A non-invasive, home-based biomechanical therapy for patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee

Ehud Atoun, Amit Mor, Ganit Segal, Ronen Debi, Dan Grinberg, Yeshaiau Benedict, Nimrod Rozen, Yiftah Beer, Avi Elbaz, Ehud Atoun, Amit Mor, Ganit Segal, Ronen Debi, Dan Grinberg, Yeshaiau Benedict, Nimrod Rozen, Yiftah Beer, Avi Elbaz

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of a non-invasive, home-based biomechanical treatment program for patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK).

Methods: Seventeen patients with SONK, confirmed by MRI, participated in this retrospective analysis. Patients underwent a spatiotemporal gait analysis and completed the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Short-Form-36 (SF-36). Following an initial assessment, patients commenced the biomechanical treatment (AposTherapy). All patients were reassessed after 3 and 6 months of treatment.

Results: A significant reduction in pain and improvement in function was seen after 3 months of therapy with additional improvement after 6 months of therapy. Pain was reduced by 53% and functional limitation reduced by 43%. Furthermore, a significant improvement was also found in the SF-36 subscales, including the summary of physical and mental scores. Significant improvements were found in most of the gait parameters including a 41% increase in gait velocity and a 22% increase in step length. Patients also demonstrated improvement in limb symmetry, especially by increasing the single limb support of the involved limb.

Conclusions: Applying this therapy allowed patients to be active, while walking more symmetrically and with less pain. With time, the natural course of the disease alongside the activity of the patients with the unique biomechanical device led to a significant reduction in pain and improved gait patterns. Therefore, we believe AposTherapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with SONK.

Trial registration: Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Institutional Helsinki Committee Registry, 141/08; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00767780 .

Keywords: Biomechanical treatment; Function; Pain; SONK.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
AposSystem. Biomechanical device
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in WOMAC subscales following 6 months of treatment

References

    1. Mont MA, Baumgarten KM, Rifai A, Bluemke DA, Jones LC, Hungerford DS. Atraumatic osteonecrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(9):1279–90. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200009000-00008.
    1. Ahlback S, Bauer GC, Bohne WH. Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 1968;11(6):705–33. doi: 10.1002/art.1780110602.
    1. Pape D, Seil R, Fritsch E, Rupp S, Kohn D. Prevalence of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle in elderly patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002;10(4):233–40. doi: 10.1007/s00167-002-0285-z.
    1. Mont MA, Marker DR, Zywiel MG, Carrino JA. Osteonecrosis of the knee and related conditions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(8):482–94. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201108000-00004.
    1. Yamamoto T, Bullough PG. Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: the result of subchondral insufficiency fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(6):858–66. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200006000-00013.
    1. al-Rowaih A, Bjorkengren A, Egund N, Lindstrand A, Wingstrand H, Thorngren KG. Size of osteonecrosis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;287:68–75.
    1. Karim AR, Cherian JJ, Jauregui JJ, Pierce T, Mont MA. Osteonecrosis of the knee: review. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(1):6.
    1. Houpt JB, Pritzker KP, Alpert B, Greyson ND, Gross AE. Natural history of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK): a review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1983;13(2):212–27. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(83)90008-2.
    1. Atoun E, Segal G, Debi R, Lubovsky O, Djabbarov R, Peskin B, et al. Gait assessment of patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2016;24(Supplement 1):1.
    1. Aglietti P, Insall JN, Buzzi R, Deschamps G. Idiopathic osteonecrosis of the knee. Aetiology, prognosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65(5):588–97.
    1. Jureus J, Lindstrand A, Geijer M, Robertsson O, Tagil M. The natural course of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SPONK): a 1- to 27-year follow-up of 40 patients. Acta Orthop. 2013;84(4):410–4. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.810521.
    1. Miller GK, Maylahn DJ, Drennan DB. The treatment of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle with arthroscopic debridement. Arthroscopy. 1986;2(1):21–9. doi: 10.1016/S0749-8063(86)80006-8.
    1. Akgun I, Kesmezacar H, Ogut T, Kebudi A, Kanberoglu K. Arthroscopic microfracture treatment for osteonecrosis of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(7):834–43. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.106.
    1. Forst J, Forst R, Heller KD, Adam G. Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle: causal treatment by early core decompression. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117(1-2):18–22. doi: 10.1007/BF00703433.
    1. Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Cartier P. UKA after spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: a retrospective analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(5):613–7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1177-1.
    1. Myers TG, Cui Q, Kuskowski M, Mihalko WM, Saleh KJ. Outcomes of total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for secondary and spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 3):76–82.
    1. Breer S, Oheim R, Krause M, Marshall RP, Amling M, Barvencik F. Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(2):340–5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2017-3.
    1. Kraenzlin ME, Graf C, Meier C, Kraenzlin C, Friedrich NF. Possible beneficial effect of bisphosphonates in osteonecrosis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(12):1638–44. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1106-4.
    1. Jureus J, Lindstrand A, Geijer M, Roberts D, Tagil M. Treatment of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SPONK) by a bisphosphonate. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(5):511–4. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.729184.
    1. Bar-Ziv Y, Beer Y, Ran Y, Benedict S, Halperin N. A treatment applying a biomechanical device to the feet of patients with knee osteoarthritis results in reduced pain and improved function: a prospective controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:179. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-179.
    1. Elbaz A, Mor A, Segal G, Debbi E, Haim A, Halperin N, et al. APOS therapy improves clinical measurements and gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010;25(9):920–5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.017.
    1. Haim A, Rubin G, Rozen N, Goryachev Y, Wolf A. Reduction in knee adduction moment via non-invasive biomechanical training: a longitudinal gait analysis study. J Biomech. 2012;45(1):41–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.017.
    1. Elbaz A, Beer Y, Rath E, Morag G, Segal G, Debbi EM, et al. A unique foot-worn device for patients with degenerative meniscal tear. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(2):380–7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2026-2.
    1. Haim A, Segal G, Elbaz A, Mor A, Agar G, Bar-Ziv Y, et al. The outcome of a novel biomechanical therapy for patients suffering from anterior knee pain. Knee. 2013;20(6):595–9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.11.009.
    1. Barker S, Craik R, Freedman W, Herrmann N, Hillstrom H. Accuracy, reliability, and validity of a spatiotemporal gait analysis system. Med Eng Phys. 2006;28(5):460–7. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.07.017.
    1. Debbi EM, Wolf A, Goryachev Y, Rozen N, Haim A. Alterations in sagittal plane knee kinetics in knee osteoarthritis using a biomechanical therapy device. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(5):1089–97. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1177-3.
    1. Elbaz A, Mor A, Segal G, Aloni Y, Teo TH, Teo YS, et al. Patients with knee osteoarthritis demonstrate improved gait pattern and reduced pain following a non-invasive biomechanical therapy: a prospective multi-center study on Singaporean population. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-1.
    1. Haim A, Rozen N, Dekel S, Halperin N, Wolf A. Control of knee coronal plane moment via modulation of center of pressure: a prospective gait analysis study. J Biomech. 2008;41(14):3010–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.029.
    1. Haim A, Rozen N, Wolf A. The influence of sagittal center of pressure offset on gait kinematics and kinetics. J Biomech. 2010;43(5):969–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.045.
    1. Haim A, Wolf A, Rubin G, Genis Y, Khoury M, Rozen N. Effect of center of pressure modulation on knee adduction moment in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(11):1668–74. doi: 10.1002/jor.21422.
    1. Khoury M, Wolf A, Debbi EM, Herman A, Haim A. Foot center of pressure trajectory alteration by biomechanical manipulation of shoe design. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(4):593–8. doi: 10.1177/1071100713477613.
    1. Khoury M, Haim A, Herman A, Rozen N, Wolf A. Alteration of the foot center of pressure trajectory by an unstable shoe design. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8:67. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0124-3.
    1. Solomonow-Avnon D, Wolf A, Herman A, Rozen N, Haim A. Reduction of frontal-plane hip joint reaction force via medio-lateral foot center of pressure manipulation: a pilot study. J Orthop Res. 2015;33(2):261–9. doi: 10.1002/jor.22744.
    1. Solomonow-Avnon D, Haim A, Levin D, Elboim-Gabyzon M, Rozen N, Peled E, et al. Reduction of hip joint reaction force via medio-lateral foot center of pressure manipulation in bilateral hip osteoarthritis patients. J Orthop Res. 2016.
    1. Debbi EM, Wolf A, Haim A. Detecting and quantifying global instability during a dynamic task using kinetic and kinematic gait parameters. J Biomech. 2012;45(8):1366–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.007.
    1. Pham T, van der Heijde D, Altman RD, Anderson JJ, Bellamy N, Hochberg M, et al. OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12(5):389–99. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.02.001.
    1. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45(4):384–91. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4<384::AID-ART352>;2-0.
    1. Assa T, Elbaz A, Mor A, Chechik O, Morag G, Salai M, et al. Gait metric profile of 157 patients suffering from anterior knee pain. A controlled study. Knee. 2013;20(1):40–4. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.03.003.
    1. Elbaz A, Mor A, Segal O, Agar G, Halperin N, Haim A, et al. Can single limb support objectively assess the functional severity of knee osteoarthritis? Knee. 2012;19(1):32–5. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.12.004.
    1. Gigi R, Haim A, Luger E, Segal G, Melamed E, Beer Y, et al. Deviations in gait metrics in patients with chronic ankle instability: a case control study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13047-014-0058-1.
    1. Khashan M, Mor A, Beer Y, Rath E, Morgensteren DR, Debi R, et al. Gait metric profile and gender differences in hip osteoarthritis patients. A case-controlled study. Hip Int. 2014;24(3):270–6. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000111.
    1. Shakoor N, Dua A, Thorp LE, Mikolaitis RA, Wimmer MA, Foucher KC, et al. Asymmetric loading and bone mineral density at the asymptomatic knees of patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(12):3853–8. doi: 10.1002/art.30626.
    1. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011;305(1):50–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923.
    1. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–9. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
    1. Durlak JA. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34(9):917–28. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004.
    1. Elbaz A, Cohen M, Debbi E, Rath U, Mor A, Morag G, et al. A noninvasive biomechanical treatment as an additional tool in the rehabilitation of an acure anterio cruciate ligamnet tear: a case report. SAGE Open Medical Case Report. 2014;2:6.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa