, Kim JS, Waldman T, Lord CJ, Ashworth A (2009) Synthetic lethal targeting of PTEN mutant cells with PARP inhibitors. EMBO Mol Med 1: 315–322
    1. Narayan G, Arias-Pulido J, Koul S, Vargas H, Zhang FF, Villella J, Schneider A, Terry MB, Mansukhani M, Murty VV (2003) Frequent promoter methylation of CDH1, DAPK, RARB, and HIC1 genes in carcinoma of cervix uteri: its relationship to clinical outcome. Mol Cancer 2: 24.
    1. Norquist B, Wurz KA, Pennil CC, Garcia R, Gross J, Sakai W, Karlan BY, Taniguchi T, Swisher EM (2011) Secondary somatic mutations restoring BRCA1/2 predict chemotherapy resistance in hereditary ovarian carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 29: 3008–3015
    1. O’Shaughnessy J, Osborne C, Pippin JE, Yoffe M, Patt D, Rocha C, Chou Koo I, Sherman BM, Bradley C (2011) Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 364: 205–214
    1. Sakai W, Swisher EM, Jacquemont C, Chandramohan KV, Couch FJ, Langdon SP, Wurz K, Higgins J, Villegas E, Taniguchi T (2009) Functional restoration of BRCA2 protein by secondary BRCA2 mutations in BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res 69: 6381–6386
    1. Sakai W, Swisher EM, Karlan BY, Agarwal MK, Higgins J, Friedman C, Villegas E, Jacquemont C, Farrugia DJ, Couch FJ, Urban N, Taniguchi T (2008) Secondary mutations as a mechanism of cisplatin resistance in BRCA2-mutated cancers. Nature 451: 1116–1120
    1. Stefansson OA, Jonasson JG, Johannsson OT, Olafsdottir K, Steinersdottir M, Valgeirsdottir S, Eyfjord JE (2009) Genomic profiling of breast tumours in relation to BRCA abnormalities and phenotypes. Breast Cancer Res 11: 404
    1. Tan DS, Rothermundt C, Thomas K, Bancroft E, Eeles R, Shanley S, Ardern-Jones A, Norman A, Kaye SB, Gore ME (2008) “BRCAness” syndrome in ovarian cancer: a case-control study describing the clinical features and outcome of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Clin Oncol 26: 5530–5536
    1. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2011) Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474: 609–615
    1. Venkitaraman AR (2002) Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell 208: 171–182
    1. Wilcox CB, Baysal BE, Gallion HH, Strange MA, DeLoia JA (2005) High-resolution methylation analysis of the BRCA1 promoter in ovarian tumours. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 159: 114–122

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa