Impact of an integrated community-based model of care for older people with complex conditions on hospital emergency presentations and admissions: a step-wedged cluster randomized trial

Jennifer Mann, Fintan Thompson, Robyn McDermott, A Esterman, Edward Strivens, Jennifer Mann, Fintan Thompson, Robyn McDermott, A Esterman, Edward Strivens

Abstract

Background: Health systems must reorient towards preventative and co-ordinated care to reduce hospital demand and achieve positive and fiscally responsible outcomes for older persons with complex needs. Integrated care models can improve outcomes by aligning primary practice with the specialist health and social services required to manage complex needs. This paper describes the impact of a community-facing program that integrates care at the primary-secondary interface on the rate of Emergency Department (ED) presentation and hospital admissions among older people with complex needs.

Methods: The Older Persons Enablement and Rehabilitation for Complex Health Conditions (OPEN ARCH) study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a stepped wedge cluster design. General practitioners (GPs; n = 14) in primary practice within the Cairns region are considered 'clusters' each comprising a mixed number of participants. 80 community-dwelling persons over 70 years of age if non-Indigenous and over 50 years of age if Indigenous were included at baseline with no new participants added during the study. Clusters were randomly assigned to one of three steps that represent the time at which they would commence the OPEN ARCH intervention, and the subsequent intervention duration (3, 6, or 9 months). Each participant was its own control. GPs and participants were not blinded. The primary outcomes were ED presentations and hospital admissions. Data were collected from Queensland Health Casemix data and analysed with multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression modelling to estimate the effectiveness of the OPEN ARCH intervention. Data were analysed at the cluster and participant levels.

Results: Five clusters were randomised to steps 1 and 2, and 4 clusters randomised to step 3. All clusters (n = 14) completed the trial accounting for 80 participants. An effect size of 9% in service use (95% CI) was expected. The OPEN ARCH intervention was found to not make a statistically significant difference to ED presentations or admissions. However, a stabilising of ED presentations and a trend toward lower hospitalisation rates over time was observed.

Conclusions: While this study detected no statistically significant change in ED presentations or hospital admissions, a plateauing of ED presentation and admission rates is a clinically significant finding for older persons with complex needs. Multi-sectoral integrated programs of care require an adequate preparation period and sufficient duration of intervention for effectiveness to be measured.

Trial registration: The OPEN ARCH study received ethical approval from the Far North Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee, HREC/17/QCH/104-1174 and is registered on the Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000198325p .

Keywords: Complexity; Emergency department; Hospital admissions; Integration; Older person; Primary care.

Conflict of interest statement

JM and ES are members of the OPEN ARCH service delivery team.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Service flow of the OPEN ARCH intervention [16].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Roll-out diagram for the OPEN ARCH stepped wedge randomised controlled trial
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Random selection and flow of participants during the OPEN ARCH study. Note: No General Practitioners (GPs) were lost to follow-up during the study period

References

    1. McPake B, Mahal A. Addressing the needs of an ageing population in the health system: the Australian case. Health Syst Reform. 2017;3(3):236–248. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2017.1358796.
    1. Katterl R, Anikeeva O, Butler C, Brown L, Smith B, Bywood P. Potentially avoidable hospitalisations in Australia: Causes for hospitalisations and primary health care interventions. [Internet]. Primary Health Care Research & Information Service: PHCRIS Policy Issue Review. Primary. 2012.
    1. Beswick AD, Rees K, Dieppe P, Avis S, Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J, Ebrahim S. Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008;371(9614):725–735. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60342-6.
    1. Agency for Clinical Innovation . Building Partnerships: A framework for integrating care for older people with complex health needs. [Internet] New South Wales: Department of Health; 2014.
    1. Tieman J, Mitchell G, Shelby-James T, Currow D, Fazekas B, O’Doherty L, Hegarty M, Erikkson L, Brown R, Reid-Orr D. Integration, coordination and multidisciplinary care: what can these approaches offer to Australian primary health care? Aust J Prim Health. 2007;13(2):56. doi: 10.1071/PY07024.
    1. Kuipers P, Kendall E, Ehrlich C, Amsters, Kendall M, Kuipers K, et al. Complexity and healthcare: health practitioner workforce services, roles, skills and training to respond to patients with complex needs. [Internet]. Clin Educ Train Queensland. 2011; Available at: [cited on 2021 Feb 2].
    1. Pond D. C., Regan C. Improving the delivery of primary care for older people. [Internet]. Med J Aust. 2019;21(2):60–62.e1.doi: 10.5694/mja2.50236
    1. Mitchell GK, Burridge L, Zhang J, Donald M, Scott IA, Dart J, Jackson CL. Systematic review of integrated models of health care delivered at the primary-secondary interface: how effective is it and what determines effectiveness? Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(4):391–408. doi: 10.1071/PY14172.
    1. Integrated care for older people: guidelines on community-level interventions to manage declines in intrinsic capacity. [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Accessed at: [cited on 2021 Feb 2].
    1. Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, Bruijnzeels MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive coneptual framework based on the intgrative functions of primary care. [Internet] Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:URN:NBN:NL:UI:10–1-114415. doi: 10.5334/ijic.886.
    1. Carswell P. Te Whiringa Ora: person-centred and integrated care in the Eastern Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. [Internet] Int J Integrated Care. 2015;15:URN:NBN:NL:UI:10–1-114820.
    1. Wodchis WP, Dixon A, Anderson GM, Goodwin N. Integrating care for older people with complex needs; key insignts and lessons from a seven-country cross-case analysis. [Internet]. Int J Integr Care. 2015;15 Available at [cited on 2021 Feb 02].
    1. Bird SR, Kurowski W, Dickman GK, Kronborg I. Integrated care facilitation for older patients with complex health care needs reduces hospital demand. Aust Health Rev. 2007;31(3):451–461. doi: 10.1071/AH070451.
    1. McNab J, Mallitt K, Gillespie J. Report of the evaluation of HealthOne Mount Druitt. [Internet]. Menzies Centre Health Policy. 2013; Available at [cited on 2021 Feb 2].
    1. State of Queensland . Integrated Care Innovation Fund. 2019.
    1. Mann J, Quigley R, Harvey D, Tait M, Williams G, Strivens E. OPEN ARCH: Integrated care at the primary-secondary interface for the community-dwelling older person with complex needs. [Internet]. Aust J Prim Health. 2020;26(2) Available at: https://doi: 10.1071/PY19184[cited on 2021 Feb 2].
    1. Kinchin I, Jacups S, Mann J, Quigley R, Harvey D, Doran CM, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a community -based model of care for older patients with complex needs: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial using a stepped wedge cluster design. [Internet]. Trials. 2018;19(668) Available at: [cited on 2021 Feb 2].
    1. Brown CA, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-54.
    1. Queensland Government . State of Queensland, Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service. 2018. Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service Clinical Service Plan 2018–2022. [Internet]
    1. Queensland Health Casemix and Clinical Costing, Supporting Services. [Internet] 2010. Available at: [cited on 2021 Feb 2].
    1. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision, 2nd ed. Available at: [cited on 2021 Feb 2].
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . National Healthcare Agreement: PI 18–Selected potentially preventable hospitalisations. [Internet]. AIHW. 2018.
    1. Mann J, Thompson F, Quigley R, McDermott R, Devine S, Strivens E. Beyond multimorbidity: primary care and the older person with complex needs. [Internet]. Aust J Prim Health. 2021; Available at: [cited on 2021 Feb 12].
    1. Snooks H, Bailey-Jones K, Russell IT, et al. Effects & costs of implementing predictive risk stratification in primary care: randomised stepped wedge trial. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018. 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007976 (more than 260 000 participant.
    1. Esterman AJ, Ben-Tovim DI. The Australian coordinated care trials: success of failure? The second round of trials may provide more answers. Med J Aust. 2002;177(9):469–470. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04911.x.
    1. Kumpunen S., Edwards N., Georghiou T., Hughes. Evaluating integrated care. Why are evaluations not producing the results we expect? Briefing Paper November 2019. [Internet] Nuffield Trust. Available at [cited on 2021 Feb 2].
    1. Stoop A, Lette M, Ambugo EA, Gadsby EW, Goodwin N, MacInnes J, et al. Improving Person-Centredness in Integrated Care for Older People: Experiences from Thirteen Integrated Care Sites in Europe. [Internet] Int J Integr Care. 2020;20(2):16. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5427.
    1. Quigley R, Russell S, Harvey D, Mann J. OPEN ARCH Integrated care model: experiences of older Australian and their carers. Aust J Prim Health. 2021;27(3):236–42. 10.1071/PY20203.
    1. Herzog A, Gaertner B, Scheidt-Nave C, Holzhausen M. ‘We can only do what we have the means for’ General Practitioners’ views of primary care for older people with complex health problems. [Internet]. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(35). 10.1186/s1287-015-0249-2.
    1. Mitchell GK, Burridge L, Zhang J, Donald M, Scott IA, Dart J, Jackson CL. Systematic review of integrated models of health care delivered at the primary-secondary interface: how effective is it and what determines effectiveness. [Internet] Aust J Prim Health. 2019;21(4):391–408. doi: 10.1071/PY14172.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa