Validation of a Machine Learning Brain Electrical Activity-Based Index to Aid in Diagnosing Concussion Among Athletes

Jeffrey J Bazarian, Robert J Elbin, Douglas J Casa, Gillian A Hotz, Christopher Neville, Rebecca M Lopez, David M Schnyer, Susan Yeargin, Tracey Covassin, Jeffrey J Bazarian, Robert J Elbin, Douglas J Casa, Gillian A Hotz, Christopher Neville, Rebecca M Lopez, David M Schnyer, Susan Yeargin, Tracey Covassin

Abstract

Importance: An objective, reliable indicator of the presence and severity of concussive brain injury and of the readiness for the return to activity has the potential to reduce concussion-related disability.

Objective: To validate the classification accuracy of a previously derived, machine learning, multimodal, brain electrical activity-based Concussion Index in an independent cohort of athletes with concussion.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective diagnostic cohort study was conducted at 10 clinical sites (ie, US universities and high schools) between February 4, 2017, and March 20, 2019. A cohort comprising a consecutive sample of 207 athletes aged 13 to 25 years with concussion and 373 matched athlete controls without concussion were assessed with electroencephalography, cognitive testing, and symptom inventories within 72 hours of injury, at return to play, and 45 days after return to play. Variables from the multimodal assessment were used to generate a Concussion Index at each time point. Athletes with concussion had experienced a witnessed head impact, were removed from play for 5 days or more, and had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15. Participants were excluded for known neurologic disease or history within the last year of traumatic brain injury. Athlete controls were matched to athletes with concussion for age, sex, and type of sport played.

Main outcomes and measures: Classification accuracy of the Concussion Index at time of injury using a prespecified cutoff of 70 or less (total range, 0-100, where ≤70 indicates it is likely the individual has a concussion and >70 indicates it is likely the individual does not have a concussion).

Results: Of 580 eligible participants with analyzable data, 207 had concussion (124 male participants [59.9%]; mean [SD] age, 19.4 [2.5] years), and 373 were athlete controls (187 male participants [50.1%]; mean [SD] age, 19.6 [2.2] years). The Concussion Index had a sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI, 80.5%-90.4%), specificity of 70.8% (95% CI, 65.9%-75.4%), negative predictive value of 90.1% (95% CI, 86.1%-93.3%), positive predictive value of 62.0% (95% CI, 56.1%-67.7%), and area under receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.89. At day 0, the mean (SD) Concussion Index among athletes with concussion was significantly lower than among athletes without concussion (75.0 [14.0] vs 32.7 [27.2]; P < .001). Among athletes with concussion, there was a significant increase in the Concussion Index between day 0 and return to play, with a mean (SD) paired difference between these time points of -41.2 (27.0) (P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: These results suggest that the multimodal brain activity-based Concussion Index has high classification accuracy for identification of the likelihood of concussion at time of injury and may be associated with the return to control values at the time of recovery. The Concussion Index has the potential to aid in the clinical diagnosis of concussion and in the assessment of athletes' readiness to return to play.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors were principal investigators at one of the clinical data acquisition sites participating in the research, whose institutions received contracts to support participant recruitment, consenting, and data acquisition and have no competing financial interests to disclaim. Drs Bazarian, Casa, Lopez, Schnyer, Yeargin, and Covassin reported receiving grants from BrainScope Co Inc during the conduct of the study. Dr Bazarian reported receiving personal fees from Abbott and Q30 Innovations outside the submitted work. Dr Elbin reported receiving grants and consulting fees from BrainScope Co Inc during the conduct of the study. Dr Neville reported being an equity owner of Quadrant Biosciences Inc outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Flowchart of Participant Enrollment and…
Figure 1.. Flowchart of Participant Enrollment and Study Population
EEG indicates electroencephalogram; RTP, return to play.
Figure 2.. Longitudinal Change in Concussion Index…
Figure 2.. Longitudinal Change in Concussion Index Among Athletes With or Without Concussion
Concussion index value at day 0, return to play (RTP) and RTP+45 days, in the athletes with or without concussion. The dotted line indicates the threshold for the Concussion Index, where more than 70 is not concussed and 70 or less is concussed. Vertical lines indicate the 95% CI. aSignificance of the difference on day 0 between the mean Concussion Index among athletes with concussion compared with those without concussion (P < .001), with the Concussion Index significantly lower among the athletes with concussion. bAmong athletes without concussion, significant noninferiority (equivalence) in the mean Concussion Index between day 0 and RTP+45 days was found, with the Concussion Index of 78% of athletes with concussion exceeding the 90th percentile Concussion Index of athletes without concussion.

References

    1. Elbin RJ, Sufrinko A, Schatz P, et al. . Removal from play after concussion and recovery time. Pediatrics. 2016;138(3):e20160910. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-0910
    1. Asken BM, Bauer RM, Guskiewicz KM, et al. ; CARE Consortium Investigators . Immediate removal from activity after sport-related concussion is associated with shorter clinical recovery and less severe symptoms in collegiate student-athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(6):1465-1474. doi:10.1177/0363546518757984
    1. Asken BM, McCrea MA, Clugston JR, Snyder AR, Houck ZM, Bauer RM. “Playing through it”: delayed reporting and removal from athletic activity after concussion predicts prolonged recovery. J Athl Train. 2016;51(4):329-335. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.5.02
    1. Anderson V, Godfrey C, Rosenfeld JV, Catroppa C. 10 Years outcome from childhood traumatic brain injury. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2012;30(3):217-224. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.09.008
    1. Scholten AC, Haagsma JA, Cnossen MC, Olff M, van Beeck EF, Polinder S. Prevalence of and risk factors for anxiety and depressive disorders after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(22):1969-1994. doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4252
    1. McMahon P, Hricik A, Yue JK, et al. ; TRACK-TBI Investigators . Symptomatology and functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(1):26-33. doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2984
    1. Sariaslan A, Sharp DJ, D’Onofrio BM, Larsson H, Fazel S. Long-term outcomes associated with traumatic brain injury in childhood and adolescence: a nationwide Swedish cohort study of a wide range of medical and social outcomes. PLoS Med. 2016;13(8):e1002103. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002103
    1. Thatcher RW, North DM, Curtin RT, et al. . An EEG severity index of traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;13(1):77-87. doi:10.1176/jnp.13.1.77
    1. Virji-Babul N, Hilderman CG, Makan N, et al. . Changes in functional brain networks following sports-related concussion in adolescents. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(23):1914-1919. doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3450
    1. Dunkley BT, Da Costa L, Bethune A, et al. . Low-frequency connectivity is associated with mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;7:611-621. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.02.020
    1. Sponheim SR, McGuire KA, Kang SS, et al. . Evidence of disrupted functional connectivity in the brain after combat-related blast injury. Neuroimage. 2011;54(suppl 1):S21-S29. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.007
    1. Slobounov SM, Zhang K, Pennell D, Ray W, Johnson B, Sebastianelli W. Functional abnormalities in normally appearing athletes following mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study. Exp Brain Res. 2010;202(2):341-354. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2141-6
    1. Balkan O, Virji-Babul N, Miyakoshi M, Makeig S, Garudadri H. Source-domain spectral EEG analysis of sports-related concussion via measure projection analysis. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:4053-4056. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319284
    1. Korn A, Golan H, Melamed I, Pascual-Marqui R, Friedman A. Focal cortical dysfunction and blood-brain barrier disruption in patients with postconcussion syndrome. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;22(1):1-9. doi:10.1097/01.WNP.0000150973.24324.A7
    1. Conley AC, Cooper PS, Karayanidis F, et al. . Resting state electroencephalography and sports-related concussion: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2018;36(1):1-13. doi:10.1089/neu.2018.5761
    1. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG. Pattern Classification. 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience; 2001.
    1. Hanley D, Prichep LS, Bazarian J, et al. . Emergency department triage of traumatic head injury using a brain electrical activity biomarker: a multisite prospective observational validation trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(5):617-627. doi:10.1111/acem.13175
    1. Hanley D, Prichep LS, Badjatia N, et al. . A brain electrical activity electroencephalographic-based biomarker of functional impairment in traumatic brain injury: a multi-site validation trial. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(1):41-47. doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5004
    1. Jacquin A, Kanakia S, Oberly D, Prichep LS. A multimodal biomarker for concussion identification, prognosis and management. Comput Biol Med. 2018;102:95-103. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.09.011
    1. Mollayeva T, El-Khechen-Richandi G, Colantonio A. Sex & gender considerations in concussion research. Concussion. 2018;3(1):CNC51. doi:10.2217/cnc-2017-0015
    1. National Collegiate Athletic Association . Concussion safety best practices for campuses. Accessed October 8, 2020.
    1. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. . Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(5):250-258. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092313
    1. McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvořák J, et al. . Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(11):838-847.
    1. Lau BC, Collins MW, Lovell MR. Sensitivity and specificity of subacute computerized neurocognitive testing and symptom evaluation in predicting outcomes after sports-related concussion. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(6):1209-1216. doi:10.1177/0363546510392016
    1. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. . Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Zurich, November 2012. J Athl Train. 2013;48(4):554-575. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.05
    1. Sport concussion assessment tool–5th edition. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(11):851-858. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097506SCAT5
    1. Randolph C, Millis S, Barr WB, et al. . Concussion symptom inventory: an empirically derived scale for monitoring resolution of symptoms following sport-related concussion. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;24(3):219-229. doi:10.1093/arclin/acp025
    1. McCrea M, Kelly JP, Randolph C, et al. . Standardized assessment of concussion (SAC): on-site mental status evaluation of the athlete. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(2):27-35. doi:10.1097/00001199-199804000-00005
    1. Cernich A, Reeves D, Sun W, Bleiberg J. Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics sports medicine battery. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(1)(suppl 1):S101-S114. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.008
    1. Nelson LD, LaRoche AA, Pfaller AY, et al. . Prospective, head-to-head study of three computerized neurocognitive assessment tools (CNTs): reliability and validity for the assessment of sport-related concussion. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016;22(1):24-37. doi:10.1017/S1355617715001101
    1. Prichep LS, Jacquin A, Filipenko J, et al. . Classification of traumatic brain injury severity using informed data reduction in a series of binary classifier algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012;20(6):806-822. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2206609
    1. Raymer ML, Punch ED, Goodman ED, Kuhn LA, Jain AK. Dimensionality reduction using genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2000;4(2):164–171. doi:10.1109/4235.850656
    1. Oh IS, Lee JS, Moon BR. Hybrid genetic algorithms for feature selection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004;26(11):1424-1437. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2004.105
    1. McCrea M, Prichep L, Powell MR, Chabot R, Barr WB. Acute effects and recovery after sport-related concussion: a neurocognitive and quantitative brain electrical activity study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(4):283-292. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181e67923
    1. Prichep LS, McCrea M, Barr W, Powell M, Chabot RJ. Time course of clinical and electrophysiological recovery after sport-related concussion. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28(4):266-273. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e318247b54e
    1. Teel EF, Ray WJ, Geronimo AM, Slobounov SM. Residual alterations of brain electrical activity in clinically asymptomatic concussed individuals: an EEG study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(4):703-707. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.08.027
    1. Johnson EW, Kegel NE, Collins MW. Neuropsychological assessment of sport-related concussion. Clin Sports Med. 2011;30(1):73-88, viii-ix. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2010.08.007
    1. Shenton ME, Hamoda HM, Schneiderman JS, et al. . A review of magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012;6(2):137-192. doi:10.1007/s11682-012-9156-5
    1. Chamard E, Lichtenstein JD. A systematic review of neuroimaging findings in children and adolescents with sports-related concussion. Brain Inj. 2018;32(7):816-831. doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1463106
    1. Davenport EM, Whitlow CT, Urban JE, et al. . Abnormal white matter integrity related to head impact exposure in a season of high school varsity football. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(19):1617-1624. doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3233
    1. McAllister TW, Ford JC, Flashman LA, et al. . Effect of head impacts on diffusivity measures in a cohort of collegiate contact sport athletes. Neurology. 2014;82(1):63-69. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000438220.16190.42
    1. Wilde EA, Goodrich-Hunsaker NJ, Ware AL, et al. . Diffusion tensor imaging indicators of white matter injury are correlated with a multimodal electroencephalography-based biomarker in slow recovering, concussed collegiate athletes. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(19):2093-2101. doi:10.1089/neu.2018.6365
    1. Iverson GL, Schatz P. Advanced topics in neuropsychological assessment following sport-related concussion. Brain Inj. 2015;29(2):263-275. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.965214
    1. Broglio SP, Puetz TW. The effect of sport concussion on neurocognitive function, self-report symptoms and postural control: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2008;38(1):53-67. doi:10.2165/00007256-200838010-00005
    1. Resch JE, Schneider MW, Munro Cullum C. The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion. Int J Psychophysiol. 2018;132(pt A):31-38. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.09.011
    1. Echemendia RJ, Bruce JM, Bailey CM, Sanders JF, Arnett P, Vargas G. The utility of post-concussion neuropsychological data in identifying cognitive change following sports-related MTBI in the absence of baseline data. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(7):1077-1091. doi:10.1080/13854046.2012.721006
    1. Valovich McLeod TC, Hale TD. Vestibular and balance issues following sport-related concussion. Brain Inj. 2015;29(2):175-184. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.965206
    1. Corwin DJ, Wiebe DJ, Zonfrillo MR, et al. . Vestibular deficits following youth concussion. J Pediatr. 2015;166(5):1221-1225. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.039
    1. Murray NG, Ambati VN, Contreras MM, Salvatore AP, Reed-Jones RJ. Assessment of oculomotor control and balance post-concussion: a preliminary study for a novel approach to concussion management. Brain Inj. 2014;28(4):496-503. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.887144
    1. Zhou G, Brodsky JR. Objective vestibular testing of children with dizziness and balance complaints following sports-related concussions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(6):1133-1139. doi:10.1177/0194599815576720
    1. Rawlins MLW, Suggs DW, Bierema L, Miller LS, Reifsteck F, Schmidt JD. Examination of collegiate student-athlete concussion reporting intentions and behavior. J Clin Transl Res. 2020;5(4):186-196.
    1. Arrieux JP, Cole WR, Ahrens AP. A review of the validity of computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in mild traumatic brain injury assessment. Concussion. 2017;2(1):CNC31. doi:10.2217/cnc-2016-0021
    1. Llewellyn T, Burdette GT, Joyner AB, Buckley TA. Concussion reporting rates at the conclusion of an intercollegiate athletic career. Clin J Sport Med. 2014;24(1):76-79. doi:10.1097/01.jsm.0000432853.77520.3d
    1. O’Brien AM, Casey JE, Salmon RM. Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2018;7(3):208-216. doi:10.1080/21622965.2017.1290529

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa