Photoplethysmographic determination of the respiratory rate in acutely ill patients: validation of a new algorithm and implementation into a biomedical device

Erwan L'Her, Quang-Thang N'Guyen, Victoire Pateau, Laetitia Bodenes, François Lellouche, Erwan L'Her, Quang-Thang N'Guyen, Victoire Pateau, Laetitia Bodenes, François Lellouche

Abstract

Background: Respiratory rate is among the first vital signs to change in deteriorating patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of respiratory rate measurements using a specifically dedicated reflection-mode photoplethysmographic signal analysis in a pathological condition (PPG-RR) and to validate its implementation within medical devices.

Methods: This study is derived from a data mining project, including all consecutive patients admitted to our ICU (ReaSTOC study, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02893462). During the evaluation phase of the algorithm, PPG-RR calculations were retrospectively performed on PPG waveforms extracted from the data warehouse and compared with RR reference values. During the prospective phase, PPG-RR calculations were automatically and continuously performed using a dedicated device (FreeO2, Oxynov, Québec, QC, Canada). In all phases, reference RR was measured continuously using electrical thoracic impedance and chronometric evaluation (Manual-RR) over a 30-s period.

Results: In total, 201 ICU patients' recordings (SAPS II 51.7 ± 34.6) were analysed during the retrospective evaluation phase, most of them being admitted for a respiratory failure and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. PPG-RR determination was available in 95.5% cases, similar to reference (22 ± 4 vs. 22 ± 5 c/min, respectively; p = 1), and well correlated with reference values (R = 0.952; p < 0.0001), with a low bias (0.1 b/min) and deviation (± 3.5 b/min). Prospective estimation of the PPG-RR on 30 ICU patients' recordings was well correlated with the reference method (Manual-RR; r = 0.78; p < 0.001). Comparison of the methods depicted a low bias (0.5 b/min) and acceptable deviation (< ± 5.5 b/min).

Conclusion: According to our results, PPG-RR is an interesting approach for ventilation monitoring, as this technique would make simultaneous monitoring of respiratory rate and arterial oxygen saturation possible, thus minimizing the number of sensors attached to the patient. Trial registry number ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02893462.

Keywords: Pulse oximetry; Respiration rate; Respiratory failure.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlation and Bland–Altman plot for reference and estimated respiratory rate during the retrospective evaluation phase. Reference respiratory rate (RR) values are provided as the chronometric measurement measured over 30 s under spontaneous ventilation or as the ventilatory rate for patients under ventilatory assistance. Estimated RR-PPG was performed using the plethysmographic curve analysis. On the 201 ICU patients’ recordings, retrospective estimation of the RR-PPG was highly correlated with the reference method (r = 0.95; p < 0.0001). Comparison of the methods using the Bland–Altman method depicted a low bias (0.1 c/min) and deviation (< ± 3.5 c/min)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation and Bland–Altman plot for reference and estimated respiratory rate during the prospective evaluation phase. Reference respiratory rate (RR) values are provided as the chronometric measurement measured over 30 s under spontaneous ventilation or as the ventilatory rate for patients under ventilatory assistance. Estimated RR was performed using the plethysmographic curve analysis (RR-PPG). On the 30 ICU patients’ recordings, prospective estimation of the RR-PPG was well correlated with the reference method (r = 0.78; p < 0.001). Comparison of the methods using the Bland–Altman method depicted a low bias (0.5 c/min) and acceptable deviation (< ± 5.5 c/min). Most of the estimation errors were related to difficult PPG signal acquisition, mostly due to artefacts and/or bad signals
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Three principal types of respiratory modulation of the plethysmogram signal (PPG) that are used for respiratory rate estimation. a Unmodulated PPG waveform. b Baseline modulation [BM]; the red dashed line depicts the baseline modulation related to the respiratory rate component. c Amplitude modulation (AM); the two red dashed lines depict the signal envelope related to the respiratory rate component. d Frequency modulation (FM); this modulation of the heart rate, also called “respiratory sinus arrythmia”, is synchronized with the respiratory rate

References

    1. Churpek MM, Yuen TC, Huber MT, Park SY, Hall JB, Edelson DP. Predicting cardiac arrest on the wards: a nested case-control study. Chest. 2012;141:1170–1176. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1301.
    1. Cretikos MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, Chen J, Finfer S, Flabouris A. Respiratory rate: the neglected vital sign. MJA. 2008;188:657–659.
    1. Mochizuki K, Shintani R, Mori K, Sato T, Sakaguchi O, Takeshige K, Nitta K, Imamura H. Importance of respiratory rate for the prediction of clinical deterioration after emergency department discharge: a single-center, case-control study. Acute Med Surg. 2016;4:172–178. doi: 10.1002/ams2.252.
    1. Lovett PB, Buchwald JM, Stürmann K, Bijur P. The vexatious vital: neither clinical measurements by nurses nor an electronic monitor provides accurate measurements of respiratory rate in triage. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.06.016.
    1. Aoyagi T, Miyasaka K. Pulse oximetry: its invention, contribution to medicine, and future task. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:S1–S3.
    1. Severinghaus JW, Honda Y. History of blood gas analysis. VII. Pulse oximetry. J Clin Monit. 1987;3:135–138. doi: 10.1007/BF00858362.
    1. Kamath MV, Fallen EL. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability: a noninvasive signature of cardiac autonomic function. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1993;21:245–311.
    1. Dornhorst AC, Howard P, Leathart GL. Respiratory variations in blood pressure. Circulation. 1952;6:553–558. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.6.4.553.
    1. Buda AJ, Pinsky MR, Ingels NB, Jr, Daughters GT, 2nd, Stinson EB, Alderman EL. Effect of intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular performance. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:453–459. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197908303010901.
    1. Lindberg LG, Ugnell H, Oberg PA. Monitoring of respiratory and heart rates using a fibre-optic sensor. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1992;30:533–537. doi: 10.1007/BF02457833.
    1. Johansson A. Neural network for photoplethysmographic respiratory rate monitoring. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003;41:242–248. doi: 10.1007/BF02348427.
    1. Meredith DJ, Clifton D, Charlton P, Brooks J, Pugh CW, Tarassenko L. Photoplethysmographic derivation of respiratory rate: a review of relevant physiology. J Med Eng Technol. 2012;36:1–7. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2011.638965.
    1. Clifton D, Douglas JG, Addison PS, Watson JN. Measurement of respiratory rate from the photoplethysmogram in chest clinic patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007;21:55–61. doi: 10.1007/s10877-006-9059-3.
    1. Foo JYA, Wilson SJ. Estimation of breathing interval from the photoplethysmographic signals in children. Physiol Meas. 2005;26:1049–1058. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/6/014.
    1. Johnston W, Mendelson Y. Extracting breathing rate information from a wearable reflectance pulse oximeter sensor. In: Conference proceedings of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society; 2004. Vol. 7, pp. 5388–91.
    1. Lee J, Chon K. Respiratory rate extraction via an autoregressive model using the optimal parameter search criterion. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38:3218–3225. doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-0080-9.
    1. Leonard P, Grubb NR, Addison PS, Clifton D, Watson JN. An algorithm for the detection of individual breaths from the pulse oximeter waveform. J Clin Monit Comput. 2004;18:309–312. doi: 10.1007/s10877-005-2697-z.
    1. Leonard PA, Clifton D, Addison PS, Watson JN, Beattie T. An automated algorithm for determining respiratory rate by photoplethysmogram in children. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:1124–1128. doi: 10.1080/08035250600612280.
    1. Nakajima K, Tamura T, Miike H. Monitoring of heart and respiratory rates by photoplethysmography using a digital filtering technique. Med Eng Phys. 1996;18:365–372. doi: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)00066-6.
    1. Wertheim D, Olden C, Symes L, Rabe H, Seddon P. Monitoring respiration in wheezy preschool children by pulse oximetry plethysmogram analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013;51:965–970. doi: 10.1007/s11517-013-1068-z.
    1. Bergese SD, Mestek ML, Kelley SD, et al. Multicenter study validating accuracy of a continuous respiratory rate measurement derived from pulse oximetry: a comparison with capnography. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1153–1159. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001852.
    1. Granholm A, Pedersen NE, Lippert A, Petersen LF, Rasmussen LS. Respiratory rates measured by a standardised clinical approach, ward staff, and a wireless device. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60:1444–1452. doi: 10.1111/aas.12784.
    1. Hernandez-Silveira M, Wieczorkowski-Rettinger K, Ang S, Burdett A. Preliminary assessment of the SensiumVitals®: a low-cost wireless solution for patient surveillance in the general wards. In: Conference proceedings of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society; 2015. pp. 4931–7.
    1. Lee PJ. Clinical evaluation of a novel respiratory rate monitor. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30:175–183. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9697-4.
    1. Atkins JH, Mandel JE. Performance of Masimo rainbow acoustic monitoring for tracking changing respiratory rates under laryngeal mask airway general anesthesia for surgical procedures in the operating room: a prospective observational study. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:1307–1314. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000362.
    1. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. 1986;i:307–310. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.
    1. Respiratory diseases in the world—European Respiratory Society. . Accessed 25 Aug 2018.
    1. Cretikos MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, Chen J, Finfer S, Flabouris A. Respiratory rate: the neglected vital sign. Med J Aust. 2008;188:657–659.
    1. Lovett PB, Buchwald JM, Stürmann K, Bijur P. The vexatious vital: neither clinical measurements by nurses nor an electronic monitor provides accurate measurements of respiratory rate in triage. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.06.016.
    1. Autet LM, Frasca D, Pinsard M, et al. Evaluation of acoustic respiration rate monitoring after extubation in intensive care unit patients. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:195–197. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu219.
    1. Folke M, Cernerud L, Ekström M, Hök B. Critical review of non-invasive respiratory monitoring in medical care. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003;41:377–383. doi: 10.1007/BF02348078.
    1. Shelley KH. Photoplethysmography: beyond the calculation of arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:S31–S36. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000269512.82836.c9.
    1. Cichetti DV. Guidelines, criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6:284–290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
    1. Simoes E, Roark R, Berman S, Esler LL, Murphy J. Respiratory rate: measurement of variability over time and accuracy at different counting periods. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:1199–1203. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.10.1199.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa