Incidence and risk factors for the progression of proximal junctional kyphosis in degenerative lumbar scoliosis following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion

Hui Wang, Lei Ma, Dalong Yang, Tao Wang, Sidong Yang, Yanhong Wang, Qian Wang, Feng Zhang, Wenyuan Ding, Hui Wang, Lei Ma, Dalong Yang, Tao Wang, Sidong Yang, Yanhong Wang, Qian Wang, Feng Zhang, Wenyuan Ding

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion, and to search for predictable risk factors for the progression of junctional kyphosis.In total 98 DLS patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed prospectively. According to the occurrence of PJK at the last follow-up, patients were divided into 2 groups: PJK group and non-PJK group. To investigate risk values for the progression of PJK, 3 categorized factors were analyzed statistically: patient characteristics-preoperative data of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD) were investigated; surgical variables-the most proximal and distal levels of the instrumentation, the number of instrumented levels; pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters include the scoliotic angle, sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar junctional angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope.PJK was developed in 17 of 98 patients (17.3%) until to the final follow-up and were enrolled as the PJK group, and 81 patients without PJK at final follow-up were enrolled as the non-PJK group. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in age at operation (P = 0.900). The patient's sex was excluded in statistical analysis because of the predominance of female patients. There were statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in BMI ([25.5 ± 1.7] kg/m in the PJK group and [23.6 ± 1.9] kg/m in the non-PJK group, P < 0.001) and BMD ([-1.4 ± 0.8] g/cm in the PJK group and [-0.7 ± 0.3] g/cm in the non-PJK group, P < 0.001). No specific surgery-related variables were found to be associated with an increased risk of developing PJK, except when the most proximal instrumented vertebrae stopped at thoracolumbar junction (T11-L1). The upper instrumentation vertebrae (UIV) at thoracolumbar junction was more common in the PJK group than that in the non-PJK group (P = 0.007). No preoperative and early postoperative variable did reveal a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. When included in a multivariate logistic regression model, BMI>25 kg/m, osteoporosis, and UIV at thoracolumbar junction were independently associated with PJK.In conclusion, osteoporosis, obesity, and UIV at thoracolumbar junction are risk factors for the development and progression of PJK in DLS patients following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Antiosteoporosis treatment extends the fusion level above the thoracolumbar region and controlling body weight before and after surgery could provide opportunities to reduce the rate of PJK and to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proximal junction sagittal Cobb measurement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Serial radiographs with preoperative, initial postoperative, 2-year follow-up of 63-year-old female patient who had treated for DLS. The proximal junctional (PJ) angle increased from 5.8° preoperative to 9.6° in immediate postoperation, to 16.9° in 2 years follow-up. The sagittal and coronal plane CT showed UIV+1 vertebral fracture. CT = computed tomography, DLS = degenerative lumbar scoliosis, PJ = proximal junctional.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Serial radiographs with preoperative, initial postoperative, 2-year follow-up and the last follow-up of 59-year-old female patient who had treated for DLS. The PJ angle increased from –8.8° preoperative to –10.6° in immediate postoperation, to –11.5° in 2 years follow-up, and to –12.2° at final follow-up. CT = computed tomography, DLS = degenerative lumbar scoliosis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Illustration showing radiographic measurements of spinopelvic parameters included in this analysis.

References

    1. Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Incidence, risk factors and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37:1479–1489.
    1. Kim HJ, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis as a distinct form of adjacent segment pathology after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37:S144–S164.
    1. Mendoza-Lattes S, Ries Z, Gao Y, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult reconstructive spine surgery results from incomplete restoration of the lumbar lordosis relative to the magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis. Iowa Orthop J 2011; 31:199–206.
    1. Wang J, Zhao Y, Shen B, et al. Risk factor analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Injury 2010; 41:415–420.
    1. Denis F, Sun EC, Winter RB. Incidence and risk factors for proximal and distal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for Scheuermann kyphosis: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:E729–E734.
    1. Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postop lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; 39:E576–E580.
    1. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in primary adult deformity surgery: evaluation of 20 degrees as a critical angle. Neurosurgery 2013; 72:899–906.
    1. Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:E60–E68.
    1. Maruo K, Ha Y, Inoue S, et al. Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38:E1469–E1476.
    1. Cammarata M, Aubin CE, Wang X, et al. Biomechanical risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a detailed numerical analysis of surgical instrumentation variables. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; 39:E500–E507.
    1. O'Shaughnessy BA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Does a longfusion “T3-sacrum” portend a worse outcome than a short fusion “T10-sacrum” in primary surgery for adult scoliosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37:884–890.
    1. Samuel K Cho, John I Shin, Yongjung Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 2014; 23:2726–2736.
    1. Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis results in inferior SRS pain subscores in adult deformity patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38:896–901.
    1. Lee JH, Kim JU, Jang JS, et al. Analysis of the incidence and risk factors for the progression of proximal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative kyphosis: minimum 2-year follow-up. Brit J Neurosurg 2014; 28:252–258.
    1. Lee JC, Kim Y, Soh JW, et al. Risk factors of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after lumbar spinal fusion: comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; 39:E339–E345.
    1. Hikata T, Kamata M, Furukawa M. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and efficacy of simultaneous decompression surgery for symptomatic adjacent segment disease. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014; 27:70–75.
    1. Hostin R, McCarthy I, O’Brien M, et al. Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures following surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38:1008–1015.
    1. Maruo K, Ha Y, Inoue S, et al. Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; 38:E1469–E1476.
    1. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32:2653–2661.
    1. Bastian L, Lange U, Knop C, et al. Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 2001; 10:295–300.
    1. Cahill PJ, Wang W, Asghar J, et al. The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37:E687–E695.
    1. Cammarata M, Aubin CÉ, Wang X, et al. Biomechanical risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a detailed numerical analysis of surgical instrumentation variables. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; 39:E500–E507.
    1. Hart RA, Prendergast MA, Roberts WG, et al. Proximal junctional acute collapse cranial to multi-level lumbar fusion: a cost analysis of prophylactic vertebral augmentation. Spine J 2008; 8:875–881.
    1. Kayanja MM, Schlenk R, Togawa D, et al. The biomechanics of 1, 2, and 3 levels of vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate in multilevel spinal segments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31:769–774.
    1. Bastian L, Lange U, Knop C, et al. Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 2001; 10:295–300.
    1. Cahill PJ, Wang W, Asghar J, et al. The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37:E687–E695.
    1. Hui Wang, Lei Ma, Da-Long Yang, et al. Radiological analysis of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in relation to pelvic incidence. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8:22345–22351.
    1. Liuke M, Solovieva S, Lamminen A, et al. Disc degeneration of the lumbar spine in relation to overweight. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005; 29:903–908.
    1. Ou CY, Lee TC, Lee TH, et al. Impact of body mass index on adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease. Neurosurgery 2015; 76:396–401.
    1. Shiri R, Solovieva S, Husgafvel-Pursiainen K, et al. The role of obesity and physical activity in non-specific and radiating low back pain: the Young Finns study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2013; 42:640–650.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa