Piloting the Use of Patient-Specific Cardiac Models as a Novel Tool to Facilitate Communication During Cinical Consultations

Giovanni Biglino, Despina Koniordou, Marisa Gasparini, Claudio Capelli, Lindsay-Kay Leaver, Sachin Khambadkone, Silvia Schievano, Andrew M Taylor, Jo Wray, Giovanni Biglino, Despina Koniordou, Marisa Gasparini, Claudio Capelli, Lindsay-Kay Leaver, Sachin Khambadkone, Silvia Schievano, Andrew M Taylor, Jo Wray

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to assess the impact of using patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) models of congenital heart disease (CHD) during consultations with adolescent patients. Adolescent CHD patients (n = 20, age 15-18 years, 15 male) were asked to complete two questionnaires during a cardiology transition clinic at a specialist centre. The first questionnaire was completed just before routine consultation with the cardiologist, the second just after the consultation. During the consultation, each patient was presented with a 3D full heart model realised from their medical imaging data. The model was used by the cardiologist to point to main features of the CHD. Outcome measures included rating of health status, confidence in explaining their condition to others, name and features of their CHD (as a surrogate for CHD knowledge), impact of CHD on their lifestyle, satisfaction with previous/current visits, positive/negative features of the 3D model, and open-ended feedback. Significant improvements were registered in confidence in explaining their condition to others (p = 0.008), knowledge of CHD (p < 0.001) and patients' satisfaction (p = 0.005). Descriptions of CHD and impact on lifestyle were more eloquent after seeing a 3D model. The majority of participants reported that models helped their understanding and improved their visit, with a non-negligible 30% of participants indicating that the model made them feel more anxious about their condition. Content analysis of open-ended feedback revealed an overall positive attitude of the participants toward 3D models. Clinical translation of 3D models of CHD for communication purposes warrants further exploration in larger studies.

Keywords: 3D printing; Communication; Congenital heart disease; Rapid prototyping; Transition clinic.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of 3D whole heart models manufactured by means of 3D printing, showing a normal heart from a healthy control for comparison purposes (a); a model of transposition of the great arteries repaired with arterial switch operation with Lecompte manoeuvre (b); a model of repaired tetralogy of Fallot (c)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Statistically significant changes were observed in confidence (a), knowledge (b) and satisfaction (c) amongst participants comparing responses before (“Pre”) and after (“Post”) their consultation. Note for a 1 = Not at all confident – 5 = Very confident; for b each point represents a point in knowledge, as marked according to the correct name of primary diagnosis, correctly identified keywords and correct use of diagrams; for c1 = Very dissatisfied – 5 = Very satisfied. The red lines indicate average score
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of participants’ level of agreement to different statements on 3D models

References

    1. Bhawra J, Toulany A, Cohen E, Moore Hepburn C, Guttmann A. Primary care interventions to improve transition of youth with chronic health conditions from paediatric to adult healthcare: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011871.
    1. Callahan TS, Winitzer RF, Keenan P. Transition from pediatric to adult-oriented health care: a challenge for patients with chronic disease. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2001;13:310–316. doi: 10.1097/00008480-200108000-00004.
    1. Niwa K. Adults with congenital heart disease transition. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015;27:576–580. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000270.
    1. Somerville J. Congenital heart disease in the adolescent. Arch Dis Child. 1989;64:771–773. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.6.771.
    1. McMurray R, Kendeall L, Parsons JM, Quirk J, Veldtman GR, Lewin RJP, Sloper P. A life less ordinary: growing up and coping with congenital heart disease. Coronary Health Care. 2001;5:51–57. doi: 10.1054/chec.2001.0112.
    1. Wright M, Jarvis S, Wannamaker E, Cook D. Congenital heart disease: functional abilities in young adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:289–293.
    1. Cetta F, Warnes CA. Adults with congenital heart disease: patient knowledge of endocarditis prophylaxis. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70:50–54. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)64665-X.
    1. Swann L, Hillis WS. Exercise prescription in adults with congenital heart disease: a long way to go. Heart. 2000;83:685–687. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.6.685.
    1. Shebani SO, Miles HF, Simmons P, Stickley J, De Giovanni JV. Awareness of risk of endocarditis associated with tattooing and body piercing among patients with congenital heart disease and paediatric cardiologists in the United Kingdom. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:1013–1014. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.114942.
    1. Canobbio MM. Health care issues facing adolescents with congenital heart disease. J Pediatr Nursing. 2001;16:363–370. doi: 10.1053/jpdn.2001.26570.
    1. Reid GJ, Irvine MJ, McCrindle BW, Sananes R, Ritvo PG, Siu SC, Webb GD. Prevalence and correlates of successful transfer from pediatric to adult care among a cohort of young adults with complex congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. 2004;113:e197–e205. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.3.e197.
    1. Saidi A, Kovacs AH. Developing a transition program from pediatric- to adult-focused cardiology care: practical considerations. Congenit Heart Dis. 2009;4:204–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2009.00312.x.
    1. Ha JF, Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J. 2010;10:38–43.
    1. Martin LR, Williams SL, Haskard KB, Dimatteo MR. The challenge of patient adherence. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005;1:189–199.
    1. Blackman J, Sahebjalal M. Patient understanding of frequently used cardiology terminology. Br. J Cardiol. 2014;21:39. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0051.
    1. Biglino G, Capelli C, Wray J, et al. 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007165. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007165.
    1. Biglino G, Capelli C, Leaver LK, Schievano S, Taylor AM, Wray J (2015) Involving the public and medical staff in the evaluation of 3D printing models of congenital heart disease. Commun Med 12:157–169
    1. Schievano S, Migliavacca F, Coats L, et al. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation based on rapid prototyping of right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary trunk from MR data. Radiology. 2007;242:490–497. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2422051994.
    1. Heery E, Sheehan AM, While AE, Coyne I. Experiences and outcomes of transition from pediatric to adult health care services for young people with congenital heart disease: a systematic review. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015;10:413–427. doi: 10.1111/chd.12251.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa