Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (Third Edition): Endorsed by the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Madoka Nakajima, Shigeki Yamada, Masakazu Miyajima, Kazunari Ishii, Nagato Kuriyama, Hiroaki Kazui, Hideki Kanemoto, Takashi Suehiro, Kenji Yoshiyama, Masahiro Kameda, Yoshinaga Kajimoto, Mitsuhito Mase, Hisayuki Murai, Daisuke Kita, Teruo Kimura, Naoyuki Samejima, Takahiko Tokuda, Mitsunobu Kaijima, Chihiro Akiba, Kaito Kawamura, Masamichi Atsuchi, Yoshihumi Hirata, Mitsunori Matsumae, Makoto Sasaki, Fumio Yamashita, Shigeki Aoki, Ryusuke Irie, Hiroji Miyake, Takeo Kato, Etsuro Mori, Masatsune Ishikawa, Isao Date, Hajime Arai, research committee of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, Madoka Nakajima, Shigeki Yamada, Masakazu Miyajima, Kazunari Ishii, Nagato Kuriyama, Hiroaki Kazui, Hideki Kanemoto, Takashi Suehiro, Kenji Yoshiyama, Masahiro Kameda, Yoshinaga Kajimoto, Mitsuhito Mase, Hisayuki Murai, Daisuke Kita, Teruo Kimura, Naoyuki Samejima, Takahiko Tokuda, Mitsunobu Kaijima, Chihiro Akiba, Kaito Kawamura, Masamichi Atsuchi, Yoshihumi Hirata, Mitsunori Matsumae, Makoto Sasaki, Fumio Yamashita, Shigeki Aoki, Ryusuke Irie, Hiroji Miyake, Takeo Kato, Etsuro Mori, Masatsune Ishikawa, Isao Date, Hajime Arai, research committee of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Abstract

Among the various disorders that manifest with gait disturbance, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence in the elderly population, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is becoming of great importance. The first edition of these guidelines for management of iNPH was published in 2004, and the second edition in 2012, to provide a series of timely, evidence-based recommendations related to iNPH. Since the last edition, clinical awareness of iNPH has risen dramatically, and clinical and basic research efforts on iNPH have increased significantly. This third edition of the guidelines was made to share these ideas with the international community and to promote international research on iNPH. The revision of the guidelines was undertaken by a multidisciplinary expert working group of the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in conjunction with the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare research project. This revision proposes a new classification for NPH. The category of iNPH is clearly distinguished from NPH with congenital/developmental and acquired etiologies. Additionally, the essential role of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus (DESH) in the imaging diagnosis and decision for further management of iNPH is discussed in this edition. We created an algorithm for diagnosis and decision for shunt management. Diagnosis by biomarkers that distinguish prognosis has been also initiated. Therefore, diagnosis and treatment of iNPH have entered a new phase. We hope that this third edition of the guidelines will help patients, their families, and healthcare professionals involved in treating iNPH.

Keywords: clinical guideline; diagnosis; idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; management; treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

The committee paid for expenses such as meeting venues and transportation for attending the committee meetings. The committee did not pay an honorarium to the committee members or study collaborators for writing manuscripts or participating in meetings.

The present guidelines have been prepared based on appropriate conflict of interest (COI) management by the operating rules of the Japan Neurosurgical Society, the Japanese Society of Neurology, the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology, and the Japan Radiological Society. The committee members, study collaborators, and evaluation/ coordinating committee members involved in these guidelines submitted self-reports to their respective academic societies regarding their COIs for the past 3 years based on the standards set by the academic societies to which they belong.

Honorarium for executives, stocks, patent royalties, lecture fees, manuscript fees, research expenses, subsidies, travel expenses, gifts, scholarships (encouragements) endowment, affiliation with an endowed chair.

Moreover, all organizations such as corporations targeted for the declaration are all "corporations/corporate organizations related to medical research and organizations for profit-making purposes.” After being reviewed by the COI Review Committee, the Guidelines were prepared/revised according to the results of the review.

The companies declared in the COI are shown below:

Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan Ltd., Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Japan Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Kaneka Medix Corporation, Software Service, Inc., Terumo Corporation, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Stryker Japan, Nippontectsystems co., Ltd., Nihon Medi-Physics Co., Ltd., Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., Hitachi, Ltd., Fujitsu Limited, FUJIFILM Corporation, Heptares Therapeutics Ltd., Integra Japan, Mentis Cura Japan, PMOD Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
DESH. Typical MRI of a patient with iNPH. Narrowing of the CSF spaces near the vertex and widening of the Sylvian fissure are good indicators that iNPH will respond to treatment. The few wide sulci that are seen on the cerebral convexity (white arrow) are all in the vicinity of large, superficial arteries. DESH: disproportionately enlarged subarachnoidspace hydrocephalus, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, iNPH: idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Classification of hydrocephalus in Relation to iNPH. DESH: disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: algorithm of diagnosis and management.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Callosal angle. (A) The callosal angle, which is the angle between the left and right parts of the corpus callosum (superior walls of ventricles) should be measured on the coronal plane, (B) on a slice through the posterior commissure and perpendicular to the anterior commissure–posterior commissure line.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
z-EI and BVR. Evaluation of the z-EI and BVRs should be done on the coronal plane, (A) on a slice through the anterior commissure and perpendicular to the AC-PC line (green). (B) The height of the frontal horns of the lateral ventricles (yellow line) in the z-axis divided by the midline diameter of the skull (magenta line) is defined as the z-EI, with a cutoff value of 0.42. The BVR at the AC levels are measured as the maximum z-axial length of the brain just above the lateral ventricles (yellow line) divided by the maximum length of the lateral ventricles (cyan line). When the coronary plane is through the AC, the value will be below 1.0, and when the plane is through the PC, it is below 1.5. This figure shows z-EI = 46.7/95.0 = 0.49 >0.42, BVR at the AC level = 28.1/46.7 = 0.6

References

    1. Hakim S, Adams RD: The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 2: 307–327, 1965
    1. Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH: Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal" cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. A treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 273: 117–126, 1965
    1. Ishikawa M: Guideline Committe for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Clinical guidelines for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 44: 222–223, 2004
    1. Hashimoto M, Ishikawa M, Mori E, Kuwana N: Study of INPH on neurological improvement (SINPHONI): Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 7: 18, 2010
    1. Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K, Yamaji S, Hirono N, Imamura T: CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19: 1277–1284, 1998
    1. Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, et al. : Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 52: 775–809, 2012
    1. Kazui H, Miyajima M, Mori E, Ishikawa M: SINPHONI-2 Investigators: Lumboperitoneal shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (SINPHONI-2): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 14: 585–594, 2015
    1. Miyajima M, Kazui H, Mori E, Ishikawa M: on behalf of the SINPHONI-2 Investigators: One-year outcome in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of lumboperitoneal shunt to ventriculoperitoneal shunt. J Neurosurg 125: 1483–1492, 2016
    1. Kuriyama N, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, et al. : Nationwide hospital-based survey of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in Japan: epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Brain Behav 7: e00635, 2017
    1. Nakajima M, Miyajima M, Ogino I, et al. : Shunt Intervention for possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus improves patient outcomes: a nationwide hospital-based survey in Japan. Front Neurol 9: 421, 2018
    1. Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM: Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57: S4–S16, 2005
    1. Wilson RK, Williams MA: Evidence that congenital hydrocephalus is a precursor to idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in only a subset of patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78: 508–511, 2007
    1. Marmarou A, Young HF, Aygok GA, et al. : Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study in 151 patients. J Neurosurg 102: 987–997, 2005
    1. Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Williams MA, Rigamonti D: Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and dynamics in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 64: 919–925; discussion 925-926, 2009
    1. Oi S, Shimoda M, Shibata M, et al. : Pathophysiology of long-standing overt ventriculomegaly in adults. J Neurosurg 92: 933–940, 2000
    1. Cornips EMJ, Overvliet GM, Weber JW, et al. : The clinical spectrum of Blake's pouch cyst: report of six illustrative cases. Childs Nerv Syst 26: 1057–1064, 2010
    1. Gangemi M, Maiuri F, Naddeo M, et al. : Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: an Italian multicenter study. Neurosurgery 63: 62–67; discussion 67-69, 2008
    1. Fukuhara T, Luciano MG: Clinical features of late-onset idiopathic aqueductal stenosis. Surg Neurol 55: 132–136; discussion 136-137, 2001
    1. Takahashi Y, Kawanami T, Nagasawa H, Iseki C, Hanyu H, Kato T: Familial normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) with an autosomal-dominant inheritance: a novel subgroup of NPH. J Neurol Sci 308: 149–151, 2011
    1. McGirr A, Cusimano MD: Familial aggregation of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: novel familial case and a family study of the NPH triad in an iNPH patient cohort. J Neurol Sci 321: 82–88, 2012
    1. Huovinen J, Kastinen S, Komulainen S, et al. : Familial idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 368: 11–18, 2016
    1. Hiraoka K, Meguro K, Mori E: Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in the elderly population of a Japanese rural community. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 48: 197–199; discussion 199-200, 2008
    1. Tanaka N, Yamaguchi S, Ishikawa H, Ishii H, Meguro K: Prevalence of possible idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in Japan: the Osaki-Tajiri project. Neuroepidemiology 32: 171–175, 2009
    1. Iseki C, Kawanami T, Nagasawa H, et al. : Asymptomatic ventriculomegaly with features of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus on MRI (AVIM) in the elderly: a prospective study in a Japanese population. J Neurol Sci 277: 54–57, 2009
    1. Iseki C, Takahashi Y, Wada M, Kawanami T, Adachi M, Kato T: Incidence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH): a 10-year follow-up study of a rural community in Japan. J Neurol Sci 339: 108–112, 2014
    1. Nakashita S, Wada-Isoe K, Uemura Y, et al. : Clinical assessment and prevalence of parkinsonism in Japanese elderly people. Acta Neurol Scand 133: 373–379, 2016
    1. Andersson J, Rosell M, Kockum K, Lilja-Lund O, Söderström L, Laurell K: Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective, population-based study. PLoS One 14: e0217705, 2019
    1. Jaraj D, Rabiei K, Marlow T, Jensen C, Skoog I, Wikkelsø C: Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology 82: 1449–1454, 2014
    1. Vanneste J, Augustijn P, Dirven C, Tan WF, Goedhart ZD: Shunting normal-pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology 42: 54–59, 1992
    1. Tisell M, Höglund M, Wikkelsø C: National and regional incidence of surgery for adult hydrocephalus in Sweden. Acta Neurol Scand 112: 72–75, 2005
    1. Brean A, Fredø HL, Sollid S, Müller T, Sundstrøm T, Eide PK: Five-year incidence of surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in Norway. Acta Neurol Scand 120: 314–316, 2009
    1. Klassen BT, Ahlskog JE: Normal pressure hydrocephalus: how often does the diagnosis hold water? Neurology 77: 1119–1125, 2011
    1. Muangpaisan W, Petcharat C, Srinonprasert V: Prevalence of potentially reversible conditions in dementia and mild cognitive impairment in a geriatric clinic. Geriatr Gerontol Int 12: 59–64, 2012
    1. Trenkwalder C, Schwarz J, Gebhard J, et al. : Starnberg trial on epidemiology of Parkinsonism and hypertension in the elderly. Prevalence of Parkinson's disease and related disorders assessed by a door-to-door survey of inhabitants older than 65 years. Arch Neurol 52: 1017–1022, 1995
    1. Bech-Azeddine R, Waldemar G, Knudsen GM, et al. : Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation and findings in a multidisciplinary memory clinic. Eur J Neurol 8: 601–611, 2001
    1. Isaacs AM, Riva-Cambrin J, Yavin D, et al. : Age-specific global epidemiology of hydrocephalus: systematic review, metanalysis and global birth surveillance. PLoS One 13: e0204926, 2018
    1. Black PM: Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Results of shunting in 62 patients. J Neurosurg 52: 371–377, 1980
    1. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Relkin N, Klinge P, Black PM: Development of guidelines for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: introduction. Neurosurgery 57: S1–3; discussion ii-v, 2005
    1. Miyoshi N, Kazui H, Ogino A, Ishikawa M, Miyake H, Tokunaga H, Ikejiri Y, Takeda M: Association between cognitive impairment and gait disturbance in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 20: 71–76, 2005
    1. Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Drücke H, et al. : Gait analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus--which parameters respond to the CSF tap test? Clin Neurophysiol 111: 1678–1686, 2000
    1. Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Drücke H, Jöhnk K, Illert M, Deuschl G: Comparative analysis of the gait disorder of normal pressure hydrocephalus and Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70: 289–297, 2001
    1. Williams MA, Thomas G, de Lateur B, et al. : Objective assessment of gait in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 87: 39–45, 2008
    1. Bugalho P, Alves L: Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: white matter lesions correlate negatively with gait improvement after lumbar puncture. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109: 774–778, 2007
    1. Marmarou A, Young HF, Aygok GA, et al. : Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study in 151 patients. J Neurosurg 102: 987–997, 2005
    1. Solana E, Poca MA, Sahuquillo J, Benejam B, Junqué C, Dronavalli M: Cognitive and motor improvement after retesting in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a real change or merely a learning effect? J Neurosurg 112: 399–409, 2010
    1. Kubo Y, Kazui H, Yoshida T, et al. : Validation of grading scale for evaluating symptoms of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 25: 37–45, 2008
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39: 142–148, 1991
    1. Nakayama T, Ouchi Y, Yoshikawa E, Sugihara G, Torizuka T, Tanaka K: Striatal D2 receptor availability after shunting in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Nucl Med 48: 1981–1986, 2007
    1. Hattingen E, Jurcoane A, Melber J, et al. : Diffusion tensor imaging in patients with adult chronic idiopathic hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 66: 917–924, 2010
    1. Iddon JL, Morgan DJ, Loveday C, Sahakian BJ, Pickard JD: Neuropsychological profile of young adults with spina bifida with or without hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75: 1112–1118, 2004
    1. Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, et al. : Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg 87: 687–693, 1997
    1. Chaudhry P, Kharkar S, Heidler-Gary J, et al. : Characteristics and reversibility of dementia in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Behav Neurol 18: 149–158, 2007
    1. Ogino A, Kazui H, Miyoshi N, et al. : Cognitive impairment in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 21: 113–119, 2006
    1. Thomas G, McGirt MJ, Woodworth G, et al. : Baseline neuropsychological profile and cognitive response to cerebrospinal fluid shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 20: 163–168, 2005
    1. Hellström P, Edsbagge M, Archer T, Tisell M, Tullberg M, Wikkelsø C: The neuropsychology of patients with clinically diagnosed idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 61: 1219–1226; discussion 1227-1228, 2007
    1. Akiguchi I, Ishii M, Watanabe Y, et al. : Shunt-responsive parkinsonism and reversible white matter lesions in patients with idiopathic NPH. J Neurol 255: 1392–1399, 2008
    1. Mataró M, Matarín M, Poca MA, et al. : Functional and magnetic resonance imaging correlates of corpus callosum in normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78: 395–398, 2007
    1. del Mar Matarin M, Pueyo R, Poca MA, et al. : Post-surgical changes in brain metabolism detected by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in normal pressure hydrocephalus: results of a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78: 760–763, 2007
    1. Krauss JK, Droste DW, Vach W, et al. : Cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: effect of periventricular and deep white matter lesions. Neurosurgery 39: 292–299; discussion 299-300, 1996
    1. Mori K: Management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a multiinstitutional study conducted in Japan. J Neurosurg 95: 970–973, 2001
    1. Kristensen B, Malm J, Fagerland M, et al. : Regional cerebral blood flow, white matter abnormalities, and cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60: 282–288, 1996
    1. Raftopoulos C, Deleval J, Chaskis C, et al. : Cognitive recovery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 35: 397–404; discussion 404-395, 1994
    1. Walchenbach R, Geiger E, Thomeer RT, Vanneste JA: The value of temporary external lumbar CSF drainage in predicting the outcome of shunting on normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72: 503–506, 2002
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12: 189–198, 1975
    1. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B: The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology 55: 1621–1626, 2000
    1. Pilgrim BM, Meyers JE, Bayless J, Whetstone MM: Validity of the Ward seven-subtest WAIS-III short form in a neuropsychological population. Appl Neuropsychol 6: 243–246, 1999
    1. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddeley A, Hiorns R: The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 11: 855–870, 1989
    1. Kazui H, Matsuda A, Hirono N, et al. : Everyday memory impairment of patients with mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 19: 331–337, 2005
    1. Hellström P, Klinge P, Tans J, Wikkelsø C: The neuropsychology of iNPH: findings and evaluation of tests in the European multicentre study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 114: 130–134, 2012
    1. Mathew R, Pavithran S, Byju P: Neuropsychiatric manifestations of cognitively advanced idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra 8: 467–475, 2018
    1. Kito Y, Kazui H, Kubo Y, et al. : Neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Behav Neurol 21: 165–174, 2009
    1. Kanemoto H, Kazui H, Suzuki Y, et al. : Effect of lumbo-peritoneal shunt surgery on neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 361: 206–212, 2016
    1. Kanemoto H, Kazui H, Suehiro T, et al. : Apathy and right caudate perfusion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a case-control study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 34: 453–462, 2019
    1. Allali G, Laidet M, Armand S, Saj A, Krack P, Assal F: Apathy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a marker of reversible gait disorders. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 33: 735–742, 2018
    1. Allali G, Laidet M, Armand S, Saj A, Krack P, Assal F: Apathy and higher level of gait control in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Int J Psychophysiol 119: 127–131, 2017
    1. Krzastek SC, Bruch WM, Robinson SP, Young HF, Klausner AP: Characterization of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurourol Urodyn 36: 1167–1173, 2017
    1. Campos-Juanatey F, Gutiérrez-Baños JL, Portillo-Martín JA, Zubillaga-Guerrero S: Assessment of the urodynamic diagnosis in patients with urinary incontinence associated with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurourol Urodyn 34: 465–468, 2015
    1. Sakakibara R, Kanda T, Sekido T, et al. : Mechanism of bladder dysfunction in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurourol Urodyn 27: 507–510, 2008
    1. Skelly J, Flint AJ: Urinary incontinence associated with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 43: 286–294, 1995
    1. Yap P, Tan D: Urinary incontinence in dementia – a practical approach. Aust Fam Physician 35: 237–241, 2006
    1. Factora R, Luciano M: Normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnosis and new approaches to treatment. Clin Geriatr Med 22: 645–657, 2006
    1. Pomeraniec IJ, Ksendzovsky A, Ellis S, Roberts SE, Jane JA: Frequency and long-term follow-up of trapped fourth ventricle following neonatal posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17: 552–557, 2016
    1. Larsson A, Wikkelsö C, Bilting M, Stephensen H: Clinical parameters in 74 consecutive patients shunt operated for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 84: 475–482, 1991
    1. Krauss JK, Regel JP, Droste DW, Orszagh M, Borremans JJ, Vach W: Movement disorders in adult hydrocephalus. Mov Disord 12: 53–60, 1997
    1. Nowak DA, Topka HR: Broadening a classic clinical triad: the hypokinetic motor disorder of normal pressure hydrocephalus also affects the hand. Exp Neurol 198: 81–87, 2006
    1. Nowak DA, Gumprecht H, Topka H: CSF drainage ameliorates the motor deficit in normal pressure hydrocephalus: evidence from the analysis of grasping movements. J Neurol 253: 640–647, 2006
    1. Odagiri H, Baba T, Nishio Y, Iizuka O, Narita W, Matsuda M, Mori E: Clinical characteristics of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with Lewy body diseases. J Neurol Sci 359: 309–311, 2015
    1. Sasaki M, Honda S, Yuasa T, Iwamura A, Shibata E, Ohba H: Narrow CSF space at high convexity and high midline areas in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus detected by axial and coronal MRI. Neuroradiology 50: 117–122, 2008
    1. Vassilouthis J: The syndrome of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61: 501–509, 1984
    1. Caruso R, Cervoni L, Vitale AM, Salvati M: Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in adults: result of shunting correlated with clinical findings in 18 patients and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 20: 104–107, 1997
    1. Holodny AI, Waxman R, George AE, Rusinek H, Kalnin AJ, de Leon M: MR differential diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease: significance of perihippocampal fissures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19: 813–819, 1998
    1. Ishii K, Kawaguchi T, Shimada K, et al. : Voxel-based analysis of gray matter and CSF space in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 25: 329–335, 2008
    1. Yamashita F, Sasaki M, Takahashi S, et al. : Detection of changes in cerebrospinal fluid space in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus using voxel-based morphometry. Neuroradiology 52: 381–386, 2010
    1. Lee WJ, Wang SJ, Hsu LC, Lirng JF, Wu CH, Fuh JL: Brain MRI as a predictor of CSF tap test response in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol 257: 1675–1681, 2010
    1. Craven CL, Toma AK, Mostafa T, Patel N, Watkins LD: The predictive value of DESH for shunt responsiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 34: 294–298, 2016
    1. Ishii K, Kanda T, Harada A, et al. : Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 18: 2678–2683, 2008
    1. Virhammar J, Laurell K, Cesarini KG, Larsson EM: The callosal angle measured on MRI as a predictor of outcome in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 120: 178–184, 2014
    1. Virhammar J, Laurell K, Cesarini KG, Larsson EM: Preoperative prognostic value of MRI findings in 108 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35: 2311–2318, 2014
    1. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Yamamoto K: Optimal diagnostic indices for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus based on the 3D quantitative volumetric analysis for the cerebral ventricle and subarachnoid space. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36: 2262–2269, 2015
    1. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Yamamoto K: Comparison of CSF distribution between idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37: 1249–1255, 2016
    1. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Yamamoto K: Fluid distribution pattern in adult-onset congenital, idiopathic, and secondary normal-pressure hydrocephalus: implications for clinical care. Front Neurol 8: 583, 2017
    1. Adachi M, Kawanami T, Ohshima F, Kato T: Upper midbrain profile sign and cingulate sulcus sign: MRI findings on sagittal images in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus, Alzheimer's disease, and progressive supranuclear palsy. Radiat Med 24: 568–572, 2006
    1. Savolainen S, Laakso MP, Paljärvi L, et al. : MR imaging of the hippocampus in normal pressure hydrocephalus: correlations with cortical Alzheimer's disease confirmed by pathologic analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21: 409–414, 2000
    1. Lee PH, Yong SW, Ahn YH, Huh K: Correlation of midbrain diameter and gait disturbance in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol 252: 958–963, 2005
    1. Mocco J, Tomey MI, Komotar RJ, et al. : Ventriculoperitoneal shunting of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus increases midbrain size: a potential mechanism for gait improvement. Neurosurgery 59: 847–850; discussion 850-851, 2006
    1. Ishii M, Kawamata T, Akiguchi I, et al. : Parkinsonian symptomatology may correlate with CT findings before and after shunting in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Parkinsons Dis 2010, 201089, 2010
    1. Hiraoka K, Yamasaki H, Takagi M, et al. : Is the midbrain involved in the manifestation of gait disturbance in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus? J Neurol 258: 820–825, 2011
    1. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Iwamuro Y, Yamamoto K: Choroidal fissure acts as an overflow device in cerebrospinal fluid drainage: morphological comparison between idiopathic and secondary normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Sci Rep 6: 39070, 2016
    1. Serulle Y, Rusinek H, Kirov II, et al. : Differentiating shunt-responsive normal pressure hydrocephalus from Alzheimer disease and normal aging: pilot study using automated MRI brain tissue segmentation. J Neurol 261: 1994–2002, 2014
    1. Ishii K, Soma T, Shimada K, Oda H, Terashima A, Kawasaki R: Automatic volumetry of the cerebrospinal fluid space in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra 3: 489–496, 2013
    1. Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, et al. : White matter lesions in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and in an age-matched control group: a comparative study. Neurosurgery 40: 491–495; discussion 495-496, 1997
    1. Tullberg M, Jensen C, Ekholm S, Wikkelsø C: Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22: 1665–1673, 2001
    1. Hoza D, Vlasák A, Horˇínek D, Sameš M, Alfieri A: DTI-MRI biomarkers in the search for normal pressure hydrocephalus aetiology: a review. Neurosurg Rev 38: 239–244, discussion 244, 2015
    1. Siasios I, Kapsalaki EZ, Fountas KN, et al. : The role of diffusion tensor imaging and fractional anisotropy in the evaluation of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a literature review. Neurosurg Focus 41: E12, 2016
    1. Keong NC, Pena A, Price SJ, Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Pickard JD: Imaging normal pressure hydrocephalus: theories, techniques, and challenges. Neurosurg Focus 41: E11, 2016
    1. Kim MJ, Seo SW, Lee KM, et al. : Differential diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus from other dementias using diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32: 1496–1503, 2011
    1. Hattori T, Yuasa T, Aoki S, et al. : Altered microstructure in corticospinal tract in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison with Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease with dementia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32: 1681–1687, 2011
    1. Hattori T, Ito K, Aoki S, et al. : White matter alteration in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: tract-based spatial statistics study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33: 97–103, 2012
    1. Scheel M, Diekhoff T, Sprung C, Hoffmann KT: Diffusion tensor imaging in hydrocephalus–findings before and after shunt surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154: 1699–1706, 2012
    1. Koyama T, Marumoto K, Domen K, Miyake H: White matter characteristics of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a diffusion tensor tract-based spatial statistic study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 53: 601–608, 2013
    1. Nicot B, Bouzerar R, Gondry-Jouet C, et al. : Effect of surgery on periventricular white matter in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: comparison of two methods of DTI analysis. Acta Radiol 55: 614–621, 2014
    1. Jurcoane A, Keil F, Szelenyi A, Pfeilschifter W, Singer OC, Hattingen E: Directional diffusion of corticospinal tract supports therapy decisions in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 56: 5–13, 2014
    1. Daouk J, Chaarani B, Zmudka J, et al. : Relationship between cerebrospinal fluid flow, ventricles morphology, and DTI properties in internal capsules: differences between Alzheimer's disease and normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Radiol 55: 992–999, 2014
    1. Radovnický T, Adámek D, Derner M, Sameš M: Fractional anisotropy in patients with disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 158: 1495–1500, 2016
    1. Nakanishi A, Fukunaga I, Hori M, et al. : Microstructural changes of the corticospinal tract in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparison of diffusion tensor and diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroradiology 55: 971–976, 2013
    1. Hori M, Kamiya K, Nakanishi A, et al. : Prospective estimation of mean axon diameter and extra-axonal space of the posterior limb of the internal capsule in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after a lumboperitoneal shunt by using q-space diffusion MRI. Eur Radiol 26: 2992–2998, 2016
    1. Kamiya K, Kamagata K, Miyajima M, et al. : Diffusional kurtosis imaging in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: correlation with severity of cognitive impairment. Magn Reson Med Sci 15: 316–323, 2016
    1. Irie R, Tsuruta K, Hori M, et al. : Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging for evaluation of corticospinal tract in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Jpn J Radiol 35: 25–30, 2017
    1. Algin O, Hakyemez B, Parlak M: The efficiency of PC-MRI in diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and prediction of shunt response. Acad Radiol 17: 181–187, 2010
    1. Forner Giner J, Sanz-Requena R, Flórez N, et al. : Quantitative phase-contrast MRI study of cerebrospinal fluid flow: a method for identifying patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurologia 29: 68–75, 2014
    1. Hayashi N, Matsumae M, Yatsushiro S, Hirayama A, Abdullah A, Kuroda K: Quantitative analysis of cerebrospinal fluid pressure gradients in healthy volunteers and patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 55: 657–662, 2015
    1. Sharma AK, Gaikwad S, Gupta V, Garg A, Mishra NK: Measurement of peak CSF flow velocity at cerebral aqueduct, before and after lumbar CSF drainage, by use of phase-contrast MRI: utility in the management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 110: 363–368, 2008
    1. Scollato A, Tenenbaum R, Bahl G, Celerini M, Salani B, Di Lorenzo N: Changes in aqueductal CSF stroke volume and progression of symptoms in patients with unshunted idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29: 192–197, 2008
    1. Scollato A, Gallina P, Gautam B, et al. : Changes in aqueductal CSF stroke volume in shunted patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30: 1580–1586, 2009
    1. Tawfik AM, Elsorogy L, Abdelghaffar R, Naby AA, Elmenshawi I: Phase-contrast MRI CSF flow measurements for the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: observer agreement of velocity versus volume parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208: 838–843, 2017
    1. Lenfeldt N, Hauksson J, Birgander R, Eklund A, Malm J: Improvement after cerebrospinal fluid drainage is related to levels of N-acetyl-aspartate in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 62: 135–141, discussion 141-142, 2008
    1. Lundin F, Tisell A, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, et al. : Reduced thalamic N-acetylaspartate in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a controlled 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of frontal deep white matter and the thalamus using absolute quantification. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82: 772–778, 2011
    1. Kizu O, Yamada K, Nishimura T: Proton chemical shift imaging in normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22: 1659–1664, 2001
    1. Algin O, Hakyemez B, Parlak M: Proton MR spectroscopy and white matter hyperintensities in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and other dementias. Br J Radiol 83: 747–752, 2010
    1. Lundin F, Tisell A, Leijon G, et al. : Preoperative and postoperative 1H-MR spectroscopy changes in frontal deep white matter and the thalamus in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84: 188–193, 2013
    1. Ohmichi T, Kondo M, Itsukage M, et al. : Usefulness of the convexity apparent hyperperfusion sign in 123I-iodoamphetamine brain perfusion SPECT for the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 130: 398–405, 2018
    1. Takahashi R, Ishii K, Tokuda T, Nakajima M, Okada T: SINPHONI-2 Investigators: Regional dissociation between the cerebral blood flow and gray matter density alterations in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalous: results from SINPHONI-2 study. Neuroradiology 61: 37–42, 2019
    1. Ishii K, Hashimoto M, Hayashida K, et al. : A multicenter brain perfusion SPECT study evaluating idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus on neurological improvement. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 32: 1–10, 2011
    1. Yamada SM, Masahira N, Kawanishi Y, Fujimoto Y, Shimizu K: Preoperative acetazolamide SPECT is useful for predicting outcome of shunt operation in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients. Clin Nucl Med 38: 671–676, 2013
    1. Sakakibara R, Uchida Y, Ishii K, et al. : Bladder recovery relates with increased mid-cingulate perfusion after shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a single-photon emission tomography study. Int Urol Nephrol 48: 169–174, 2016
    1. Sakakibara R, Uchida Y, Ishii K, et al. : Correlation of right frontal hypoperfusion and urinary dysfunction in iNPH: a SPECT study. Neurourol Urodyn 31: 50–55, 2012
    1. Tatsch K, Poepperl G: Nigrostriatal dopamine terminal imaging with dopamine transporter SPECT: an update. J Nucl Med 54: 1331–1338, 2013
    1. Townley RA, Botha H, Graff-Radford J, et al. : 18F-FDG PET-CT pattern in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroimage Clin 18: 897–902, 2018
    1. Calcagni ML, Lavalle M, Mangiola A, et al. : Early evaluation of cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglu) with 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinical assessment in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) patients before and after ventricular shunt placement: preliminary experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39: 236–241, 2012
    1. Calcagni ML, Taralli S, Mangiola A, et al. : Regional cerebral metabolic rate of glucose evaluation and clinical assessment in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus before and after ventricular shunt placement: a prospective analysis. Clin Nucl Med 38: 426–431, 2013
    1. Hiraoka K, Narita W, Kikuchi H, et al. : Amyloid deposits and response to shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 356: 124–128, 2015
    1. Rinne JO, Frantzen J, Leinonen V, et al. : Prospective flutemetamol positron emission tomography and histopathology in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurodegener Dis 13: 237–245, 2014
    1. Leinonen V, Rinne JO, Virtanen KA, et al. : Positron emission tomography with [18F]flutemetamol and [11C]PiB for in vivo detection of cerebral cortical amyloid in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients. Eur J Neurol 20: 1043–1052, 2013
    1. Wong DF, Moghekar AR, Rigamonti D, et al. : An in vivo evaluation of cerebral cortical amyloid with [18F]flutemetamol using positron emission tomography compared with parietal biopsy samples in living normal pressure hydrocephalus patients. Mol Imaging Biol 15: 230–237, 2013
    1. Agostini V, Lanotte M, Carlone M, et al. : Instrumented gait analysis for an objective pre-/postassessment of tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96: 1235–1241, 2015
    1. Allali G, Laidet M, Armand S, et al. : A combined cognitive and gait quantification to identify normal pressure hydrocephalus from its mimics: hte Geneva's protocol. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 160: 5–11, 2017
    1. Damasceno BP, Carelli EF, Honorato DC, Facure JJ: The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid tap-test in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 55: 179–185, 1997
    1. Gallagher R, Marquez J, Osmotherly P: Clinimetric properties and minimal clinically important differences for a battery of gait, balance, and cognitive examinations for the tap test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 84: E378–E384, 2019
    1. Gallina P, Lastrucci G, Caini S, Lorenzo ND, Porfirio B, Scollato A: Accuracy and safety of 1-day external lumbar drainage of CSF for shunt selection in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Journal Neurosurg, Epub 2018 Nov 1; doi: 10.3171/2018.6.JNS18400.
    1. Haan J, Thomeer RT: Predictive value of temporary external lumbar drainage in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 22: 388–391, 1988
    1. Ishikawa M, Oowaki H, Matsumoto A, Suzuki T, Furuse M, Nishida N: Clinical significance of cerebrospinal fluid tap test and magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography findings of tight high convexity in patients with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 50: 119–123, disucussion 123, 2010
    1. Ishikawa M, Yamada S, Yamamoto K: Early and delayed assessments of quantitative gait measures to improve the tap test as a predictor of shunt effectiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS 13: 20, 2016
    1. Kang K, Ko PW, Jin M, Suk K, Lee HW: Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and the cerebrospinal fluid tap test. J Clin Neurosci 21: 1398–1403, 2014
    1. Lenfeldt N, Larsson A, Nyberg L, et al. : Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: increased supplementary motor activity accounts for improvement after CSF drainage. Brain 131: 2904–2912, 2008
    1. Mahr CV, Dengl M, Nestler U, et al. : Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and predictive value of clinical testing, lumbar drainage, and CSF dynamics. J Neurosurg 125: 591–597, 2016
    1. Malm J, Kristensen B, Karlsson T, Fagerlund M, Elfverson J, Ekstedt J: The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with th idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol 52: 783–789, 1995
    1. Matsuoka T, Akakabe M, Iida JI, Kawahara M, Uchiyama Y: Changes in cognitive function scores after cerebrospinal fluid tap testing in patients with suspected idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Cogn Behav Neurol 31: 201–206, 2018
    1. Mendes GAS, de Oliveira MF, Pinto FCG: The Timed Up and Go test as a diagnostic criterion in normal pressure hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg 105: 456–461, 2017
    1. Mihalj M: CSF tap test – obsolete or appropriate test for predicting shunt responsiveness? A systemic review. J Neurol Sci 370: 157, 2016
    1. Raneri F, Zella MAS, Di Cristofori A, Zarino B, Pluderi M, Spagnoli D: Supplementary tests in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a single-center experience with a combined lumbar infusion test and tap test. World Neurosurg 100: 567–574, 2017
    1. Ravdin LD, Katzen HL, Jackson AE, Tsakanikas D, Assuras S, Relkin NR: Features of gait most responsive to tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 110: 455–461, 2008
    1. Sand T, Bovim G, Grimse R, Myhr G, Helde G, Cappelen J: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: the CSF tap-test may predict the clinical response to shunting. Acta Neurol Scand 89: 311–316, 1994
    1. Schniepp R, Trabold R, Romagna A, et al. : Walking assessment after lumbar puncture in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a delayed improvement over 3 days. J Neurosurg 126: 148–157, 2017
    1. Scully AE, Lim ECW, Teow PP, Tan DML: A systematic review of the diagnostic utility of simple tests of change after trial removal of cerebrospinal fluid in adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Rehabil 32: 942–953, 2018
    1. Thakur SK, Serulle Y, Miskin NP, Rusinek H, Golomb J, George AE: Lumbar puncture test in normal pressure hydrocephalus: does the volume of CSF removed affect the response to tap? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38: 1456–1460, 2017
    1. Virhammar J, Cesarini KG, Laurell K: The CSF tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation time, reliability and the influence of pain. Eur J Neurol 19: 271–276, 2012
    1. Wikkelsø C, Andersson H, Blomstrand C, Lindqvist G: The clincial effect of lumbar puncture in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45: 64–69, 1982
    1. Wikkelsø C, Hellström P, Klinge PM, Tans JT: European iNPH Multicentre Study Group: The European iNPH Multicentre Study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF tap test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84: 562–568, 2013
    1. Wolfsegger T, Topakian R: Cognitive impairment predicts worse short-term response to spinal tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 379: 222–225, 2017
    1. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Miyajima M, et al. : Disease duration: the key to accurate CSF tap test in iNPH. Acta Neurol Scand 135: 189–196, 2017
    1. Clinical guideposts for the practicing neurologist. Neurol Clin Pract 7: 1, 2017
    1. Lopes MIR, Tornai JB, Jeng FLM, et al. : Development of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the "Grading scale for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus": cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 76: 692–696, 2018
    1. Yamada S, Kimura T, Jingami N, et al. : Disability risk or unimproved symptoms following shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: post hoc analysis of SINPHONI-2. J Neurosurg 126: 2002–2009, 2017
    1. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Miyajima M, et al. : Timed up and go test at tap test and shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Clin Pract 7: 1–11, 2017
    1. Williams MA, Malm J: Diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 22: 579–599, 2016
    1. Panciani PP, Migliorati K, Muratori A, Gelmini M, Padovani A, Fontanella M: Computerized gait analysis with inertial sensor in the management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 54: 724–729, 2018
    1. Weerakkody RA, Czosnyka M, Schuhmann MU, et al. : Clinical assessment of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus. Guide to interpretation based on observational study. Acta Neurol Scand 124: 85–98, 2011
    1. Pisani R, Mazzone P, Cocito L: Continuous lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure monitoring in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: predictive value in the selection for shunt surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 100: 160–162, 1998
    1. Krauss JK, Droste DW, Bohus M, et al. : The relation of intracranial pressure B-waves to different sleep stages in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 136: 195–203, 1995
    1. Eide PK, Stanisic M: Cerebral microdialysis and intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: association with clinical response to extended lumbar drainage and shunt surgery. J Neurosurg 112: 414–424, 2010
    1. Eide PK, Fremming AD, Sorteberg A: Lack of relationship between resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow and intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 108: 381–388, 2003
    1. Poca MA, Mataró M, Del Mar Matarín M, Arikan F, Junqué C, Sahuquillo J: Is the placement of shunts in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus worth the risk? Results of a study based on continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 100: 855–866, 2004
    1. Sahuquillo J, Rubio E, Codina A, et al. : Reappraisal of the intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in patients with the so-called "normal pressure hydrocephalus" syndrome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 112: 50–61, 1991
    1. Black PM, Ojemann RG, Tzouras A: CSF shunts for dementia, incontinence, and gait disturbance. Clin Neurosurg 32: 632–651, 1985
    1. Bárcena A, Mestre C, Cañizal JM, Rivero B, Lobato RD: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: analysis of factors related to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics determining functional prognosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139: 933–941, 1997
    1. Delwel EJ, de Jong DA, Avezaat CJ: The prognostic value of clinical characteristics and parameters of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147: 1037–1042; discussion 1042-1043, 2005
    1. Brean A, Eide PK: Assessment of idiopathic normal pressure patients in neurological practice: the role of lumbar infusion testing for referral of patients to neurosurgery. Eur J Neurol 15: 605–612, 2008
    1. Eide PK: Intracranial pressure parameters in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients treated with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148: 21–29, discussion 29, 2006
    1. Anile C, De Bonis P, Albanese A, et al. : Selection of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus for shunt placement: a single-institution experience. J Neurosurg 113: 64–73, 2010
    1. Kahlon B, Sundbärg G, Rehncrona S: Comparison between the lumbar infusion and CSF tap tests to predict outcome after shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73: 721–726, 2002
    1. Takeuchi T, Kasahara E, Iwasaki M, Mima T, Mori K: Indications for shunting in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus presenting with dementia and brain atrophy (atypical idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 40: 38–46; discussion 46-47, 2000
    1. Børgesen SE: Conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 71: 1–45, 1984
    1. Miyake H, Ohta T, Kajimoto Y, Deguchi J: Diamox((R)) challenge test to decide indications for cerebrospinal fluid shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141: 1187–1193, 1999
    1. Jeppsson A, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Wikkelsø C: Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: pathophysiology and diagnosis by CSF biomarkers. Neurology 80: 1385–1392, 2013
    1. Jeppsson A, Höltta M, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Wikkelsø C, Tullberg M: Amyloid mis-metabolism in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS 13: 13, 2016
    1. Pyykkö OT, Lumela M, Rummukainen J, et al. : Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker and brain biopsy findings in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. PLoS One 9: e91974, 2014
    1. Agren-Wilsson A, Lekman A, Sjöberg W, et al. : CSF biomarkers in the evaluation of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 116: 333–339, 2007
    1. Akiba C, Nakajima M, Miyajima M, et al. : Change of amyloid-β 1-42 toxic conformer ratio after cerebrospinal fluid diversion predicts long-term cognitive outcome in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Alzheimers Dis 63: 989–1002, 2018
    1. Lim TS, Choi JY, Park SA, et al. : Evaluation of coexistence of Alzheimer's disease in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus using ELISA analyses for CSF biomarkers. BMC Neurol 14: 66, 2014
    1. Miyajima M, Nakajima M, Ogino I, Miyata H, Motoi Y, Arai H: Soluble amyloid precursor protein α in the cerebrospinal fluid as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur J Neurol 20: 236–242, 2013
    1. Tsai A, Malek-Ahmadi M, Kahlon V, Sabbagh MN: Differences in cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers between clinically diagnosed idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism 4: 1000150, 2014
    1. Kapaki EN, Paraskevas GP, Tzerakis NG, et al. : Cerebrospinal fluid tau, phospho-tau181 and beta-amyloid1-42 in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a discrimination from Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Neurol 14: 168–173, 2007
    1. Lins H, Wichart I, Bancher C, Wallesch CW, Jellinger KA, Rösler N: Immunoreactivities of amyloid beta peptide((1-42)) and total tau protein in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid of patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 111: 273–280, 2004
    1. Santangelo R, Cecchetti G, Bernasconi MP, et al. : Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β 42, total tau and phosphorylated tau are low in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus: analogies and differences with Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 60: 183–200, 2017
    1. Ray B, Reyes PF, Lahiri DK: Biochemical studies in normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients: change in CSF levels of amyloid precursor protein (APP), amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide and phospho-tau. J Psychiatr Res 45: 539–547, 2011
    1. Jingami N, Asada-Utsugi M, Uemura K, et al. : Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus has a different cerebrospinal fluid biomarker profile from Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 45: 109–115, 2015
    1. Chen Z, Liu C, Zhang J, Relkin N, Xing Y, Li Y: Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau levels in the differential diagnosis of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fluids Barriers CNS 14: 13, 2017
    1. Li X, Miyajima M, Mineki R, Taka H, Murayama K, Arai H: Analysis of potential diagnostic biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus by proteomics. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148: 859–864, discussion 864, 2006
    1. Nagata Y, Bundo M, Sugiura S, et al. : PTPRQ as a potential biomarker for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Mol Med Rep 16: 3034–3040, 2017
    1. Futakawa S, Nara K, Miyajima M, et al. : A unique N-glycan on human transferrin in CSF: a possible biomarker for iNPH. Neurobiol Aging 33: 1807–1815, 2012
    1. Pfanner T, Henri-Bhargava A, Borchert S: Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers as predictors of shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review. Can J Neurol Sci 45: 3–10, 2018
    1. Tisell M, Tullberg M, Hellström P, Edsbagge M, Högfeldt M, Wikkelsö C: Shunt surgery in patients with hydrocephalus and white matter changes. J Neurosurg 114: 1432–1438, 2011
    1. Hung AL, Vivas-Buitrago T, Adam A, et al. : Ventriculoatrial versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 157: 1–6, 2017
    1. Kluge S, Baumann HJ, Regelsberger J, et al. : Pulmonary hypertension after ventriculoatrial shunt implantation. J Neurosurg 113: 1279–1283, 2010
    1. Pascual JM, Prakash UB: Development of pulmonary hypertension after placement of a ventriculoatrial shunt. Mayo Clin Proc 68: 1177–1182, 1993
    1. Samtleben W, Bauriedel G, Bosch T, Goetz C, Klare B, Gurland HJ: Renal complications of infected ventriculoatrial shunts. Artif Organs 17: 695–701, 1993
    1. Haffner D, Schindera F, Aschoff A, Matthias S, Waldherr R, Schärer K: The clinical spectrum of shunt nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 12: 1143–1148, 1997
    1. Burström G, Andresen M, Bartek J, Jr, Fytagoridis A: Subacute bacterial endocarditis and subsequent shunt nephritis from ventriculoatrial shunting 14 years after shunt implantation. BMJ Case Rep 2014, bcr2014204655, 2014
    1. Tudor KI, Tudor M, McCleery J, Car J: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7: CD010033, 2015
    1. Kageyama H, Miyajima M, Ogino I, et al. : Panventriculomegaly with a wide foramen of Magendie and large cisterna magna. J Neurosurg 124: 1858–1866, 2016
    1. Chan AK, McGovern RA, Zacharia BE, et al. : Inferior short-term safety profile of endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a population-based study. Neurosurgery 73: 951–960; discussion 960-961, 2013
    1. Pollack IF, Albright AL, Adelson PD: A randomized, controlled study of a programmable shunt valve versus a conventional valve for patients with hydrocephalus. Hakim-Medos Investigator Group. Neurosurgery 45: 1399–1408; discussion 1408-1411, 1999
    1. Ringel F, Schramm J, Meyer B: Comparison of programmable shunt valves vs standard valves for communicating hydrocephalus of adults: a retrospective analysis of 407 patients. Surg Neurol 63: 36–41, discussion 41, 2005
    1. Xu H, Wang ZX, Liu F, Tan GW, Zhu HW, Chen DH: Programmable shunt valves for the treatment of hydrocephalus: a systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 17: 454–461, 2013
    1. Li M, Wang H, Ouyang Y, Yin M, Yin X: Efficacy and safety of programmable shunt valves for hydrocephalus: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 44: 139–146, 2017
    1. Giordan E, Palandri G, Lanzino G, Murad MH, Elder BD: Outcomes and complications of different surgical treatments for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg, Epub 2018 Nov 1; doi: 10.3171/2018.5.JNS1875.
    1. Serarslan Y, Yilmaz A, Çakır M, et al. : Use of programmable versus nonprogrammable shunts in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: a multicenter retrospective study with cost-benefit analysis in Turkey. Medicine (Baltimore) 96: e8185, 2017
    1. Lemcke J, Meier U, Müller C, et al. : Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84: 850–857, 2013
    1. Delwel EJ, de Jong DA, Dammers R, Kurt E, van den Brink W, Dirven CMF: A randomised trial of high and low pressure level settings on an adjustable ventriculoperitoneal shunt valve for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: results of the Dutch evaluation programme Strata shunt (DEPSS) trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84: 813–817, 2013
    1. Toma AK, Tarnaris A, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD: Use of the proGAV shunt valve in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 68: 245–249, 2011
    1. Suchorska B, Kunz M, Schniepp R, et al. : Optimized surgical treatment for normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison between gravitational and differential pressure valves. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 157: 703–709, 2015
    1. Freimann FB, Vajkoczy P, Sprung C: Patients benefit from low-pressure settings enabled by gravitational valves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115: 1982–1986, 2013
    1. Bozhkov Y, Roessler K, Hore N, Buchfelder M, Brandner S: Neurological outcome and frequency of overdrainage in normal pressure hydrocephalus directly correlates with implanted ventriculo-peritoneal shunt valve type. Neurol Res 39: 601–605, 2017
    1. Trost HA, Sprung C, Lanksch W, Stolke D, Miethke C: Dual-switch valve: clinical performance of a new hydrocephalus valve. Acta Neurochir Suppl 71: 360–363, 1998
    1. Lund-Johansen M, Svendsen F, Wester K: Shunt failures and complications in adults as related to shunt type, diagnosis, and the experience of the surgeon. Neurosurgery 35: 839–844, discussion 844, 1994
    1. Weiner HL, Constantini S, Cohen H, Wisoff JH: Current treatment of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of flow-regulated and differential-pressure shunt valves. Neurosurgery 37: 877–884, 1995
    1. Janson CG, Romanova LG, Rudser KD, Haines SJ: Improvement in clinical outcomes following optimal targeting of brain ventricular catheters with intraoperative imaging. J Neurosurg 120: 684–696, 2014
    1. Wilson TJ, McCoy KE, Al-Holou WN, Molina SL, Smyth MD, Sullivan SE: Comparison of the accuracy and proximal shunt failure rate of freehand placement versus intraoperative guidance in parietooccipital ventricular catheter placement. Neurosurg Focus 41: E10, 2016
    1. Wan KR, Toy JA, Wolfe R, Danks A: Factors affecting the accuracy of ventricular catheter placement. J Clin Neurosci 18: 485–488, 2011
    1. Jeremiah KJ, Cherry CL, Wan KR, Toy JA, Wolfe R, Danks RA: Choice of valve type and poor ventricular catheter placement: modifiable factors associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure. J Clin Neurosci 27: 95–98, 2016
    1. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Yamamoto K: Utility of preoperative simulation for ventricular catheter placement via a parieto-occipital approach in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 16: 647–657, 2019
    1. Lind CR, Tsai AM, Law AJ, Lau H, Muthiah K: Ventricular catheter trajectories from traditional shunt approaches: a morphometric study in adults with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 108: 930–933, 2008
    1. Nesvick CL, Khan NR, Mehta GU, Klimo P, Jr: Image guidance in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid shunt catheter placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 77: 321–331, discussion 331, 2015
    1. Wilson TJ, Stetler WR, Al-Holou WN, Sullivan SE, Fletcher JJ: Management of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Neurosurg 118: 1063–1068, 2013
    1. Nakajima M, Bando K, Miyajima M, Arai H: Lumboperitoneal shunt placement using computed tomography and fluoroscopy in conscious patients. J Neurosurg 111: 618–622, 2009
    1. Kawahara T, Oyoshi T, Atsuchi M, Takasaki K, Arita K: Use of the guidewire for repositioning displaced spinal catheter during lumboperitoneal shunt placement. Surg Neurol Int 7: 63, 2016
    1. Kawahara T, Kawahawa T, Higashi T, et al. : Use of blunt scalp hooks for abdominal procedure in lumboperitoneal shunt placement: technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 54: 552–553, 2014
    1. Okamura Y, Maruyama K, Fukuda S, et al. : Detailed standardized protocol to prevent cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection. J Neurosurg, 132: 755–759, 2020
    1. Kestle JR, Holubkov R, Douglas Cochrane D, et al. : A new Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network protocol to reduce cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17: 391–396, 2016
    1. Kestle JR, Riva-Cambrin J, Wellons JC, Kulkarni AV, Whitehead WE, Walker ML, Oakes WJ, Drake JM, Luerssen TG, Simon TD, Holubkov R: Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network: A standardized protocol to reduce cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network Quality Improvement Initiative. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8: 22–29, 2011
    1. Farber SH, Parker SL, Adogwa O, McGirt MJ, Rigamonti D: Effect of antibiotic-impregnated shunts on infection rate in adult hydrocephalus: a single institution's experience. Neurosurgery 69: 625–629, discussion 629, 2011
    1. Farahmand D, Qvarlander S, Malm J, Wikkelsö C, Eklund A, Tisell M: Intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus: impact of shunt adjustments and body positions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86: 222–228, 2015
    1. Farahmand D, Sæhle T, Eide PK, Tisell M, Hellström P, Wikkelsö C: A double-blind randomized trial on the clinical effect of different shunt valve settings in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 124: 359–367, 2016
    1. Zemack G, Romner B: Adjustable valves in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a retrospective study of 218 patients. Neurosurgery 51: 1392–1400; discussion 1400-1402, 2002
    1. Sindou M, Guyotat-Pelissou I, Chidiac A, Goutelle A: Transcutaneous pressure adjustable valve for the treatment of hydrocephalus and arachnoid cysts in adults. Experiences with 75 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 121: 135–139, 1993
    1. Tsuji O, Sato K: CSF dynamics in a patient with a programmable shunt. Acta Neurochir Suppl 71: 364–367, 1998
    1. Miyake H, Ohta T, Kajimoto Y, Nagao K: New concept for the pressure setting of a programmable pressure valve and measurement of in vivo shunt flow performed using a microflowmeter. Technical note. J Neurosurg 92: 181–187, 2000
    1. Miyake H, Kajimoto Y, Tsuji M, Ukita T, Tucker A, Ohmura T: Development of a quick reference table for setting programmable pressure valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 48: 427–432, discussion 432, 2008
    1. Miyake H, Kajimoto Y, Murai H, et al. : Assessment of a quick reference table algorithm for determining initial postoperative pressure settings of programmable pressure valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: SINPHONI subanalysis. Neurosurgery 71: 722–728, discussion 728, 2012
    1. Miyake H: Shunt devices for the treatment of adult hydrocephalus: recent progress and characteristics. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 56: 274–283, 2016
    1. Sundström N, Malm J, Laurell K, et al. : Incidence and outcome of surgery for adult hydrocephalus patients in Sweden. Br J Neurosurg 31: 21–27, 2017
    1. Tarnaris A, Toma AK, Chapman MD, Keir G, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD: Use of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β and total tau protein to predict favorable surgical outcomes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 115: 145–150, 2011
    1. Klinge P, Hellström P, Tans J, Wikkelsø C: European iNPH Multicentre Study Group: One-year outcome in the European multicentre study on iNPH. Acta Neurol Scand 126: 145–153, 2012
    1. Nakajima M, Miyajima M, Ogino I, et al. : Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for prognosis of long-term cognitive treatment outcomes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 357: 88–95, 2015
    1. Gölz L, Ruppert FH, Meier U, Lemcke J: Outcome of modern shunt therapy in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus 6 years postoperatively. J Neurosurg 121: 771–775, 2014
    1. Liu A, Sankey EW, Jusué-Torres I, et al. : Clinical outcomes after ventriculoatrial shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 143: 34–38, 2016
    1. Shaw R, Everingham E, Mahant N, Jacobson E, Owler B: Clinical outcomes in the surgical treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 29: 81–86, 2016
    1. Kazui H, Kanemoto H, Yoshiyama K, et al. : Association between high biomarker probability of Alzheimer's disease and improvement of clinical outcomes after shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 369: 236–241, 2016
    1. Ishikawa M, Hashimoto M, Mori E, Kuwana N, Kazui H: The value of the cerebrospinal fluid tap test for predicting shunt effectiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS 9: 1, 2012
    1. Nakajima M, Miyajima M, Ogino I, et al. : Preoperative phosphorylated tau concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid can predict cognitive function three years after shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Alzheimers Dis 66: 319–331, 2018
    1. Lemcke J, Meier U: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and co-morbidity: an outcome analysis of 134 patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 114: 255–259, 2012
    1. Kiefer M, Meier U, Eymann R: Does idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus always mean a poor prognosis? Acta Neurochir Suppl 106: 101–106, 2010
    1. Stein SC, Burnett MG, Sonnad SS: Shunts in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: do we place too many or too few? J Neurosurg 105: 815–822, 2006
    1. Williams MA, Sharkey P, van Doren D, Thomas G, Rigamonti D: Influence of shunt surgery on healthcare expenditures of elderly fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 107: 21–28, 2007
    1. Kameda M, Yamada S, Atsuchi M, et al. : Cost-effectiveness analysis of shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus based on the SINPHONI and SINPHONI-2 trials. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 159: 995–1003, 2017
    1. Tullberg M, Persson J, Petersen J, Hellström P, Wikkelsø C, Lundgren-Nilsson Å: Shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is cost-effective-a cost utility analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 160: 509–518, 2018

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa