Prospective observational study in patients with obstructive lung disease: NOVELTY design

Helen K Reddel, Maria Gerhardsson de Verdier, Alvar Agustí, Gary Anderson, Richard Beasley, Elisabeth H Bel, Christer Janson, Barry Make, Richard J Martin, Ian Pavord, David Price, Christina Keen, Asparuh Gardev, Stephen Rennard, Alecka Sveréus, Aruna T Bansal, Lance Brannman, Niklas Karlsson, Javier Nuevo, Fredrik Nyberg, Simon S Young, Jørgen Vestbo, Helen K Reddel, Maria Gerhardsson de Verdier, Alvar Agustí, Gary Anderson, Richard Beasley, Elisabeth H Bel, Christer Janson, Barry Make, Richard J Martin, Ian Pavord, David Price, Christina Keen, Asparuh Gardev, Stephen Rennard, Alecka Sveréus, Aruna T Bansal, Lance Brannman, Niklas Karlsson, Javier Nuevo, Fredrik Nyberg, Simon S Young, Jørgen Vestbo

Abstract

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have overlapping clinical features and share pathobiological mechanisms but are often considered distinct disorders. Prospective, observational studies across asthma, COPD and asthma-COPD overlap are limited. NOVELTY is a global, prospective observational 3-year study enrolling ∼12 000 patients ≥12 years of age from primary and specialist clinical practices in 19 countries (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02760329). NOVELTY's primary objectives are to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns and disease burden over time, and to identify phenotypes and molecular endotypes associated with differential outcomes over time in patients with a diagnosis/suspected diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD. NOVELTY aims to recruit real-world patients, unlike clinical studies with restrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data collected at yearly intervals include clinical assessments, spirometry, biospecimens, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare utilisation (HCU). PROs and HCU will also be collected 3-monthly via internet/telephone. Data will be used to identify phenotypes and endotypes associated with different trajectories for symptom burden, clinical progression or remission and HCU. Results may allow patient classification across obstructive lung disease by clinical outcomes and biomarker profile, rather than by conventional diagnostic labels and severity categories. NOVELTY will provide a rich data source on obstructive lung disease, to help improve patient outcomes and aid novel drug development.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: H.K. Reddel reports that this study is funded by AstraZeneca. She received reimbursement from AstraZeneca for time spent working on the study design but not for manuscript preparation. Medical writing support was provided by AstraZeneca, as stated in the support statement. She has served on a data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) and advisory boards, and has received unconditional research grants and honoraria from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline for providing independent medical education, consulting and studying inhalers. She has served on a DSMB for Merck. She has served on a DSMB and an advisory board for, and received an honorarium from Novartis for providing independent medical education. She has received honoraria from Teva and Mundipharma for providing independent medical education. She has received an honorarium from Boehringer Ingelheim for providing independent medical education from and serving on an advisory board. Conflict of interest: M. Gerhardsson de Verdier is an employee of AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: A. Agustí reports receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Menarini, and personal fees from Chiesi, Teva and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: G. Anderson has received honoraria from and serves on an advisory board for Novartis; has received honoraria from, serves on an advisory board for and was employed on a sabbatical basis from 2016 to 2017 by AstraZeneca; and has received honoraria and serves on advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline, Pieris Pharmaceuticals and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: R. Beasley reports receiving personal fees from Astra Zeneca during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline and the Health Research Council of New Zealand, and grants from Genentech, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: E.H. Bel reports receiving grants and personal fees from Novartis, GSK and AstraZeneca, grants from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi Regeneron, Teva, Vectura and Boehringer, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Janson reports receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Teva, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: Related to the topic of COPD, B. Make reports funding from the NHLBI for the COPDGene study; grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and Sunovian; personal fees for DSMB from Spiration and Baxalta; CME personal fees from Consensus Medical Education, Integrity Medical Education, WebMD, National Jewish Health, American College of Chest Physicians, Projects in Knowledge, Hybrid Communications, SPIRE Learning, Peer Review Institute, and Medscape; personal fees and other from Mt. Sinai Medical Center; royalties from Up-To-Date; personal fees from Novartis; personal fees from CSL Bering; other from Cleveland Clinic; grants from Pearl (a member of the AstraZeneca Group); and personal fees from Verona, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R.J. Martin reports receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca for service on a steering committee during the conduct of the study; and travel fees from Respiratory Effectiveness Group, consultancy fees from PMD Healthcare, and grants from MedImmune, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA and NHLBI, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: I. Pavord reports receiving speaker fees, advisory board honoraria and sponsorship to attend scientific meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and GlaxoSmithKline, a speaker fee from Aerocrine, speaker fees and advisory board honoraria from Almirall and Novartis, advisory board honoraria from Genentech, Regeneron, Merck & Co., Schering-Plough and Mylan Speciality (Dey Pharma) and Respivert, advisory board honoraria and sponsorship to attend scientific meetings from Napp Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D. Price reports receiving funding from AstraZeneca for the conduct of this study; and board membership (fees paid to Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute) from Aerocrine, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Mylan, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, consultancy agreements (fees paid to Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute) with Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Mylan, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Theravance, grants and unrestricted funding for investigator-initiated studies (conducted through Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute) from Aerocrine, AKL Research and Development Ltd, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, British Lung Foundation, Chiesi, Mylan, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis, Pfizer, Respiratory Effectiveness Group, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Theravance, UK National Health Service and Zentiva, lectures/speaking engagements (fees paid to Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute) for Almirall, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, CIPLA, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin, Mylan, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Skyepharma, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, manuscript preparation (fees paid to Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute) from Mundipharma and Teva Pharmaceuticals, payment for travel/accommodation/meeting expenses (fees paid to Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute) from Aerocrine, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceuticals, funding for patient enrolment or completion of research (fees paid to Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute) from Chiesi, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceuticals and Zentiva, payment for the development of educational materials (fees paid to Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute) from Mundipharma and Novartis, peer review for grant committees for the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme and Health Technology Assessment, outside the submitted work; and stock/stock options in AKL Research and Development Ltd, which produces phytopharmaceuticals. He owns 74% of the social enterprise Optimum Patient Care Ltd (Australia, Singapore and UK) and 74% of Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd (Singapore). Conflict of interest: C. Keen is an employee of AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: A. Gardev is an employee of AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: S. Rennard is an employee of AstraZeneca and retains professorship and a part-time appointment at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. He reports personal fees from ABIM, Able Associates, Advantage Healthcare, Align2Action, Almirall, APT, ATS, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cheisi, CIPLA, ClearView Healthcare, the Cleveland Clinic, CME Incite, Complete Medical Group, the COPD Foundation, Cory Paeth, CSA, CSL, CTS Carmel, Dailchi Sankyo, Decision Resources, the Dunn Group, Easton Associates, Elevation Pharma, FirstWord, Forest, the Frankel Group, Gerson, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Grifols, GroupH, Guidepoint Global, Haymarket, HealthStar, Huron Cosulting, Incite, Inthought, IntraMed (Forest), Johnson & Johnson, LEK, McKinsey, Medical Knowledge, MedImmune, the Methodist Health System (Dallas, TX, USA), Navigant, NCI Consulting, Novartis, Nuvis, Pearl (a member of the AstraZeneca Group), Penn Technology, Pfizer, PlanningShop, Prescott, Pro Ed Comm, ProiMed, PSL FirstWord, Pulmatrix, Quadrant, Qwessential, Regeneron, Saatchi and Saatchi, Schlesinger Associates, Strategic North, Synapse, Takeda, Theron, WebMD, NHLBI, the Nebraska DHHS, Otsuka, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Nycomed, AstraZeneca, Centocor, and Almirall, outside the submitted work. Please note that he has had tobacco industry funding. Specifically, he has received funding from the tobacco industry for studies relating to harm reduction and to the impact of tobacco smoke on stem cells. He has also consulted with R.J. Reynolds, without personal fees, on the topic of harm reduction. He received funding from R.J. Reynolds to evaluate the effect of a harm reduction product in normal smokers (1996) and in subjects with chronic bronchitis (1999) and to assess the effect of smoking cessation on lower respiratory tract inflammation (2000); he participated in a Philip Morris multicentre study to assess biomarkers of smoke exposure (2002); he received funding for a clinical trial from the Institute for Science and Health (2005), which receives support from the tobacco industry, to evaluate biomarkers in exhaled breath associated with smoking cessation and reduction. This study was supplemented with funding from Lorillard and R.J. Reynolds. He has received a grant from the Philip Morris External Research Program (2005) to assess the impact of cigarette smoking on circulating stem cells in the mouse. He has consulted with R.J. Reynolds on the topic of harm reduction until 2007 but did not receive personal remuneration for this. He has no active tobacco industry-funded projects. All ties with tobacco industry companies and entities supported by tobacco companies were terminated in 2007. Conflict of interest: A. Sveréus is an employee of AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: A.T. Bansal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Brannman is an employee of AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: N. Karlsson is an employee of AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: J. Nuevo is an employee of AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: F. Nyberg is an employee of AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: S.S. Young is an employee of AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: J. Vestbo reports receiving an honorarium from AstraZeneca for being a co-principal investigator of the NOVELTY study; and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline for consultancy for COPD Phase 2 and 3 programme, personal fees from Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, Boeehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and AstraZeneca for consultancy for COPD Phase 2 and 3 programme and payment for lectures including service in speaker bureaus, outside the submitted work.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
NOVELTY study design. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eCRF: electronic case report form; EMR: electronic medical record; HCU: healthcare utilisation; HRQoL: health-related quality of life; PRO: patient-reported outcome.

References

    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. . Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2163–2196.
    1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. . Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2095–2128.
    1. Moore WC, Fitzpatrick AM, Li X, et al. . Clinical heterogeneity in the Severe Asthma Research Program. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013; 10: Suppl, S118–S124.
    1. Vestbo J, Agusti A, Wouters EFM, et al. . Should we view chronic obstructive pulmonary disease differently after ECLIPSE? A clinical perspective from the study team. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 189: 1022–1030.
    1. Bateman ED, Reddel HK, van Zyl-Smit RN, et al. . The asthma–COPD overlap syndrome: towards a revised taxonomy of chronic airways diseases? Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3: 719–728.
    1. Alshabanat A, Zafari Z, Albanyan O, et al. . Asthma and COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS): a systematic review and meta analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0136065.
    1. Lange P, Celli B, Agustí A, et al. . Lung function trajectories leading to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 111–122.
    1. McGeachie MJ, Yates KP, Zhou X, et al. . Patterns of growth and decline in lung function in persistent childhood asthma. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1842–1852.
    1. McGeachie MJ, Yates KP, Zhou X, et al. . Genetics and genomics of longitudinal lung function patterns in individuals with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 1465–1474.
    1. Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A, et al. . Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1128–1138.
    1. Kupczyk M, ten Brinke A, Sterk PJ, et al. . Frequent exacerbators – a distinct phenotype of severe asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2014; 44: 212–221.
    1. Sastre J, Fabbri LM, Price D, et al. . Insights, attitudes, and perceptions about asthma and its treatment: a multinational survey of patients from Europe and Canada. World Allergy Organ J 2016; 9: 13.
    1. Anderson GP. Endotyping asthma: new insights into key pathogenic mechanisms in a complex, heterogeneous disease. Lancet 2008; 372: 1107–1119.
    1. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate end-points: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 69: 89–95.
    1. Agustí A, Bafadhel M, Beasley R, et al. . Precision medicine in airway diseases: moving to clinical practice. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1701655.
    1. Herland K, Akselsen JP, Skjonsberg OH, et al. . How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger ‘real life’ population of patients with obstructive lung disease? Respir Med 2005; 99: 11–19.
    1. Price D, Bateman ED, Chisholm A, et al. . Complementing the randomized controlled trial evidence base. Evolution not revolution. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11: Suppl. 2, S92–S98.
    1. Roche N, Reddel HK, Agustí A, et al. . Integrating real-life studies in the global therapeutic research framework. Lancet Respir Med 2013; 1: e29–e30.
    1. Putcha N, Drummond MB, Wise RA, et al. . Comorbidities and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence, influence on outcomes, and management. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 36: 575–591.
    1. Faner R, Tal-Singer R, Riley JH, et al. . Lessons from ECLIPSE: a review of COPD biomarkers. Thorax 2014; 69: 666–672.
    1. Han MK, Muellerova H, Curren-Everett D, et al. . GOLD 2011 disease severity classification in the COPDGene cohort. Lancet Respir Med 2013; 1: 43–50.
    1. Keene JD, Jacobson S, Kechris K, et al. . Biomarkers predictive of exacerbations in the SPIROMICS and COPDGene cohorts. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 473–481.
    1. Kuo CS, Pavlidis S, Loza M, et al. . A transcriptome-driven analysis of epithelial brushings and bronchial biopsies to define asthma phenotypes in U-BIOPRED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 443–455.
    1. Martinez CH, Diaz AA, Meldrum C, et al. . Age and small airway imaging abnormalities in subjects with and without airflow obstruction in SPIROMICS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 464–472.
    1. Shaw DE, Sousa AR, Fowler SJ, et al. . Clinical and inflammatory characteristics of the European U-BIOPRED adult severe asthma cohort. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 1308–1321.
    1. SPIROMICS. Participating Institutions. Date last updated: 2016. Date last accessed: July 3, 2017.
    1. U-BIOPRED. Who is involved? Date last updated: 2016. Date last accessed: July 3, 2017.
    1. Aguib Y, Al Suwaidi J. The Copenhagen City Heart Study (Østerbroundersøgelsen). Glob Cardiol Sci Pract 2015; 2015: 33.
    1. Lifelines. Researchers Date last updated: 2016. Date last accessed: August 31, 2017.
    1. Reddel HK, Gerhardsson de Verdier M, Agustí A, et al. . An innovative approach to study design: using electronic medical records to inform the feasibility and design of the NOVELTY study (a NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY on patients with asthma and/or COPD). Thorax 2016; 71: A157–A158.
    1. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. . Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 319–338.
    1. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, et al. . Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1324–1343.
    1. Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, et al. . Development and first validation of the COPD assessment test. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 648–654.
    1. Schatz M, Sorkness CA, Li JT, et al. . Asthma Control Test: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients not previously followed by asthma specialists. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 549–556.
    1. Martinez FJ, Mannino D, Leidy NK, et al. . A new approach for identifying patients with undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 748–756.
    1. Diez D, Agustí A, Wheelock CE. Network analysis in the investigation of chronic respiratory diseases. From basics to application. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 190: 981–988.
    1. Wang B, Mezlini AM, Demir F, et al. . Similarity network fusion for aggregating data types on a genomic scale. Nat Methods 2014; 11: 333–337.
    1. Pavord ID, Beasley R, Agustí A, et al. . After asthma: redefining airways diseases. Lancet 2017; 391: 350–400.
    1. Hekking PP, Wener RR, Amelink M, et al. . The prevalence of severe refractory asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 135: 896–902.
    1. Reddel HK. Treatment of overlapping asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: can guidelines contribute in an evidence-free zone? J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 136: 546–552.
    1. Falagas ME, Vardakas KZ, Vergidis PI. Under-diagnosis of common chronic diseases: prevalence and impact on human health. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 1569–1579.
    1. Fingleton J, Travers J, Williams M, et al. . Treatment responsiveness of phenotypes of symptomatic airways obstruction in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 136: 601–609.
    1. Bourdin A, Molinari N, Vachier I, et al. . Prognostic value of cluster analysis of severe asthma phenotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 134: 1043–1050.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa