Bubble continuous positive airway pressure for children with high-risk conditions and severe pneumonia in Malawi: an open label, randomised, controlled trial

Eric D McCollum, Tisungane Mvalo, Michelle Eckerle, Andrew G Smith, Davie Kondowe, Don Makonokaya, Dhananjay Vaidya, Veena Billioux, Alfred Chalira, Norman Lufesi, Innocent Mofolo, Mina Hosseinipour, Eric D McCollum, Tisungane Mvalo, Michelle Eckerle, Andrew G Smith, Davie Kondowe, Don Makonokaya, Dhananjay Vaidya, Veena Billioux, Alfred Chalira, Norman Lufesi, Innocent Mofolo, Mina Hosseinipour

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia is the leading cause of death among children globally. Most pneumonia deaths in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) occur among children with HIV infection or exposure, severe malnutrition, or hypoxaemia despite antibiotics and oxygen. Non-invasive bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) is considered a safe ventilation modality that might improve child pneumonia survival. bCPAP outcomes for high-risk African children with severe pneumonia are unknown. Since most child pneumonia hospitalisations in Africa occur in non-tertiary district hospitals without daily physician oversight, we aimed to examine whether bCPAP improves severe pneumonia mortality in such settings.

Methods: This open-label, randomised, controlled trial was done in the general paediatric ward of Salima District Hospital, Malawi. We enrolled children aged 1-59 months old with WHO-defined severe pneumonia and either HIV infection or exposure, severe malnutrition, or an oxygen saturation of less than 90%. Children were randomly assigned 1:1 to low-flow nasal cannula oxygen or nasal bCPAP. Non-physicians administered care; the primary outcome was hospital survival. Primary analyses were by intention-to-treat and interim and adverse events analyses per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02484183, and is closed.

Findings: We screened 1712 children for eligibility between June 23, 2015, and March 21, 2018. The data safety and monitoring board stopped the trial for futility after 644 of the intended 900 participants were enrolled. 323 children were randomly assigned to oxygen and 321 to bCPAP. 35 (11%) of 323 children who received oxygen died in hospital, as did 53 (17%) of 321 who received bCPAP (relative risk 1·52; 95% CI 1·02-2·27; p=0·036). 13 oxygen and 17 bCPAP patients lacked hospital outcomes and were considered lost to follow-up. Suspected adverse events related to treatment occurred in 11 (3%) of 321 children receiving bCPAP and 1 (<1%) of 323 children receiving oxygen. Four bCPAP and one oxygen group deaths were classified as probable aspiration episodes, one bCPAP death as probable pneumothorax, and six non-death bCPAP events included skin breakdown around the nares.

Interpretation: bCPAP treatment in a paediatric ward without daily physician supervision did not reduce hospital mortality among high-risk Malawian children with severe pneumonia, compared with oxygen. The use of bCPAP within certain patient populations and non-intensive care settings might carry risk that was not previously recognised. bCPAP in LMICs needs further evaluation before wider implementation for child pneumonia care.

Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, International AIDS Society, Health Empowering Humanity.

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile bCPAP=bubble continuous positive airway pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier mortality curves Time to hospital death was an exploratory analysis. Day 37 was the latest day that a child had a hospital outcome in the oxygen group.

References

    1. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet. 2017;388:3027–3035.
    1. Scott JAG, Wonodi C, Moïsi JC. The definition of pneumonia, the assessment of severity, and clinical standardization in the Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:S109–S116.
    1. McCollum ED, King C, Hammitt LL. Reduction of childhood pneumonia mortality in the Sustainable Development era. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:932–933.
    1. Sonego M, Pellegrin MC, Becker G, Lazzerini M. Risk factors for mortality from acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI) in children under five years of age in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116380.
    1. Lazzerini M, Sonego M, Pellegrin MC. Hypoxaemia as a mortality risk factor in acute lower respiratory infections in children in low and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136166.
    1. Theodoratou E, McAllister DA, Reed C. Global, regional, and national estimates of pneumonia burden in HIV-infected children in 2010: a meta-analysis and modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:1250–1258.
    1. McCollum ED, Nambiar B, Deula R. Impact of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on clinical and hypoxemic childhood pneumonia over three years in central Malawi: an observational study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0168209.
    1. Lazzerini M, Seward N, Lufesi N. Mortality and its risk factors in Malawian children admitted to hospital with clinical pneumonia, 2001–12: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4:e57–e68.
    1. Hooli S, Colbourn T, Lufesi N. Predicting Hospitalised Paediatric Pneumonia Mortality Risk: An External Validation of RISC and mRISC, and Local Tool Development (RISC-Malawi) from Malawi. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0168126.
    1. Morley SL. Non-invasive ventilation in paediatric critical care. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2016;20:24–31.
    1. Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK. American College of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:1061–1093.
    1. Jensen EA, Chaudhary A, Bhutta ZA, Kirpalani H. Non-invasive respiratory support for infants in low- and middle-income countries. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21:181–188.
    1. Martin S, Duke T, Davis P. Efficacy and safety of bubble CPAP in neonatal care in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F495–F504.
    1. Walk J, Dinga P, Banda C. Non-invasive ventilation with bubble CPAP is feasible and improves respiratory physiology in hospitalised Malawian children with acute respiratory failure. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2016;36:28–33.
    1. Myers S, Dinga P, Anderson M. Use of bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) in the management of critically ill children in a Malawian paediatric unit: an observational study. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019;6:e000280.
    1. McCollum ED, Smith A, Golitko CL. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected infant. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15:562–564.
    1. Chisti MJ, Salam MA, Smith JH. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure for children with severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia in Bangladesh: an open, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1057–1065.
    1. Graham SM, English M, Hazir T, Enarson P, Duke T. Challenges to improving case management of childhood pneumonia at health facilities in resource-limited settings. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:349–355.
    1. McCollum ED, Smith AG, Eckerle M, Mvalo T, O'Brien KL, Baqui AH. CPAP treatment for children with pneumonia in low-resource settings. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:924–925.
    1. Smith AG, Eckerle M, Mvalo T. CPAP IMPACT: a protocol for a randomized trial of bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus standard care for high-risk children with severe pneumonia using adaptive design methods. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017;4:e000195.
    1. Guidelines for the management of common childhood illnesses 2nd edn Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2013.
    1. Calderini E, Chidini G, Pelosi P. What are the current indications for noninvasive ventilation in children? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:368–374.
    1. Essouri S, Chevret L, Durand P, Haas V, Fauroux B, Devictor D. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation: five years of experience in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7:329–334.
    1. Viele K, McGlothlin A, Broglio K. Interpretation of clinical trials that stopped early. JAMA. 2016;315:1646–1647.
    1. Wilson PT, Baiden F, Brooks JC. Continuous positive airway pressure for children with undifferentiated respiratory distress in Ghana: an open-label, cluster, crossover trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e615–e623.
    1. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50:217–226.
    1. Technical specifications for oxygen concentrators Geneva: World Health Organization. 2015.
    1. Hafner S, Beloncle F, Koch A, Radermacher P, Asfar P. Hyperoxia in intensive care, emergency, and peri-operative medicine: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? A 2015 update. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5:42.
    1. Helping babies breathe provider guide 2nd edn Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics.
    1. Dodrill P, Gosa MM. Pediatric dysphagia: physiology, assessment, and management. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(suppl 5):24–31.
    1. Hori R, Isaka M, Oonishi K, Yabe T, Oku Y. Coordination between respiration and swallowing during non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. Respirology. 2016;21:1062–1067.
    1. Hanin M, Nuthakki S, Malkar MB, Jadcherla SR. Safety and efficacy of oral feeding in infants with BPD on nasal CPAP. Dysphagia. 2015;30:121–127.
    1. Thukral A, Sankar MJ, Chandrasekaran A, Agarwal R, Paul VK. Efficacy and safety of CPAP in low- and middle-income countries. J Perinatol. 2016;36(suppl 1):S21–S28.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa