Correlation between preoperative ultrasonographic airway assessment and laryngoscopic view in adult patients: A prospective study

Aruna Parameswari, Mithila Govind, Mahesh Vakamudi, Aruna Parameswari, Mithila Govind, Mahesh Vakamudi

Abstract

Background and aims: Difficult tracheal intubation is associated with serious morbidity and mortality and cannot be always predicted based on preoperative airway assessment using conventional clinical predictors. Ultrasonographic airway assessment could be a useful adjunct, but at present, there are no well-defined sonographic criteria that can predict the possibility of encountering a difficult airway. The present study was conducted with the aim of finding some correlation between preoperative sonographic airway assessment parameters and the Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade at laryngoscopic view in adult patients.

Material and methods: This was a prospective, double-blinded study on 130 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Preoperative clinical and ultrasonographic assessment of the airway was done to predict difficult intubation and was correlated with the CL grade noted at laryngoscopy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of the parameters were assessed.

Results: The incidence of difficult intubation was 9.2%. Among the clinical predictors, the modified Mallampati classification had the maximum sensitivity and specificity, and among the sonographic parameters, the skin to epiglottis distance had the maximum sensitivity and specificity to predict difficult laryngoscopy. A combination of these two tests improved the sensitivity in predicting a difficult laryngoscopy.

Conclusions: The skin to epiglottis distance, as measured at the level of the thyrohyoid membrane, is a good predictor of difficult laryngoscopy. When combined with the modified Mallampati classification, the sensitivity of the combined parameter was found to be greater than any single parameter taken alone.

Keywords: Airway; assessment; laryngoscopy; ultrasonography.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Blue dotted line: Width of the tongue
Figure 2
Figure 2
Blue dotted area CDEF: Cross-sectional area of the tongue; yellow dash line AB: Mentohyoid distance
Figure 3
Figure 3
Skin to epiglottis distance shown by blue dotted line
Figure 4
Figure 4
Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy based on skin to epiglottis distance. Patients with skin to epiglottis distance 18 mm were predicted to be easy. X-axis indicates difficult or easy laryngoscopy as per Cormack–Lehane grade
Figure 5
Figure 5
Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy based on tongue volume. Patients with tongue volume >100 cm3 were predicted to be difficult and those with tongue volume

References

    1. Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW, et al. Management of the difficult airway: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:33–9.
    1. Mallampati SR. Clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation (hypothesis) Can Anaesth Soc J. 1983;30:316–7.
    1. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: A prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985;32:429–34.
    1. Karkouti K, Rose DK, Wigglesworth D, Cohen MM. Predicting difficult intubation: A multivariable analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:730–9.
    1. El-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: Predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:1197–204.
    1. Khan ZH, Mohammadi M, Rasouli MR, Farrokhnia F, Khan RH. The diagnostic value of the upper lip bite test combined with sternomental distance, thyromental distance, and interincisor distance for prediction of easy laryngoscopy and intubation: A prospective study. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:822–4.
    1. Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Astrup G, Afshari A, Lundstrøm LH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists’ prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: A cohort study of 188 064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:272–81.
    1. Kristensen MS. Ultrasonography in the management of the airway. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:1155–73.
    1. Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A. Ultrasound of the airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55:456–62.
    1. Singh M, Chin KJ, Chan VW, Wong DT, Prasad GA, Yu E, et al. Use of sonography for airway assessment: An observational study. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:79–85.
    1. Tsui BC, Hui CM. Sublingual airway ultrasound imaging. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55:790–1.
    1. Hui CM, Tsui BC. Sublingual ultrasound as an assessment method for predicting difficult intubation: A pilot study. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:314–9.
    1. Wojtczak JA. Submandibular sonography: Assessment of hyomental distances and ratio, tongue size, and floor of the mouth musculature using portable sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:523–8.
    1. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39:1105–11.
    1. Adhikari S, Zeger W, Schmier C, Crum T, Craven A, Frrokaj I, et al. Pilot study to determine the utility of point-of-care ultrasound in the assessment of difficult laryngoscopy. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18:754–8.
    1. Wu J, Dong J, Ding Y, Zheng J. Role of anterior neck soft tissue quantifications by ultrasound in predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:2343–50.
    1. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: A meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:429–37.
    1. Ezri T, Gewürtz G, Sessler DI, Medalion B, Szmuk P, Hagberg C, et al. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients by ultrasound quantification of anterior neck soft tissue. Anaesthesia. 2003;58:1111–4.
    1. Lee A, Fan LT, Gin T, Karmakar MK, Ngan Kee WD. A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the Mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1867–78.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa