Fitness and Fatness as Health Markers through the Lifespan: An Overview of Current Knowledge

Francisco B Ortega, Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez, Duck-Chul Lee, Jonatan R Ruiz, Steven N Blair, Xuemei Sui, Francisco B Ortega, Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez, Duck-Chul Lee, Jonatan R Ruiz, Steven N Blair, Xuemei Sui

Abstract

There is an increasing body of evidence supporting that both fitness and fatness levels relate to current and future individuals' health status. In this article, we discuss the meaning of fitness and fatness/obesity, and make an overview of what is currently known about fitness and fatness as potentially modifiable risk factors related to health and disease from preschool children to older adults. We describe the methods available for fitness assessment in each age group, providing reference/criterion values when available. Most of the existing previous reviews are focused on specific age groups with the advantage of allowing more in-depth analysis of the evidence, but the disadvantage of losing the overall understanding of the fitness and fatness binomial through the human lifespan, which is the ultimate goal of the present article.

Keywords: Physical fitness; adolescents; adults; cardiorespiratory fitness; children; fatness; health; obesity; older adults; preschool.

Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of the European Society of Preventive Medicine.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Graphical illustration of the key concepts and focus of the present article.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Graphical illustration of physical activity- and fitness-related concepts. PA = physical activity; METs = metabolic equivalents.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Graphical illustration of the associations of BMI, BF%, FMI, and FFMI with CVD mortality and physiological explanation. Reproduced with permission from Ortega et al.[5] BMI = body mass index, BF% = Body fat percent, CVD = cardiovascular disease; HR = Hazard Ratios; LV = left ventricular; RV = right ventricular.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Evidence-based fitness test batteries to assess fitness in preschoolers, children, and adolescents. Adapted from Ruiz et al.[12] and Ortega et al.[7] with permission of the publisher. It is important to note that the fitness tests included in the PREFIT battery have major adaptations so that can be used in preschool children. As an example, the 20 m shuttle run test initial speed was reduced from 8.5 to 6.5 km/h, because the original speed was too difficult for 3–5 year olds. It is important to note that the standing on 1 leg test was selected based on the systematic review, but later testing in preschool children has shown poor reliability, being therefore its usefulness in this age group highly questionable (this is represented in the figure with the symbol “?”). Detailed information on the adaptations, practical consideration, and reliability of the tests included in the PREFIT battery has been published elsewhere.[8] The standing on 1 leg test has shown a poor reliability in this population, being therefore highly questionable its usefulness in this age group. ALPHA = Assessing Levels of PHysical Activity and fitness; BMI = body mass index; PREFIT = assessing FITness in PREschoolers.
Fig 5.
Fig 5.
Hazard ratios (95% CI) of incident CVD risk factors by combined categories of changes in CRF and percentage body fat. Reproduced with permission from Lee et al.[23] CI = confidence interval.
Fig 6.
Fig 6.
Illustration of the Fat but Fit paradox in relation with CVD mortality and all-cause mortality in men and women. Reproduced from Ortega et al.,[19,25] with permission of the publishers. Unfit-fit was categorized as below-above the age- and sex-specific percentile 20th within each original study. BMI = body mass index; CVD = cardiovascular disease.
Fig 7.
Fig 7.
Illustration of the Fat but Fit paradox in older adults. Figure based on the data shown in Table 7 of the article published by Sui et al.[29] Obesity was defined based on BMI using the standard cut-points (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 to define severe obesity) (A), based on BF% using the cut-point of ≥ 25% and ≥ 30% for men and women, respectively (B), and based on waist circumference ≥ 102 cm and ≥ 88 cm for men and women respectively (C). Unfit-fit was categorized as below-above the age- and sex-specific percentile 20th within each original study. BMI = body mass index; BF% = body fat percent.

References

    1. Kennedy AB, Lavie CJ, Blair SN.Fitness or fatness, what is more important? J Am Med Assoc. 2018;319:231–232..
    1. Lavie CJ, De Schutter A, Parto P, et al. Obesity and prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and prognosis—the obesity paradox updated. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58:537–547..
    1. Lavie CJ, Sharma A, Alpert MA, et al. Update on obesity and obesity paradox in heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58:393–400..
    1. Oktay AA, Lavie CJ, Kokkinos PF, et al. The interaction of cardiorespiratory fitness with obesity and the obesity paradox in cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;60:30–44..
    1. Ortega FB, Sui X, Lavie CJ, et al. Body mass index, the most widely used but also widely criticized index: would a criterion standard measure of total body fat be a better predictor of cardiovascular disease mortality? Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:443–455..
    1. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, et al. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32:1–11..
    1. Ortega FB, Cadenas-Sánchez C, Sánchez-Delgado G, et al. Systematic review and proposal of a field-based physical fitness-test battery in preschool children: the PREFIT battery. Sports Med. 2015;45:533–555..
    1. Cadenas-Sanchez C, Martinez-Tellez B, Sanchez-Delgado G, et al. Assessing physical fitness in preschool children: feasibility, reliability and practical recommendations for the PREFIT battery. J Sci Med Sport. 2016. 19:910–915..
    1. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:13–27..
    1. Ruiz JR, Castro-Piñero J, Artero EG, et al. Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:909–923..
    1. Crump C, Sundquist J, Winkleby MA, et al. Physical fitness among Swedish military conscripts and long-term risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:577–584..
    1. Ruiz JR, Castro-Piñero J, España-Romero V, et al. Field-based fitness assessment in young people: the ALPHA health-related fitness test battery for children and adolescents. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:518–524..
    1. Ruiz JR, Cavero-Redondo I, Ortega FB, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness cut points to avoid cardiovascular disease risk in children and adolescents; what level of fitness should raise a red flag? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:58–65..
    1. Esteban-Cornejo I, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Contreras-Rodriguez O, et al. A whole brain volumetric approach in overweight/obese children: examining the association with different physical fitness components and academic performance. The ActiveBrains project. Neuroimage. 2017;159:346–354..
    1. Ortega FB, Silventoinen K, Tynelius P, et al. Muscular strength in male adolescents and premature death: cohort study of one million participants. BMJ. 2012;345:e7279.
    1. Smith JJ, Eather N, Morgan PJ, et al. The health benefits of muscular fitness for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44:1209–1223..
    1. Skinner AC, Perrin EM, Moss LA, et al. Cardiometabolic risks and severity of obesity in children and young adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1307–1317..
    1. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Labayen I, et al. The fat but fit paradox: what we know and don’t know about it. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:151–153..
    1. Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301:2024–2035..
    1. Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, et al. American Heart Association Physical Activity Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; Stroke Council. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134:e653–e699..
    1. Kaminsky LA, Arena R, Beckie TM, et al. American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. The importance of cardiorespiratory fitness in the United States: the need for a national registry: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:652–662..
    1. Lee DC, Sui X, Church TS, et al. Changes in fitness and fatness on the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:665–672..
    1. Lee DC, Sui X, Artero EG, et al. Long-term effects of changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Circulation. 2011;124:2483–2490..
    1. Ortega FB, Lavie CJ, Blair SN.Obesity and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2016;118:1752–1770..
    1. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study investigators. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386:266–273..
    1. Kim Y, Wijndaele K, Lee DC, et al. Independent and joint associations of grip strength and adiposity with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in 403,199 adults: The UK Biobank study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:773–782..
    1. Ruiz JR, Sui X, Lobelo F, et al. Association between muscular strength and mortality in men: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a439.
    1. Sui X, LaMonte MJ, Laditka JN, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity as mortality predictors in older adults. JAMA. 2007;298:2507–2516..
    1. Bouaziz W, Vogel T, Schmitt E, et al. Health benefits of aerobic training programs in adults aged 70 and over: a systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;69:110–127..
    1. Borde R, Hortobágyi T, Granacher U.Dose-response relationships of resistance training in healthy old adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015;45:1693–1720..

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa