Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343

Kevin S Hughes, Lauren A Schnaper, Jennifer R Bellon, Constance T Cirrincione, Donald A Berry, Beryl McCormick, Hyman B Muss, Barbara L Smith, Clifford A Hudis, Eric P Winer, William C Wood, Kevin S Hughes, Lauren A Schnaper, Jennifer R Bellon, Constance T Cirrincione, Donald A Berry, Beryl McCormick, Hyman B Muss, Barbara L Smith, Clifford A Hudis, Eric P Winer, William C Wood

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether there is a benefit to adjuvant radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery and tamoxifen in women age ≥ 70 years with early-stage breast cancer.

Patients and methods: Between July 1994 and February 1999, 636 women (age ≥ 70 years) who had clinical stage I (T1N0M0 according to TNM classification) estrogen receptor (ER) -positive breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy were randomly assigned to receive tamoxifen plus radiation therapy (TamRT; 317 women) or tamoxifen alone (Tam; 319 women). Primary end points were time to local or regional recurrence, frequency of mastectomy, breast cancer-specific survival, time to distant metastasis, and overall survival (OS).

Results: Median follow-up for treated patients is now 12.6 years. At 10 years, 98% of patients receiving TamRT (95% CI, 96% to 99%) compared with 90% of those receiving Tam (95% CI, 85% to 93%) were free from local and regional recurrences. There were no significant differences in time to mastectomy, time to distant metastasis, breast cancer-specific survival, or OS between the two groups. Ten-year OS was 67% (95% CI, 62% to 72%) and 66% (95% CI, 61% to 71%) in the TamRT and Tam groups, respectively.

Conclusion: With long-term follow-up, the previously observed small improvement in locoregional recurrence with the addition of radiation therapy remains. However, this does not translate into an advantage in OS, distant disease-free survival, or breast preservation. Depending on the value placed on local recurrence, Tam remains a reasonable option for women age ≥ 70 years with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram. Tam, tamoxifen alone; TamRT, tamoxifen plus radiation therapy.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Time to local or regional recurrence. HR, hazard ratio; Tam, tamoxifen alone; TamRT, tamoxifen plus radiation therapy.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Time to subsequent mastectomy. HR, hazard ratio; Tam, tamoxifen alone; TamRT, tamoxifen plus radiation therapy.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Time to distant metastasis. HR, hazard ratio; Tam, tamoxifen alone; TamRT, tamoxifen plus radiation therapy.
Fig 5.
Fig 5.
Overall survival. HR, hazard ratio; Tam, tamoxifen alone; TamRT, tamoxifen plus radiation therapy.
Fig 6.
Fig 6.
Observed versus expected survival.
Fig A1.
Fig A1.
Breast cancer–specific survival. HR, hazard ratio; Tam, tamoxifen alone; TamRT, tamoxifen plus radiation therapy.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa