Inverted ILM-flap techniques variants for macular hole surgery: randomized clinical trial to compare retinal sensitivity and fixation stability

Andrea Cacciamani, Aldo Gelso, Marta Di Nicola, Fabio Scarinci, Guido Ripandelli, Ciro Costagliola, Tommaso Rossi, Andrea Cacciamani, Aldo Gelso, Marta Di Nicola, Fabio Scarinci, Guido Ripandelli, Ciro Costagliola, Tommaso Rossi

Abstract

To report closure rate, Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Retinal Sensitivity (RS) and Fixation Stability (FS) of idiopathic Macular Holes (MH) randomized to Cover Group (CG) or Fill Group (FG) of the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) flap surgical procedure. Twenty-eight patients were randomized (1:1) to receive a vitrectomy with either Cover or Fill ILM flap technique. All patients underwent BCVA, RS and FS assessment at baseline, 1-month and 3-months after surgery. MH closed in all patients. BCVA rose from 20/100 (baseline) to 20/33 (1-month) in both groups, to 20/28 in CG versus 20/33 in FG (3-months) (p < 0.05). The central 4° RS rose from 11.5 and 12 dB to 19 and 19.5 dB (1-month) and to 22 and 20 dB (3-months), respectively, in CG and FG (p < 0.001). The central 10° RS rose from 11 and 15 dB to 22 and 20 dB (1-month) and to 23 and 20 dB (3-months), respectively, in CG and FG (p < 0.001). FS increased significantly more in CG. CG improved significantly more than FG in terms of BCVA, RS and FS. The average MH diameter was relatively small (397 µm); larger MHs may behave differently.Trial registration: Trial Registry: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Identifier: NCT04135638. Registration date 22/10/2019.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Best corrected visual acuity trend of cover and fill groups at baseline, 1-month and 3-months follow-up. The difference at 3-month follow-up is statistically significant (p < 0.001). (GIMP free software, version number GIMP 2.10.18, released 2020-02-24, URL https://www.gimp.org).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Retinal Sensitivity within the central 4° and 10° trend of Cover and Fill Groups at baseline, 1-month and 3-months follow-up. The difference at 3-month follow-up is statistically significant (p < 0.001) (GIMP free software, version number GIMP 2.10.18, released 2020-02-24, URL https://www.gimp.org).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scattergram showing Macular Hole diameter versus IS/OS line defect width. (GIMP free software, version number GIMP 2.10.18, released 2020-02-24, URL https://www.gimp.org).

References

    1. Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chic. Ill: 1960) 1991;109:654–659. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050068031.
    1. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Adelman RA, Nawrocki J. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:2018–2025. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.011.
    1. Rossi T, et al. Macular hole closure patterns associated with different internal limiting membrane flap techniques. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2017;255:1073–1078. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3598-9.
    1. Molina-Martin A, Perez-Cambrodi RJ, Pinero DP. Current clinical application of microperimetry: a review. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2018;33:620–628. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1375125.
    1. Chen WC, Wang Y, Li XX. Morphologic and functional evaluation before and after successful macular hole surgery using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography combined with microperimetry. Retina (Phila. Pa.) 2012;32:1733–1742. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318242b81a.
    1. Bonnabel A, et al. Long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of idiopathic macular hole surgery. The yield of spectral-domain OCT combined with microperimetry. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2013;251:2505–2511. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2339-y.
    1. Aurora A, Seth A, Sanduja N. Cabbage leaf inverted flap ILM Peeling for macular hole: a novel technique. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:830–832. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20170928-08.
    1. Chen SN. Large semicircular inverted internal limiting membrane flap in the treatment of macular hole in high myopia. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2017;255:2337–2345. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3808-5.
    1. Rizzo S, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap technique for treatment of full-thickness macular holes: a comparative study in a large series of patients. Retina (Phila. Pa.) 2018;38(Suppl 1):S73–S78. doi: 10.1097/iae.0000000000001985.
    1. Wang Z, et al. MP-3 measurement of retinal sensitivity in macular hole area and its predictive value on visual prognosis. Int. Ophthalmol. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-1032-x.
    1. Sun Z, et al. Effect of preoperative retinal sensitivity and fixation on long-term prognosis for idiopathic macular holes. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2012;250:1587–1596. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-1997-5.
    1. Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Mandelcorn MS, Lillakas L, Steinbach MJ. Fixation stability, fixation location, and visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50:84–89. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2342.
    1. Nakabayashi M, Fujikado T, Ohji M, Saito Y, Tano Y. Fixation patterns of idiopathic macular holes after vitreous surgery. Retina (Phila. Pa.) 2000;20:170–175. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200002000-00010.
    1. Schubert HD, Kuang K, Kang F, Head MW, Fischbarg J. Macular holes: migratory gaps and vitreous as obstacles to glial closure. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Opthalmol. = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 1997;235:523–529. doi: 10.1007/BF00947011.
    1. Noguchi K, Gel Y, Brunner E, Konietschke F. nparLD: An R software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. J. Stat. Softw. 2012;50:1–23. doi: 10.18637/jss.v050.i12.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa