Intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention using a cross-sectoral couple-based intervention: results from a cluster randomised control trial in Ibadan, Nigeria

Neetu A John, Ayodeji Adebayo, Natalie A Boychuk, Funmilola OlaOlorun, Neetu A John, Ayodeji Adebayo, Natalie A Boychuk, Funmilola OlaOlorun

Abstract

Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most common form of violence women experience globally. Economic empowerment interventions have been implemented across countries to prevent and address IPV, with mixed results. A sociological 'male-backlash' model suggests that addressing unequal gender norms is crucial to reduce IPV. This study evaluates the impact of a multipronged intervention among heterosexual couples in urban and periurban Ibadan that aimed at reducing IPV by increasing financial and reproductive literacy, fostering gender equality and improving relationship quality.

Methods: A four-arm mixed-methods cluster randomised control trial was employed. Baseline data and end line data six months postintervention were collected to estimate changes in key outcomes. In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 couples 2 years postintervention to explore the drivers of changes in outcomes. Difference-in-differences regression models were estimated to compare changes in IPV levels across the three intervention arms and control arm, and thematic analysis was conducted to understand drivers of change in IPV outcomes.

Results: Physical IPV decreased significantly in the gender socialisation (GS) (β: -4.63 (SE: 2.12)) and GS and financial literacy (β: -4.61 (SE: 2.02)) groups as compared with the control group. Changes in emotional and sexual IPV were marginally significant or insignificant, respectively, suggesting that the intervention did not have an impact on non-physical forms of IPV. In the in-depth interviews, couples reported improved communication and trust, enhanced conflict management skills, and increased mutual respect as a result of participation across intervention arms, which may have facilitated the reduction of violence in their relationships.

Conclusion: This study highlights the potential utility of gender transformative interventions for improving physical IPV outcomes. Future research should seek to understand the mechanisms that influence sexual and emotional IPV as their aetiology may be different from physical violence.

Trail registration number: The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03888495).

Keywords: KAP survey; cluster randomized trial; public health; qualitative study.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. García-Moreno C, Pallitto C, Devries K. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2013: 50.
    1. World Health Organization . WHO | Global plan of action to strengthen the role of the health system within a national multisectoral response to address interpersonal violence, in particular against women and girls, and against children [Internet]. World Health Organization, 2016. Available: [Accessed 18 Jul 2021].
    1. Bacchus LJ, Ranganathan M, Watts C, et al. . Recent intimate partner violence against women and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019995. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019995
    1. Hill A, Pallitto C, McCleary-Sills J, et al. . A systematic review and meta-analysis of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016;133:269–76. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.023
    1. Pallitto CC, García-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, et al. . Intimate partner violence, abortion, and unintended pregnancy: results from the who Multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013;120:3–9. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.003
    1. ICRW U. Intimate partner violence: high costs to households and communities. WashingtonDC: Int Cent Res Women ICRW U N Popul Fund UNFPA, 2009.
    1. Izaguirre A, Calvete E. Children who are exposed to intimate partner violence: interviewing mothers to understand its impact on children. Child Abuse Negl 2015;48:58–67. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.05.002
    1. Silverman JG, Decker MR, Cheng DM, et al. . Gender-Based disparities in infant and child mortality based on maternal exposure to spousal violence: the heavy burden borne by Indian girls. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:22–7. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.261
    1. Ferdos J, Rahman MM. Maternal experience of intimate partner violence and low birth weight of children: a hospital-based study in Bangladesh. PLoS One 2017;12:e0187138. 10.1371/journal.pone.0187138
    1. Jeong J, Adhia A, Bhatia A, et al. . Intimate partner violence, maternal and paternal parenting, and early child development. Pediatrics 2020;145:e20192955. 10.1542/peds.2019-2955
    1. Bhattacharyya M, Bedi AS, Chhachhi A. Marital violence and women’s employment and property status: Evidence from north Indian villages. World Dev 2011;39:1676–89. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.001
    1. Sen P. Enhancing Women’s Choices in Responding to Domestic Violence in Calcutta: A Comparison of Employment and Education. Eur J Dev Res 1999;11:65–86. 10.1080/09578819908426739
    1. Nussbaum MC. Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    1. Sen A. Gender and Cooperative Conflicts. In: Persistent inequalities: women and world development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999: 123–49p..
    1. Agarwal B. ‘'Bargaining'’ and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household. Fem Econ 1997;3:1–51. 10.1080/135457097338799
    1. Women KN. Wages and intra-household power relations in urban Bangladesh. Dev Change 1997;28:261–302.
    1. Hornung CA, McCullough BC, Sugimoto T. Status relationships in marriage: risk factors in spouse abuse. J Marriage Fam 1981;43:675–92. 10.2307/351768
    1. Macmillan R, Gartner R. When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. J Marriage Fam 1999;61:947–58. 10.2307/354015
    1. Aizer A. The gender wage gap and domestic violence. Am Econ Rev 2010;100:1847–59. 10.1257/aer.100.4.1847
    1. Luke N, Munshi K. Women as agents of change: female income and mobility in India. J Dev Econ 2011;94:1–17. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.01.002
    1. John NA. Exploring the Linkages Between Women’s Paid and Unpaid Work and Their Experiences of Intimate Partner and Non-Partner Violence in Nepal. Fem Econ 2020;26:89–113. 10.1080/13545701.2020.1828601
    1. Vyas S, Watts C. How does economic empowerment affect women’s risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published evidence. J Int Dev J Dev Stud Assoc 2009;21:577–602.
    1. Hidrobo M, Fernald L. Cash transfers and domestic violence. J Health Econ 2013;32:304–19. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.11.002
    1. Quisumbing AR, Hallman K. Marriage in transition: evidence on age, education, and assets from six developing countries. Chang Transit Adulthood Dev Ctries Sel Stud 2005:200–69.
    1. Ganle JK, Afriyie K, Segbefia AY. Microcredit: Empowerment and Disempowerment of rural women in Ghana. World Dev 2015;66:335–45. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.027
    1. Balasubramanian S. Why micro-credit may leave women worse off: non-cooperative bargaining and the marriage game in South Asia. J Dev Stud 2013;49:609–23. 10.1080/00220388.2012.709618
    1. Gupta J, Falb KL, Lehmann H, et al. . Gender norms and economic empowerment intervention to reduce intimate partner violence against women in rural Côte d’Ivoire: a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2013;13:1–12. 10.1186/1472-698X-13-46
    1. Kim JC, Watts CH, Hargreaves JR, et al. . Understanding the impact of a microfinance-based intervention on women's empowerment and the reduction of intimate partner violence in South Africa. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1794–802. 10.2105/AJPH.2006.095521
    1. Dunkle K, Stern E, Chatterji S, et al. . Effective prevention of intimate partner violence through couples training: a randomised controlled trial of Indashyikirwa in Rwanda. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5:e002439. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002439
    1. Schuler SR, Hashemi SM, Riley AP. The influence of women’s changing roles and status in Bangladesh’s fertility transition: Evidence from a study of credit programs and contraceptive use. World Dev 1997;25:563–75. 10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00119-2
    1. Sonfield A, Hasstedt K, Kavanaugh ML. The social and economic benefits of women’s ability to determine whether and when to have children. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013.
    1. John NA, Tsui AO, Roro M. Quality of contraceptive use and women’s paid work and earnings in Peri-Urban Ethiopia. Fem Econ 2020;26:23–43. 10.1080/13545701.2019.1632471
    1. Kabeer N. Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment. Dev Change 1999;30:435–64. 10.1111/1467-7660.00125
    1. OlaOlorun FM, John NA. A couple-based gender transformative intervention to enhance women’s participation in household decision-making: results from a cluster randomised control trial in Ibadan, Nigeria. Dev Pract 2021:1–13.
    1. National population Commission (NPC) II . Nigeria demographic and health survey 2013. Abuja, Nigeria and Rockville, Maryland, USA, 2014.
    1. Hemming K, Girling AJ, Sitch AJ, et al. . Sample size calculations for cluster randomised controlled trials with a fixed number of clusters. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:102. 10.1186/1471-2288-11-102
    1. Kim J, Shin W. How to do random allocation (randomization). Clin Orthop Surg 2014;6:103–9. 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103
    1. WHO . | WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women [Internet]. WHO. World Health Organization. Available: [Accessed 01 Aug 2021].
    1. Esie P, Osypuk TL, Schuler SR, et al. . Intimate partner violence and depression in rural Bangladesh: accounting for violence severity in a high prevalence setting. SSM Popul Health 2019;7:100368. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100368
    1. Carlson J, Casey E, Edleson JL. Strategies to engage men and boys in violence prevention: a global organizational perspective. Violence Women 2015;21:1406–25.
    1. Semahegn A, Torpey K, Manu A, et al. . Are interventions focused on gender-norms effective in preventing domestic violence against women in low and lower-middle income countries? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health 2019;16:93. 10.1186/s12978-019-0726-5
    1. Doyle K, Levtov RG, Barker G, et al. . Gender-transformative Bandebereho couples' intervention to promote male engagement in reproductive and maternal health and violence prevention in Rwanda: findings from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2018;13:e0192756. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192756
    1. Hazrati M, Hamid TA, Ibrahim R. The effect of emotional focused intervention on spousal emotional abuse and marital satisfaction among elderly married couples: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 2017;5:329–34.
    1. Hurless N, Cottone RR. Considerations of conjoint couples therapy in cases of intimate partner violence. The Family Journal 2018;26:324–9. 10.1177/1066480718795708

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa