New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 1)

M Matsuhisa, M Koyama, X Cheng, Y Takahashi, M C Riddle, G B Bolli, T Hirose, EDITION JP 1 study group, M Matsuhisa, M Koyama, X Cheng, Y Takahashi, M C Riddle, G B Bolli, T Hirose, EDITION JP 1 study group

Abstract

Aim: To compare efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with that of insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: The EDITION JP 1 study (NCT01689129) was a 6-month, multicentre, open-label, phase III study. Participants (n = 243) were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 while continuing mealtime insulin. Basal insulin was titrated with the aim of achieving a fasting self-monitored plasma glucose target of 4.4-7.2 mmol/l. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) over 6 months. Safety measures included hypoglycaemia and change in body weight.

Results: Gla-300 was non-inferior to Gla-100 for the primary endpoint of HbA1c change over the 6-month period {least squares [LS] mean difference 0.13 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.29]}. The annualized rate of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/l) or severe hypoglycaemic events was 34 % lower with Gla-300 than with Gla-100 at night [rate ratio 0.66 (95 % CI 0.48-0.92)] and 20 % lower at any time of day [24 h; rate ratio 0.80 (95 % CI 0.65-0.98)]; this difference was most pronounced during the first 8 weeks of treatment. Severe hypoglycaemia was infrequent. The basal insulin dose increased in both groups (month 6 dose: Gla-300 0.35 U/kg/day, Gla-100 0.29 U/kg/day). A between-treatment difference in body weight change over 6 months favouring Gla-300 was observed [LS mean difference -0.6 kg (95 % CI -1.1 to -0.0); p = 0.035]. Adverse event rates were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions: In Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal plus mealtime insulin, less hypoglycaemia was observed with Gla-300 than with Gla-100, particularly during the night, while glycaemic control did not differ.

Keywords: basal insulin; glycaemic control; insulin analogues; phase III study; randomised trial; type 1 diabetes.

© 2015 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through the main 6‐month period of the EDITION JP 1 study [modified intention‐to‐treat (mITT) and safety populations]. Gla‐100, insulin glargine 100 U/ml; Gla‐300, insulin glargine 300 U/ml.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical measures across the 6‐month study period in the modified intention‐to‐treat (mITT) population: (A) glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), (B) laboratory‐measured fasting plasma glucose (FPG), (C) average pre‐injection self‐monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) profile and (D) daily basal and mealtime insulin dose. Data are shown as mean ± standard error. Gla‐100, insulin glargine 100 U/ml; Gla‐300, insulin glargine 300 U/ml; BL, baseline; W, week; M, month; LOCF, last observation carried forward.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean eight‐point self‐monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles at baseline and month 6 (LOCF; modified intention‐to‐treat population). Data are shown as mean ± standard error. Gla‐100, insulin glargine 100 U/ml; Gla‐300, insulin glargine 300 U/ml; LOCF, last observation carried forward.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Occurrence of confirmed or severe hypoglycaemic events during the 6‐month study period (safety population): (A) cumulative mean number of confirmed [≤3.9 mmol/l (≤70 mg/dl)] or severe events per participant at any time (24 h) and (B) events per participant‐year; (C) cumulative mean number of nocturnal (00:00–05:59 h) confirmed [≤3.9 mmol/l (≤70 mg/dl)] or severe events per participant and (D) events per participant‐year; (E) ratio of event rates and (F) relative risk, during the night (00:00–05:59 h) and at any time (24 h). CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. American Diabetes Association . Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2015. 7. Approaches to glycemic treatment. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: S41–S48.
    1. Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS, Michels AW. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 2014; 383: 69–82.
    1. Japan Diabetes Society . Treatment guide for diabetes 2013; 2012–2013.
    1. Recent product approvals in Japan. Inpharma Weekly 2003; 1411: 21.
    1. Kanazawa Y, Igarashi Y, Komiya K et al. Long‐term efficacy of insulin glargine after switching from NPH insulin as intensive replacement of basal insulin in Japanese diabetes mellitus. Comparison of efficacy between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (JUN‐LAN study 1.2). Endocr J 2007; 54: 975–983.
    1. Yamamoto‐Honda R, Takahashi Y, Yoshida Y et al. Use of insulin glargine in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes. Intern Med 2007; 46: 937–943.
    1. Chan JC, Gagliardino JJ, Baik SH et al. Multifaceted determinants for achieving glycemic control: the International Diabetes Management Practice Study (IDMPS). Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 227–233.
    1. Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, Cowie CC. The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988‐2010. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 2271–2279.
    1. Vouri SM, Shaw RF, Waterbury NV, Egge JA, Alexander B. Prevalence of achievement of A1c, blood pressure, and cholesterol (ABC) goal in veterans with diabetes. J Manag Care Pharm 2011; 17: 304–312.
    1. Bolli GB, Andreoli AM, Lucidi P. Optimizing the replacement of basal insulin in type 1 diabetes mellitus: no longer an elusive goal in the post‐NPH era. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13(Suppl. 1): S43–S52.
    1. Owens DR, Matfin G, Monnier L. Basal insulin analogues in the management of diabetes mellitus: what progress have we made? Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2014; 30: 104–119.
    1. Becker RH, Nowotny I, Teichert L, Bergmann K, Kapitza C. Low within‐ and between‐day variability in exposure to new insulin glargine 300 U/ml. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015; 17: 261–267.
    1. Becker RHA, Dahmen R, Bergmann K, Lehmann A, Jax T, Heise T. New insulin glargine 300 ‐1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 ‐1 . Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 637–643.
    1. Shiramoto M, Eto T, Irie S et al. Single‐dose new 0insulin glargine 300 U/ml provides prolonged, stable glycaemic control in Japanese and European people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015; 17: 254–260.
    1. Bolli GB, Riddle MC, Bergenstal RM et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin‐naive people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose‐lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3). Diabetes Obes Metab 2015; 17: 386–394.
    1. Home PD, Bergenstal RM, Bolli GB et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 1 diabetes: a randomized, phase 3a, open‐label clinical trial (EDITION 4). Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 2217–2225.
    1. Riddle MC, Bolli GB, Zieman M et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose and hypoglycemia in a 6‐month randomized controlled trial (EDITION I). Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 2755–2762.
    1. Terauchi Y, Koyama M, Cheng X, Shimizu S, Hirose T. Glycemic control and hypoglycaemia in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving new insulin glargine 300 U/mL in combination with OADs (EDITION JP 2). Diabetologia 2014; 57: S401.
    1. Yki‐Järvinen H, Bergenstal R, Zieman M et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6‐month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2). Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 3235–3243.
    1. Bergenstal R, Bailey TS, Rodbard D, Guo H, Muehlen‐Bartmer I, Ahmann AJ. Insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs 100 U/mL: glucose profiles of morning vs evening injections in adults with T1DM measured with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Diabetes Technol Ther 2015; 17: A16–A17.
    1. ICH . ICH harmonized tripartite guideline: guideline for good clinical practice E6 (R1), 1996. Available from URL: . Accessed 19 January 2016.
    1. World Medical Association . Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Ferney‐Voltaire: World Medical Association, 2013.
    1. ADA Workgroup on Hypoglycemia . Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1245–1249.
    1. Heller S, Buse J, Fisher M et al. Insulin degludec, an ultra‐longacting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal‐bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (BEGIN Basal‐Bolus Type 1): a phase 3, randomised, open‐label, treat‐to‐target non‐inferiority trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1489–1497.
    1. Mathieu C, Hollander P, Miranda‐Palma B et al. Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec in a flexible dosing regimen vs insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes (BEGIN: Flex T1): a 26‐week randomized, treat‐to‐target trial with a 26‐week extension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 1154–1162.
    1. Cryer PE, Davis SN, Shamoon H. Hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1902–1912.
    1. Gerstein HC, Bosch J, Dagenais GR et al. Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 319–328.
    1. Iwamoto Y, Clauson P, Nishida T, Kaku K. Insulin degludec in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. J Diabetes Invest 2013; 4: 62–68.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa