Long-Term Efficacy and Safety From an Open-Label Extension of Adjunctive Cenobamate in Patients With Uncontrolled Focal Seizures

Pavel Klein, Sami Aboumatar, Christian Brandt, Fang Dong, Gregory L Krauss, Sarah Mizne, Juan Carlos Sanchez-Alvarez, Bernhard J Steinhoff, Vicente Villanueva, Pavel Klein, Sami Aboumatar, Christian Brandt, Fang Dong, Gregory L Krauss, Sarah Mizne, Juan Carlos Sanchez-Alvarez, Bernhard J Steinhoff, Vicente Villanueva

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate long-term efficacy (percent seizure frequency reduction and responder rates), safety, and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate in an open-label extension (OLE) of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Methods: Patients (aged 18-70 years) with uncontrolled focal seizures despite treatment with 1-3 antiseizure medications who completed the 18-week double-blind study (n=360) could enter the OLE, where they underwent a 2-week blinded conversion to cenobamate (target dose, 300 mg/day; min/max, 50/400 mg/day).

Results: Three hundred fifty-five patients were included in the OLE safety population (265 originally randomized to cenobamate, 90 originally randomized to placebo), and 354 were included in the OLE modified intent-to-treat population. As of July 2019, 58.9% (209/355) of patients were continuing cenobamate treatment and 141 had discontinued, including 16.6% (59/355) due to lack of efficacy, 8.7% (31/355) due to withdrawal by patient, and 7.6% (27/355) due to adverse events. Median (range) duration of OLE exposure was 53.9 (1.1-68.7) months. Retention rates at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 83%, 71%, 65%, and 62%, respectively. Median percent seizure frequency reduction over baseline increased with each 6-month OLE interval, up to 76.1% at months 43-48. Among observed patients, 16.4% (36/220) achieved 100% and 39.1% (86/220) achieved ≥90% seizure reduction during >36-48 months. Among the initial OLE mITT population, 10.2% (36/354) of patients achieved 100% and 24.3% (86/354) achieved ≥90% seizure reduction during >36-48 months. Similar to the double-blind study, adverse events (AEs) included dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, and headache. Serious AEs occurred in 20.3% (72/355) of patients.

Conclusion: Long-term efficacy, including 100% and ≥90% seizure reduction, was sustained during 48 months of cenobamate treatment, with 71% retention at 24 months. No new safety issues were identified. These results confirm the findings of the double-blind study and support the potential long-term clinical benefit of cenobamate.

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01866111.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that oral Cenobamate 50-400 mg/day is effective as an adjunctive treatment for the long-term management of patients with uncontrolled focal seizures previously treated with 1 to 3 ASMs.

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

Figures

Figure 1. Patient Disposition and Reason for…
Figure 1. Patient Disposition and Reason for Discontinuation (OLE Population)
aStudy completion as reported on the end-of-study subject disposition case report form. mITT = modified intent-to-treat; OLE = open-label extension.
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Time to…
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Time to Discontinuation During OLE
Event = early discontinuation from OLE. Patients who completed the study and patients ongoing at the date of data cutoff are considered as censored. OLE = open-label extension.
Figure 3. Median Percent Change in Seizure…
Figure 3. Median Percent Change in Seizure Frequency/28 Days by 6-Month Intervals During OLE (mITT Population)
Median (IQR) baseline seizure frequency/28 days during the double-blind study for the 354 patients in the mITT population was 9.5 (16.0). CNB = cenobamate; DB = double-blind; IQR = interquartile range; mITT = modified intent-to-treat; OLE = open-label extension; PBO = placebo.
Figure 4. 100% Reduction in Seizure Frequency…
Figure 4. 100% Reduction in Seizure Frequency by 12-Month Intervals During OLE (mITT Population)
mITT = modified intent-to-treat; OLE = open-label extension; SE = standard error.
Figure 5. ≥50%, ≥75%, and ≥90% Reduction…
Figure 5. ≥50%, ≥75%, and ≥90% Reduction in Seizure Frequency by 12-Month Intervals During OLE (mITT Population)
(A) Observed patients at each time point and (B) initial OLE mITT population. mITT = modified intent-to-treat; OLE = open-label extension.

References

    1. Hauser WA. Questioning the effectiveness of newer antiseizure medications. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(3):273-274. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3069.
    1. Golyala A, Kwan P. Drug development for refractory epilepsy: the past 25 years and beyond. Seizure. 2017;44:147-156. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2016.11.022.
    1. Chen Z, Brodie MJ, Liew D, Kwan P. Treatment outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy treated with established and new antiepileptic drugs: a 30-year longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(3):279-286. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3949.
    1. Mula M, Zaccara G, Galimberti CA, et al. . Validated outcome of treatment changes according to International League Against Epilepsy criteria in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2019;60(6):1114-1123. doi:10.1111/epi.14685.
    1. Vingerhoets G. Cognitive effects of seizures. Seizure. 2006;15(4):221-226. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2006.02.012.
    1. Laxer KD, Trinka E, Hirsch LJ, et al. . The consequences of refractory epilepsy and its treatment. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;37:59-70. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.05.031.
    1. Nevalainen O, Ansakorpi H, Simola M, et al. . Epilepsy-related clinical characteristics and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2014;83(21):1968-1977. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001005.
    1. Amin U, Benbadis SR. Avoiding complacency when treating uncontrolled seizures: why and how? Expert Rev Neurother. 2020;20(3):227-235. doi:10.1080/14737175.2020.1713100.
    1. Lawn ND, Bamlet WR, Radhakrishnan K, O'Brien PC, So EL. Injuries due to seizures in persons with epilepsy: a population-based study. Neurology. 2004;63(9):1565-1570. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000142991.14507.b5.
    1. Thurman DJ, Logroscino G, Beghi E, et al. . The burden of premature mortality of epilepsy in high-income countries: a systematic review from the Mortality Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2017;58(1):17-26. doi:10.1111/epi.13604.
    1. XCOPRI (cenobamate tablets), for oral use, CV [prescribing information]. SK Life Science, Inc.; 2021.
    1. Krauss GL, Klein P, Brandt C, et al. . Safety and efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate (YKP3089) in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(1):38-48. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30399-0.
    1. Chung SS, French JA, Kowalski J, et al. . Randomized phase 2 study of adjunctive cenobamate in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures. Neurology. 2020;94(22):e2311-e2322. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000009530.
    1. Toledo M, Whitesides J, Schiemann J, et al. . Safety, tolerability, and seizure control during long-term treatment with adjunctive brivaracetam for partial-onset seizures. Epilepsia. 2016;57(7):1139-1151. doi:10.1111/epi.13416.
    1. Krauss GL, Perucca E, Kwan P, et al. . Final safety, tolerability, and seizure outcomes in patients with focal epilepsy treated with adjunctive perampanel for up to 4 years in an open-label extension of phase III randomized trials: study 307. Epilepsia. 2018;59(4):866-876. doi:10.1111/epi.14044.
    1. Kwok CS, Johnson EL, Krauss GL. Comparing safety and efficacy of “third-generation” antiepileptic drugs: long-term extension and post-marketing treatment. CNS Drugs. 2017;31(11):959-974. doi:10.1007/s40263-017-0480-6.
    1. Halasz P, Cramer JA, Hodoba D, et al. . Long-term efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate: results of a 1-year open-label extension study in partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51(10):1963-1969. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02660.x.
    1. Rosenow F, Kelemen A, Ben-Menachem E, McShea C, Isojarvi J, Doty P. Long-term adjunctive lacosamide treatment in patients with partial-onset seizures. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016;133(2):136-144. doi:10.1111/ane.12451.
    1. Rosenfeld W, Fountain NB, Kaubrys G, et al. . Safety and efficacy of adjunctive lacosamide among patients with partial-onset seizures in a long-term open-label extension trial of up to 8 years. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;41:164-170. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.074.
    1. Hufnagel A, Ben-Menachem E, Gabbai AA, Falcao A, Almeida L, Soares-da-Silva P. Long-term safety and efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy: results of a 1-year open-label extension study. Epilepsy Res. 2013;103(2-3):262-269. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.07.014.
    1. Husain A, Chung S, Faught E, Isojarvi J, McShea C, Doty P. Long-term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: results from a phase III open-label extension trial. Epilepsia. 2012;53(3):521-528. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03407.x.
    1. Sperling MR, Klein P, Aboumatar S, et al. . Cenobamate (YKP3089) as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled focal seizures in a large, phase 3, multicenter, open-label safety study. Epilepsia. 2020;61(6):1099-1108. doi:10.1111/epi.16525.
    1. Rosenfeld WE, Nisman A, Ferrari L. Efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate based on number of concomitant antiseizure medications, seizure frequency, and epilepsy duration at baseline: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical study. Epilepsy Res. 2021;172:106592. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106592.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa