Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated whole virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, TURKOVAC, in healthy adults: Interim results from randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 and 2 trials

Aykut Ozdarendeli, Zafer Sezer, Shaikh Terkis Islam Pavel, Ahmet Inal, Hazel Yetiskin, Busra Kaplan, Muhammet Ali Uygut, Adnan Bayram, Mumtaz Mazicioglu, Gamze Kalin Unuvar, Zeynep Ture Yuce, Gunsu Aydin, Ahmet Furkan Aslan, Refika Kamuran Kaya, Rabia Cakir Koc, Ihsan Ates, Ates Kara, Aykut Ozdarendeli, Zafer Sezer, Shaikh Terkis Islam Pavel, Ahmet Inal, Hazel Yetiskin, Busra Kaplan, Muhammet Ali Uygut, Adnan Bayram, Mumtaz Mazicioglu, Gamze Kalin Unuvar, Zeynep Ture Yuce, Gunsu Aydin, Ahmet Furkan Aslan, Refika Kamuran Kaya, Rabia Cakir Koc, Ihsan Ates, Ates Kara

Abstract

Background: Development of safe and effective vaccine options is crucial to the success of fight against COVID-19 pandemic. Herein, we report interim safety and immunogenicity findings of the phase 1&2 trials of ERUCoV-VAC, an inactivated whole virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Methods: Double-blind, randomised, single centre, phase 1 and 2 trials included SARS-CoV-2 seronegative healthy adults aged 18-55 years (18-64 in phase 2). All participants, except the first 4 in phase 1 who received ERUCoV-VAC 3 μg or 6 μg unblinded and monitored for 7 days for safety purposes, were assigned to receive two intramuscular doses of ERUCoV-VAC 3 μg or 6 μg (an inactivated vaccine containing alhydrogel as adjuvant) or placebo 21 days apart (28 days in phase 2) according to computer-generated randomisation schemes. Both trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (phase 1, NCT04691947 and phase 2, NCT04824391).

Results: Forty-four participants (3 μg [n:17], 6 μg [n:17], placebo [n:10]) in phase 1 and 250 (3 μg [n:100], 6 μg [n:100], placebo [n:50]) in phase 2 received ≥1 dose. In phase 1 trial, 25 adverse events AEs (80 % mild) occured in 15 participants (34.1 %) until day 43. There was no dose-response relationship noted in safety events in ERUCoV-VAC recipients (p = 0.4905). Pain at injection site was the most common AE (9/44;20.5 %). Both doses of ERUCoV-VAC 3 μg and 6 μg groups were comparable in inducing SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralising antibody (MNT50): GMTs (95 %CI) were 8.3 (6.4-10.3) vs. 8.6 (7.0-10.2) at day 43 (p = 0.7357) and 9.7 (6.0-13.4) vs. 10.8 (8.8-12.8) at day 60 (p = 0.8644), respectively. FRNT50 confirmed MNT50 results: SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralising antibody GMTs (95 %CI) were 8.4 (6.3-10.5) vs. 9.0 (7.2-10.8) at day 43 (p = 0.5393) and 11.0 (7.0-14.9) vs. 12.3 (10.3-14.5) at day 60 (p = 0.8578). Neutralising antibody seroconversion rates (95 %CI) were 86.7 % (59.5-98.3) vs 94.1 % (71.3-99.8) at day 43 (p = 0.8727) and 92.8 % (66.1-99.8) vs. 100 % (79.4-100.0) at day 60 (p = 0.8873), in ERUCoV-VAC 3 μg and 6 μg groups, respectively. In phase 2 trial, 268 AEs, (67.2 % moderate in severity) occured in 153 (61.2 %) participants. The most common local and systemic AEs were pain at injection site (23 events in 21 [8.4 %] subjects) and headache (56 events in 47 [18.8 %] subjects), respectively. Pain at injection site was the only AE with a significantly higher frequency in the ERUCoV-VAC groups than in the placebo arm in the phase 2 study (p = 0.0322). ERUCoV-VAC groups were comparable in frequency of AEs (p = 0.4587). ERUCoV-VAC 3 μg and 6 μg groups were comparable neutralising antibody (MNT50): GMTs (95 %CI) were 30.0 (37.9-22.0) vs. 34.9 (47.6-22.1) at day 43 (p = 0.0666) and 34.2 (23.8-44.5) and 39.6 (22.7-58.0) at day 60, (p = 0.2166), respectively. FRNT50 confirmed MNT50 results: SARS-CoV-2 wildtype neutralising antibody GMTs were 28.9 (20.0-37.7) and 30.1 (18.5-41.6) at day 43 (p = 0.3366) and 34.2 (23.8-44.5) and 39.6 (22.7-58.0) at day 60 (p = 0.8777). Neutralising antibody seroconversion rates (95 %CI) were 95.7 % (91.4-99.8) vs. 98.9 % (96.9-100.0) at day 43 (p = 0.8710) and 96.6 % (92.8-100.0) vs 98.9 % (96.7-100.0) at day 60 (p = 0.9129) in ERUCoV-VAC 3 μg and 6 μg groups, respectively.

Conclusions: Two-dose regimens of ERUCoV-VAC 3 μg and 6 μg 28 days both had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and elicited comparable neutralising antibody responses and seroconversion rates exceeding 95 % at day 43 and 60 after the first vaccination. Data availability Data will be made available on request.

Keywords: COVID-19; ERUCoV-VAC; Inactivated whole virion vaccine; SARS-CoV-2; TURKOVAC.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Aykut Ozdarendeli, Shaikh Terkis Islam Pavel, Hazel Yetiskin, Muhammet Ali Uygut and Gunsu Aydin are the named inventors on patent applications covering inactivated COVID-19 vaccine development.

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study profiles for (A) phase 1 and (B) phase 2 trials. n = number of participants.*not included as the targeted number of randomised patients was achieved. **The first four patients enrolled in the study (two in each vaccine arm) unblindly received ERUCoV-VAC and were monitored for a week for safety purposes (see randomisation and masking). #Placebo recipients were released from the trials to allow them to receive one of the vaccines that became available for emergency use.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study profiles for (A) phase 1 and (B) phase 2 trials. n = number of participants.*not included as the targeted number of randomised patients was achieved. **The first four patients enrolled in the study (two in each vaccine arm) unblindly received ERUCoV-VAC and were monitored for a week for safety purposes (see randomisation and masking). #Placebo recipients were released from the trials to allow them to receive one of the vaccines that became available for emergency use.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Titres of SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralising antibodies (A-D) and anti-S1-RBD IgG (E-F) and anti- SARS-CoV-2 total IgG (G-H) antibodies at baseline, day 43 and day 60 in the ERUCoV-VAC (3 µg and 6 µg) and placebo groups in the phase 1 and phase 2 trials. Dose schedule: two doses 21 days apart in the phase 1 trial; two doses 28 days apart in the phase 2 trial. *placebo recipients were released from the trial after day 43, therefore not included in day 60 analyses. **ns = not significant. The numbers above the spots are the GMT estimates, the error bars represent the 95 %CI of the GMT and the spots indicate the individual antibody titres. ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FRNT = focus-reduction neutralisation test; GMT = geometric mean titre; IgG = immunoglobulin G. MNT = microneutralisation test. SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; S1-RBD = spike 1-receptor binding domain.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Titres of SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralising antibodies (A-D) and anti-S1-RBD IgG (E-F) and anti- SARS-CoV-2 total IgG (G-H) antibodies at baseline, day 43 and day 60 in the ERUCoV-VAC (3 µg and 6 µg) and placebo groups in the phase 1 and phase 2 trials. Dose schedule: two doses 21 days apart in the phase 1 trial; two doses 28 days apart in the phase 2 trial. *placebo recipients were released from the trial after day 43, therefore not included in day 60 analyses. **ns = not significant. The numbers above the spots are the GMT estimates, the error bars represent the 95 %CI of the GMT and the spots indicate the individual antibody titres. ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FRNT = focus-reduction neutralisation test; GMT = geometric mean titre; IgG = immunoglobulin G. MNT = microneutralisation test. SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; S1-RBD = spike 1-receptor binding domain.
Supplementary figure 1
Supplementary figure 1
Correlation between MNT50 and FRNT50 results, responses to SARS-Cov-2 in the A) phase 1 on day 43. FRNT=focus-reduction neutralisation test; MNT=microneutralisation test.
Supplementary figure 2
Supplementary figure 2
Correlation between MNT50 and FRNT50 results, responses to SARS-Cov-2 in the B) phase 2 trials on day 43. FRNT=focus-reduction neutralisati
Supplementary figure 3
Supplementary figure 3
ELISPOT results from phase 2 trial. PBMC=peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

References

    1. Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–1723.
    1. World Health Organization. Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. (accessed March 01, 2022).
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. (accessed March 01, 2022).
    1. Ehreth J. The global value of vaccination. Vaccine. 2003;21:596–600.
    1. Roush S.W., Murphy T.V. Vaccine-Preventable Disease Table Working Group. Historical comparisons of morbidity and mortality for vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298:2155–2163.
    1. Rodrigues C.M.C., Plotkin S.A. Impact of vaccines; health, economic and social perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1526.
    1. World Health Organization. COVID-19 vaccines. (accessed March 01, 2022).
    1. World Health Organization. COVID-19 vaccine tracker and landscape. (accessed March 01, 2022).
    1. Pavel S.T.I., Yetiskin H., Uygut M.A., et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine against SARS CoV-2. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9:1266.
    1. Pavel S.T.I., Yetiskin H., Aydin G., et al. Isolation and characterization of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Turkiye. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0238614.
    1. Xia S., Duan K., Zhang Y., et al. Effect of an inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 on safety and immunogenicity outcomes: Interim analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 2020;324:951–960.
    1. Zhang Y., Zeng G., Pan H., et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:181–192.
    1. Gao Q., Bao L., Mao H., et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science. 2020;369(6499):77–81.
    1. Xia S., Zhang Y., Wang Y., et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:39–51.
    1. Pan H.X., Liu J.K., Huang B.Y., et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 inactivated vaccine in healthy adults: randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials. Chin Med J (Engl) 2021;134:1289–1298.
    1. Ella R., Vadrevu K.M., Jogdand H., et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: a double-blind, randomised, phase 1 trial [published correction appears in Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr; 21(4):e81] Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:637–646.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa