Effect of Secukinumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Phase III Randomized Trial (MEASURE 1)

Atul A Deodhar, Maxime Dougados, Dominique L Baeten, James Cheng-Chung Wei, Piet Geusens, Aimee Readie, Hanno B Richards, Ruvie Martin, Brian Porter, Atul A Deodhar, Maxime Dougados, Dominique L Baeten, James Cheng-Chung Wei, Piet Geusens, Aimee Readie, Hanno B Richards, Ruvie Martin, Brian Porter

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of secukinumab (interleukin-17A inhibitor) on patient-reported outcomes in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods: In this phase III study, 371 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive intravenous (IV) secukinumab 10 mg/kg at baseline and weeks 2 and 4 followed by subcutaneous (SC) secukinumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (IV→150 mg group), or SC secukinumab 75 mg every 4 weeks (IV→75 mg group), or placebo. Patient-reported outcomes included the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), BASDAI criteria for 50% improvement (BASDAI 50), Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) score and mental component summary (MCS) score, Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), EuroQol 5-domain (EQ-5D) questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health questionnaire (WPAI-GH).

Results: At week 16, secukinumab IV→150 mg or IV→75 mg was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvements from baseline versus placebo in the BASDAI (-2.3 for both regimens versus -0.6; P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively), SF-36 PCS (5.6 for both regimens versus 1.0; P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively), and ASQoL (-3.6 for both regimens versus -1.0; P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Clinically significant improvements in the SF-36 MCS, BASFI, EQ-5D, and BASDAI 50 were observed with both secukinumab groups versus placebo at week 16; improvements were also observed in the FACIT-F and WPAI-GH. All improvements were sustained through week 52.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that secukinumab provides significant and sustained improvements in patient-reported disease activity and health-related quality of life, and reduces functional impairment, fatigue, and impact of disease on work productivity in patients with active AS.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01358175.

© 2016 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Rheumatology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Odds ratios (ORs) for Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for 20% improvement in disease activity (ASAS20), ASAS40, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index criteria for 50% improvement (BASDAI 50), and Short Form 36 (SF‐36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) responses at week 16 in AS patients treated with secukinumab versus those treated with placebo. ASAS20/40 and SF‐36 PCS were analyzed as part of a predefined hierarchical testing strategy, with P values adjusted for multiple testing; P values for BASDAI 50 and SF‐36 MCS are unadjusted. Missing data were imputed as nonresponse. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; IV = intravenous.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean change from baseline through week 52 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (A), Short Form 36 physical component summary score (B), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire (C). Least squares mean data are from mixed‐effects model repeated measures through week 52. P values at week 16 were adjusted for multiple testing. ∗ = P < 0.0001; † = P < 0.001; § = P < 0.01, versus placebo. IV = intravenous.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean change from baseline through week 52 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. Least squares mean data are from mixed‐effects model repeated measures through week 52. ∗ = P < 0.0001; § = P < 0.01; ‡ = P < 0.05 versus placebo. IV = intravenous.

References

    1. Deodhar A. Axial spondyloarthritis criteria and modified NY criteria: issues and controversies. Clin Rheumatol 2014;33:741–7.
    1. Garg N, van den Bosch F, Deodhar A. The concept of spondyloarthritis: where are we now? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2014;28:663–72.
    1. Gran J, Husby G, Hordvik M. Prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis in males and females in a young middle‐aged population of Tromsø, northern Norway. Ann Rheum Dis 1985;44:359–67.
    1. Kaipiainen‐Seppanen O, Aho K, Heliovaara M. Incidence and prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis in Finland. J Rheumatol 1997;24:496–9.
    1. Alamanos Y, Papadopoulos NG, Voulgari PV, Karakatsanis A, Siozos C, Drosos AA. Epidemiology of ankylosing spondylitis in Northwest Greece, 1983–2002. Rheumatology 2004;43:615–8.
    1. Dai SM, Han XH, Zhao DB, Shi YQ, Liu Y, Meng JM. Prevalence of rheumatic symptoms, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and gout in Shanghai, China: a COPCORD study. J Rheumatol 2003;30:2245–51.
    1. Hukuda S, Minami M, Saito T, Mitsui H, Matsui N, Komatsubara Y, et al. Spondyloarthropathies in Japan: nationwide questionnaire survey performed by the Japan Ankylosing Spondylitis Society. J Rheumatol 2001;28:554–9.
    1. Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 2007;369:1379–90.
    1. Braun J, van den Berg R, Baraliakos X, Boehm H, Burgos‐Vargas R, Collantes‐Estevez E, et al. 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:896–904.
    1. Glintborg B, Ostergaard M, Krogh NS, Dreyer L, Kristensen HL, Hetland ML. Predictors of treatment response and drug continuation in 842 patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with anti‐tumour necrosis factor: results from 8 years’ surveillance in the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:2002–8.
    1. Toussirot É. Current therapeutics for spondyloarthritis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2011;12:2469–77.
    1. Song IH, Poddubnyy D. New treatment targets in ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthritides. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2011;23:346–51.
    1. Zochling J, van der Heijde D, Burgos‐Vargas R, Collantes E, Davis JC Jr, Dijkmans B, et al. ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:442–52.
    1. Heiberg MS, Koldingsnes W, Mikkelsen K, Rødevand E, Kaufmann C, Mowinckel P, et al. The comparative one‐year performance of anti‐tumor necrosis factor α drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: results from a longitudinal, observational, multicenter study. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:234–40.
    1. Haibel H, Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Sieper J. Open label trial of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis over 24 weeks. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:296–8.
    1. Sieper J, Braun J, Kay J, Badalamenti S, Radin AR, Jiao L, et al. Sarilumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: results of a Phase II, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study (ALIGN). Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1051–7.
    1. Bowness P, Ridley A, Shaw J, Chan AT, Wong‐Baeza I, Fleming M, et al. Th17 cells expressing KIR3DL2+ and responsive to HLA‐B27 homodimers are increased in ankylosing spondylitis. J Immunol 2011;186:2672–80.
    1. Noordenbos T, Yeremenko N, Gofita I, van de Sande M, Tak PP, Caňete JD, et al. Interleukin‐17–positive mast cells contribute to synovial inflammation in spondylarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:99–109.
    1. Mei Y, Pan F, Gao J, Ge R, Duan Z, Zeng Z, et al. Increased serum IL‐17 and IL‐23 in the patient with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 2011;30:269–73.
    1. Baeten D, Baraliakos X, Braun J, Sieper J, Emery P, van der Heijde D, et al. Anti‐interleukin‐17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab in treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382:1705–13.
    1. Baeten D, Sieper J, Braun J, Baraliakos X, Dougados M, Emery P, et al. Secukinumab, an interleukin‐17A inhibitor, in ankylosing spondylitis. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2534–48.
    1. Van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361–8.
    1. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2286–91.
    1. Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF‐36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
    1. Doward LC, Spoorenberg A, Cook SA, Whalley D, Helliwell PS, Kay LJ, et al. Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:20–6.
    1. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O'Hea J, Mallorie P, et al. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2281–5.
    1. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ‐5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001;33:337–43.
    1. Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia‐related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997;13:63–74.
    1. Cella D, Yount S, Sorensen M, Chartash E, Sengupta N, Grober J. Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2005;32:811–9.
    1. Loeppke R, Hymel PA, Lofland JH, Pizzi LT, Konicki DL, Anstadt GW, et al. Health‐related workplace productivity measurement: general and migraine‐specific recommendations from the ACOEM Expert Panel. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45:349–59.
    1. Boonen A, van der Linden SM. The burden of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol Suppl 2006;78:4–11.
    1. Aissaoui N, Rostom S, Hakkou J, Berrada Ghziouel K, Bahiri R, Abouqal R, et al. Fatigue in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: prevalence and relationships with disease‐specific variables, psychological status, and sleep disturbance. Rheumatol Int 2012;32:2117–24.
    1. Deodhar A, Braun J, Inman RD, Mack M, Parasuraman S, Buchanan J, et al. Golimumab reduces sleep disturbance in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: results from a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:1266–71.
    1. Brophy S, Davies H, Dennis MS, Cooksey R, Husain MJ, Irvine E, et al. Fatigue in ankylosing spondylitis: treatment should focus on pain management. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2013;42:361–7.
    1. Hammoudeh M, Zack DJ, Li W, Stewart VM, Koenig AS. Associations between inflammation, nocturnal back pain and fatigue in ankylosing spondylitis and improvements with etanercept therapy. J Int Med Res 2013;41:1150–9.
    1. Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Luo MP, Wong RL. Psychometric characteristics of the short form 36 health survey and functional assessment of chronic illness Therapy‐Fatigue subscale for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:36.
    1. Pathan E, Abraham S, van Rossen E, Withrington R, Keat A, Charles PJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1475–80.
    1. Boonen A, Chorus A, Miedema H, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Schouten H, et al. Withdrawal from labour force due to work disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:1033–9.
    1. Zochling J. Measures of symptoms and disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Scale (ASQoL), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS‐G), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Dougados Functional Index (DFI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire for the Spondylarthropathies (HAQ‐S). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63 Suppl 11:S47–58.
    1. EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health‐related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa