Promoting parent-child relationships and preventing violence via home-visiting: a pre-post cluster randomised trial among Rwandan families linked to social protection programmes

Theresa S Betancourt, Sarah K G Jensen, Dale A Barnhart, Robert T Brennan, Shauna M Murray, Aisha K Yousafzai, Jordan Farrar, Kalisa Godfroid, Stephanie M Bazubagira, Laura B Rawlings, Briana Wilson, Vincent Sezibera, Alex Kamurase, Theresa S Betancourt, Sarah K G Jensen, Dale A Barnhart, Robert T Brennan, Shauna M Murray, Aisha K Yousafzai, Jordan Farrar, Kalisa Godfroid, Stephanie M Bazubagira, Laura B Rawlings, Briana Wilson, Vincent Sezibera, Alex Kamurase

Abstract

Background: Sugira Muryango is a father-engaged early child development and violence-prevention home-visiting programme delivered by trained lay workers. This cluster-randomised trial evaluates whether families living in extreme poverty (Ubudehe 1, the poorest category in the Government of Rwanda's wealth ranking) who receive Sugira Muryango in combination with a government-provided social protection programme demonstrate greater responsive, positive caregiving, nutrition, care seeking, hygiene, and father involvement compared with control families receiving usual care (UC).

Methods: Using detailed maps, we grouped closely spaced villages into 284 geographic clusters stratified by the type of social protection programmes operating in the village clusters; 198 clusters met all enrolment criteria. Sugira Muryango was delivered to n = 541 families in 100 treatment clusters with children aged 6-36 months living in extreme poverty. We assessed changes in outcomes in intervention and n = 508 UC control families using structured surveys and observation. Analyses were intent to treat using mixed models to accommodate clustering.

Results: Families receiving Sugira Muryango improved on core outcomes of parent-child relationships assessed using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (Cohen's d = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.99) and the Observation of Mother-Child Interaction (Cohen's d = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.41). We also saw reductions in harsh discipline on items from the UNICEF MICS (OR = 0.30: 95% CI: 0.19, 0.47) and in violent victimisation of female caregivers by their partners (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24, 1.00) compared with UC. Moreover, children in families receiving SM had a 0.45 higher increase in food groups consumed in the past 24 h (Cohen's d = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.47), increased care seeking for diarrhoea (OR = 4.43, 95% CI: 1.95, 10.10) and fever (OR = 3.28, 95% CI: 1.82, 5.89), and improved hygiene behaviours such as proper treatment of water (OR = 3.39, 95% CI: 2.16, 5.30) compared with UC. Finally, Sugira Muryango was associated with decreased caregiver depression and anxiety (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.88).

Conclusions: Sugira Muryango led to improvements in caregiver behaviours linked to child development and health as well as reductions in violence.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02510313.

Keywords: Early childhood development (ECD); Father engagement; Home-visiting; Poverty; Social protection; Violence.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sugira Muryango Conceptual Model
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cluster sampling strategy and flow chart of participants in the Sugira Muryango trial. cPW = expanded public works; cPW = classic public works. Note: Although each cluster had a 50% chance of being assigned to receive treatment, we were not guaranteed an equal number of treatment and control clusters because randomisation occurred within relatively small strata that sometimes contained an odd number of clusters

References

    1. Black MM, Walker SP, Fernald LCH, et al. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet. 2017;389:77–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31389-7.
    1. Andersen SL. Trajectories of brain development: point of vulnerability or window of opportunity? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003;27:3–18. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00005-8.
    1. Britto PR, Lye SJ, Proulx K, et al. Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development. Lancet. 2017;389:91–102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3.
    1. Yousafzai AK, Rasheed MA, Rizvi A, Armstrong R, Bhutta ZA. Effect of integrated responsive stimulation and nutrition interventions in the lady health worker programme in Pakistan on child development, growth, and health outcomes: a cluster-randomised factorial effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2014;384:1282–1293. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60455-4.
    1. Aboud FE, Singla DR, Nahil MI, Borisova I. Effectiveness of a parenting program in Bangladesh to address early childhood health, growth and development. Soc Sci Med. 2013;97:250–258. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.020.
    1. Richter LM, Daelmans B, Lombardi J, et al. Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development. Lancet. 2017;389:103–118. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31698-1.
    1. Mikton C, MacMillan H, Dua T, Betancourt TS. Integration of prevention of violence against children and early child development. Lancet Glob Heal. 2014;2:e442–e443. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70233-5.
    1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda . The fifth integrated household living survey (EICV5) Rwanda poverty profile report, 2016/17. 2018.
    1. The World Bank . Poverty. 2019.
    1. Republic of Rwanda Local Administrative Entities Development Agency (LODA). Environmental and social management framework for the social protection investment project financing operation. 2018. . Accessed 1 Mar 2020.
    1. Government of Rwanda . Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy 2013-2018: Shaping our Development. 2013.
    1. Ministry of Health Rwanda, UNICEF Rwanda . Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Assessment on Early Nurturing of Children Report. 2014.
    1. Republic of Rwanda Local Administrative Entities Development Agency (LODA) Ubudehe social categorization report. 2016.
    1. Betancourt TS, Ng LC, Kirk CM, et al. Family-based promotion of mental health in children affected by HIV: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58:922–930. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12729.
    1. Betancourt TS, Franchett E, Kirk CM, et al. Integrating social protection and early childhood development: open trial of a family home-visiting intervention, Sugira Muryango. Early Child Dev Care. 2018. 10.1080/03004430.2018.1464002.
    1. World Health Organization, UNICEF . Care for child development: improving the care for young children. 2012.
    1. Rasheed MA, Yousafzai AK. The development and reliability of an observational tool for assessing mother-child interactions in field studies- experience from Pakistan. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41:1161–1171. doi: 10.1111/cch.12287.
    1. Caldwell BM, Bradley RH. Home observation for measurement of the environment: administration manual. 2003.
    1. Singla DR, Kumbakumba E, Aboud FE. Effects of a parenting intervention to address maternal psychological wellbeing and child development and growth in rural Uganda: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Glob Heal. 2015;3:e458–e469. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00099-6.
    1. UNICEF . MICS5 questionnaire for children under five. 2013.
    1. USAID, AED, Food and nutrition technical assistance, UC Davis, International Food Policy Research Institute, WHO. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Geneva; 2008. . Accessed 1 Mar 2020.
    1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda, Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, Ministry of Health, ICF International. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2014–15. Kigali; 2016. . Accessed 1 Mar 2020.
    1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda, ORC Macro. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2005. Kigali; 2006. . Accessed 1 Mar 2020.
    1. UNICEF, Imbuto Foundation . Early Childhood Development and Family Services: baseline evaluation in 20 sites in Rwanda. 2015.
    1. Bolton P. Local perceptions of the mental health effects of the Rwandan genocide. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001;189:243–248. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200104000-00006.
    1. Plumpton CO, Morris T, Hughes DA, White IR. Multiple imputation of multiple multi-item scales when a full imputation model is infeasible. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:45. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1853-5.
    1. World Health Organization, UNICEF . WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. 2009.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa