Effects of added involvement from concerned significant others in internet-delivered CBT treatments for problem gambling: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Anders Nilsson, Kristoffer Magnusson, Per Carlbring, Gerhard Andersson, Clara Hellner Gumpert, Anders Nilsson, Kristoffer Magnusson, Per Carlbring, Gerhard Andersson, Clara Hellner Gumpert

Abstract

Introduction: Problem gambling is a public health concern affecting ∼2.3% of the Swedish population. Problem gambling also severely affects concerned significant others (CSOs). Several studies have investigated the effect of individual treatments based on cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), but less is known of the effect of involving CSOs in treatment. This study aims to compare an intervention based on behavioural couples therapy (BCT), involving a CSO, with an individual CBT treatment to determine their relative efficacy. BCT has shown promising results in working with substance abuse, but this is the first time it is used as an intervention for problem gambling. Both interventions will be internet-delivered, and participants will receive written support and telephone support.

Methods and analysis: A sample of 120 couples will be randomised to either the BCT condition, involving the gambler and the CSO, or the CBT condition, involving the gambler alone. Measures will be conducted weekly and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. The primary outcome measure is gambling behaviour, as measured by Timeline Followback for Gambling. This article describes the outline of the research methods, interventions and outcome measures used to evaluate gambling behaviour, mechanisms of change and relationship satisfaction. This study will be the first study on BCT for problem gambling.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been given ethical approval from the regional ethics board of Stockholm, Sweden. It will add to the body of knowledge as to how to treat problem gambling and how to involve CSOs in treatment. The findings of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and published at international and national conferences.

Trial registration number: NCT02543372; Pre-results.

Keywords: Internet based interventions; behavioral couples therapy; cognitive behavioral therapy; concerned significant others; problem gambling.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

References

    1. Statens folkhälsoinstitut [Swedish National Institute of Public Health]. Spel om pengar och spelproblem i Sverige 2008/2009. Huvudresultat från SWELOGS befolkningsstudie [Gambling and Gambling Problems in Sweden 2008/2009. Main Results from the SWELOGS Population Study]. Östersund, Sweden: Statens folkhälsoinstitut [Swedish National Institute of Public Health], 2010.
    1. Ferris J, Wynne H. The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa: (ON: ): Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, 2001.
    1. Toce-Gerstein M, Gerstein DR, Volberg RA. A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community. Addiction 2003;98:1661–72. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00545.x
    1. Hodgins DC, Stea JN, Grant JE. Gambling disorders. Lancet 2011;378:1874–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62185-X
    1. Petry NM. Disordered gambling and its treatment. Cogn Behav Pract 2009;16:457–67. 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.02.005
    1. Wickwire EM, Burke RS, Brown SA et al. . Psychometric evaluation of the National Opinion Research Center DSM-IV Screen for Gambling Problems (NODS). Am J Addict 2008;17:392–5. 10.1080/10550490802268934
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub, 2013.
    1. Leeman RF, Potenza MN. Similarities and differences between pathological gambling and substance use disorders: a focus on impulsivity and compulsivity. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2012;219:469–90. 10.1007/s00213-011-2550-7
    1. Frascella J, Potenza MN, Brown LL et al. . Shared brain vulnerabilities open the way for nonsubstance addictions: carving addiction at a new joint? Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;1187:294–315. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05420.x
    1. Hasin DS, O'Brien CP, Auriacombe M et al. . DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale. Am J Psychiatry 2013;170:834–51. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782
    1. Barry DT, Stefanovics EA, Desai RA et al. . Differences in the associations between gambling problem severity and psychiatric disorders among black and white adults: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Am J Addict 2011;20:69–77. 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00098.x
    1. Carragher N, Mcwilliams LA. A latent class analysis of DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychiatry Res 2011;187:185–92. 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.022
    1. Kessler RC, Hwang I, Labrie R et al. . DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychol Med 2008;38:1351–60. 10.1017/S0033291708002900
    1. Grant JE, Williams KA, Kim SW. Update on pathological gambling. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2006;8:53–8. 10.1007/s11920-006-0081-4
    1. Gerstein DR, Volberg RA, Toce MT et al. . Gambling impact and behavior study: report to the national gambling impact study commission Chicago: (IL: ): National Opinion Research Center, 1999.
    1. Kalischuk RG, Nowatzki N, Cardwell K et al. . Problem gambling and its impact on families: a literature review. Int Gambl Stud 2006;6:31–60. 10.1080/14459790600644176
    1. Williams RJ, Volberg RA, Stevens RM. The population prevalence of problem gambling: methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, 2012.
    1. Petry NM, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66:564–74. 10.4088/JCP.v66n0504
    1. Kim HS, Salmon M, Wohl MJ et al. . A dangerous cocktail: alcohol consumption increases suicidal ideations among problem gamblers in the general population. Addict Behav 2016;55:50–5. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.12.017
    1. Moghaddam JF, Yoon G, Dickerson DL et al. . Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in five groups with different severities of gambling: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Am J Addict 2015;24:292–8. 10.1111/ajad.12197
    1. Newman SC, Thompson AH. The association between pathological gambling and attempted suicide: findings from a national survey in Canada. Can J Psychiatry 2007;52:605–12.
    1. Morasco BJ, Vom Eigen KA, Petry NM. Severity of gambling is associated with physical and emotional health in urban primary care patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2006;28:94–100. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.09.004
    1. Mason K, Arnold R. Problem gambling risk factors and associated behaviours and health status: results from the 2002/03 New Zealand Health Survey. N Z Med J 2007;120:U2604.
    1. Pulay AJ, Dawson DA, Hasin DS et al. . Violent behavior and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2008;69:12 10.4088/JCP.v69n0103
    1. Afifi TO, Brownridge DA, Macmillan H et al. . The relationship of gambling to intimate partner violence and child maltreatment in a nationally representative sample. J Psychiatr Res 2010;44:331–7. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.07.010
    1. Afifi TO, Cox BJ, Martens PJ et al. . Demographic and social variables associated with problem gambling among men and women in Canada. Psychiatry Res 2010;178:395–400. 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.10.003
    1. Langham E, Badiane A, Manga NM et al. . Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health 2016;16:1 10.1186/s12889-015-2639-8
    1. Slutske WS. Natural recovery and treatment-seeking in pathological gambling: results of two US national surveys. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:297–302.
    1. Bellringer M, Pulford J, Abbott M et al. . Problem gambling-barriers to help-seeking behaviours, final report Gambling Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, 2008.
    1. Clarke D, Abbott M, Desouza R et al. . An overview of help seeking by problem gamblers and their families including barriers to and relevance of services. Int J Ment Health Addict 2007;5:292–306. 10.1007/s11469-007-9063-y
    1. Evans L, Delfabbro PH. Motivators for change and barriers to help-seeking in Australian problem gamblers. J Gambl Stud 2005;21:133–55. 10.1007/s10899-005-3029-4
    1. Suurvali H, Cordingley J, Hodgins DC et al. . Barriers to seeking help for gambling problems: a review of the empirical literature. J Gambl Stud 2009;25:407–24. 10.1007/s10899-009-9129-9
    1. Melville KM, Casey LM, Kavanagh DJ. Psychological treatment dropout among pathological gamblers. Clin Psychol Rev 2007;27:944–58. 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.02.004
    1. Dunn K, Delfabbro P, Harvey P. A preliminary, qualitative exploration of the influences associated with drop-out from cognitive-behavioural therapy for problem gambling: an Australian perspective. J Gambl Stud 2012;28:253–72. 10.1007/s10899-011-9257-x
    1. Westphal JR. Are the effects of gambling treatment overestimated? Int J Ment Health Addict 2007;5:65–79.
    1. Svensson J, Romild U, Shepherdson E. The concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in a national representative sample in Sweden—a 1 year follow-up study. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1
    1. Patford J. For worse, for poorer and in ill health: how women experience, understand and respond to a partner's gambling problems. Int J Ment Health Addict 2008;7:177–89. 10.1007/s11469-008-9173-1
    1. Shaw M, Forbush KT, Schlinder J et al. . The effect of pathological gambling on families, marriages, and children. CNS Spectr 2007;12:615 10.1017/S1092852900021416
    1. Dowling NA, Rodda SN, Lubman DI et al. . The impacts of problem gambling on concerned significant others accessing web-based counselling. Addict Behav 2014;39:1253–7. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.011
    1. Downs C, Woolrych R. Gambling and debt: the hidden impacts on family and work life. Commun Work Fam 2010;13: 311–28. 10.1080/13668803.2010.488096
    1. Volberg RA, Abbott MW, Rönnberg S et al. . Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001;104:250–6. 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00336.x
    1. Hing N, Nuske E, Gainsbury S. Gamblers at-risk and their help-seeking behaviour. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia, 2012.
    1. Wenzel HG, Øren A, Bakken IJ. Gambling problems in the family—a stratified probability sample study of prevalence and reported consequences. BMC Public Health 2008;8:412 10.1186/1471-2458-8-412
    1. Cowlishaw S, Merkouris S, Dowling N et al. . Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD008937 10.1002/14651858.CD008937.pub2
    1. Pallesen S, Mitsem M, Kvale G et al. . Outcome of psychological treatments of pathological gambling: a review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2005;100:1412–22. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01204.x
    1. Gooding P, Tarrier N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural interventions to reduce problem gambling: hedging our bets? Behav Res Ther 2009;47:592–607.
    1. Carlbring P, Jonsson J, Josephson H et al. . Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: a randomized controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther 2010;39:92–103. 10.1080/16506070903190245
    1. Carlbring P, Smit F. Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008;76:1090 10.1037/a0013603
    1. Ingle PJ, Marotta J, Mcmillan G et al. . Significant others and gambling treatment outcomes. J Gambl Stud 2008;24:381–92. 10.1007/s10899-008-9092-x
    1. Petry NM, Weiss L. Social support is associated with gambling treatment outcomes in pathological gamblers. Am J Addict 2009;18:402–8. 10.3109/10550490903077861
    1. Tepperman L, Korn D, Reynolds J. Partner influence on gambling: an exploratory study. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, 2006.
    1. Grant JE, Kim SW, Kuskowski M. Retrospective review of treatment retention in pathological gambling. Compr Psychiatry 2004;45:83–7. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2003.12.005
    1. Kourgiantakis T, Saint-Jacques MC, Tremblay J. Problem gambling and families: a systematic review. J Soc Work Pract Addict 2013;13:353–72. 10.1080/1533256X.2013.838130
    1. Jimenez-Murcia S, Granero R, Fernã¡Ndez-Aranda F et al. . Predictors of outcome among pathological gamblers receiving cognitive behavioral group therapy. Eur Addict Res 2015;21:169–78. 10.1159/000369528
    1. Tepperman L, Korn D, Reynolds J. Partner influences on gambling: An exploratory study. Guelph, Canada: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, 2006.
    1. Hing N, Nuske E, Gainsbury SM et al. . Perceived stigma and self-stigma of problem gambling: perspectives of people with gambling problems. Int Gambl Stud 2016;16:31–48. 10.1080/14459795.2015.1092566
    1. Public Health Agency of Sweden. Stödlinjen för spelare och anhöriga 2010–2015 [The National Gambling Helpline 2010–2015]. Östersund: Folkhälsomyndigheten, 2016.
    1. Swedish National Institute of Public Health. Öppenvårdsprojekt för spelberoende: En utvärdering [Out-patient treatment of gambling addiction: an evaluation]. Östersund: Statens folkhälsoinstitut, 2010.
    1. Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Makarchuk K et al. . Minimal treatment approaches for concerned significant others of problem gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. J Gambl Stud 2007;23: 215–30. 10.1007/s10899-006-9052-2
    1. Makarchuk K, Hodgins DC, Peden N. Development of a brief intervention for concerned significant others of problem gamblers. Addict Disord Their Treat 2002;1:126–34. 10.1097/00132576-200211000-00003
    1. Rychtarik RG, McGillicuddy NB. Preliminary evaluation of a coping skills training program for those with a pathological-gambling partner. J Gambl Stud 2006;22:165–78.10.1007/s10899-006-9008-6
    1. O'Farrell TJ, Murphy M, Alter J et al. . Behavioral family counseling for substance abuse: a treatment development pilot study. Addict Behav 2010;35:1–6. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.07.003
    1. Meis LA, Griffin JM, Greer N et al. . Couple and family involvement in adult mental health treatment: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2012;33:275–86. 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.12.003
    1. Powers MB, Vedel E, Emmelkamp PM. Behavioral couples therapy (BCT) for alcohol and drug use disorders: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2008;28:952–62. 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.002
    1. Fletcher K. Couple therapy treatments for substance use disorders: a systematic review. J Soc Work Pract Addict 2013;13:327–52. 10.1080/1533256X.2013.840213
    1. Lotteriinspektionen [The Swedish Gambling Authority]. Spelmarknadens utveckling i Sverige och internationellt 2014 [Developments in the Gambling Market in Sweden and Internationally 2014]. Strängnäs, Sweden: Lotteriinspektionen [The Swedish Gambling Authority], 2015.
    1. Stockholm Centre for Psychiatric Research. Stödlinjen för spelare och anhöriga. Årsrapport 2015. [The National Gambling Helpline Annual Report 2015] Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Centre for Psychiatric Research, 2016.
    1. Rodda S, Lubman DI, Dowling NA et al. . Web-based counseling for problem gambling: exploring motivations and recommendations. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e99 10.2196/jmir.2474
    1. Rodda SN, Lubman D, Dowling NA et al. . Reasons for using web-based counselling among family and friends impacted by problem gambling. Asian J Gambl Issues Public Health 2013;3:1 10.1186/2195-3007-3-12
    1. Carlbring P, Degerman N, Jonsson J et al. . Internet-based treatment of pathological gambling with a three-year follow-up. Cogn Behav Ther 2012;41:321–34. 10.1080/16506073.2012.689323
    1. Weinstock J, Whelan JP, Meyers AW. Behavioral assessment of gambling: an application of the timeline followback method. Psychol Assess 2004;16:72–80. 10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.72
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG et al. . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Orford J, Wardle H, Griffiths M et al. . PGSI and DSM-IV in the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey: reliability, item response, factor structure and inter-scale agreement. Int Gambl Stud 2010;10:31–44. 10.1080/14459790903567132
    1. Ortiz L. Till spelfriheten!: kognitiv beteendeterapi vid spelberoende: manual för behandling individuellt eller i grupp [Cognitive behavioral therapy for gambling addiction: a manual for individual or group therapy]. Natur och kultur, 2006.
    1. O'Farrell TJ, Fals-Stewart W. Behavioral couples therapy for alcoholism and drug abuse. Guilford Press, 2006.
    1. Jacobson NS, Christensen A, Prince SE et al. . Integrative behavioral couple therapy: an acceptance-based, promising new treatment for couple discord. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:351–5. 10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.351
    1. Mairal JB. Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) as a third-wave therapy. Psicothema 2015;27:13–18. 10.7334/psicothema2014.101
    1. Nordell M. Anhörig till spelberoende. En manual för utbildning och stöd till spelberoendes anhöriga. [CSOs of pathological gamblers. A manual for treatment and support for CSOs of pathological gamblers.]. Östersund: Statens folkhälsoinstitut, 2005.
    1. Magnusson K, Nilsson A, Hellner Gumpert C et al. . Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy for concerned significant others of people with problem gambling: study protocol for a randomised wait-list controlled trial. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008724 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008724
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. Guilford Press, 2012.
    1. Holtgraves T. Evaluating the problem gambling severity index. J Gambl Stud 2009;25:105–20. 10.1007/s10899-008-9107-7
    1. Walker M, Toneatto T, Potenza MN et al. . A framework for reporting outcomes in problem gambling treatment research: the Banff, Alberta Consensus. Addiction 2006;101:504–11. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01341.x
    1. Hodgins DC. Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: psychometric evaluation. Addict Behav 2004;29:1685–90. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.03.017
    1. Hodgins DC, Makarchuk K. Trusting problem gamblers: reliability and validity of self-reported gambling behavior. Psychol Addict Behav 2003;17:244–8. 10.1037/0893-164X.17.3.244
    1. Rask M, Malm D, Kristofferzon ML et al. . Validity and reliability of a Swedish version of the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): a pilot study. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs 2009;20:16–21.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Phq-9. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–13. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB et al. . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder—the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092–7. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
    1. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF et al. . Development of the Alcohol-Use Disorders Identification Test (Audit)—WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption—II. Addiction 1993;88:791–804. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x
    1. Bernstein EM, Putnam FW. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986;174:727–35. 10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004
    1. Davidson P. Dissociativa upplevelser under spel hos patologiska spelare. [Dissociative experiences during gambling among pathological gamblers]. Umeå: Institutionen för psykologi, Umeå universitet, 2010.
    1. Gelman A, Hill J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    1. Hesser H. Modeling individual differences in randomized experiments using growth models: recommendations for design, statistical analysis and reporting of results of internet interventions. Internet Interventions 2015;2:110–20. 10.1016/j.invent.2015.02.003
    1. Xing D, Huang Y, Chen H et al. . Bayesian inference for two-part mixed-effects model using skew distributions, with application to longitudinal semicontinuous alcohol data. Stat Methods Med Res In press. doi:10.1177/0962280215590284 10.1177/0962280215590284
    1. Kahn JH, Schneider WJ. It's the destination and it's the journey: using multilevel modeling to assess patterns of change in psychotherapy. J Clin Psychol 2013;69:543–70. 10.1002/jclp.21964
    1. Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ, Zhang Z. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Methods 2010;15:209 10.1037/a0020141
    1. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319:670–4.
    1. Keselman H, Algina J, Kowalchuk RK. The analysis of repeated measures designs: a review. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2001; 54:1–20. 10.1348/000711001159357
    1. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. Application of random-effects pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies. Psychol Methods 1997;2:64 10.1037/1082-989X.2.1.64
    1. Danielsson AK, Eriksson AK, Allebeck P. Technology-based support via telephone or web: a systematic review of the effects on smoking, alcohol use and gambling. Addict Behav 2014;39:1846–68. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.06.007
    1. Andersson G. Using the internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy. Behav Res Ther 2009;47:175–80. 10.1016/j.brat.2009.01.010
    1. Hedman E, Ljótsson B, Lindefors N. Cognitive behavior therapy via the Internet: a systematic review of applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2012;12:745–64. 10.1586/erp.12.67
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P et al. . Guided internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry 2014;13:288–95. 10.1002/wps.20151

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa