Total joint arthroplasty: practice variation of physiotherapy across the continuum of care in Alberta

C Allyson Jones, Ruben San Martin, Marie D Westby, Lauren A Beaupre, C Allyson Jones, Ruben San Martin, Marie D Westby, Lauren A Beaupre

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive and timely rehabilitation for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is needed to maximize recovery from this elective surgical procedure for hip and knee arthritis. Administrative data do not capture the variation of treatment for rehabilitation across the continuum of care for TJA, so we conducted a survey for physiotherapists to report practice for TJA across the continuum of care. The primary objective was to describe the reported practice of physiotherapy for TJA across the continuum of care within the context of a provincial TJA clinical pathway and highlight possible gaps in care.

Method: A cross-sectional on-line survey was accessible to licensed physiotherapists in Alberta, Canada for 11 weeks. Physiotherapists who treated at least five patients with TJA annually were asked to complete the survey. The survey consisted of 58 questions grouped into pre-operative, acute care and post-acute rehabilitation. Variation of practice was described in terms of number, duration and type of visits along with goals of care and program delivery methods.

Results: Of the 80 respondents, 26 (33 %) stated they worked in small centres or rural settings in Alberta with the remaining respondents working in two large urban sites. The primary treatment goal differed for each phase across the continuum of care in that pre-operative phase was directed at improving muscle strength, functional activities were commonly reported for acute care, and post-acute phase was directed at improving joint range-of-motion. Proportionally, more physiotherapists from rural areas treated patients in out-patient hospital departments (59 %), whereas a higher proportion in urban physiotherapists saw patients in private clinics (48 %). Across the continuum of care, treatment was primarily delivered on an individual basis rather than in a group format.

Conclusions: Variation of practice reported with pre-and post-operative care in the community will stimulate dialogue within the profession as to what is the minimal standard of care to provide patients undergoing TJA.

Keywords: Hip arthroplasty; Knee arthroplasty; Physical therapy; Practice; Rehabilitation.

References

    1. Minns Lowe CJ, Barker KL, Dewey M, Sackley CM. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2007;335:812. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Coulter CL, Scarvell JM, Neeman TM, Smith PN. Physiotherapist-directed rehabilitation exercises in the outpatient or home setting improve strength, gait speed and cadence after elective total hip replacement: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2013;59:219–226. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70198-X.
    1. Westby MD. Rehabilitation and total joint arthroplasty. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28:489–508. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2012.05.005.
    1. Wallis JA, Taylor NF. Pre-operative interventions (non-surgical and non-pharmacological) for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis awaiting joint replacement surgery--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19:1381–1395. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.09.001.
    1. Fancott C, Jaglal S, Quan V, Berg K, Cott CA, Davis A, et al. Rehabilitation services following total joint replacement: a qualitative analysis of key processes and structures to decrease length of stay and increase surgical volumes in Ontario, Canada. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16:724–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01185.x.
    1. Westby MD, Backman CL. Patient and health professional views on rehabilitation practices and outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis:a focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:119. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-119.
    1. Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435.
    1. Meier W, Mizner RL, Marcus RL, Dibble LE, Peters C, Lastayo PC. Total knee arthroplasty: muscle impairments, functional limitations, and recommended rehabilitation approaches. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38:246–256. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2715.
    1. Bhave A, Mont M, Tennis S, Nickey M, Starr R, Etienne G. Functional problems and treatment solutions after total hip and knee joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:9–21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00628.
    1. Trudelle-Jackson E, Emerson R, Smith S. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty: a study of patients one year postsurgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32:260–267. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.6.260.
    1. Bumpass DB, Nunley RM. Assessing the value of a total joint replacement. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5:274–282. doi: 10.1007/s12178-012-9139-6.
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada: Canadian Joint Replacement Registry 2014 Annual Report. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2015. .
    1. Tian W, DeJong G, Brown M, Hsieh CH, Zamfirov ZP, Horn SD. Looking upstream: factors shaping the demand for postacute joint replacement rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1260–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.035.
    1. Antoniou J, Martineau PA, Filion KB, Haider S, Zukor DJ, Huk OL, et al. In-hospital cost of total hip arthroplasty in Canada and the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:2435–2439.
    1. Fernandes L, Hagen KB, Bijlsma JW, Andreassen O, Christensen P, Conaghan PG, et al. EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1125–1135. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202745.
    1. Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:465–474. doi: 10.1002/acr.21596.
    1. Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma JW, Dieppe P, et al. EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT) Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:1145–1155. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.011742.
    1. Pendleton A, Arden N, Dougados M, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma JW, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT) Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59:936–944. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.12.936.
    1. Lingard EA, Berven S, Katz JN, Kinemax Outcomes G. Management and care of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: variations across different health care settings. Arthritis Care Res. 2000;13:129–136. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200006)13:3<129::AID-ANR1>;2-6.
    1. Mahomed NN, Lau JT, Lin MK, Zdero R, Davey JR. Significant variation exists in home care services following total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:973–975.
    1. Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Ku LJ, Cutchin MP, Heatwole-Shank K, Edwards LJ. Disparities in post-acute rehabilitation care for joint replacement. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:1020–1030. doi: 10.1002/acr.20477.
    1. Mulley AG. Inconvenient truths about supplier induced demand and unwarranted variation in medical practice. BMJ. 2009;339:b4073. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4073.
    1. Gooch K, Marshall DA, Faris PD, Khong H, Wasylak T, Pearce T, et al. Comparative effectiveness of alternative clinical pathways for primary hip and knee joint replacement patients: a pragmatic randomized, controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:1086–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.017.
    1. Landry MD, Goldstein M, Stokes E. Physiotherapy health services research (PHSR): the road ‘that must now be taken’. Physiother Res Int. 2012;17:63–65. doi: 10.1002/pri.1528.
    1. Statistics Canada. CANSIM table: Population by year, by province and territory. 2015. .
    1. College of Physical Therapists of Alberta. Annual Report 2013. 2014. .
    1. Alberta Health Services Zones. 2-17-2015. Online Source. .
    1. Kitchneham BA, Pfleeger SL. Principles of survey research Part 3: Constructing a survey instrument. 27, 20–24. 2002. ACM Sigsoft. Software Engineering Notes.
    1. Survey Monkey. Online Source. 2014. . Accessed 2016.
    1. Westby MD, Brittain A, Backman CL. Expert consensus on best practices for post-acute rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a Canada and United States Delphi study. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66:411–423. doi: 10.1002/acr.22164.
    1. Roos EM. Effectiveness and practice variation of rehabilitation after joint replacement. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003;15:160–162. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200303000-00014.
    1. Gronhaug G, Osteras N, Hagen KB. Quality of hip and knee osteoarthritis management in primary health care in a Norwegian county: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:598. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0598-x.
    1. Westby M, Klemm A, Li L, Jones CA. The emerging role of quality indicators in physical therapy practice and health services delivery. Phys Ther. 2016; 96:90-100. doi:10.2522/ptj.20150106.
    1. Cott CA, Davis AM, Badley EM, Wong R, Canizares M, Li LC, et al. Commonalities and differences in the implementation of models of care for arthritis: key informant interviews from Canada. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:415. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1634-9.
    1. Davis AM, Cott C, Landry MD, Li L, Jones A, Linneker S et al. Care for people with arthritis. Policy: decisions, impacts and gaps. Edited by Arthritis Community and Evaluation Unit. MOCA2010-07/005. 2010. Toronto, ON. .

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa