Effectiveness of group medical visits for improving diabetes care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laura Housden, Sabrina T Wong, Martin Dawes, Laura Housden, Sabrina T Wong, Martin Dawes

Abstract

Background: Group medical visits, whereby health care professionals meet with groups of patients who have the same disease, have been introduced in primary care as a way to meet the increasing demand for health care delivery to patients with chronic diseases. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on the effectiveness of such visits for patients with diabetes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of all relevant studies published from 1947 to February 2012 identified in a search of electronic databases and grey literature. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published in English that included patients aged 16-80 years with type 1 or 2 diabetes and that had group medical visits as the intervention. These studies were assessed for methodologic quality. We included data only from the RCTs in the meta-analysis.

Results: Of the 94 studies identified, we selected 26 that met our inclusion criteria, 13 of which were RCTs. Group medical visits had a positive effect on clinical and patient-reported outcomes, with significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c reduction -0.46%, 95% confidence interval -0.80% to -0.31%). We were unable to assess the effect of group medical visits on processes of care because of an insufficient number of RCTs that reported on this outcome.

Interpretation: Group medical visits for patients with diabetes were found to be effective in terms of reducing HbA1c. The results of our meta-analysis suggest that wider implementation of group medical visits for patients with diabetes will have a positive effect on patient outcomes.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Selection of studies. RCT = randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Pooled analysis of the effect of group medical visits versus usual care for patients with diabetes on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reported in randomized controlled trials. A weighted mean difference of less than zero indicates a positive effect of group medical visits. CI = confidence interval, SD = standard deviation.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa