Effect of a Virtual Patient Navigation Program on Behavioral Health Admissions in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Jason Roberge, Andrew McWilliams, Jing Zhao, William E Anderson, Timothy Hetherington, Christine Zazzaro, Elisabeth Hardin, Amy Barrett, Manuel Castro, Margaret E Balfour, James Rachal, Constance Krull, Wayne Sparks, Jason Roberge, Andrew McWilliams, Jing Zhao, William E Anderson, Timothy Hetherington, Christine Zazzaro, Elisabeth Hardin, Amy Barrett, Manuel Castro, Margaret E Balfour, James Rachal, Constance Krull, Wayne Sparks

Abstract

Importance: The number of patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) for psychiatric care continues to increase. Psychiatrists often make a conservative recommendation to admit patients because robust outpatient services for close follow-up are lacking.

Objective: To assess whether the availability of a 45-day behavioral health-virtual patient navigation program decreases hospitalization among patients presenting to the ED with a behavioral health crisis or need.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial enrolled 637 patients who presented to 6 EDs spanning urban and suburban locations within a large integrated health care system in North Carolina from June 12, 2017, through February 14, 2018; patients were followed up for up to 45 days. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with a behavioral health crisis and a completed telepsychiatric ED consultation. The availability of the behavioral health-virtual patient navigation intervention was randomly allocated to specific days (Monday through Friday from 7 am to 7 pm) so that, in a 2-week block, there were 5 intervention days and 5 usual care days; 323 patients presented on days when the program was offered, and 314 presented on usual care days. Data analysis was performed from March 7 through June 13, 2018, using an intention-to-treat approach.

Interventions: The behavioral health-virtual patient navigation program included video contact with a patient while in the ED and telephonic outreach 24 to 72 hours after discharge and then at least weekly for up to 45 days.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the conversion of an ED encounter to hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included 45-day follow-up encounters with a self-harm diagnosis and postdischarge acute care use.

Results: Among 637 participants, 358 (56.2%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 39.7 (16.6) years. The conversion rates were 55.1% (178 of 323) in the intervention group vs 63.1% (198 of 314) in the usual care group (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.02; P = .06). The percentage of patient encounters with follow-up encounters having a self-harm diagnosis was significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the usual care group (36.8% [119 of 323] vs 45.5% [143 of 314]; P = .03).

Conclusions and relevance: Although the primary result did not reach statistical significance, there is a strong signal of potential positive benefit in an area that lacks evidence, suggesting that there should be additional investment and inquiry into virtual behavioral health programs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03204643.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr McWilliams reported being cofounder of iEnroll LLC. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.. CONSORT Flow Diagram of Patients
Figure.. CONSORT Flow Diagram of Patients

References

    1. North Carolina Healthcare Association. NC behavioral health by the numbers. . Accessed July 15, 2019.
    1. Stern M, Fava M, Wilens T, Rosenbaum J. Emergency psychiatry In: Massachusetts General Hospital Comprehensive Clinical Psychiatry. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Elsevier; 2016:-.
    1. Saurman E, Kirby SE, Lyle D. No longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:156. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0839-7
    1. Wang H, Johnson C, Robinson RD, et al. . Roles of disease severity and post-discharge outpatient visits as predictors of hospital readmissions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):564. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1814-7
    1. Zhu JM, Singhal A, Hsia RY. Emergency department length-of-stay for psychiatric visits was significantly longer than for nonpsychiatric visits, 2002-11. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(9):1698-1706. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0344
    1. Hamilton JE, Desai PV, Hoot NR, et al. . Factors associated with the likelihood of hospitalization following emergency department visits for behavioral health conditions. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(11):1257-1266. doi:10.1111/acem.13044
    1. Kuszmar TJ, Bell L, Scholz DM. Detox in the ED: taking urgent action. JAAPA. 2000;13(6):43-44, 47-48, 52-54.
    1. Wright K, McGlen I, Dykes S. Mental health emergencies: using a structured assessment framework. Emerg Nurse. 2012;19(10):28-35. doi:10.7748/en2012.03.19.10.28.c8993
    1. Nelson EA, Maruish ME, Axler JL. Effects of discharge planning and compliance with outpatient appointments on readmission rates. Psychiatr Serv. 2000;51(7):885-889. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.51.7.885
    1. Miller IW, Camargo CA Jr, Arias SA, et al. ; ED-SAFE Investigators . Suicide prevention in an emergency department population: the ED-SAFE study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(6):563-570. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0678
    1. Reuland DS, Brenner AT, Hoffman R, et al. . Effect of combined patient decision aid and patient navigation vs usual care for colorectal cancer screening in a vulnerable patient population: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(7):967-974. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1294
    1. Kelly E, Fulginiti A, Pahwa R, Tallen L, Duan L, Brekke JS. A pilot test of a peer navigator intervention for improving the health of individuals with serious mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 2014;50(4):435-446. doi:10.1007/s10597-013-9616-4
    1. The Columbia Lighthouse Project. The Columbia protocol for communities and healthcare. . Accessed July 17, 2019.
    1. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, et al. . The Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266-1277. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704
    1. Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147. doi:10.1136/bmj.h2147
    1. PASS 15 [computer program]. Kaysville, UT: Power Analysis and Sample Size Software; 2017.
    1. SAS enterprise guide, version 7.1 for Windows on platform 9.4.1 [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2013.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa